Grim Milestone: Over 20,000 Deadly Islamist Attacks Worldwide Since 9-11

Coffins of three Shi’ite Muslims, killed in a bomb attack, are carried during their funeral procession in Sanaa November 29, 2012. (Reuters)

Grim Milestone:
The liberal media may have missed this but this week we saw the 20,000 recorded deadly Islamist attack since the 9-11 attacks in 2001.

Religion of Peace reported:

On a week in which two suicide bombers slaughtered over 54 Christian and Druze and Sunni extremists massacred nearly 100 Shiites in Iraq, TROP recorded our 20,000th Islamic terror attack since 9/11.  It happened to be the stabbing and dismemberment of a Jewish woman in her Iranian home by religious radicals intent on expanding a mosque.

Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”
(Sahih Bukhari 52:177)

“Killing Jews is worship that draws us closer to Allah.”
CAIR-supported Hamas

Remember this the next time you hear some unhinged progressive try to compare Islam to Christianity or any other religion.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • http://none tommy mc donnell

    about wmds, how much do you have to find? do you need an area the size of texas filled with them to prove they exist? it would seem to me that all you would need to have is a couple of fifty-five gallon drums of anthrax or saran gas to be able cause considerable damage. that would be very easy to hide.

  • Highlander

    Tommy, that doesn’t matter to these liberal, Bush-hating morons. They won’t believe in WMD’s until they see the blinding flash, or their organs are liquefying …. and EVEN THEN, they’ll just start looking for someone to blame for not protecting them rather than face the fact that THEY were responsible for weakening our security, our intelligence agencies, and our military …

    Let’s face it. They’re a pathetic bunch of spoiled, useless excuses for Americans, and personally, I couldn’t care less what happens to a single one of them, as long as they keep their fingers out of my pockets and stay the hell out of the way ….

  • Pingback: Grim Milestone: Since the 9-11 2001 Attacks on America – There Have Now Been Over 20,000 Recorded Deadly Islamist Attacks Worldwide | The Navigator Online()

  • paul52

    guess old ‘bg’ was locked and loaded today! Good on ya, bg!

  • Patty


    Syrian ‘Rebel’ Films Himself Shooting 10 Prisoners – WARNING: Graphic Video

    10 men wearing t-shirts and camouflage trousers lying face down next to a building and a lookout tower. Even before the shooting, two of the men are not moving and one has blood coming from his torso.

    “I swear to God that we are peaceful,” begs one of the men to the camera, which is being held by the gunman. Cowering, the man gets up to plead with rebels. As he approaches a rebel off-screen, a shot is heard and he returns holding his bloodied arm.

    The cameraman then points the camera along the barrel of his Kalashnikov assault rifle as he shoots the men.

    “God is great. Jabhat al-Nusra,” he says, referring to the secretive al-Nusra Front, an Islamist rebel unit linked to al Qaeda that has claimed responsibility for several suicide bomb attacks around the country.

    The gunman gets on the back of a pickup truck and the camera pans to show the man who had been shot in the arm still moving. More shots are fired and his body spasms.

    It was filmed in Ras al-Ain, a town on the border with Turkey where pitched battles have raged in recent weeks.[…………………..] READ ON

  • Sandy

    These Muslims are our friends, so they blow up buildings and behead children–we need to understand what makes them tick so we can help them. At least this is what the administration says and they are never wrong?

  • http://. WillofLa

    Obama is and has been a terrorist supporter for many, many years. His long term association with the PLO for instance, brought into the White House with him on that Black Berry he carries around with him that he refused to turn over to the FBI when he was chosen as a candidate for President, poses a direct and emminent threat to the security of the United States. His continued association with groups of terrorist like the Muslim Brotherhood is the greatest threat to our nations security that we have today.

    The other threats that these so called elected officials that ignorant and deluded voters of this nation, work closely with terror groups in the hopes and deluded idea that if we are nice to them and offer them things that America has never offered to it’s enemies, further threaten our nations security. On a whole America is not safe and secure in the hands of those who are running our government, and the hub of treason, the State Dept. sees to it that our enemies have a free run of not only our nation but inside the supposed most secure elements and departments of our government. CAIR sits on the board of directors of the part of the Dept. of Homeland Security that makes plans and decisions of how to protect this nation to it’s highest levels from Muslim terrorist attack.

    This is insanity!! How much longer are we going to allow this criminal Obama to take our country down the road to destruction? I would guess part of the answer to that question is, when our elected representatives take serious the fact that WE ARE AT WAR WITH ISLAM AND NO ONE ELSE. Of course, we are also at war with Islam’s supporters as well and that would include Obama himself. We must take serious the threat that comes from Obama himself when it is a fact that he is deeply associated with the PLO, the Muslim Brotherhood who at this very moment is in process of overthrowing Syria, and is in preparation of beginnning the overthrow of Jordan. Israel announced a couple of days ago that they are “SURROUNDED”. And what does Israel think it’s choices are in a military situation like that?

    Obama and his Muslim friends should have been one of the primary reasons to vote him out of office. But that apparently is not going to happen now. So if that is the case then we must take the same attitude that Israel is taking from their actual situation that we are SURROUNED!!

    We the People do have the Constitutional right to use force to “remove” the government that is plainly being run by Communists, and “replace” it with a Constitutional form of governance. And there are specific things that would give us that authority. There are only two requirements for the people to have the right to act, 1) the government must be out of control. Well, that’s pretty much a given. 2) there must be a despot in control of the government. Well, that’s pretty much of a given as well. Obama is clearly a tyrant, and he IS a member of the Communist Party. He joined it when he ran for city councilmen in South Chicago back in the 90’s. He won, and so did the four other Communists who ran with him as well. He has not dropped his membership because from time to time he meets with Communist members who are currently serving Congressmen from South Chicago.

    We need marching orders right now before we wake up one morning and we no longer have that right. And I’ll guarantee you it will happen some time during this term of Obama’s. Are you ready?

  • Pingback: Grim Milestone: Over 20,000 Deadly Islamist Attacks Worldwide ... | The Indigenous Uprising of the British Isles |

  • http://. WillofLa

    “jharp” comments that we are no better than the terrorists when we go to places like Iraq and kill Islamic terrorist, because we have killed without reason or anything that liberals believe that no one has to take the life of another human being. “jharp” believes there is no difference when we kill and when the terrorists kill, he comments “…it’s okay when we do it.”

    Well, jharp, it is okay when we do it. And let me straighten out your thinking when it comes to why it’s okay when we do it.

    When you have to use war as a last resort to make an enemy stop their aggression, the use of it is right when it is done for the purpose of being the one doing the killing for the RIGHT reason. The Muslims are killing for the wrong reasons. We are doing the killing for the right reasons. And there is a big difference.

    Islam has always used killing other people for the wrong reason. Their history is full of examples of the wrong use of killing other people who were minding their own business when the Muslims showed up demanding that these people bow down to their god. And when they didn’t the Muslims killed them because that’s what their prophet Muhammed said was okay to do, and their god wanted them to do that.

    Any reasonable person knows there’s something wrong with that. And don’t give me any crap about the Crusades. That to was for the right reasons until later on when it became perverted and then it was wrong. Then it was for greed and power and that is never a reason to kill other people who were minding their own business.

    When Islam takes the position that they are going to kill people all over the world who won’t bow down to their god, somebody must take on the responsibility of stopping them for the sake of humanity. Everyone should feel safe within the borders of their own country. It’s not like we showed up in the middle of the night, like Muslims do, and slaughtered everyone. The terrorists in Iraq knew we were coming. Bush waited a year and ahalf before we rolled our tanks into their country. It’s not like we started bombing them without any warning. We didn’t. They knew it was coming, they just didn’t know exactly the hour.

    We freed 50 million people from a despot that no one else in the world had the guts to put an end to. Hussein had murdered 50,000 Kirds with gas!! Maybe “jharp” wouldn’t have minded if Hussein had kept that up. After all it wasn’t the bad ‘ol mean American’s who never have any reason for killing anyone, huh?

    Let me ask you this “jharp”, why is it okay for Muslims to kill people, the Soviet’s to kill innocent Georgan’s, and the Chinese to murder their countrymen, but when American’s do it, it’s wrong? It doesn’t matter that you don’t believe that killing is justified any time. That’s fine, I don’t have a problem with that. It’s your belief. But when killing is absolutely neccessary and since we don’t go around the world all the time killing people like Muslims do, and when we are done freeing the people we leave and don’t ever come back to kill somemore, like Muslims do, we have to invade another country and do our duty to mankind and stop tyranny where ever we find it, and when we’re done we leave and the people of that country are better off for the sacrifice our countrymen made for their sake. Where do you have a problem with that?


    It’s NOT, a “religion” — it’s a CULT MURDER GANG, like the Indian Thugees — the Nazi’s also posed thusly .

  • bg


    to all who complimented me, thank you..

    and please be sure to keep info on file, because as long
    as PROGRESSIVES breath, truth, Bush, and Republicans
    will be a target no matter the evidence to the contrary..


  • bg


    jahrp hasn’t reasoning enough to figure out the reality is that ISLAMISTS
    have slaughtered more MUSLIMS in Iraq and just about everywhere else
    they slink out from under their rock god..


  • bg


    WillofLa #29 December 2, 2012 at 4:14 pm



    Is It Right to Fight?

    [One other point, if everyone was a pacifist except the evil and
    lawbreakers of the world, then the world would be run by evil
    dictators or our society would be anarchy.

    Pacifism in its fullest sense is untenable
    in the sinful world in which we live.


    The subject “Is it right to fight?” is a difficult issue because it makes us face the awful issues of a suppressive dictatorship, evil aggression, killing and death on the one hand and the “necessary evil” of war to stop it. Could this be the reason that General Robert E. Lee at the Battle of Fredericksburg said, “It is well that war is so terrible—we should grow too fond of it.” The just war position, in the writer’s opinion, fits best with the Scriptural evidence.

    Remember, it is possible to love your enemies and use force against him. The principle that love is embraced in laws of justice helps us see that loving one’s enemy is to make sure that justice prevails. In doing so, the Christian is also demonstrating “love for the ones his enemy has hurt.”]

    “On Moral Equivalency and Cold War History”
    Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 10 (1996)

    [Where does that leave us, though, with the new evidence we have about the victims of Stalin and Mao Zedong? One recent but reliable estimate suggests that Stalin’s domestic victims alone – when one totals not only the figures for the purges but also for the collectivization of agriculture and the famine that resulted from it – numbered about twenty million dead. This does not count the additional acknowledged twenty-seven million Soviet citizens who died as a result of World War II. But this is not the worst of it. Estimates of those who died in one single episode – the Chinese famine produced by Mao’s ill-conceived Great Leap Forward from 1958 to 1961 – now come to some thirty million, thereby qualifying the Chairman (whose image was once a popular adornment for t-shirts and dormitory wall posters in the West) as perhaps the greatest mass murderer of all time.


    Why didn’t the United States exploit its advantage to keep the Soviet Union from developing its own bomb? Or to avoid near-defeat in Korea? These are complicated questions, but one of the answers that comes up, when one looks at what American officials said to each other, is the conviction that a democracy could only use such a weapon as a last resort, and in self-defense.

    But that in turn raises another interesting question of comparative morality: would an authoritarian system – one based on an ideology that explicitly justified any means necessary to achieve its ends, one that employed terror as a method of government, and one as casual about the loss of human life as were Stalin’s and Mao’s – have shown similar restraint had it got the bomb first?


    We need to be careful about the methodological metaphors we keep in our minds. Too much of Cold War history was written as if its major contenders were indeed featureless billiard balls, whose internal composition and character didn’t much matter. In retrospect, apples and oranges might have been the better metaphor: at least it would have allowed for irregularity, asymmetry, and the possibility of internal rot.]

    same holds true today more than ever..

    Death by Government

    [How can we understand all this killing by communists? It is the marriage of an absolutist ideology with the absolute power. Communists believed that they knew the truth, absolutely. They believed that they knew through Marxism what would bring about the greatest human welfare and happiness. And they believed that power, the dictatorship of the proletariat, must be used to tear down the old feudal or capitalist order and rebuild society and culture to realize this utopia. Nothing must stand in the way of its achievement. Government–the Communist Party–was thus above any law. All institutions, cultural norms, traditions, and sentiments were expendable. And the people were as though lumber and bricks, to be used in building the new world.

    Constructing this utopia was seen as though a war on poverty, exploitation, imperialism, and inequality. And for the greater good, as in a real war, people are killed. And thus this war for the communist utopia had its necessary enemy casualties, the clergy, bourgeoisie, capitalists, wreckers, counterrevolutionaries, rightists, tyrants, rich, landlords, and noncombatants that unfortunately got caught in the battle. In a war millions may die, but the cause may be well justified, as in the defeat of Hitler and an utterly racist Nazism. And to many communists, the cause of a communist utopia was such as to justify all the deaths. The irony of this is that communism in practice, even after decades of total control, did not improve the lot of the average person, but usually made their living conditions worse than before the revolution. It is not by chance that the greatest famines have occurred within the Soviet Union (about 5,000,000 dead during 1921-23 and 7,000,000 from 1932-3) and communist China (about 27,000,000 dead from 1959-61). In total almost 55,000,000 people died in various communist famines and associated diseases, a little over 10,000,000 of them from democidal famine. This is as though the total population of Turkey, Iran, or Thailand had been completely wiped out. And that something like 35,000,000 people fled communist countries as refugees, as though the countries of Argentina or Columbia had been totally emptied of all their people, was an unparalleled vote against the utopian pretensions of Marxism-Leninism.

    But communists could not be wrong. After all, their knowledge was scientific, based on historical materialism, an understanding of the dialectical process in nature and human society, and a materialist (and thus realistic) view of nature. Marx has shown empirically where society has been and why, and he and his interpreters proved that it was destined for a communist end. No one could prevent this, but only stand in the way and delay it at the cost of more human misery. Those who disagreed with this world view and even with some of the proper interpretations of Marx and Lenin were, without a scintilla of doubt, wrong. After all, did not Marx or Lenin or Stalin or Mao say that. . . . In other words, communism was like a fanatical religion. It had its revealed text and chief interpreters. It had its priests and their ritualistic prose with all the answers. It had a heaven, and the proper behavior to reach it. It had its appeal to faith. And it had its crusade against nonbelievers.

    What made this secular religion so utterly lethal was its seizure of all the state’s instrument of force and coercion and their immediate use to destroy or control all independent sources of power, such as the church, the professions, private businesses, schools, and, of course, the family.]

    Mass Murder

    what the fascist left have been aiming for is to “equate” good with evil.. that’s the only way they can appease their conscience in the face of the harsh reality they are trying to escape from because it does not fit in with their ideological utopian matrix.. if there is no good vs evil, then all is good even if [the] all is evil.. – bg

    they, as we all are, in Gods hands, he alone will judge..


  • Patty

    Donatello Restaurant Fine Italian and Mediterranean Dining in Toronto.

    Benghazi is a moving target of little lies that serve as cover for the big lie
    Benghazi explained: Behind the lies



    Obama, Clinton, their foreign policy advisors and the people involved in this agenda intend to start a war that will make Afghanistan and Iraq look like a small police action by comparison. They are going to start a war that will likely grow from a regional war to a global war, or WW III. Afghanistan ‘imploded’ when attacked, as did Iraq. Syria will not, it will explode. Do the American people understand this?

    Until now, everyone has been focused on the ‘little lies.’ The security, the misidentification of the CIA compound, the timeline, and on and on. They want us to focus on the little lies so they can pull off the BIG LIE. The big lie being told is that the U.S. is merely providing minimal support, including humanitarian aid to the Syrians so they can defend themselves from Assad. That’s the big lie that covers up what they are really doing in the region.

    The CIA compound in Benghazi was a logistics hub for weapons, but not only weapons from Libya. Weapons ordered by and destined for other countries, like Saudi Arabia, the UAE and other countries, knowing the plan, were allowing the weapons to be diverted, with Libya acting as the central shipping hub. When Assad falls and U.S. troops are called in for ground support, who will they be fighting? The Syrian army? No, they will be fighting the Iranian army, the Russian army and the Chinese army. Why? Because Iran, Russia and China all have a stake in the region. Putin called Syria his red line in the sand, and stated that WW III will start in Syria, not Iran.

    Benghazi is a moving target of little lies that serve as cover for the big lie. Are Americans onboard?

  • Patty

    Obama wants the Rebels in Syria to have more armor. Why?

  • Pingback: Religio-Political Talk (RPT) December is Islam Awareness Month!()