Mark Levin Goes Off on O-Care Decision: “It’s Absolutely Lawless!” (Video)

Conservative talker Mark Levin went off yesterday on his show following the shocking Supreme Court ruling on Obamacare.
“This decision I would go as far to say is lawless. Absolutely lawless!”
From the First Segment of his June 28 Show.

I agree with Levin. There is no silver lining to this “tax” argument. This was an assault against the American public.

1 2 Newer Comments >>
`

#1 June 29, 2012 at 10:31 am
Patty commented:

SO DOES SAVAGE: VIDEO ON SITE….. VIDEO ON SITE

Michael Savage: Roberts Epilepsy Medication Affects His Cognition

“Let’s talk about Roberts. I’m going to tell you something that you’re not going to hear anywhere else, that you must pay attention to. It’s well known that Roberts, unfortunately for him, has suffered from epileptic seizures. Therefore he has been on medication. Therefore neurologists will tell you that medication used for seizure disorders, such as epilepsy, can introduce mental slowing, forgetfulness and other cognitive problems. And if you look at Roberts’ writings you can see the cognitive dissociation in what he is saying,” Michael Savage said on his radio program this evening.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/06/28/michael_savage_roberts_epilepsy_medication_effects_his_cognition.html
#2 June 29, 2012 at 10:38 am
Ace commented:

Forget that Savage nonsense.

Levin characterizes Roberts as a criminal—and he’s correct.
His victim list numbers 300 million.
#4 June 29, 2012 at 10:55 am
Big Al commented:

Yeah I don’t know why Savage goes off on such fruitless sideshows…

I am really afraid that this decision may breathe life back into Obamacare and it will be almost impossible to undo it now. I don’t know what Roberts was thinking. He alone will bear the burden of having destroyed that dream that was called America. We are surely being dragged into the fetid stinking swamp of European socialism and look at all the good it did them.
#5 June 29, 2012 at 10:55 am
mcc commented:

Even if Barry’s defeated in November, he can still keep spending the money – our tax dollars – designated for this monstrosity until he’s out Jan. 20.

Don’t believe he won’t.

I think he revved it up recently, thinking it’d be overturned. Now he’s got another 6-7 months to squander our money.

Thanks, Roberts.
#6 June 29, 2012 at 11:03 am
Smarty commented:

Read Krauthammer’s piece.

Also, consider that unless the GOP are a bunch of liars and wusses (oh god, we’re screwed), in a year we will be much better off. Obama was neck and neck with Romney, now Roberts and the supreme court called him a liar and enabled the rest of us to call him a hypocrite and tax & spender. That hurts his re-election chances. it also prevents an economic rally just in time to save Obama (companies would have looked to hire and expand if Obamacare was defeated). Now the rally can happen Nov 3rd, not too long to wait to end the US experiment in socialism.

Next, there is a state medicare opt-out that makes implementing the Obamacare utopia next to impossible without more bully tactics- the public will freak if Obama goes to war against half the states as he is against AZ.

With the commerce clause being restricted (and future Dems trying to open up the commerce clause again will have to invalidate a ruling that allowed socialized medicine- so they cannot do that politically), and Obama and the Dems likely to be thrown out on their ears, in a year we will have NO Obamacare, a limited Commerce Clause, and even another few gems thrown in, like the restrictions on union dues collection for political activity. All with a court immune to charges of “conservative activism”. And BTW, the liberal judges and politicians got publicly punked by John Roberts. The Brilliant Latina et al were just shown to be fools who horsetraded for Obamacare and got a donkey in return.

John Machiavelli Roberts, he is.
#7 June 29, 2012 at 11:31 am
Robert commented:

#6 Smarty

I’m not buying any of that. People want to play checkers with laws and chess with the Constitution, instead of seeing that the federal government at all levels is completely out of control.

It will be very difficult for states to opt out. The media will trot out a hard case or two and pile on so hard that the politicians will be scrambling to sign up. In addition you will have various pressures coming from the fraudsters in D.C. including the Republican ones who can’t seem to actually do a single thing to reduce spending and federal meddling in every aspect of our lives, or even say anything about it.

Everything you cite can be forestalled if a single “conservative” jurist gets replaced by a liberal one.
#8 June 29, 2012 at 11:38 am
Robert commented:

The time to limit the federal government was right here and right now with this so-called legislation that far exceeded the limits of the Constitution, and not by laying down some invisible legal marker that lawyers can point at and say “Look over there. Later we can begin, maybe just start, just a little wee bit at some point in the future on some future case, to limit the unchecked expansion of the federal government.”

What really happened was that the Supreme Court did not rule on the Constitutionality of the law, but instead the Politicality of it.
#9 June 29, 2012 at 11:40 am
Robert commented:

Chief Justice Roberts played politics with the Constitution.
#11 June 29, 2012 at 11:52 am
Redwine commented:

I also agree with Levin. Roberts’ decision was simply an affirmation of a fraudulently perpetrated law.
#12 June 29, 2012 at 11:53 am
Redwine commented:

Andy McCarthy: ObamaCare Ruling: Pure Fraud and No Due Process
http://pjmedia.com/andrewmccarthy/2012/06/28/obamacare-ruling-pure-fraud-and-no-due-process/
#13 June 29, 2012 at 1:00 pm
Crackermike commented:

At this point, I don’t think it matters what the Congress passes or doesn’t pass. John Roberts has taken over as Tyrant of the Judiciary. There is no way he will allow Obamacare to be repealed, he will step in unlawfully to negate Congressional action. I think Obama has something on Roberts: drugs, women, men, something. It’s how Obama got elected to every previous office, just ask Ryan in Illinois. If Roberts says his job isn’t to protect the people from their bad elective choices, then why the hell did he negate Arizona’s law?? He actually REWROTE Obamacare to his own standard when it was originally written without severibility so the whole thing HAD to be thrown out as Unconstitutional just as Kennedy said in his dissent. Something is going on here.
#14 June 29, 2012 at 1:01 pm
mg4us commented:

Mark Levin is 100% correct. . . the ruling by in-Justice Roberts is affirmation that we are in a post-Constitutional America. . . not just crony capitalism but crony judicial activism, crony legislative representation and crony law enforcement.

——————————————————————————————-
According to the same unreliable sources used by ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC as well as NYT and WaPo, the reason in-Justice Roberts ruled the way he did at the last minute is that Obama and his troops probably have pictures and videos of Roberts in unusual sexual activities. Or maybe proof that Roberts is gay and might be Obama’s secret lover when Obama sneaks out of White House.

News at 11pm.
————————————————————————–
Remember the way Obama first gained his Illinois senate seat, by exposing his opponent’s sexual diversions when the guy wouldn’t quit the race. Eventually Jack Ryan did pull out. It is the Obama way!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_election_in_Illinois,_2004

In those files, Jeri Ryan alleged that Jack Ryan had taken her to sex clubs in several cities, intending for them to have sex in public.
#15 June 29, 2012 at 1:13 pm
William commented:

Who else here thinks that Roberts was a terror baby planted here as an infant for this one purpose?
#16 June 29, 2012 at 1:13 pm
susanm commented:

NOW HOW MUCH MONEY DID ROBERTS MAKE?……..ANOTHER CORRUPT JUDGE!
#17 June 29, 2012 at 2:46 pm
rolling thunder commented:

Anyone who thinks this decision will be overturned if Romney wins the presidency and Republicans take the Senate and House are delusional. Even if you get the needed majority of Republicans in the Senate, I am sure that John McCain or Lindsey Graham are chomping at the bit to play “Maverick” once again and vote against conservative principles for the sake of positive publicity from the liberal pundits. Just like John Roberts did!!! Sadly, the Republican Party simply doesn’t understand the juggernaut that the Obama machine has become. The Republicans are still playing by the rules of the upscale WASP country club from the 1950s–the Obama Democrats have a playbook straight out of the Politburo. I fully expect Obamacare to be fully implemented in the next few years and it will be a fiasco rife with massive fraud, corruption, and incompetence. Whether the United States can survive financially until full implementation is problematic, but nonetheless, until the complete financial collapse of this once great republic, Obamacare is now an entitlement.
#18 June 29, 2012 at 3:35 pm
Big Al commented:

#17 – right on – thats what I’m talkin about. As I said the Roberts decision was an unmitigated disaster and may have been our last chance to save the ship.
#19 June 29, 2012 at 4:01 pm
aprilnovember811 commented:

Roberts should resign. I never would have imagined he’s corrupt. He seems clueless as to the reaction to him. Roberts, you’re the Supreme Court Crook!
#20 June 29, 2012 at 6:47 pm
B. Johnson commented:

With all due respect to Chief Justice Kennedy, what was he thinking when he referenced the Gibbons v. Ogden case in the Obamacare opinion? As evidenced by the two excerpts from Gibbons below which he evidently “overlooked,” he seemingly read Gibbons as “carefully” as the HoR read Obamacare before they passed that irresponsible legislation. And I predict that in the coming weeks that Democrats will not be able to reasonably defend key statements in Gibbons to justify the Court’s misguided Obamacare decision, a decision that possibly reflects the Article I, Section 8-ignoring stance of post FDR era activist justices.

The two key statements in Gibbons which cast serious doubt on the constitutionality of Obamacare imo are the following.

“State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress.” –Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” –Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

These excerpts from Gibbons should reasonably clarify for taxpaying voters that Congress has no constitutional authority to establish a healthcare related tax. Note that Article V requires Congress to first successfully petition the states to ratify an amendment to the Constitution which grants Congress the specific power to do so. In the meanwhile, government healthcare programs remain a unique, 10th Amendment protected right of the states as evidenced by RomneyCare.

So based on some glaringly loose threads concerning his “careful” review of previous case opinions in helping to decide the constitutionality of Obamacare, Kennedy may have given patriots a license to clean up all three branches of the Constitution-ignoring federal government.