After Attacking Bible and Constitution… Piers Morgan Attacks Supreme Court

CNN’s Piers Morgan has already bashed the US Constitution and the Bible. Now, the far left crank is attacking the US Supreme Court.
NewsBusters reported:

Transcript via NewsBusters:

PIERS MORGAN, HOST: Here’s the problem: then it comes down to the Supreme Court, Jeffrey, isn’t it, because they are the ultimate arbiters I guess of revisiting the constitution, and as we saw in 2008, actually in my view, they have been dangerous in the way that they’ve done this.

JEFFREY TOOBIN, CNN LEGAL ANALYST: Well, they have been what they have always been which is political. They reflect the presidents who appoint them. George W. Bush, by appointing John Roberts and Samuel Alito, replacing other less conservative justices, give gun owners more power. That’s why elections matter.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • Seems he will say or do anything to maintain in public eye. I think we should ignore his comments and let him drift away to a place he does not hate so much.

  • briscuit

    Sorry Jeffery, but John Roberts is NOT a conservative. He is a bought and paid for lackey for Obama. He has discredited the Court more than anyone to date. The Court is no longer, in my opinion, a institution deserving of respect.

  • Brenda

    Elections DO matter; that’s why this last one was so tragic!!

  • MrGoodWench

    George W. Bush, by appointing John Roberts and Samuel Alito, replacing other less conservative justices, give gun owners more power.
    What about the politics of J-Lo and KD Lang ? Guess who got more power because of them ?
    Jihadies and marxists ……..guess THAT is fine with the shameless hatemonger ” jourNOlister” Toobin !

  • donh


  • Pingback: After Attacking Bible and Constitution… Piers Morgan Attacks Supreme Court « infowarsusa()

  • MrGoodWench

    Sorry, forgot this :

    J-Lo = Sotomayor
    KD Lang = Kagan

  • Bobbi

    Hey, briscuit, CJ Roberts has just scheduled a full hearing on the Obama eligibility case to be heard for full conference
    Nobody’s talking about it. That’s why their putting their hatchet man, Piers, on it

  • Bobbi
  • BigRed

    Hey jerk-You’re not one of us! Our laws are there to protect us from the kind of tyranny your ancestors imposed on us. Your opinion is irrelevant. Means nothing. Now go back to the land of rotten teeth and leave us real Americans alone! WE REALLY DON’T WANT YOU HERE!

  • AuntieMadder

    I’m not real pleased with the Supreme Court nowadays, either, but it’s MY country and MY Supreme Court, giving me the right and the responsibility to say something about it. As a citizen of Britain, it’s NOT up to Morgan to complain about the US Supreme Court. If he doesn’t like the laws of this country, right down to the US Constitution, and the the Supreme Court’s rulings, he should haul his pasty pale a** back home to jolly ol’ England.

  • Jim

    Talk about two serious douchebags. There’s Piers Morgan that y’all know about. Especially his part of the hacking scandal in the UK not to mention him being a douche in general.

    The thing to remember is that Jeff Toobin-CNN’s legal analyst is a major liberal douche himself. Toobin cheated on his wife with Jeff Greenfield’s daughter Casey, got her pregnant, then denied that he was the father. Just google Toobin’s douchebaggery.

  • Economan

    In a sane world he’d be sent back in a monkey cage addressed to the Queen.

  • crackermike

    We are in for lots of trouble, civil unrest and disobedience over Obama’s abrogation of Constitutional Rights. When the Brits instituted the Stamp Act and then later came for the Cap and Ball, it started the Revolution. Obama is doing the same thing and he has his Tories too. The Supreme Court settled the 2nd Amendment issue just a couple of years ago and Obama is now cancelling the Constitution he so hates. When even Pravda warns Americans to not surrender our guns to Obama’s Socialist Regime, you know it’s serious. It’s now time to look Obama, Pelosi, and Reid straight in the eye and say; eff you!

  • Patty


  • bg


    Breaking Free From The Constitution

    by Barack Obama
    January 18, 2001

    [Mr. Obama’s comments take a turn from discussing the historical
    record. Unprovoked he laments that the Supreme Court “could not
    break free from the essential constraints placed by the Founding
    Fathers in the Constitution.” He further describes the Constitution
    as “a charter of negative liberties.” This is at odds with the preamble
    to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.]

    here & here & here, in connecting links & threads..

    [Consequently. the thrust of ARA is towards generating dialogue
    which will give people a rational handle on this controversial subject.
    this includes bringing speakers like Daniel ElIsberg to campus, publishing
    fact sheets compiled by interested faculty, and investigating the possible
    development of an interdisciplinary program in the Columbia curriculum
    dealing with peace, disarmament, and ‘world order’.]


  • Lim Lynn

    Piers Morgan will continue to rant how he hates everything Bible, America’s Bill of Rights and Supreme Court. Guess what he be attacking we only will know when the media reports back to us.

  • piers doesn’t seem to like much about america, why is he here?

  • Rose

    See – Odrama Queen won’t deport Piers because the two of them are IDENTICAL British Subject goonie birds of the same flock

  • Servo1969

    Why doesn’t he just come out and say it?
    America is stupid and needs to be more like England.
    Isn’t that what he wants?
    Next I suppose it will be “What’s with these inches and feet? Why can’t Americans use the metric system like the rest of the civilized world?”
    “And why is everyone driving on the wrong side of the road?”

  • bg



    January 10, 2013

    American dollars buying ode to bin Laden

    God Help US..


  • bg


    re: #16 January 10, 2013 at 7:59 pm bg

    January 10, 2013

    Gun Advocates Celebrate ‘Secret’ Obamacare Provision
    Forbidding Exec Order To Regulate Guns And Ammo ….

    [As for Reid’s reasons for burying a pro-gun measure into the body of the
    Affordable Care Act, the Majority Leader is said to have been concerned
    that the NRA planned to take an active position against the passage of
    Obamacare and decided, no doubt with the permission of Reid’s friend,
    NRA boss Wayne LaPierre, to head the problem off at the pass by putting
    language in the bill that would mollify the gun lobby.

    Further, there was concern that a conspiracy theory then in circulation
    among right – wing circles — a meme suggesting that the Obama
    Administration had cleverly planted language in the ACA that could be
    used as a tool to get to the guns—would further erode public support
    for the legislation. For these reasons, Reid determined to insert some
    cozy language for the gun people into the Senate version of the ACA
    — language certain to escape public review at a time when the
    conversation was far more focused on hot button subjects like death
    panels, taxes and mandates.

    if there’s anything these power hungry narcissists that
    rule the roost know how to do, it’s how to plan ahead,
    lets just hope & pray we won’t be losing ours any time
    soon.. *sigh*


  • bg


    re: #22 January 10, 2013 at 9:20 pm bg

    January 9, 2013

    This Is How a Secret Gun Provision
    Made its Way Into Obamacare Legislation

    [The Washington Post first reported on Dec. 30 about the presence of this controversial wording. Under a section with the headline “Protection of Second Amendment Gun Rights,” the NRA-advocated wording is nestled deep within the law. The Post called the inclusion, “a largely overlooked but significant challenge to a movement in American medicine to treat firearms as a matter of public health.”]


  • Mikey

    stop reporting on this tabloid Brit. you’re giving him the attention he wants.
    just like the left can ice stories, so should we. PIERS MORGAN is a non-story

  • Lim Lynn

    It’s possible Piers Morgan wants to enjoy entertainment value given by America citizens reaction after turning American Dream to be hell on Earth similar to his country England ban firearms.

  • bg


    Mikey #24 January 10, 2013 at 9:50 pm

    so are Bil Maher, Donald Trump, Karl Rove, and several others..

    heck, if i din’t come to GP so often, i’d never know if
    either were still alive, nor cared, and still don’t btw..

    just let me know if and when
    they do something for US.. 🙄


  • bg


    seems to me everything is a dog and pony show, they keep US
    busy with one thing, while doing other things behind our back..

    Federal Assault Weapons Ban

    [The Federal Assault Weapons Ban (AWB), or Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act, was a subtitle of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, a federal law in the United States that included a prohibition on the manufacture for civilian use of certain semi-automatic firearms, so called “assault weapons”. The 10-year ban was passed by Congress on September 13, 1994, and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton the same day. The ban only applied to weapons manufactured after the date of the ban’s enactment.

    The Federal Assault Weapons Ban expired on September 13, 2004, as
    part of the law’s sunset provision. There have been multiple attempts
    to renew the ban, but no bill has reached the House floor for a vote.

    a False Assault on Assault Weapons

    [Machine Guns Still Illegal

    Contrary to what the ad clearly implies, any weapon that can fire 300 rounds per minute remains illegal for civilians to own without specific clearance by the US Department of Justice.

    In fact, machine guns have been tightly regulated since the passage of the National Firearms Act in 1934, in the wake of the gangster era. Legal ownership of a machine gun requires an extensive federal background check, fingerprinting, signed clearance from the chief of local law enforcement (such as a county sheriff), a $200 excise tax, and weeks of paperwork. That was true before the assault-weapon ban was enacted in 1994, and it remains true with the expiration of the ban at midnight Sept. 13, 2004.

    That’s made clear in a question-and-answer document posted Sept.
    13 on the Web site of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and
    Explosives (ATF), explaining the effect of the expiration of the assault
    -weapon ban:

    ATF: All provisions of the National Firearms Act (NFA) relating to registration and transfer of machine guns . . . still apply.

    The fully automatic version of the AK47 — pictured and described
    in the ad — remains just as illegal as it was before the ban expired.


    But it is also a fact that Bush was publicly committed to sign
    an extension if Congress passed it, and it was Congress that
    failed to do so.]

    January 10, 2013

    The Obamas of The World ‘Don’t Want to Save Lives’:
    The Ted Nugent Gun Interview You’ve Been Waiting For


  • Danny

    I always thought SCOTUS was about the law and not politic.
    Foolish me. Since Jeffy mentioned Roberts let me remind you that Roberts GAVE “O” ZERO ObamaCare and stuffed it down America throat. I hope the D’s choke on it in the long run.
    The bills/costs are coming to ALL Americans not to mention IPAB that will make life and death decisions for the weak amongst us.
    Don’t forget that IRS will be the enforcement agent for ZEROcare and they ain’t got an ounce of pity in them. Americans who pay the bills will have a VERY INTIMATE relationship with IRS that will wizz them off all the time and remind them the D’s gave this grief for a long time.
    Another thing IRS can do is take $ out of your bank accounts. I can see bounced checks on mortgages after IRS seizures play HAVOC on credit ratings.