A group of Republican women held a press conference today on the ObamaTax law. The women called for a complete repeal of the unpopular Democrat law. Rep. Cathy McMorris Rogers (R-WA) said Obamacare is the “largest tax in America’s history.”
The group included Rep. Nan Hayworth (R-NY – an ophthalmologist), Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle (R-NY), Rep. Renee Ellmers (R-NC – a nurse) and Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA).
Via Speaker Boehner’s website:
The Obamacare law contains 20 new hidden taxes on the American people. 75% of Obamacare costs will fall on the backs of those Americans making less than $120,000 a year.
The 3.8% “Roberts Tax” on Investment Income Kicks in on Jan. 1, 2013.
ADVERTISEMENT
Your donations help keep TheGatewayPundit.com online.
© Copyright 2013, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Web Development By Arlington Kirk

`
NeoKong commented:
Three years ago the Democrats were saying Obamacare was for the 45 million people without health insurance.
Now today they are saying it is for the 1% of the people who can afford to buy it but choose to be free riders.
All this for 1%…?
snap boy commented:
ObamaTAXcare.
kato commented:
But I predict the Clueless Party, even if they obtain majorities in November, will not repeal ObamaCare.
They’ll throw all sorts of roadblocks into the mix, they’ll cut their own deals with the healthcare industry, but they won’t repeal. They’re liars, from Mr. RomneyCare on down to the lowliest RINO in the House.
Minty commented:
#3
You are the second funniest conservative after P. J. O’Rourke.
demoncrat commented:
In 2011 the Demoncrats called us the Uninsured, today they call us the Freeloaders.
how dumbed down are we bg commented:
++
July 2, 2012
Undoing Obamacare
Suddenly, everyone wants out.
[You would have thought that Chief Justice John Roberts had shouted
"fire" in a crowded theater. In upholding Obamacare, he set off a headlong
race for the exits by the same lobbying groups -- believe it or not -- that
had cut deals with the administration to create the legislation. Back then,
the lobbyists were telling each other: If you’re not at the table, you’re on
the menu. Now the bodies are piling up in the doorway as those who
pandered to the president trample over each other in their haste to get
out of the blazing or crumbling structure that is Obamacare. To paraphrase
Oscar Wilde on the death of Little Nell, no one without a heart of stone can
witness this deadly scene without wanting to laugh out loud.]
Scott Walker Says No To ObamaTax
[Walker, defending his position, stated,
“While the court said it was legal, that doesn’t make it right. For us to
put time and effort and resources into that doesn’t make a lot of sense.”
He’s right. If Republicans intend to spend their political capital on the
repealing of Obamacare, then it is a bit of a mixed message to begin
the process of implementing that which your party is working against.
Walker has made it clear his disdain for federally mandated healthcare.
Calling it a “tax increase”, Walker claimed that Obamacare will lead to
the rationing of care to control costs.]
[think i'm going to nn him Clint, as in make my day..
]
==
Obama Lies = Freedom Dies commented:
++
OT..
July 2, 2012
Personhood founder’s home attacked at night, children terrorized
-bg
==
Patty commented:
If you don’t buy, IRS will reach what penalty you will pay according to ALL Household income.
And if IRS looks back into your returns and questions something on them, they will audit you.
This ObamaRobotax will be getting You Coming and Going.
There are so many things that are involved an but if you are looking for a JOB?
IRS has some openings.
Joe College commented:
The propaganda technique Team Obama is using to turn people to accepting Obamacare is class warfare. They are giving people a new enemy, and they are borrowing the phrase One Percent to describe that enemy since is a tested phrase that has already been used and people understand it. This One Percent — as the propaganda campaign goes — are the “Free Riders” who would attempt to get free healthcare at the expense of their hard working neighbors. You see, you are supposed to get angry at the Free Riders, just as you are already supposed to be angry at the One Percent who do not pay their “Fair Share.” But Obama is not going to let them get away with it! No sir. He’s got your back and he will get tough with the “Free Riders” to make sure everyone pays their “Fair Share.”
Once more, Americans are sliced into smaller and note helpless and isolated groups. Groups who are to hate each other.
Patty commented:
OT
Secret Service shuts down ‘Fire Holder’ protest outside White House
http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/02/secret-service-shuts-down-fire-holder-protest-outside-white-house/
Would they if there were prostitutes on the corner of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Patty commented:
#11
OT
White House didn’t shut down the EX Pipeline Protests,,,,,see the bias, people!!
Blue Hen commented:
Three years ago the Democrats were saying Obamacare was for the 45 million people without health insurance.
Now today they are saying it is for the 1% of the people who can afford to buy it but choose to be free riders.
All this for 1%…?
Wait, I thought that we were supposed to hate the 1%? I’m so confused.
Obama Lies = Freedom Dies - bg commented:
++
“a tyranny of the elite”
The Oligarchy We Live In, Charted
[please note: the red & blue colors do not represent reps & dems]
more
==
Patty commented:
Tenth Amendment Network
This series of commentaries will examine President Barack Obama through the lens of constitutional defiance. It will illustrate that conduct which most breeches his oath of office, which most damages the government of which he himself is a part, and which most harms the very people who live under his stewardship.
[.........]
http://www.tenthamendment.net/home/story.asp?postid=13
Obama Lies = Freedom Dies.. bg commented:
++
Logic Assured, Laughter Guaranteed
==
Patty commented:
Can Government Now Tax Handgun Ammunition 10,000%?
One possibility that should generate grave concern is that the Federal government could use to the tax code to undermine the Supreme Court’s landmark decisions affirming Second Amendment rights in Heller v. D.C. and McDonald v. Chicago.
This is not a new idea; it is an old one. The New York Times reported in 1993 that the late Sen. Daniel P. Moynihan (D-NY) proposed adding a 10,000% Federal tax to 9mm handgun ammunition as part of “HillaryCare.” Yes, you read that correctly; it is not a typo. Ten thousand percent. Did John Roberts just open the door for a future Democratic Congress to actually enact such a tax as part of ObamaCare?
Of course, like most left-wing Democratic proposals, the truly rich would be unaffected. The goal of the gun-controllers has never been total disarmament, just the disarmament of the common man. The rich will always have a loophole, a political connection, or be able to hire private armed security firms. A truly wealthy person — say, a Warren Buffett — could easily pay a 10,000 per cent tax on a box of handgun ammunition, and it would be an absolute bargain if he ever had to use it to save his life. But most people would probably not be able to afford it — and they’d just have to submit to the will of the armed criminal who stole his ammunition or purchased it on the black market without paying the tax.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/07/can_government_now_tax_handgun_ammunition_10000.html#ixzz1zUkrC8TO
Patty commented:
LISTS OF ALL THE TAXES IN OBAMAROBOTAX CARE
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/taxes-going-pay-pay-obamacare-145413745.html
archer52 commented:
Can the government tax anything? Yes. Can your elected representatives survive the next election cycle? No.
And that is how Roberts views the hierarchy of our nation.
1. You first
2. then your representatives
3. The courts- which should not tell either of the above they are wrong to want stupid things, be idiots or write bad laws.
Only when the law’s writing or implementation violates the Constitution as interpreted by the courts (a big key) should the court step in.
The usual process should be the above self-correcting the error like in 2010.
1. You say no freaking way and vote
2. The right people in to make the good and tough choices
3. Which will be equally as constitutional as Obamatax.
It has already started with Romney receiving something like 2 million dollars in a couple of hours after the decision. Obama is ass kissing Clooney in France for less! Thank you Judge Roberts!
Rubio, again who should be VP, jumped on the decision within an hour and made the best case against it for young people, “millions have just been made targets of the IRS.”
Remember what the biggest complaint is on the Right when dealing with Courts. They fear judges who impress their own PERSONAL opinions and feelings onto a court case. The ninth circuit in California for example.
If Roberts were out there, the ninth would not have overturned proposition 8. The will of the people had spoken, constitutionally. Good bad or indifferent, it was done properly.
Here, and some disagree with me on this, I think Roberts stretched to make the other two branches, one of which was beating on him pretty bad, take back the Obamatax hot potato, but now exposed as it truly is, a nation killing program.
As I said in one of my posts Roberts gave Obama what was akin to the Chinese curse “May you live in interesting times.”
http://truthandcommonsense.com/2012/06/29/judge-roberts-gives-obama-a-chinese-curse-may-you-live-in-interesting-times-what-conservatives-missed-in-the-ruling/
Was it a smart move? I think it was a bold one as he tried to not only get out of the way of the politics that would have surely struck the Court if the law was thrown out, but also took the opportunity to define what this court thinks, how it will rule, and what is now limited that was not before.
And possibly the biggest trick- to make all of us pissed off while REMINDING us we did it to ourselves. The “we” being the collective population of America from the thirties. Honestly, how long have we, as the silent majority, allowed minority liberals to change our world?
And then when it gets too much we complain one guy did us wrong and its is all HIS fault. Unfair to say the least.
He gave the conservatives enough ammo, direction, suggestions and ideas to last a decade. Hopefully, Romney gets elected, a couple of SP’s leave and Roberts remains the Chief Justice- now no longer vilified by the Left (how are they going to complain now on other matters?)- but on a Court filled with Constitutionalists like Thomas and Alito. (again assuming Romney doesn’t screw it up- a big if but not under Roberts’ control)
At which point Roberts can take a break, sip some tea, and watch the justices squish big government progressive agendas like ants at a picnic for the next twenty years.
Big government has been the desire of our leaders in both parties and, sadly, a majority of voters. Progressives educated us that way. MSM tells us what to believe. Conservatives tend to give the benefit of the doubt and let the Left get away with stuff they shouldn’t.
It isn’t Roberts’ job to manage that. But he did give us a major kick in the shorts to remind us it is our job.
Let’s get started.
randyinrocklin commented:
we need to get rid of Renee Elmers, she voted for more of the same, more spending, more earmarks. She threw us TEA people under the bus. She went with the spineless leadership of Boehner and Canter. She’s got to go. she’s no TEA party candidate for sure.
`