Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • Militant Conservative

    BG you knocked the left outta the park with that one.

    Undeniable evidence of a willful intent to destroy America.

    THAT is Obama’s goal and ambition.

  • Militant Conservative

    #18 November 4, 2012 at 2:47 pm
    shadow commented:

    pretty easy to win when you oversample democrats by 4 to 8 points.

    That you are this easily fooled means your a perfect democrat voter.

  • Pingback: Landslide: George Will Predicts 321-217 Romney Romp (Video) | I'm a Man! I'm 41!()

  • Mike Devx

    I wouldn’t call 321 a landslide. Not if you look at all presidential elections historically. I *would* call it a very solid, resounding victory though. I definitely think 321 delivers a secure mandate for change.

    You could look at it this way, though: Obama has 200+ votes locked up from the solid blue states. That means that only 338 electoral votes are up for grabs. To win 321 of THOSE 338 is, in a sense, a landslide.

  • shadow

    pretty easy to win when you oversample democrats by 4 to 8 points.

    Ah yes, conspiracy theories … the winger’s best friend. I guess it would be tough for you to face reality, with reality’s liberal bias and all. Of course in due time we will find out who has been fooled. But then, I imagine you’ll just spin out another conspiracy theory.

  • Pingback: Landslide Watch: George Will Predicts 321-217 Romney Romp (Video)()

  • Lars

    Will Be Right, more respect for the spectacles.

  • iconoclast

    #6 November 4, 2012 at 1:28 pm
    shadow commented:

  • iconoclast

    #6 November 4, 2012 at 1:28 pm
    shadow commented:

    Oops, hit post instead of preview.

    Anyway, 321 against an incumbent (recumbent?) president to be a mandate. A decisive rejection by America of the progressive, racial, and environmental extremism represented by the Obama administration. Every time these extremists look like they are gaining power Americans slap them down hard–Carter, Clinton in the 94 mid-terms, and now Obama. Americans recognize progressivism for the utterly failed ideology that it is.

  • http://www.themadjewess.wordpress.com The Mad Jewess

    We all need to pray very HARD for Mitt Romney.
    Even though I am a far right wing crazy, I know that he is better than Obama.

    PRAY PRAY PRAY

  • Sandy

    Shadow # 15 — the electors represent the winner of the election in that state so for Romney to win 321 electors he would have to win an awful lot of states.

  • bigL

    trake the victory any way we can. A victory even by 10 electors is a victory. Lets move on.
    And thanks George Will for invitng all those foks over to your hose in ’08. And Thanks Dr K for running Sarah Palin into the ground. Thanks Will for not mentioing you had a Down’s syndrome child and giving Palin some support.
    We see your jerkdom, if that is a word.

  • shadow

    Sandy #31 – Romney to win 321 electors he would have to win an awful lot of states.

    Yes, it would be a solid win, but a landslide?? No. Reagan ’84 was a landslide. As was Nixon ’72.

  • shadow

    iconoclast commented #29
    So then Clinton’s 370 in ’92 delivered a mandate, and was a repudiation by America of trickle-down economics. Or does that mandate/repudiation stuff only work for Republicans?

  • http://www.truthandcommonsense.com archer52

    I worry only on turnout. The Dems are pretty confident they get their people out early and often. That means EVERY Republican has to vote and drag an independent with them. Obama could lose the popular vote by ten million and get an electoral victory.

    I think we are safe in Fla. I can’t say anything about Va, I don’t think we’ll get PA or Iowa.

    Colorado maybe- we should. New Hampshire? They are some odd ducks up there.

    MI- no. Wisconsin- maaaybe…probably not. So it comes down to Ohio VA Florida NH and Colorado.

    It will be close. The hurricane didn’t help the last week. However, the polls don’t mean anything to me anymore it is turnout. Polls remind me of a pro basketball game. One team up twenty, then down ten and miraculously in the last 2 minutes it is nearly tied.

    We’ll see. Just vote and take a friend.

  • Pingback: » Landslide Watch: George Will Predicts 321-217 Romney Romp …()

  • Militant Conservative

    #25 November 4, 2012 at 3:32 pm
    shadow commented:

    No one gets into the WH without a plurality of the white vote. Clinton with the help

    of Ross perot and Obama with the help of McCain got this.

    Obama gave up on the white vote earlier this year. He signed his own

    death cirtificate. Now go back to playing MWIII.

  • Look-Out

    It can only be Barry’s “shadow” —

    So caught up in the little things…

    avoiding like crazy what’s important.

    The count is 6 posts and most likely rising…

  • noway

    Sandy #31 – Romney to win 321 electors he would have to win an awful lot of states.

    Yes, it would be a solid win, but a landslide?? No. Reagan ’84 was a landslide. As was Nixon ’72.

    naw landslide! considering the lies and prostitution by the media it is a frigging landsldie. i am sick and tired of seeing this romney campaign always being lied about and belittled.

  • shadow

    #38 Look-Out

    You are counting my replies and accusing ME of being “caught up in the little things?” Are you the blog comedian?