Stuxnet…The White House Reveals Their Depravity

There is no moral code guiding the White House.  None.

If we had any doubt the Israelis might not share their national defense plans with the U.S. those can be solidly put to rest.  In a complete betrayal to America, its national security, and the security of our allies in the Middle East, the Obama Administration leaked TS/NO FOR/Special Access information regarding Stuxnet.  This is a national security acronym for Top Secret/ No Foreign/ Special Access only.  But, to Obama’s intimate team of depraved idiots, desperate to rewrite public opinion of a complete loser, this means absolutely…nothing.  A campaign hungry to create a “really cool president” needs to be fed by some “really cool stuff”.  So, information protected by TS/NO FOR/Special Access only clearance is released to the whole wide world, which includes our enemies.  That would be the No Foreign part.

The Foundry reported,

The New York Times revealed today in a major news article that the well-known Stuxnet malware attack on the Iranian nuclear program was, in fact, an American operation. Most experts had felt that was the most logical conclusion, but it had never been confirmed. The Times report is based on interviews with anonymous sources “because the effort remains highly classified, and parts of it continue to this day,” reporter David Sanger wrote. While this is an acknowledgement of U.S. prowess in cyberwarfare, the revelation is an inexcusable breach of security that seems to be a part of a disturbing trend.

One has to ask: Why is the Obama Administration choosing to continue revealing operational information that is normally not released? This includes the specific units that conducted the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, information from the bin Laden compound, classified information on the bin Laden raid, details of drone operations, and now secrets about cyberwarfare. There is NO good operational reason for doing this. The only “logical” reason is a tight race for presidency. Does this mean that the closer that we get to the election, the more operational secrets will be given away?

The larger reality is that these leaks, designed to highlight the President’s credentials as a tough leader, are trying to mask the fact that Obama has virtually nothing to show on key national security issues. Progress in the big and important issues, such as relations with China and Russia, broadly fending off Iranian nuclear development, and keeping the rogue regime in North Korea inside its box, have all proven elusive for this Administration.

When progress is absent, a desperate Administration may use leaks, even if it harms national security. The Times reports that Obama “repeatedly expressed concerns that any American acknowledgment that it was using cyberweapons…could enable other countries, terrorists or hackers to justify their own attacks.” So either the Administration completely disregarded its prior national security concerns, or it has no control over sensitive information. Either way, it doesn’t look good.

“A desperate Administration may use leaks, even if it harms national security.”  The level of treachery and complete depravity Obama and his minions-of-Socialist-evil are willing to unleash on their own country is unspeakable.  Who cares if Iran builds nuclear weapons to destroy Western civilization?  Obama is so cool.  All corners of the political spectrum, including loyal Democrats, are now calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor.  That should be fun during an election season.

Update:  The Washington Free Beacon has Wolf Blitzer’s interview with Senator Dianne Feinstein on Obama’s WH Intel leaks.  She said, in all her years on the Intelligence Committee she “has never seen it worse”.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • Pingback: Stuxnet…The White House Reveals Their Depravity()

  • Flintstone F.

    Well, with the glass half full, our military is a glutton for punishment and they’ll always come out on top. Our national security is in good hands ultimately, it’s just a little disturbing that the enemy is the commander in chief this time around. Little did we know that his fundamental transformation of the country just might have been to set the clock back to Sept. 10, 2001.

    God Bless the men and women of the US military past and present. Unstoppable and undeterred under any circumstances.

  • Pingback: Stuxnet: White House Leaks Classified Operational Info on Malware Cyber Attacks, Specifics About Special Units That Raided Bin Laden’s Compound « Frugal Café Blog Zone()

  • Pingback: Stuxnet…The White House Reveals Their Depravity | Liberal Whoppers()

  • mcc

    #38 arnonerik —

    It’s interesting that big name Democrats ( Clinton, Dianne Feinstein, etcetra.) are no longer covering for Obama at great political risk to themselves. I think the pressure will be building within his own party to convince Obama not to run for re-election.

    That may be what’s going on…they smelled he was in trouble and it was confirmed with Tuesday’s loss in Wisconsin. Dems are nothing but loyal to a “win.”

    #42 Flintstone F. —

    God Bless the men and women of the US military past and present. Unstoppable and undeterred under any circumstances.

    Yes. God bless and keep them all. I don’t know how they do it with this CIC.

  • VotingFemale

    The sociopath knows he is going down Nov 2012. No doubt about it. This is revenge.

  • aquaviva

    Wolfie tried, he really tried to run interference – “this has been going on for decades and still we prevail, right?” – but even Feinstein wouldn’t let him – “Fair enough”.

    This is CNN.

    P.S. And, of course, Barry is a traitor for this…goeswithoutsaying

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    She said, in all her years on the Intelligence Committee she “has never seen it worse”.

    Uh huh.

    “Senator, the guy in the White House right now, he’s a Democrat, ain’t he?

  • BurmaShave

    Thank you Jim, for adding Wolf Blitzer’s interview with Senator Dianne Feinstein.

    It is instructive to watch useful [DNC] media idiot Blitzer actively trying to soft pedal the Obama Administration’s out and out treason. Take note, everybody. Even Feinstein (D) was not buying his proffered cr@p.

  • Militant Conservative

    #9 June 7, 2012 at 10:21 pm
    Matt commented:

    He swallows big time.

  • Militant Conservative

    #34 June 7, 2012 at 11:40 pm
    Matt commented:

    With knee pads too.

  • Militant Conservative

    All on this thread. Obama cannot even qualify for

    A security clearance if he was not a politician.

    Background investigation, what background.

    Finding the NEW party membership would have

    Disqualified him immediately as well as his

    Personnal associations with known deviants.

    Powder is dry

  • DaveRHancock

    GOOD THING THE PRESIDENT IS NOT IN THE TOP 100 TO KNOW > Where would we be, if He was Really in the ‘Loop’……..

  • mg4us

    As a member of the New Party, a socialist movement, to destroy our US Capitalist system and transform us into a European model is not enough,
    or creating massive debt for generations to come is not enough,
    or supporting enemies in the middle east is not enough,
    or running guns to Mexican Drug cartels is not enough,
    Or suing states over immigration is not enough,
    or preventing oil drilling and pipelines is not enough
    or refusing to show official birth certificate is not enough
    then how about leaking TS info like this and the recent Yemen airplane bombers where they outed a British spy operation. . .
    Can we say TREASON NOW????

    Try Obama, Holder, Axelrod and Jarrett for treason NOW!!!

  • BurmaShave

    “One has to ask: Why is the Obama Administration choosing to continue revealing operational information that is normally not released?”

    That is an easy one. The Obama Administration is traitorous.

    “The larger reality is that these leaks, designed to highlight the President’s credentials as a tough leader [WT*?!?], are trying to mask the fact that Obama has virtually nothing to show on key national security issues” except for betraying the country. {Fixed it for you.}

    And some people think that Hillary might run for President after being part of, and integrally involved in, the criminal enterprise known as the Obama Administration?!?

  • Hassaan
  • bg


    Zuhdi Jasser

    [The Third Jihad exposes the war the media is not telling you about. It reveals the enemy our government is too afraid to name. One person who is not afraid to tell you the truth is Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, a Muslim American and former physician to the US Congress. After the FBI releases a radical Islamist manifesto describing how to destroy America from within, Dr. Jasser decides to investigate. The Third Jihad is about what he discovered. Interviews are conducted with radical Islamists in the US and the leaders trying to stop them, such as Rudy Giuliani, Clinton CIA Director Jim Woolsey, NYC Police Commissioner Ray Kelly, Senator Joe Lieberman, former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, and former terrorist group member Tawfik Hamid.]

    Clare Lopez

    [Aimed at co-opting Americas foreign policy in the Middle East, a
    network including well-known American diplomats, congressional
    representatives, figures from academia and the think tank world –
    with ties to the clerical regime in Tehran – is directing the Obama
    Administration’s policy towards the Islamic Republic of Iran and
    the Middle East.”]


    Tarek Fatah

    [Today, in the White House, there are three members of the Muslim Brotherhood that influence Obama’s policy. One is Rashad Hassan of Indian origin, who is the American ambassador to the 52-nation organization of Islamic countries. Dahlia Mujahid who writes his speech, who comes from the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Just day before yesterday, another woman, an academic, was appointed in that circle. This is happening while we sit silent, and I say that as a liberal democrat, as someone who worked and campaigned for Barrack Obama.]



  • Jerry C

    @ #9 & #24

    If you’re going to give LUITPOS credit for the STUXNET virus while on his watch, for the love of God give him credit for the trillions he has spent as well and stop blaming it on Bush.

    But you won’t ’cause your liberal diseased mind cannot handle the truth, STFU. Please.

  • Jerry C

    (Lying Usurper-in-Thief POS)

  • Peter Warner

    If the active military become strongly suspicious that our Commander In Chief is less than committed to American victory in each decision, they will begin to manage things so that his input is not actively involved or necessary for the completion of certain operations.

    Perhaps they already are. There were hints of that in the Bin Laden operation, and the press photo sure implied that he wasn’t central to its execution.

    For myself, it’s hard to condemn the military marginalizing him. It goes against the principle of civilian control of the military, but at the same time, it’s a reasonable question if this elected President was ever a legitimate candidate. The military is obligated to ‘protect the Constitution and these United States, from all enemies, foreign AND domestic’, and they take that sworn responsibility very seriously.

    May God guide our nation and its leaders.

    Best regards, Peter Warner.