Fauxahontas Warren Wants Government to Pilfer Another $1.3 Trillion Annually From Taxpayers to Pay for Infrastructure

Phony Indian Elizabeth Warren wants the US government to be like communist China.

(Hennessey’s View)

The Democrat thought leader told supporters recently that she believes government should be like China and pilfer 9% of the national GDP from taxpayers to pay for infrastructure. That’s around $1.35 trillion a year.

Good Grief! This crackpot continues to un-impress.
Red Mass Group reported:

And, you just know, even #1.3 trillion would not be enough to make Warren happy.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • bigkahuna

    They are putting this crackpot on the convention stand to speak the night before Clinton speaks…

    I wonder if the Romney campaign will put out ads of this twit when she is speaking ? Same with Bubba… Use Bubbas words about Obama and Romney in an ad during his speech.

  • Pingback: Fauxahontas Warren Wants Government to Pilfer Another $1.3 Trillion Annually From Taxpayers to Pay for Infrastructure|PolitifreakPolitifreak()

  • snap boy

    MA received more than its “fair share” of the infrastructure pie for the next one hundred years with the Big Dig.

  • Diane Harvey

    Crackpot for sure. I’m a Mass. resident and voter and I’m seeing this nonsense up close and personal.

    But the real crackpots are the all too typical Mass. liberal voter. Granny Warren is tied – tied !!! – with Scott Brown. SB s/b walking away. This is the same crowd that voted for McGovern in 1972 and Ted Fat Boy Kennedy for more than 45 years.

    Many of the original 13 colonies have been looney bins.

  • Mekan

    And yet the citizens of her state are divided. How can half a state be so completely ignorant? How can half a country be so completely ignorant?

    By design.

  • Flintstone F.

    Democrats have been invoking the need to build the infrastructure for several elections in a row. I think they like the word as much as they do “high speed rail.”

    I thought most of the infrastructure was related to what states must do to maintain the state. Bridges fall down in Illinois, what’s it got to do with a bridge not falling down in Montana?

    Infrastructure is a term like, “for the children.” It’s supposed to be unassailable for it’s universally understood urgent need. It’s just a need for more cash to use on whatever.

  • Indiana

    The Democratic Party is nothing more than a comune for “freaks, frauds, felons, and free-loaders.” Every Democrat I meet falls into one of those categories.

  • Faye

    #7, I would agree with you observation cause that is pretty close to the truth but my niece and nephew are hard working people who for some strange reason still have not grown a brain. My nephew is a lawyer who is now going going to med school this fall. My niece just got her masters in business last spring. They both worship the ground that O walks on. Plenty of book smarts but zero common sense.
    As for Ms. Warren why doesn’t she just move to China?

  • Goodbye Darth Vader

    China has ghost cities loaded with infrastructure. Many spent and nobody living there, nobody walking the roads, lots of roads that go nowhere, and the infrastructure is deteriorating.

  • KornKing

    I Fauxcahontas feels so strongly about this, perhaps she could suggest that the entire”investment” come from Mass.

  • DomesticGoddess

    But roads and bridges are so, so……… visionary!! Obama wants to be remembered as the President who brought roads and bridges to the US. Ooooh, Ahhhhhh!

  • NeoKong

    Maybe Warren should remember that we already built our infrastructure decades ago.
    She is advocating spending money just to give people busy work whether it is necessary or not.

  • Robodog7

    OH BOY, more of those “Shovel-ready Jobs” that worked soooo well last time , huh “Spewing Bull”.

  • Pingback: Fauxahontas Warren Wants Government to Pilfer Another $1.3 Trillion Annually From Taxpayers to Pay for Infrastructure | Born Conservative()

  • Westie

    Lie-a-Lizzie just made…..another gutsy call for Infrastructure aka Union/Mafia Jobs, it’s the Communist Way.

  • lizzy84

    A nut like Warren could only survive in academia. In the real world, she’d be run out of any honest job she held whenever she opened her ‘collectivist’ mouth. She and oBama need to go back to fantasy land and leave the rest of us alone.

  • Pingback: Fauxahontas Warren Wants Government to Pilfer Another $1.3 Trillion Annually From Taxpayers to Pay for Infrastructure()

  • Jpmn

    Why can’t we get infrastructure done like China? One reason is the environmental lobby which has prevented mining, logging, oil drilling, roads, bridges, factories and countless other economic activities.

  • bigL

    It would take a human counting as in 1…2..3, like that , thirty-two thousand years to count to
    a trillion. It is ridioculous to aplly measurements to stars this way.

    AND yAhoo had a collection of photos showing factories sites in China. The caption said that when there is no room for the discard of the factory left-over, the Chinese move the factory.

    So how much do they spend on the infrastructure, anyway?

  • Winston Wolfe

    China has ghost cities loaded with infrastructure. – GDV

    Too bad it takes a commenter on a blog post to point out what the media refuses to do when she trots out nonsense like this.

  • Nelle

    Where are the trillions in stimulus funds, if not in the “infrastructure”? Where are the billions each state collects on every gasoline purchase? and what about the federal tax? Why isn’t this country one big multi-level parking lot?

  • How is China’s unionized labor coming along nowdays?

  • MicahStone

    Typically, “lying sacaja sh^t” warren is NOT stating something original, but is just regurgitating stuff that’s already in the socialist borg-like collective: On 07 Jul 2012, U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood argued …that China outpaces the United States in building major transportation infrastructure like high-speed rail because of its authoritarian system and because the Chinese don’t have the Republican Party holding up progress.

    “The Chinese are more successful [in building infrastructure] because in their country, only three people make the decision. In our country, 3,000 people do,” LaHood said in a short interview with The Cable

    Never forget: most lunatic-left d-cRAT socialist extremists are MENTALLY INCAPABLE of original thought.

  • Robodog7

    #21 Nelle

    The Federal excise tax, which you pay on Gas, Tires, car sales, motor oil, ect…just like all other taxes including Social Security, & FICA, get dumped into the general fund so that Congress Critters can spend to their hearts delight, ( if they do have hearts).

  • bg
  • bg


    Robodog7 #24 July 31, 2012 at 2:14 pm

    re: [(if they do have hearts)]

    nothing personal, but having a heart
    has absolutely nothing to do with it..


    [Democrats beat the market by 73 basis points per month, compared
    to 18 for Republicans. That’s a rout anyway you look at it. Senators
    fare even better than house members.]

    “shared sacrifice”

    [Harry Reid in a statement to the press yesterday said that “We asked
    Republicans to consider a balanced approach that would have required
    shared sacrifice, but they would not.”

    First of all let’s get one thing straight. When Senator Reid and others
    from BOTH parties of the 44% Wall Street millionaire dominated
    Congress speak of “shared sacrifice”, they are not speaking of any
    sacrifice on their part or on the part of any member of Congress. All
    members of Congress, even those few who are not multimillionaires,
    belong to the upper 5% of the wealthiest people in our nation. [Any
    American who earns in excess of $180,000 a year is in the upper 5%

    as they laugh all the way to
    the banks Obama built.. /s/


    [The largest banks are actually bigger than they were when he took
    office. And earned more in the first two-and-a-half years of his term
    than they did during the entire eight years of the Bush administration.]