Don’t tell Senator Feinstein.
More than 450 teachers and other school employees applied for 24 spots in a free Ohio firearms training program.
The Columbus Dispatch reported, via Free Republic:

More than 450 teachers and other school employees from around Ohio have applied for 24 spots in a free firearms-training program being offered by the Buckeye Firearms Association.

“We’re pleasantly surprised, but it’s not shocking,” Ken Hanson, legal chairman for the association, said today of the response since the group began taking applications on its website 10 days ago. “The demand has been there for quite some time.”

The issue of arming school employees to protect students has been “on the radar” of school boards in Ohio for several years, he said, but the organization decided to launch its training program after the Dec. 14 shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., where a gunman killed 20 children and six adults.

“That was the breaking point,” he said. “We decided it’s time to quit talking about it and move forward.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

 

Disable Refresh for 30 Days

Cookies and JavaScript must be enabled for your setting to be saved.

1 2 3

`
  1. #17, airon-later, you really are winging it here, aren’t you? Let me give you the benefit of my research.

    According to the most recent FBI stats, California, a state with tight gun control laws, has twice the number of murders by firearms than Texas, a state considered by the Brady Institute to have lax gun control laws. How do you account for that when California does not have twice the population of Texas?

    Also, the number of murders committed by guns listed as “rifles, shotguns and others” is smaller than the number of murders committed by “knives, others (which would include even baseball bats, hammers, axes, etc) and fists, hands, feet. How do you account for that if it is only guns killing people?

    Another thing you need to account for: the number of firearm murders has been steadily going down for five years although the number of privately owned firearms has skyrocketed. If greater gun ownership by law abiding citizens (who are the only people gun laws apply to since they are the only ones who respect the laws) means greater firearm murders, then you have to be able to give a reason why the U.S. murder rate is decreasing.

    And here is a little tidbit that the gun grabbing left will never discuss:

    According to a 2007 USA Today report:

    Baltimore – 91% of murder victims this year had criminal records, up from 74% a decade ago

    Philadelphia – 75% of murder victims this year had criminal records, up from 71% in 2005

    Milwaukee – a 39% spike in murder in 2005 lead the local leaders to look at the criminal history of the murder victims. They found that in the past two years (2006-2007) 77% of the murder victims had criminal arrest records with an average of nearly 12 arrests each.

    Newark, N.J. – of murder victims in the first six months of 2007, almost 85% of them had criminal records, on par with 2005, but up from 2006.

    Gangbangers killing gangbangers who, believe me, did not obtain their weapons legally.

    So, until Dianne Feinstein gives up her own personal CCW permit, because she no longer feels the need to have it for her own protections, she needs to leave mine alone. When the state/federal governments finally get illegal guns out of the hands of the gangbangers and other criminals, like the man who just shot four firefighters and killed two of them, who was a convicted felon not legally allowed to own firearms, leave mine alone.

  2. Airon, you gun grabbers are pathetic. More people are killed with knives and blunt instruments in America EVERY YEAR. Do you care about those knives, hammers, or baseball bats? No, you only seem to care about guns. In fact, you’re obsessed with them. I wonder why that is?

    Every American needs to ask themselves that question before they even consider caving in to the demands of people like you. Anyone with an ounce of sense knows it’s no coincidence that the people like you who are constantly screaming for more gun control are the very same people who support installing a tyrannical, oppressive progressive Socialist government in America. You’d like nothing better to disarm your opposition and send them into a gun fight with a knife, wouldn’t you?

    I have news for you airon. It isn’t going to happen. You can pass all the laws you want, but patriotic Americans aren’t going to surrender their firearms willingly. They know that the founders were right … their firearms are the only thing that stand between them and people like you.

  3. While most of those applying ( as no one has been accepted as of yet ) are teachers, the class will not accept anyone that has no prior firearms experience…

    How do you know that any of those 450 teachers have no firearms experience?

  4. Maria, in the sidebar of the blog you referenced, the author specifically states:

    “Safe storage, better gun design, gun safety training are just some of the measures that could have prevented these tragedies…”

    No mention of gun control, or gun bans. I wonder why that is? Could it be that the author is actually concerned with improving gun safety, rather than stripping us of our Second Amendment rights and leaving us at the mercy of tyrants and criminals?

  5. Yeah, and what are the odds that the State Teachers Union will track down every last one of the 450 applicants and make their lives and their jobs a living hell? The personal responsibility and discipline needed to carry does not fit the Progressive / Union mantra of give us your money and we will take care of you. Hope someone tracks this…

  6. #23

    Ah, the “knives and hammers and blah blah blah” defense.

    Over-simplification and poor attempts to divert attention from reality do not serve you and your blindly ideological fellows well. Your knee-jerk, twitchy, responses only serve to make it easier for people like Adam Lanza to obtain firearms that are designed and manufactured to kill another human.

    #24

    And I would ask what makes you so sure that all 450 do have prior experience? I was quoting the article that was linked. Apparently you take issue with the facts relevant to the topic at hand.

  7. And I would ask what makes you so sure that all 450 do have prior experience?

    Where did I say they did? YOU are the one basically insinuating none of them have any firearms experience, so YOU prove it.

  8. Blaque, airhead can’t prove anything, nor does he want to. He’s all about spreading lies and disinformation … when presented with facts, he just changes the subject and throws another piece of left-wing propaganda out there, hoping it will stick. It’s pointless to engage people like that. Our efforts are far better spent readying ourselves to defeat them.

  9. Airhead, it isn’t an OVER SIMPLIFICATION to state FACTS, and the FACT is, far more people are killed by stabbings and blunt trauma injuries every year. In reality, the number of gun deaths is REMARKABLY low considering how many guns are in circulation in America. Based on the death statistics, it’s pretty clear that guns are the least of our worries. You have a better chance of being killed mowing your lawn or driving to the store.

    And, once again, you distort the truth when you state that firearms “are designed and manufactured to kill another human”. Firearms are designed and manufactured to accurately and reliably deliver a projectile. Period. They are nothing but tools, and just like a hammer, the person who picks the tool up is responsible for using it safely and properly. If they CHOOSE to take a human life with it, then they and they alone are responsible for that decision. You don’t blame the car when a drunk driver kills your kid do you?

    Come on … who do you think you’re fooling? We know what your agenda is. Your faux concern for America’s gunshot victims is laughable. If you really cared about protecting people, then you would know that many more Americans’ lives are SAVED by firearms every year than lost …

  10. In reality, the number of gun deaths is REMARKABLY low considering how many guns are in circulation in America.

    Unless one lives in a liberal bastion like Chicago, complete with gun ban…

  11. ++

    MarineCorpsVet #3 December 28, 2012 at 11:42 pm

    Thank You for serving..

    ==

  12. ++

    just a sample:

    Gun Control in the UK & Their Warning to the U.S.

    Guns Also Save Lives – The Second Amendment

    Gun Control explained

    “one can lead a prog-dem-lib to knowledge, but
    one cannot force a prog-dem-lib to think”
    -bg

    ==

  13. A friend showed me his union “newspaper” where it railed against teachers with guns in the schools. Funny how all of a sudden the union is so concerned about the safety of the students, when its always been about the union’s power.
    So a previous poster is quite right, that the teacher’s union will probably send the union thugs in to “educate” these teachers what the party line is and what the teachers are allowed to do and what they’re allowed to say.

  14. #29 No insiuation was put forward. This is purely your reactionary interpretation of a clear and accurate quote from the article. And, based on the very nature of the Modern American Right as it relates to the ownership and purchase of firearms ( especially the semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15 – which can easily be fired in “full auto” without any modification ) I see that portion of the article as completely within the realm of relevancy. Also, I find it quite telling that you – and many like you – never feel that you have to back up your statements, as you favor the tactic of deflection and insistence that any opposing party should prove themselves. Accountability within your ideological existence is of no matter to you. It’s quite sad actually.

    #30 The subject was always in the forefront of my comments. It is you and several others that have this drooling desire to remove firearms from the equation entirely.

    #31 The firearm(s) in question – as you most likely know – that ARE IN FACT designed an manufactured to kill another human are the ones like Adam Lanza used at Sandy Hook. I grew up in a family of hunters and NONE of them used or currently use anything remotely like an AR-15 Bushmaster to take down a deer, an elk, or even a coyote. And while you opt for the techically purist definition of what a firearm is, you again soft-peddle the issue at hand. Your insistence that you “know” my agenda – which I find quite comical, and just a shade conspiratorial – or that you believe I have no concern for those that were needlessly slaughtered flies in the face of anything remotely realistic, as you and your fellow mouth-agape compatriots follow the approach of essentially flooding the market with guns, consequences be damned.

  15. The problem in America is that guns, even military guns, can be so easily obtained that even people with mental and psychological problems can buy them or will have one in their home at their disposal. I believe I am looking at the big picture and what I see is out of control gun sales in America and the sooner an embargo is decreed on the owning of them and the sale of them the better. I would hate to live in a country where I couldn’t venture out without carrying a gun or I would be putting myself in danger because everyone else has one. The thought of having guns on school premises defies belief, ARE YOU ALL MAD?. ‘Defend my right to hold a gun’ ‘Lets get some guns and have some fun.’ I give up!! I will never understand the pro gun mentality.



1 2 3


`

© Copyright 2014, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Web Development By Arlington Kirk