Your tax dollars at work.

Planned Parenthood celebrated Christmas this year by handing out chocolate birth control treats.
Life News reported:

What do you get your special someone for Christmas when they have a sweet tooth? Forget candy canes, cookies, cakes, or pies. Planned Parenthood has an option for you: chocolate birth control.

The nation’s biggest abortion business has made chocolate “treats” shaped like a packet of birth control with its logo printed prominently on the bottom. The chocolate has the same layout as a birth control packet along with the days of the week each “pill” should be taken.

The pro-abortion blog Jezebel thanked the abortion business today for the “chocolate deliciousness.”

Thank you, Planned Parenthood, for sending me chocolate that looks like birth control. (Not “abortion pills,” mind you!)

I legitimately just ate one of my packs in under 30 seconds. It’s what God intended! [Insert your own reproductive rights-themed joke about PP's fantastic gift-giving skills here.]

Hat Tip Mara

 

 

Disable Refresh for 30 Days

Cookies and JavaScript must be enabled for your setting to be saved.

1 2

`
  1. Considering how young some of their patrons are, it was the logical next step. Flintstone Plan B anyone?

  2. Sad but true #1.

  3. Those that do not have their taxes siphoned out of their paycheck should just refuse to pay them.

    Just don’t pay.

  4. Well I am waiting until they produce the strawberry chocolate fetal part chocolates. That really puts the Planned parenthood meaning into a Christmas without restraint.

  5. Chocolate helps soothe the guilt of ditching little Veruka brats down the garbage chute…> http://youtu.be/nkIS9NKhn28

  6. Chocolate? How racist….. but considering the number of ‘chocolate’ babies they’ve killed maybe it’s a boast on their part.

  7. I think they should make a chocolate fetus next year. Just to be that edgy.

  8. OMG! IT IS ALSO TRES NOIR, even MORE SINISTER LOOKING then the TIME cover!

    TACKY! DO NOT EAT!

  9. Call your Congressman and complain that THIS is how they misuse our tax dollars. .

    If we want free chocolate then subsidize Hersey and not Planned Parenthood. . .

  10. In your face, you life loving suckers!!! Hahaha!!!

    They collect signatures on Christmas Eve too. In fact they ramp up the effort on that day it seems. You ask them “what are you collecting signatures for?” They say “I’m not collecting signatures,” just as a couple of girls stand there putting their names in his notebook.

    He should be out riding his skateboard but instead he stands with a blank stare repeating words. He was indoctrinated into a cult of death. They send in the kids who made it out alive to tug the heart strings of passersby and the candy is to get them familiar with taking the pill.

    We don’t get to have candy cigarettes by the way (not deadly enough apparently).

    The life they want to live, is to make sure you don’t live yours, your way. It’s much easier to deny that to a fetus than a walking talking opponent. That’s a huge bother. I used to say “give the kid a chance,” but it seems their motivation for not giving the kid a chance is to not give the kid a chance. They’re manufactured sociopaths with government funding.

  11. #1

    Just for the record: Me, Wilma, Pebbles and Dino stand with Betty and Barney and their freak of nature kid “Bam Bam” in direct opposition to the use of our likenesses for anything associated with Planned Parenthood.

    Yabba, Dabba, Doo.

    F.

    PS I drive a Brontosaurus for a living. I’ll just disassemble their buildings if I have to.

  12. Wow, most women love their chocolate. What an idea? idiots.

    Sick idea and hope the FDA have made sure all nutrition facts are on this chocolate and who is the manufacture of this?

    Isn’t it illegal not to have this package properly. Need to look into this.

  13. I’m pro-choice and I think this is outrageous. Birth control pills have synethetic hormones which lead to heart attacks, strokes, breast and uterine cancer. Putting estrogen and progesterone in a a candy doesn’t make it any less toxic. Moreover it will make even more progressive women complain about their weight as they stuff yet another sweet treat in their mouths.

  14. besides Planned parenthood being sick on Christmas meaning. .so too is Obama

    here is a real world leader with a real message. .

    http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/12/prime-minister-benjamin-netanyahus-christmas-greeting-2012/#more

  15. All those who voted and support obama policies show their true hearts–they are not Christians NOT one of them. As they celebrate Christmas— what FAKES. It just amazes me how so many women over 50 say I voted for Obama, because I believe in a womans choice–”What ?” so your planning on not having a baby? And your over 50? A choice for what? A woman’s choice to murder children after they are born alive? Isn’t that murder? Obama said, well it was their intent. As they get ready for church. So now all abortions are paid for by taxpayers. 52% of Americans voted to walk with a man who stands for everything GOD is against and they walk with a man, flesh and blood verus what is right and wrong. GOD knows their hearts every last one of them as they justify what they do. When is evil is made good.

  16. ++

    December 26, 2012

    Liberal Hypocrisies

    Hypocrisy Number 1: If a woman wants a child and she is pregnant, she is said to be carrying a baby. If a woman doesn’t want a child and she is pregnant, she is said to be carrying a fetus. Sanitizing words to change their connotations has become a science unto itself these days. Words like “fetus” sanitize the horror of murder that the unborn experience at the rate of over 3,000 every day in this country. And physicians who will go to extreme lengths to save the life of a child in the womb for a mother who wants the child will also tear a child apart in the womb if the mother so desires. This is an oddity that cannot be explained by any word other than hypocrisy – except for perhaps the word evil.

    Our nation rightfully mourns over the deaths of the children that were massacred in Newtown but why don’t the same people mourn over the 3,000 babies that are murdered every day in America? What about Mr. Obama, who gave a compassionate speech regarding the tragedy? At times he seemed to be restraining tears as he recounted the event. I would count it to his credit if I didn’t remember that this is the same man who voted to leave babies to die without medical help that were born alive after a botched abortion procedure. Once again, I don’t think there is any way to explain this except as hypocrisy – or perhaps evil.

    Or is it age from the date of conception that matters? In other words, from 1 day to 9 months from the point of conception, life is not life but a mother’s choice, but at 9 months and 1 day after conception, life is life and worthy of protection? If life is not easily defined and subjective, then why are we surprised by the growing disregard for life we are seeing in this country? Are the lives of 5- and 6-year-olds more valuable than the lives of babies in the womb? And what about legislators and Supreme Court judges who have made it easy for women to believe that it is all right to kill babies? In my not so humble opinion, any man or woman who does not understand that the most basic function of government is to protect life – especially that of the innocent – are nothing less than hypocrites – or perhaps evil.]

    EVIL

    [Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed
    because they are “morally irrelevant” and ending their lives is
    no different to abortion, a group of medical ethicists linked to
    Oxford University has argued.]

    White Paper, and much more..

    [Resolving the question of when human life begins is critical for advancing a reasoned public policy debate over abortion and human embryo research. This article considers the current scientific evidence in human embryology and addresses two central questions concerning the beginning of life: 1) in the course of sperm-egg interaction, when is a new cell formed that is distinct from either sperm or egg? and 2) is this new cell a new human organism—i.e., a new human being? Based on universally accepted scientific criteria, a new cell, the human zygote, comes into existence at the moment of sperm-egg fusion, an event that occurs in less than a second. Upon formation, the zygote immediately initiates a complex sequence of events that establish the molecular conditions required for continued embryonic development. The behavior of the zygote is radically unlike that of either sperm or egg separately and is characteristic of a human organism. Thus, the scientific evidence supports the conclusion that a zygote is a human organism and that the life of a new human being commences at a scientifically well defined “moment of conception.” This conclusion is objective, consistent with the factual evidence, and independent of any specific ethical, moral, political, or religious view of human life or of human embryos.]

    Amen anyways..

    ==

  17. I didn’t think they believed in Jesus. I don’t think they know what Christmas is about either. Killing babies and birth control is not it.



1 2


`

© Copyright 2014, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved. B
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions