It’s Not a Traditional America Anymore–
Bill O’Relly offered this shrewd analysis of the 2016 election tonight before the votes were even reported in any of the swing states.
O’Reilly said,

It’s not a traditional America anymore. People want stuff. They want things. And who is going to give them things? President Obama. He knows it and he ran on it. Whereby twenty years ago President Obama would be roundly defeated by an establishment candidate like Mitt Romney. The white establishment is now the minority. The voters, many of them, feel like the economic system is stacked against them. And they want stuff. You’re going to see a tremendous Hispanic vote for President Obama. Overwhelming black vote for President Obama. And women will probably break President Obama’s way. People feel they are entitled to things. And which candidate between the two is going to give them things?

 

 

Disable Refresh for 30 Days

Cookies and JavaScript must be enabled for your setting to be saved.

1 2 3 4 5 6

`
  1. we have to stop referring to government handouts as “free stuff,” call it what it really is things paid for with other people money. there is nothing for free, no free library, no free public education, no free medical care, no free welfare programs, no free anything, someone has to work to pay for it and its not the politicans.

  2. I place a great deal of the blame for this on Chief Justice Roberts The traitor in Chief. He allowed Obamacare to pass as a tax rather than a massive lie /failure it was/ is.

    I feel Obama would have been severaly weakened by that defeat.

  3. Well, this time Obama will inherit a mess of his own making.

  4. Yeah Dave NYC, Go back to work, that is rare for a Democrat in these times…But I commend you for at least working so you can help your master pay for his vacations his rounds of golf and of course paying for the free cell phones he is handing out to all the physically fit to work lowlifes to get there vote. Did I also mention all the illegals health care bills and benefits.
    Why don’t you stop by for another chat when they are taking 60% of your paycheck, and at the rate their spending that will be real soon, or maybe when Obie throws Israel under the bus and all your people are being tortured and killed like in Syria, you did mention you are Jewish didn’t you…What an idiot…..

  5. ++

    re: #41 November 7, 2012 at 12:45 am bg

    Our Totalitarian Eugenicist-in-Chief

    [FHAO also received grant funds from the Joyce Foundation, upon whose
    board Barack Obama also sat: $100,000 in 1997 (for a two-year project)
    and $50,000 in 1999 (for a one-year project). . . .

    Sandra Stotsky writes in her 2004 paper, “The Stealth Curriculum:
    Manipulating America’s History Teachers,” that FHAO is “[p]ossibly
    the most malevolent of the organizations professing to address
    citizenship education.”

    Regarding FHAO’s 2002 supplementary resource book, Race and
    Membership in American History: The Eugenics Movement (RMAH),
    Stotsky calls it “even more poisonous” with its “causal connection
    between the American eugenics movement and the Holocaust.” In
    the end, she writes, “Americans appear almost directly responsible
    for the Final Solution. The net effect is the discrediting of American
    society.”]

    scroll for more or not, your choice..

    and the dumbed down believe he wants to do this for THEIR good,
    and not to decrease the population to a point it can be more easily
    controlled.. or perhaps they’re doing it “for the children”, hah!! now
    there’s a royal contradiction for you..

    Reps are not at war with women, however, the Dems have
    declared war against babies, but thank goodness some are
    waking up, again, scroll for more..

    ==

  6. People get the government they deserve. At least I can say I NEVER voted for Obama.I do feel sorry for the next generation who will not have the same opportunities I had. But like Obama voters I have to look out for myself first.I look forward to seeing what happens to the 47% when they figure out that the 53% are tired of paying for them.

  7. Employers should check the voting records to find out if any of their employees are democrats…lol

  8. #48 if that’s really what’s at stake under Obama, more shame on your party for squandering votes like mine with its hateful and ignorant social platform.

    And like I said, the Democrats are not good on the economy, but the Republicans are no better (and might very well be worse).

  9. Romney lost becuase he allowed Obama to use the auto bailouts. He didnt use Obamas tax /fee lies on Obamacare

    1. Obama went on tv and swore it was a NOT A TAX then went to supreme court and swore it WAS. HE LIED TO YOU AMERICA

    2. Obama claimed fair share and Level playing field but gave GM $50 Billion and then changed laws to allow $45 billion in tax writeoffs. Not fair or level. He also closed 10 GM plants and closed 2200 dealers and killed 100,000 jobs.

    3. He allowed Libya to be dealt with by Fox and hidden by the MSM. He HAD to chalenge Obama on those.

    4. Romney won the first debate and then went on defense and played NOT TO LOSE. Thats always a failure.

  10. ++

    again i implore you to understand what is and has
    been happening in earnest since the early 70’s..

    the powers that be are working together towards (albeit sloppily executed,
    but well organized) a new one world order, whatever that is going to entail,
    as i have but the stated goals and my imagination to work with.. however,
    one thing is for certain, either we’re all gong to be bowing to either Mecca,
    or an Earth bound man-god, of which my bet is on the former, preceded by
    the latter..

    “Today, the responsibility, which used to be laid at
    the door of God, is fastened on the shoulders of man.”

    ==

  11. However, it is a toss between the election results and the conservative new media that warrants my disappointment and distain. How many of you knew before tonight that htis would be the end result and still cheered us on to defeat?

    I guessing none. The RW media blows smoke up your skirt, and you love the way it feels, ignoring the fact that it is partisan spin.

  12. “gay marriage” is busting out all over..

    Are you afraid that it may undermine your “hertosexual” marriage?

  13. ++

    shadow #54 November 7, 2012 at 1:57 am

    yeah, that’s it… :roll:

    ==

  14. #56, thank ou for showing just how out of touch Republicans are on this issue. Comparisons of gay marriage to pedophilia, complete failure to comprehend the concept of consenting *adults*, etc–just par for the Republican course.

  15. ++

    re: #56 – page 3 November 7, 2012 at 2:09 am bg

    re: shadow #54 November 7, 2012 at 1:57 am

    Pedophiles want same rights as homosexuals

    [Using the same tactics used by “gay” rights activists, pedophiles have
    begun to seek similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual
    orientation no different than heterosexual or homosexuals.

    Critics of the homosexual lifestyle have long claimed that once it became
    acceptable to identify homosexuality as simply an “alternative lifestyle”
    or sexual orientation, logically nothing would be off limits. “Gay”
    advocates have taken offense at such a position insisting this would
    never happen. However, psychiatrists are now beginning to advocate
    redefining pedophilia in the same way homosexuality was redefined
    several years ago.]

    go figure..

    ["A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl
    is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having
    intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual act such as foreplay,
    rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a
    girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an
    infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is
    permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this
    girl will not count as one of the man's four permanent wives. He also is
    not permitted to marry the girl's sister."
    ]

    more here.. :-(

    ==

  16. If the economy was stacked against them, they ain’t seen nothin yet.

  17. ++

    Dave in NYC #57 November 7, 2012 at 2:33 am

    i’m out of touch??

    you’re in touch??

    okay.. that actually revealed more about you than Republicans,
    not that i’m a Republican, but one thing for certain, i’m no more
    on of today’s Democrat than Jack & Bobby were.. :-(

    ==



1 2 3 4 5 6


`

© Copyright 2014, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions