After Ignoring Michelle Obama’s Expensive Wardrobe For Years, Lib Media Is Suddenly Interested in Ann Romney’s Pricey Clothes

By: Andrea Ryan

Last month at the Kids’ Choice Awards, Michelle Obama wore an outfit designed by New York-based, uber-expensive designer, Wes Gordon.  His clothing commands prices in the thousands of dollars and can only be found in the elite stores of the super wealthy.  If you enjoy spending more than $4,000 on a pair of shorts…yes that is three zeroes after the comma…then you might like this little jacket from one of Michelle Obama’s favorite designers.  It’s a steal for only $2,250.  Of course, we never heard one peep out of the Liberal mainstream media on Michelle Obama’s high-priced clothing.

But, that all changed now that Mitt Romney has become the presumptive Republican nominee for president.

Suddenly, the media is very interested in Ann Romney’s choice of pricey clothes…

The fashion house that makes the nearly $1,000 blouse worn by Ann Romney on morning television earlier this week tells ABC News that they had nothing to do with the wardrobe choice, remarking that they’d prefer to stay out of politics.

“We had nothing to do with it,” a rep for designer Reed Krakoff said. “She must have bought it from Saks or Bergdorf’s, we definitely didn’t send it to her.”

“It’s 100 percent a Reed Krakoff shirt, but we 100 percent didn’t send it to her,” the rep added. “We don’t get involved politically.”

The shirt, an item in the label’s 2012 Spring/Summer collection, retails for $990, and for those shopping, is called the “The Reed Audubon Silk Shirt.”

The price of the shirt was first reported by the style blog

Mrs. Romney does not have a stylist, according to an aide with the Romney campaign, and is likely to have purchased the shirt on her own.

A spokeswoman for the Romney campaign declined to comment on Mrs. Romney’s fashion choices.

This isn’t the first time that Mrs. Romney has been tweaked on her fashion choices.

In March, a little girl on the ropeline at a campaign event in Illinois asked Mrs. Romney if her watch was “real.”

Since the MSM has developed a new interest in high-end clothing, here’s a glimpse of Michelle Obama’s expensive, designer wardrobe worn during her $4M tax payer-funded jaunt to Hawaii last December.

UPDATE: Michelle’s Obama’s Mirror has the rundown on Michelle Obama’s wardrobe.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • well now

    Anne Romney is paying for her own damned clothes and if she wants to wear a $1000.00 shirt I’m fine with that, it’s HER money
    Moochelle Obama OTOH is a high class grifter gaming the system and using OUR MONEY AND THERIN LIES THE DIFFERENCE.

  • well now

    One more thing…no matter what the Mooch puts on she looks like 10 lbs of sh*t in a 5lb bag. I offer up the the photo accompanying this story as evidence.

  • OxyCon

    I bet Michele Obama’s wigs cost more than everything in Ann Romney’s wardrobe.

  • KornKing

    Doesn’t matter how much of our dough Mooch spends on clothes, she always looks like she’s wearing surplus government drapery

  • SeniorD

    Like everything else Obama and their odious ilk, their relality is not the same as normal thinking adults. Theirs is a blue sky filled with unicorns, rainbow, smiling happy faced animals and never a discouraging word is heard.

    Bridezilla is smart enough to not permit a picture of her ‘South 40’ be published. Her full-time makeup artist (also on the Fed Payroll) ensures she always looks like a Holyweird starlet.

    Thinking adults know better.

  • Pingback: After Ignoring Michelle Obama’s Expensive Wardrobe For Years, Lib Media Is Suddenly Interested in Ann Romney’s Pricey Clothes|Politifreak()

  • bobdog

    Barack, tell me the truth. Does this outfit make my ass look big?

    Why, no, honey. You look like a million bucks.

  • Greg

    OFF TOPIC………… I just listened to Newt Gingrich’s bow out speech and he was impressive. Newt has more vision than the rest of the beltway put together…..Fox news let ED Rawlins trash Newt at the end…. Rawlins is a rino and a puke. other language would be more appropriate but censored.
    Texas has not voted for the primary and I will not vote for a rino

  • Sparky

    The Zulu Queen looks horrid no matter what the outfit, nor how much it cost. She is absolute disgrace as the First Grifter and is a Rottweiler with lipstick.

  • George

    Does this really suprise anyone? It’s the same reason the MSM ignores every other scandle involoved with this adminastration. As long as they support abortion and an ever increasing permenant dependent class, they can do anyting they want. Nothing will ever stick.

  • George

    If a Republican POTUS ordered secret drone attacks that are killing Aphgan children, The Code pinkos would be calling for war crime charges against him. If Romney somehow wins in Nov., they will crawl out from under the rocks they’ve been living under since Obummer got elected. I’m tellin’ you folks, these people worship at the alter of abotion. That’s all they care about.

  • MichelleIndependent

    At least Anne Romney’s clothes fit well and she looks classy.

    MOOch Antoinette aka Michelle Obama looks like a drunken hooker clown in her ill-fitting, tacky costumes.


    When are we going to realize, that no matter WHAT you say about The Obamas, it is racist. pure and simple. The Romneys are Rich…they are EVIL…go get them…

    The media are fools. If they don’t realize, that we can see right through them…that’s good for us. November is coming and the Obamas are going!!!!

  • Jan S

    Just vote them out! It’s the best thing we can do! PLEASE VOTE FOLKS! We owe it to our Children and Grandchildren!

  • Dylan

    That is the difference between capitalism and socialism…. Ms. Romney buys her own, we pay for Missys.

  • Roadrunner

    So, we are supposed to be outraged by what the Romneys do with their money, but no care what the Obamas do with ours?

    No matter how you slice it though, it doesn’t make any difference what moochelle is wearing, it only serves to prove that you can’t polish a turd

  • KornKing

    You can, but it’s till a turd.

  • tommy mc donnell

    hypocrisy in the democratic party-media complex, couldn’t be the democratic party-media complex without it.

  • schatzi

    Comments #1 and 2 – ’nuff said.

  • Spartan

    I don’t give a flip what Ann Romney paid for her clothing. SHE paid for it, I as a taxpayer did not. Unlike the crone headlining this story! And I might add,,,,at least Ann Romney has taste.

    The mooching cow described by MSM as the ‘best dressed since Jackie O’ wears her taste only in her mouth. And that’s a bit sketchy in itself!!

  • owl

    Ditto #15

    The creepy MSM would not have the guts to try to pull off such outlandish double standards when we are paying, except they keep shovels behind their desks to scoop up the piles.

    They got away with making Palin into their trailor trash, so now they are going to turn Ann into the rich woman that never worked and only spent money for her back. Meanwhile, all the little people are out working trying to feed their kids and dress the entire family from discount.

    Michelle and her kids spend other people’s money. How much did that little spring break trip for a 13 year old, her friends and 26 agents cost us little people???????????

  • TXPatriot

    Could someone please start a list of what these people have spent in 3 1/2 years courtesy of US? Post it for everyone to see.

  • Indiana

    I find it disgraceful that the Main Slime Media is more interested in “how Mitt & Ann Romney spend their money……than how Maobama and Moochelle spend ours.” Especially since it takes sooooo much material to cover the wookie’s back side.

  • Cee

    I enjoy seeing what the Duchess of Cambridge is wearing; for her age, she has classical fashion sense.

  • olm

    Moochelle looks awful in that outfit.
    No matter how much taxpayer money she spends, she can’t buy taste.

  • StChuckMom

    I can 100% guarantee that if Mitt does become President, you will NEVER see Ann dressed in an outfit such as Michelle is wearing in the photo. It will be wonderful to again have a first lady that dresses with class.

    No skin-tight short shorts, no low-cut outfits, and no bare arms showing off her biceps.

  • Peggy R

    Mrs. Romney might wear expensive brands, but her style is classic and understated, unlike M.O. She can afford quality materials and workmanship. MO’s fashions are trendy and flashy.

  • bg
  • anti-bho

    In that outfit she looks like she just finished a try-out for pole dancing and the pole won.

  • A_Nonny_Mouse

    Good Lord, the fact that Ann Romney wears expensive clothes paid for with Her Own Money is supposed to shock and offend us proles??? (Of course I remember the MF-MSM also had hissy-fits and palpitations over Sarah Palin’s wardrobe back during the 2008 campaign.)

    Sorry, Big Media. It’s been done before. No sale.


    Next Faux-Outrage, please.

  • jay

    The Media hasn’t ignored Michele’s outfits, they have lavished praise upon her sense of style.

  • della street

    No matter what we pay for Mooch’s clothes, they look cheap, because they never fit properly.
    She undoubtedly throws them on the floor after wearing, because a] she’s a slob. and b] they smell bad from her excessive sweating.
    Please, please, Chicago take her back now !

  • bg


    that’s just a test design for her role in the One World Order..


  • bigL

    hey, Mitt has not been nominated yet…No one will recognize him after the scum bag machine trashes him. Lies-no problem~!
    this is a walk-in-the-park…
    why not reply about the economy, about the USA is going off the abyss…

  • mg4us

    Looking at Obama’s tax return, HOW DOES ANGRY BIG MAMA get t dress in so many uber-expensive designer clothes. . surely she has not paid for them all. . .

    And if they are given as a gift. .

    I thought the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT has clear guidelines on accepting gifts. . . Heck you cannot buy most government workers lunch. . .even Mickey D’d. . .

    Where is the investigation of illegal campaign contributions?

  • Jackson

    No matter how much Moochele pays for her clothes, she looks awful. Ann Romney wears hers so well and she pays for them.

  • Patriot Act

    Considering that Mooch seems to wear something different every day of the year, and what she wears is invariably designer, she must have spent far in excess of a million dollars on her lavish wardrobe by now. What an azz.

    I’ll bet that Ann doesn’t wear something different every day, and I’ll bet that what she does wear is never as unseemly as the outfits that Mooch so often wears, like the one above.

  • Redwine

    Ann Romney: buys her own clothes with her own money – looks lovely, elegant and dignified

    Queen Bitchelle: uses taxpayer money to buy (mainly ill-fitting) clothes + up to $15,000/day makeup guy (also taxpayer-bought) – looks ridiculous and undignified

  • Pingback: Media Trying To Make Issue Of Ann Romney’s Clothing Prices…While Michelle Obama Wears Clothing Worth 4 Times As Much « Tai-Chi Policy()

  • susanm

    she’s no jackie-o thats for sure, & she looks like trash, out for the night, standing on a corner under a pole light???????????


    I think I saw this space man costume on an old Lost In Space rerun. AND the Robot had a smaller caboose!!!

  • What do you think Moochie is thinking in that picture ?

    I have a thought I think it’s……..” Boy these britches are a lot tighter than I thought, I sure hope my pecker isn’t showing…..

  • CommieJuice

    I see all the attacks on her. I don’t feel bad for her, I feel bad for we the people. The so-called media has tried to make her out to be something special, when in reality she is far from it. I don’t find her attractive, intelligent or even honest in the least bit, but I can’t comment on how she smells or how others see her without the media trying to shove down our throats how amazing she is. I dislike her character and ideology, the same with her husband. It’s that simple, nothing more or less. Their actions speak louder than their words. Overall I blame the media for creating this monster!

    I would have never said anything about how she looks or her being a Fascist hypocrite on health and fitness if not for the media and her own ways. It’s truly disgusting to me that I can’t agree with a single thing the president and first lady does or says. What happen to the days when you could be proud of your leaders, the direction of the country and the position the USA was in? Instead you have papa and mama nanny trying to play parent to us all. I already have parents who are much better people and leaders in every single way than mama and papa nanny.

    The same goes with the media and the electric cars. This green crap being shoved down our throats. I thought the electric car was a good idea, but having the government try to force us into it instead of letting the free market decide is appalling to me as a free thinking American Capitalist! The big question with the media and government trying to push things like the first lady being a smart and beautiful woman is like trying to live in that old saying about ‘are you going to believe me or your lying eyes’ and I happen to think the American people, or at least hope the majority of us can still make or own educated decisions on what is real and what is propaganda and who we want to be our leaders even with the hijacking of the so-called news.

    Back to the media on the green crap and the electric cars. When gas becomes $5 or more per gallon on average and we move onto these expensive tiny green electric cars… what is going to power them? The sun? I think not. The power companies? HOW? They are shutting down coal mines, the same mines that power the country. How can we remove gasoline and only use coal power energy when it’s going to be mass blackouts and brownouts? Also what happens when your electric bill inherits your fuel charges and the government has both boots on the neck of the coal companies? Then your electric bill goes from $150 a month to about $300 a month. In short time that $300 turns into $500 and that $500 a month turns into $750 and eventually your power bill more than quadrupled. Is that worth giving up gasoline, buying a very expensive unsafe electric car that gets 40-80 miles per charge? Maybe to the libs who only care about never making personal decisions and having government running everything, but not to a free thinking American Capitalist like myself and many of you!

    My whole point is the media is responsible for most of the bad things going on. Libs will be libs, the right thinking people will continue to fight on to save the country and maintain freedom, liberty and the Constitution. But the liberal media aka the DNC Pravda be damned for what they do and attempt to do daily…. the lies and propaganda they try to spread to ALL of us! The first step in moving in the right direction is to pound the so-called media into the pavement! A good place to start is in high school and college where journalism is taught by liberal teachers and professors.

  • Out in ’12

    I look forward to the election when they’re tossed out and NObama’s lumpy rumper won’t quit spending. He’d better be looking over the Kenyan real estate ads for a modest mud hut.


    She should wear that “Caaaaptain Videoooooooo” space helmet Norton wore on the Honeymooners. It would go great with that space suit…AND cover her angry mug.


    MICHELLE OBAMA: “Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we’re going to have to change our traditions, our history; we’re going to have to move into a different place as a nation.”

  • pat smear

    Good Lord, people. Get your priorities straight. Michelle was very successful in the private sector prior to giving that up to be First Lady. She’s not buying clothes with your money. And yeah, she did that WHILE being a mother.

    On the other hand, Ann Romney IS buying clothes with money made by her husband’s robbing and exploiting the working class. Don’t believe me? Look up what a private equity firm does to the companies it buys. And the best part is Ann lived the high life while NOT working because she was a mother.

    Help me understand what I’m missing here? Why is Ann Romney someone to applaud? She wouldn’t give you the time of day.

  • @ pat smear: Moochelle only got a high paying j*b after Jefh got into office, and it went away when she moved to DC. the hospital created it just for her. in a completely unrelated move, the hospital got federal earmarks after she was hired.

    before that, she was allegedly w*rking for other politically connected groups there in Coruptiontown, and, somewhere along the way, she had to surrender her law license by court order.

    so no, the First Klingon is NOT what would be called “successful in the private sector” and, of the two, i’d prefer to associate with Ann any day.

  • note to the post author: “Lib Media” is redundant. %-)

  • Remember how the left savaged Condi Rice’s wardrobe choice a immodest?

  • well now

    @pap smear: should’nt you be at an Occupy Rally? The grown ups are talking here sweetheart and it’s time for you to go to bed

  • xiphos

    #4: If the American public has their heads screwed on ‘right’, SHE’LL be nothing more than government surplus drapery come November.

  • Earthmover

    47 At least your parents had a sense of humor (gynocologically speaking). I can’t
    believe ANYONE could be happy with Obama. If Bush had done exactly the same
    things as Obama, he would have been impeached at the very least. Open your
    eyeholes for the sake of this country!

  • Pingback: After Ignoring Michelle Obama’s Expensive Wardrobe For Years, Lib Media Is Suddenly Interested in Ann Romney’s Pricey Clothes | Born Conservative()

  • bg


    pat smear #47 May 2, 2012 at 4:57 pm

    Meesh & Pumski

    the rest of your post is, well, embarrassing..

    you really need to stop posting & do some research..


  • sandy

    Michelle looks more like first hooker than first lady in that ridiculous ill fitting crap. At least she should wear a girdle to keep her rolls of fat in cased.

  • tru

    Cutlers Bad Thumb commented:
    What do you think Moochie is thinking in that picture ?

    Well, considering you can clearly see her adult diaper through the fabric, she can’t be looking for a leak.

  • Linda

    #47 pat smear commented May 2, 2012 at 4:57 pm
    On the other hand, Ann Romney IS buying clothes with money made by her husband’s robbing


  • Andy

    “Anyone who hates Obama is a hardcore racist. That is a fact!

    Let us know when you learn to walk upright. I have a feeling it’s going to be awhile.

  • Pingback: After Ignoring Michelle Obama’s Expensive Wardrobe For Years, Lib Media Is Suddenly Interested in Ann Romney’s Pricey Clothes | Liberal Whoppers()

  • Pingback: Media Suddenly Takes Interest in the Price Tag of the Clothing of a Candidate’s Wife | The Lonely Conservative()

  • Ajanel

    Aunque la mona se vista de seda mona se queda.

  • Rachelle

    Did she step off the space ship from Planet of the Apes in that outfit?

  • Obamas regulation destroy jobs

    so ugly….the outfit…why doesn’t she give the money she spends to the UN? and help the poor in Kenyan? they are racist hypocrites…Tom Hank /Clooney should be proud..

  • Earthmover

    This is worth reading and passing on!

    I was born in one country, raised in another. My father

    was born in another country. I was not his only child.

    He fathered several children with numerous women.

    I became very close to my mother, as my father showed no

    interest in me.

    Although my father deserted me and my mother raised me, I

    later wrote a book idolizing my father—-not my mother.

    Later in life, questions arose over my real name.

    My birth records were sketchy.

    No one was able to produce a legitimate, reliable birth certificate.

    I grew up practicing one faith but converted to

    Christianity, as it was widely accepted in my new country, but I

    practiced non-traditional beliefs and didn’t follow Christianity,

    except in the public eye under scrutiny.

    I worked and lived among lower-class people as a young

    adult, disguising myself as someone who really cared about them.

    That was before I decided it was time to get serious about

    my life and embarked on a new career.

    I wrote a book about my struggles growing up.

    It was clear to those who read my memoirs, that I had

    difficulties accepting that my father abandoned me as a child.

    I became active in local politics in my 30’s then, with

    help behind the scenes, I literally burst onto the scene as a

    candidate for national office in my 40’s.

    They said I had a golden tongue and could talk anyone into anything.

    I had a virtually non-existent resume, little work

    history, and no experience in leading a single organization.

    Yet I was a powerful speaker and citizens were drawn to

    me, as though I were a magnet and they were small roofing tacks.

    I drew incredibly large crowds during my public appearances.

    This bolstered my ego.

    At first, my political campaign focused on my country’s

    foreign policy…

    I was very critical of my country in the last war, and

    seized every opportunity to bash my country.

    But what launched my rise to national prominence were my

    views on the country’s economy.

    I pretended to have a really good plan on how we could do

    better, and every poor person would be fed and housed for free.

    I knew which group was responsible for getting us into this mess.

    It was the free market, banks and corporations.

    I decided to start making citizens hate them and, if they

    became envious of others who did well, the plan was clinched tight.

    I called mine “A People’s Campaign.”

    That sounded good to all people.

    I was the surprise candidate because I emerged from

    outside the traditional path of politics and was able to gain

    widespread popular support.

    I knew that, if I merely offered the people ‘hope’,

    together we could change our country and the world..

    So, I started to make my speeches sound like they were on

    behalf of the downtrodden, poor, ignorant to include “persecuted


    My true views were not widely known and I kept them

    unknown, until after I became my nation’s leader.

    I had to carefully guard reality, as anybody could have

    easily found out what I really believed, if they had simply read my

    writings and examined those people I associated with. I’m glad they


    Then I became the most powerful man in the world.

    And then the world learned the truth.

    Who am I?


    If you were thinking of SOMEONE ELSE, you should be

    scared, very scared!

  • Toddski

    First of all, someone needs to tell what the hell she is wearing…..This looks totally classless, and brings more attention to her flat tits, and big ass, not to mention, she looks like a man in drag……UGH !

  • xiphos

    Nothing there that a wheelbarrow full of bondo couldn’t help.

  • Rachelle

    Ajanel commented:

    Aunque la mona se vista de seda mona se queda.

    So true.

  • Sarah

    She looks just like a first “lady of the evening”. Could she be any more classless?

  • sandy

    God Bless Ann and keep her strong. She can be a marvelous First Lady we can all look up to.

  • stephen E. Morgan

    Man that is one ugly disgusting man on Stage dressed in freakish womans clothes…

  • regeya
  • regeya

    “Michelle Obama Criticized as “Modern-day Marie Antoinette” Over Spain Vacation”

    CBS News, August 5, 2010

  • Vincent Pinson

    @#16 WIN!!!!

    “So, we are supposed to be outraged by what the Romneys do with their money, but no care what the Obamas do with ours?”

    “It’s 100 percent a Reed Krakoff shirt, but we 100 percent didn’t send it to her,” the rep added. “We don’t get involved politically.”

    As if they’d be trip-dribbling all over themselves if Mooch-elle had worn their shirt.

  • bg


    Michelle looks like she’s “packin” in that dominatrix number..


  • juandos

    Well no matter how talented the designer, how expensive the material Michelle will still look like banjo butt from the hood

  • Pingback: Michelle Obama Bizarre Fashion Fails – Best of the Worst Collection « LEADING MALAYSIAN NEOCON()

  • Pingback: Anonymous()

  • Pingback: Bias on Display: Media Ignores Michelle O’s $2700 Sweater But Attacks Ann Romney for $990 Top|Politifreak()

  • Pingback: URL()

  • Pingback: Lawrence O’Donnell Slams Ann Romney for Wearing $990 Shirt on TV|Politifreak()

  • pat smear

    @well now, I guess the adults don’t get pseudonym irony, then – otherwise you wouldn’t have misspelled my name in your attempt to ridicule me.

    And if this page is any example of the nescient, poorly researched, conspiracy-laden, misanthropic calumny that we expect from adults in our society, then I fear for our country tremendously.

    Did you understand what I meant by that, or should I speak in W. for you?

  • pat smear

    And while I’m at it, @bg, you’re accusing the First Lady of profiteering? Hmmm…

    You do realize that the amount of money you’re up in arms over doesn’t even amount to what Romney called “the few bucks” he made at public speaking events LAST YEAR?

    And of course you realize the vast fortunes Romney has made through his deep connections to Goldman Sachs, right? What has Goldman Sachs done for you? That’s right, criminally ruin the economy to enrich an elite, fraudulent few. Like Mitters, so Ann can now afford her $1,000 shirts.

  • Pingback: Lawrence O’Donnell Slams Ann Romney for Wearing $990 Shirt on TV()

  • Mary Schmidt

    You folks do realize how petty you’re being, don’t you? Here’s a little sanity check for you: Would you say some of these horrible, nasty things to Ms. Obama’s face? Would you say it to anyone’s face? I know it won’t make you hate the Obamas any less, but the fact is most of the clothes are donated to the first lady. Just as they were for Nancy Reagan and Laura Bush. I’m an Obama supporter and am proud of the First Lady. I don’t think everything she wears works, but then I’m sure she could say the same about me.

    P.S. Yep, that’s my real name. If I say it, I own it. And, now I think I need to do something worthwhile in the real world. Like – oh, I dunno – make a sandwich. Peace out. A flowchart of the internet argument to end all internet arguments

  • Pingback: Lawrence O’Donnell Slams Ann Romney for Wearing $990 Shirt on TV |()

  • bg


    Mary Schmidt #87 May 3, 2012 at 5:05 pm

    re: You folks do realize how petty you’re being, don’t you?

    oh yeah, we most certainly do, i mean, hardly a day goes by
    that Obama, the Dems, or his MSM minions don’t remind US..


  • bg


    pat smear #85 May 3, 2012 at 9:59 am

    re: [And while I’m at it, @bg, you’re
    accusing the First Lady of profiteering?]

    i am??

    rotf 😆 mbo!!


  • bg
  • bg


    pat smear #84 May 3, 2012 at 9:46 am

    ipso facto: W. (GWB) was the only one who never uttered
    the words NEW WORLD ORDER, go “conspiracy” figure..

    more here & here in connecting links & threads..


  • bg


    re: #91 May 3, 2012 at 6:37 pm bg

    oh yeah, a bit more re: GS..


  • Pingback: Homepage()

  • Pingback: Media Suddenly Takes Interest in the Price Tag of the Clothing of a Candidate’s Wife « Cajun Conservatism()

  • Pingback: AWGBlog » Blog Archive » $2000 Sweater, $990 Shirt… seriously? Why?()

  • pat smear

    #90 @bg, Forgive me, I’m a bit out of practice in arguing with myopic, illogical people.

    Let me get this straight. You refute my comments (#47) by posting links to videos that accuse the First Lady of using her position to make unethical money. Do we agree on that?

    By definition, that act is a form of profiteering, is it not? Do we agree on that?

    Well, then, reason clearly dictates that you, through posting those links, ipso facto, accused the First Lady of profiteering.

    Wow. I better brush off the cobwebs before the election season heats up. You conspiracy folks are in top form.

    As for Goldman Sachs, the article I posted wasn’t referring to campaign contributions. It was WAS TALKING ABOUT MITTENS’ PERSONAL WEALTH!

    Also, here’s a site you might want to keep handy to check your facts. Turns out, according to this unbiased source, you had it backward. Goldman Sachs was ROMNEY’S LEADING CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTOR, not Obama’s

  • Dominique

    so many racist comments from people without any pictures or real names lol all the kkk members still hide inder their hoods

  • Pingback: Words Matter – 5/8/12: With Romney as presumed nominee, why are Paul supporters so happy? (Video) | Red White Blue News()