Hmm… Shock Claim: Obama Only Wants Military Leaders Who ‘Will Fire on U.S. Citizens’

Dr. Jim Garrow, the author of The Pink Pagoda: One Man’s Quest to End Gendercide in China, made the following claim on Facebook this week that is getting a whole lot of attention.
The Examiner reported:

On Monday, renowned author and humanitarian Dr. Jim Garrow made a shocking claim about what we can expect to see in Obama’s second term.

Garrow made the following Facebook post:

I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.” Those who will not are being removed.

So, who is the source?

Garrow replied: “The man who told me this is one of America’s foremost military heroes.”

Hmm… It’s a stretch to believe Obama would want to fire on all US citizens. But, if Garrow is just talking about Republicans he might be on to something. It would be interesting to hear who his source was for the post.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • ★FALCON★

    A caller to the Warroom made these same allegations a few weeks ago. He didn’t say lot and couldn’t reveal all he knew – but he did indicate that something nefarious is coming.

  • luckyone

    This is how Obama will claim his Dictatorship. He will never leave willingly.

  • cavt

    Never heard of Garrow and this is just hard to believe except it does follow with the dictators constant war on conservatives. Dictators words and actions do bring this claim into the realm of possibility.

  • brian

    At what level is this happening? All the way down to major or just at the general level? No reason to go nuts over this until it’s truly substantiated.

    Btw this would be an argument for universal military service compared with the current professional military. Worst case is the professional military is turned into an arm of the government instead of an organization made up of “citizen soldiers”.

  • Kate

    The GOP of course. Get rid of arms of the citizens and then full steam ahead. Following fellow despots’ course of taking over. And then, the media will be right along pushing Obama’s agenda. Eventually, it will come back to bite them when “journalists” and I use the term loosely, start being jailed for not promoting Obama’s ideas in the manner to which he had become accustomed. Of course, then, it will be too late. However, I will never believe that our military will ever fire on American citizens.

  • Pingback: Hmm… Shock Claim: Obama Only Wants Military Leaders Who ‘Will Fire on U.S. Citizens’ « infowarsusa()

  • ★FALCON★

    @ Brian – Obama’s crew already relieved Carter Ham and a few others for attempting to assist those in Benghazi.

    If you go to the DHS Website under purchase orders – or to the Congressional Appropriations – you will find all of the items DHS has purchased.

    Everyone already knows about the billions of rounds of ammo – however, most do not know about the bullet proof check point booths, nor the other items at seem to have earmarks for Americans.

    Personally, I don’t believe Obama is to be trusted with any power, even limited.

  • King

    Most of the upper brass are politicians scurrying for advancement. Killing civilians won’t be a problem for them.

  • Rob Crawford

    Don’t know the source so I cannot judge it on those merits, but the root problem with this theory is how idiotic a policy it would be. How do you test someone for the willingness to commit treason? The moment you broach the subject, they have a handle on YOU. Arguably, a patriot would go along with them long enough to gather information and expose it. Or betray them at the last moment.

  • Sam Stone

    An American Spring and the forced removal of the leader is in order. Obama supported the same in Libya and Egypt. It is good for us as well.

  • donh

    This ” stunt ” by convicted felon VA assemblyman Joe Morrissey… brandishing an assault weapon on the house floor with finger on the trigger is a GLIMPSE at things to come. …>

    We will wake up one day soon and these mafia thug politicians will come to the floor in hoodies and black trench coats to gun down the evil racist people who want to ” put y’all back in chains ” ” starve your granny ” “poison the children ” and take us ” backwards “…DEATH to those standing in the way of the long march ” Vorwartz ” …….Then Abby Huntsman and Megan McCain will be on CNN snickering in fiendish delightful laughter as the whole media joins in the mob applause of Obama’s final solution to a ” broken system “

  • Koenig Jojo

    Its a stretch? Have you read NDAA? How about Al-Awlakis 16 yr old son being vaporized? I know it is hard to process, but why do you think they are going after guns so hard? That leads to a dark place, but so does the Fed monetizing debt. Fiat currency has run its course.

  • Servo1969

    I don’t believe it’s a stretch at all.
    His second presidency is, in his mind, the result of all the civil rights marches and protests for the last 50 years.
    He is the one. He is the lightbringer.
    He’s going to set things right. He’s going to put things in their place.
    He’s wide open now. He’s going to go for it.
    Some people will not like it. Some people will resist.
    He wants to know he can count on the military if push comes to shove.
    And he may be forced to push.
    Oh yes.

  • ★FALCON★

    @ Koenig Jojo – why is it hard to process? That’s the historical trend of the leftists.

    Get elected or over-throw the government in a coup – and then eliminate the opposition.

    It’s a two step process, nothing more.

  • Bobby Tucker

    Republicans are already in a circular formation. Obama is just giving the go-ahead.

  • Another Bob

    So somewhere around 75 to 100 million gun owners. 400,000 or so active duty military. Many of them will not fire on Americans. So the commies still have a problem. But they are working on it.

  • Misha Prepelitski

    Getting rid of some military leaders should make the deficit hawks happy.

  • surfin’ bird

    A politically correct military is a sign of bad times.

  • Reaganite Republican

    He’ll be going full Chavez it seems

    Well at least Sean Penn will be happy, no more elections I guess…

  • ice

    Back in the late 70’s I had communication with some people in law enforcement. These individuals were talking about the future of America and how there was an individual embedded deeply with the Democrats that was leaking them information. This ‘leak’ spoke about the future intentional bankrupting of America, dis-arming of Americans, and bringing us into the International community.
    The ‘leak’ communicated to these law enforcement individuals that the big concern with those planning this were aware of civil up risings, and that an armed America would be dangerous to their plans. The ‘leak’ stated the biggest concern would be that the ‘planners’ would need troops and law enforcement that would be willing to fire upon Americans. Their plan for this was to brining foreign troops to American soil by calling them law enforcement, and creating troops that would be loyal to the International plan. And if American troops were not willing participants then they would need to be deployed off of American soil to foreign battles, thus removing them from either offensive or defensive implimintation of the plan.
    William Ayers wrote about this in his book back in the late 60’s. December 2009, the President issued an Executive Order calling for Canadian Troops on American soil to put down Civil up-risings. January 2010, the President issued an Executive order allowing Interpol (International Police) to come and go on American soil with complete immunity from domestic law, granting them the right to detain and extradite off of American soil without informing any American law enforcement, no American law enforcement can search/detain/or review what they have, and called for Interpol to set up bases on American soil.
    And it was the President that called for and spoke of a Civilian Security Force that would be larger and better armed than the military. Of course we have that, it’s called the 2nd Amendment. However, the Civilian Security Force he was referring to would be loyal to him, not to the Constitution.