Lib Kirstin Powers: “Why Did Jovan Belcher Have a Gun?… I Don’t Think He Should Have Had a Gun” (Video)

Spoken like a true leftist.
Kirstin Powers was on America Live today to discuss blowhard Bob Costas and the Jovan Belcher murder suicide case. Towards the end of the segment Powers said this,

“Why did he have a gun?… I don’t think he should have had a gun.”


Why did Jovan have a gun?
Because it is a right in this country, Kirstin.

 

  • Gregor

    #12 jharp.

    You’re absolutely right! She would have been knifed. Or maybe beaten with a golf club. Or possibly whacked upside the head with an iron. All things which should obviously be outlawed.

    Or, maybe he would have simply strangled strangled her with his massive hands. I just wonder … WHY DID HE HAVE HANDS ANYWAY? I don’t think he should have had hands.

    jharp, does it hurt to walk around without a brain?

  • http://mychal-massie.com/premium/ bg

    ++

    re; #20 December 3, 2012 at 2:40 pm bg

    get the point??

    if not, here it is:

    what you said makes just about
    as much sense as what i said..

    ==

  • aprilnovember811

    Did you know that David Souter one of the leftists on the Supreme Court was robbed with a machete? Kirsten, shut up. I no longer watch FOX, because they let leftists speak. Leftists are what need to be outlawed, now the Bill of Rights.

    Civil War will finally break out if they don’t stop this nonsense.

    “The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.”~Thomas Jefferson

  • Pingback: Lib Kirstin Powers: “Why Did Jovan Belcher Have a Gun?… I Don’t Think He Should Have Had a Gun” (Video)Politifreak()

  • Bullman

    Why did he have a car? If he didn’t have a car he could not have driven over there to shoot her, and then to the Chiefs parking lot to shoot himself. I think all cars should be banned, because they automatically drive people to shootings all the time.

  • jharp

    #18 Blacque Jacques Shellacque commented:

    “She could have been offed in a different manner, Idiot. Of what difference is the method of the crime”

    Key word is could have. She “could have’ been hit by lightning too.

    We’ll never know though because she was shot dead.

  • ★FALCON★

    Let’s place the blame where it belongs – on her. If she wasn’t out at a rap concert whoring herself up and down – she wouldn’t have been shot.

    Annnnnd my war on women continues.

  • mikeinlv

    I don’t care what a sports boob’s opinion about guns. I do care that a sports boob has a huge venue to say it on whereas none of the rest of us do.

  • AmericaWILL

    I don’t think Kirstin Powers should have a brain. Oh, wait…

  • Mad Hatter

    It’s amazing how many of the Second Amendment haters want to blame the gun, and not the thug.

  • Metalhead

    Not the right question. Correct Question: Why DIDN’T his girlfriend have one?

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    Key word is could have. She “could have’ been hit by lightning too.

    It’s rather unlikely that lightning would strike her for crossing Belcher.

    You really are as stupid as you seem.

  • dba_vagabond_trader

    Along that line of deep thought OJ Simpson shouldn’t have been allowed to own sharp objects and librals near voting booths.

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    Leftists are what need to be outlawed,…

    I prefer that they be publicly ridiculed, early and often.

  • dba_vagabond_trader

    ^^^

    should be illegal.

  • Gregor

    jharp says … “Key word is could have. She “could have’ been hit by lightning too.”

    Right. And I don’t see you on any blogs calling for the outlawing of lightning. Do you not even realize how stupid you sound? It’s almost as if you’re a conservative plant, hanging out on blogs, posting stupid $h!t just to make liberals look like morons. Trust me … they don’t need your help.

  • jharp

    #32

    “It’s rather unlikely that lightning would strike her for crossing Belcher.”

    Now we’re learning. Good one.

    It’s no less unlikely that she wouldn’t have been shot and killed if he didn’t have a gun.

    Get it?

  • jharp

    #36 December 3, 2012 at 3:00 pm
    Gregor commented:

    jharp says … “Key word is could have. She “could have’ been hit by lightning too.”

    “Right. And I don’t see you on any blogs calling for the outlawing of lightning.”

    Outlaw lightning? God you people are stupid. I think lightning would ignore the law.

    Outlaw handguns? More than half the civilized world does and it works.

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    Now we’re learning. Good one.

    No, you’re not learning. Lightning is a random occurring act. Gunfire is deliberate.

    Get it now? Or is that too much for your pea-sized brain?

  • Gregor

    jharp says … “Outlaw handguns? More than half the civilized world does and it works.”

    Really? Can you name a single country that does not have murders? Guns are outlawed in NY City. Working pretty well there, huh? Which country, state, city, county, or portion of the universe do you know that murders do not take place due to a lack of handguns?

    jharp, stop it. You’re humiliating yourself.