Democrat Party Is Losing Christian Voters in Droves Thanks To Barack Obama

Last week Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan lashed out at the Obama Administration for forcing religious organizations to go out into the marketplace and buy a product that violates their conscience. New Obama regulations will force Christian organizations to provide free contraceptives, sterilizations and abortion drugs to workers even though this violates Catholic Church teaching. The new rules are so strict that most Catholic institutions will not qualify for an exemption.

This week the military is telling Catholic Chaplains what they can and cannot say about the Obama Administration.

These are just the latest examples of Obama’s war on Christians.

So it really comes as no surprise that religious voters are fleeing the Democrat Party and Barack Obama.
Redstate reported, via FOX Nation:

The topline number in this Pew survey shows that the current breakdown among registered voters is 43/48 GOP/Dem, which is a seven point shift from their 39/51 results in 2008. Now that alone should worry the Democrats, seeing as Pew found that the breakdown in 2010 was 43/47, which was the year where Democrats got shellacked across the country; but the news is if anything worse when you look at the breakdown by religious affiliation. A lot of attention will be on how Jewish support for the GOP went from 20/72 to 29/65 between ’08 and today; but what may be even more important is that that GOP support among white Mainline Protestant and white Catholic voters flipped from 45/45 and 41/49 in 2008 to 51/39 & 49/42 in 2011. How this will translate into likely voters is, of course, anybody’s guess… but if you’ve been wondering why the President is suddenly talking about how neat God is, it’s probably because somebody on his staff is keeping track of Pew.

When Rick Santorum says Barack Obama is the most anti-religion president in history, he now has data to back him up.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • Liz


  • No Man

    If one has a well-formed conscience one will not vote for demonic (prowling America for the ruin of souls) party candidates.

  • nana

    We must vote him out in Nov 2012. B. O. is a long nightmare, he has to go.

  • Patty

    The Catholic Vote, a guide for Catholics

    According to the Catholic Bishops AND the Pope i.e. Pope Benedict XVI, there are non negotiable issues which include abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research and same sex marriage. Catholics need to ask what a candidate’s stand is, on these non negotiable issues and vote accordingly. If a Catholic votes for a candidate BECAUSE of, for example, their pro abortion stand, they might be committing a serious sin. Because of the number of deaths caused by abortion, of totally innocent humans, many Bishops have suggested that the abortion “non negotiable” trumps the other non negotiable issues. Unfortunately in most elections, there is no candidate with pro life stands on all of the non negotiable issues. War, is, by the way, NOT one of the non negotiable issues because the church feels at times, a society may feel that war is the only way of protecting their citizens (as the consensus was after the horrendous 9/11 attack).

    Is it wrong to be a “one issue voter”? We are ALL one issue voters. For example, what if a candidate told you that he or she was in favor of terrorism, would you even CARE what his or her stands on “other issues” was? Everyone answers “NO” to that.

    Well, abortion kills millions more human beings EACH YEAR than terrorism has killed in the last 50 years!

    What if you feel the liberal policies of the pro abortion candidate would cut down abortions more than the conservative policies of the pro life candidate?

    You know that is NOT true when the abortion industry has funded a candidate heavily. For example, Planned Parenthood spent 5 million dollars to win over 5 swing states for Al Gore in 2000 (and it worked to win those states although Gore lost the election). Planned Parenthood also spent 10 million dollars to help elect Barack Obama. Planned Parenthood is the largest provider of abortions in the USA. Do you think Planned Parenthood would fund a candidate whose policies would reduce the number of abortions?

  • Patty

    Well, abortion kills millions more human beings EACH YEAR than terrorism has killed in the last 50 years!

    Mind blowing. God help us!

  • Patty

    According to the Catholic Bishops AND the Pope i.e. Pope Benedict XVI, there are non negotiable issues which include abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research and same sex marriage.

    Now, if this is the Catholic’s belief, why would the vote for a democrat. They sound more Conservative to me.

  • Patty

    Once Obama is out of office and his imprint is substantially gone, Catholics may come back to the fold.

    There is an explosion that has been ignored. The youth, they are turning against Obama and some for the pot factor are going to Paul but that isn’t the only reason. He would never do what Obama has done and said in reference to the Catholic church.

    But Paul has other problems, indeed. The statements that the HHS has made and Obama’s threatening religious freedoms have been the throne in the side of Catholics every where.

    Obama will be asked, I predict by the Pope for an audience soon.

  • Patty

    Can someone who voted AGAINST the ban of partial birth abortion really care about the poor people?

    Partial birth abortion is a type of infanticide where a viable baby is killed WITHOUT anesthetic! Ask how the candidate whom you are considering voting for, voted when the Partial Birth Abortion Ban bill came before Congress or if not in Congress, ask what his/her stand on the Partial Birth Abortion is. (Even many Democrats voted for the ban! The ban did pass but Planned Parenthood is holding it up in court.

    I believe Obama did vote for Partial Birth and I do believe he said He Doesn’t Want His Daughters Punished with a Baby

    Now, here are some reasons why the Catholics will rethink their vote.

  • BuddyG

    God Bless America

  • bg


    Patty #8 February 4, 2012 at 6:59 pm

    yes, yes he did..


  • bg


    Newt Gingrich



    [GINGRICH: Give you just two more examples. I will sign on that day
    an executive order reinstating Ronald Reagan’s Mexico City policy. No
    U.S. money will go anywhere in the world to pay for abortion, period.

    And finally, many of you may have noticed that the Obama
    administration has declared war on the Catholic Church and
    other religious institutions. I want you to know that, on the
    very first day, I will sign an executive order repealing every
    anti-religious act of the Obama administration as of that


  • retire05

    So now Catholics are upset because a straw has finally broken the camel’s back? Gee, where have they been for the last 70 years? The Church was designed for one thing, and that was to teach the lessons passed on to us by Christ. Part of those lessons including caring for the elderly, the sick and the poor. You know, that whole charity from the heart pricipal. But the Bishops were more than useful idiots, being all too happy to hand that responsibility over to the government.

    Care for the elderly? Well, hand that over to FDR who was more than happy to give us a false sense of security with Social “Security.” The poor? Nah, the government picked up that tab, as well with LBJ’s Great Society. The sick? Well, if we can get the government to handle the sick that are poor, we won’t be having to pay for some poor smuck who comes into our Church owned hospitals and doesn’t have any money. The government will just tax all those Protestants to pay for it. And golly gee, this all fits in with our “social justice” road we have taken (don’t call it Marxism) and now we can just invest in things like stock and bonds, not people.

    But we do have to build churches, you know. So let’s build them like supermarkets, not the glorious edifaces that we were once known for that was a testament to our love of God. No, no, let’s build them with a monitary value in mind so that if we lose too many parishioners, we can just sell it to someone else who can turn it into a community center or hell, just add a minaret and turn it into a mosque.

    And hell, while we’re at it, let’s get rid of most of our traditions, like the Mass as said forever, and turn in more in to a Kumbaya ceremony. We can all shake hands and say “Peace be upon you”, even knowing that the slug we are shaking hands with beats his kids or the woman cheats on her husband with his best friend. And while we are at it, we will add deacons, you know, like the Episcopalians and get rid of that alter railing thing that is, you know, so, so Catholic. Hello, Vatican II?

    But now, after 70 years of turning their back on what Christ’s Church was designed for, the Bishops are upset. But there will be no protests, no marches, no speaking out from the pulpit telling parishioners that the time to end the socialist takeover of our faith is here; no, no, the Bishops will sent a letter. Well, that should do the trick, don’t you think? I mean, when you send a letter to your Congressman, you always get a response, right?

    Too little, too late? Perhaps. But the Church allowed this to happen. Seventy years ago.

  • Gloria Gilson

    Ted Kennedy wrote an unpublished codicil to his famous 2009 letter to the Pope,

    in which he implodes the Pope to write an amicus curia brief to St. Peter on his (Ted’s) behalf.

    Included in that codicil was a further plea for the Pope to issue writs of excommunication for any Catholic who did not subscribe to every single agenda item of the Democrat Party, most esp. health care.

    The Pope has now given his answer.

  • retire05

    bg, Gingrich had the opportunity to make Reagan’s Mexico City policy permanent when he was Speaker of the House. Where was he then? Perhaps too busy trying to find tony committees for Randy “Duke” Cunningham to serve on?

  • Gloria Gilson

    Kennedy’s letter to the Pope consisted of 11 paragraphs.

    10 of those paragraphs began with “I.”

  • Molon Labe

    I do not believe this is completely true. The Dhimmierats will attract Muslims, hate Amerikkaists, and Marxists as well as Afro-Kwazawana racists, to their particular temple of the Dear Leader.

  • retire05

    I will know the Church is serious about returning to its fundamentals when it excommicates John Kerry and Nancy Pelosi.

  • Knox

    The problem here is that the Catholic Church in America and American Catholics are not the same thing.

  • bg


    retire05 #14 February 4, 2012 at 7:32 pm

    “As to US contributions to the United Nations Fund for Population Activities,
    their continuation will be conditional on “concrete assurances” that no part
    of the US monies will be used for abortion and the Fund does not support
    abortion or coercive family planning programs”

    -US Policy Statement for the International
    Conference on Population, 1984

    Speaker Gingrich was one of nearly 150 co-sponsors of a bill in 1989
    which included provisions to fund the UN Population Fund. He never
    voted for this legislation and this never became law. This bill would not
    have overturned the Mexico City policy, and this funding would never
    have gone through. Gingrich was assured that Ronald Reagan’s “Mexico
    City Policy,” which prohibits any American tax dollars from funding or
    promoting abortions overseas, was in effect, so no funds from this bill
    would go toward supporting China’s barbaric “One Child” policy or any
    other programs that used abortion as means for “population control.”

    Gingrich has always supported the Mexico City policy, and on day one of
    his presidency, he will reinstate Ronald Reagan’s policy to assure that
    no tax dollars fund non-governmental agencies or charities that perform
    or promote abortions in foreign countries.


  • Tom Whitcomb

    No candidate as far as I know has articulated any views as to abortion, same sex marriage, or how evil the present administration is, and what their doing to this country. Catholics have a moral obligation to vote this demon out.

  • retire05

    bg, Bill Clinton recinded the Mexico City Policy in 1993 via Executive Order. And who was in the House at the time, with the capabilities to write legislation? And who was speaker of the House until 1999? Oh, gee, that’s right; NEWT GINGRICH.

    Are we to assume that Gingrich was such an inept Speaker that he could not lobby for, and get, legislation that would have made Reagan’s Mexico City Policy permanent? If that is the case, why would anyone want to vote for him, any more than they would want to vote for a northeastern progressive?

  • pill

    Give me a break they got what they one bares more responsibility than Catholics for Obama Care.same bunch that pull the lever for Durbiin and are quiet on Pelosi..

    No sympathy here..


    Cradle to the grave catholic

  • Taqiyyotomist

    Then there was G.W.

    George Washington, that is.

    Read it and weep.

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    Democrat Party Is Losing Christian Voters in Droves Thanks To Barack Obama

    I seriously doubt that they’re turning into conservatives though…

  • Taqiyyotomist

    George Washington:

    While we are zealously performing the duties of good citizens and soldiers, we certainly ought not to be inattentive to the higher duties of religion. To the distinguished character of Patriot, it should be our highest glory to add the more distinguished character of Christian.

    John Adams, 2nd U.S. president:

    “Suppose a nation in some distant Region should take the Bible for their only law Book, and every member should regulate his conduct by the precepts there exhibited! Every member would be obliged in conscience, to temperance, frugality, and industry; to justice, kindness, and charity towards his fellow men; and to piety, love, and reverence toward Almighty God … What a Eutopia, what a Paradise would this region be.”


    “The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were the general principles of Christianity. I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God.”

    Thomas Jefferson, 3rd U.S. president:

    This must be bolded:

    “God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the Gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever; That a revolution of the wheel of fortune, a change of situation, is among possible events; that it may become probable by Supernatural influence! The Almighty has no attribute which can take side with us in that event.”

    The Almighty has no attribute which can [IS EVEN CAPABLE OF] taking side with us in that event.

    Hello, folks. Welcome to “that event”.

    What’s coming to our nation ain’t pretty, and Jefferson laid it out right there, plain and simple.

  • Mac in NM

    It just doesn’t matter. Catholics will still overwhelmingly vote for Obama. Especially the Hispanics.

  • Taqiyyotomist

    John Hancock, 1st signer of the Declaration of Independence

    “Resistance to tyranny becomes the Christian and social duty of each individual. … Continue steadfast and, with a proper sense of your dependence on God, nobly defend those rights which heaven gave, and no man ought to take from us.”

    Benjamin Franklin, signer of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution:

    “Here is my Creed. I believe in one God, the Creator of the Universe. That He governs it by His Providence. That He ought to be worshipped.

    That the most acceptable service we render to him is in doing good to his other children. That the soul of man is immortal, and will be treated with justice in another life respecting its conduct in this. These I take to be the fundamental points in all sound religion, and I regard them as you do in whatever sect I meet with them.

    As to Jesus of Nazareth, my opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the system of morals and his religion, as he left them to us, is the best the world ever saw, or is likely to see;

    But I apprehend it has received various corrupting changes, and I have, with most of the present dissenters in England, some doubts as to his divinity; though it is a question I do not dogmatize upon, having never studied it, and think it needless to busy myself with it now, when I expect soon an opportunity of knowing the truth with less trouble. I see no harm, however, in its being believed, if that belief has the good consequence, as probably it has, of making his doctrines more respected and more observed; especially as I do not perceive, that the Supreme takes it amiss, by distinguishing the unbelievers in his government of the world with any peculiar marks of his displeasure.”

    Heady stuff — these folks were as wise as Solomon.

    As we can see, now, reading their prognostications in hindsight.

  • Pingback: Religious Voters Flee Democrat Party and Obama | ()

  • Adi

    I thought it was only “them Jews” turning their backs to the (self)anointed One.

    Peoples is raaacists, after all.

  • Pingback: Democrat Party Is Losing Christian Voters in Droves Thanks To Barack Obama()

  • bg


    retire05 #21 February 4, 2012 at 8:02 pm

    could you please provide a link to
    back up your claims, thank you..

    January 22, 1993

    Memorandum on the Mexico City Policy

    January 26, 2009

    President Obama Rescinds Mexico City Policy


  • Taqiyyotomist

    But damn, it’s gonna be an interesting year.

    Goodnight GP. Good night, Mary Ellen. Good night, John Boy.

  • retire05

    bg, you presented the EO that reversed the Mexico City Policy by Clinton. Your favorite research site, Wikipedia, also states that Clinton reversed it.

    So what’s your deal?

    Did Gingrich not have six years to create legislation that would have made the Mexico City Policy irreversible or not? Why, yes, bg, he did.

  • retire05

    bg, read the last sentence in your second link and tell us what it says.

  • bg


    re: #31 February 4, 2012 at 8:39 pm bg

    July 28, 2011


    3. Newt Gingrich (former speaker of the House,
    1995-1998; former U.S. rep. of Georgia, 1979-1998)

    NARAL reports that Gingrich cast 74 votes on abortion and other
    reproductive-rights issues; 72 of those were considered to be
    “anti-choice.” He has repeatedly voted for the Federal Abortion
    Ban, which criminalizes some abortion services, and he has voted
    to eliminate the Title X family-planning program. He signed the
    SBA List pledge last month.

    From Gingrich’s 2012 presidential campaign website:

    “End taxpayer subsidies for abortion by repealing Obamacare, defunding Planned Parenthood, and reinstating the ‘Mexico City Policy’ which banned funding to organizations that promote and/or perform abortions overseas.”


  • bg


    re: #31 February 4, 2012 at 8:39 pm bg

    The American Presidency Project

    Memorandum for the Acting Administrator of
    the Agency for International Development

    Subject: AID Family Planning Grants/Mexico City Policy

    The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 prohibits nongovernmental organizations (“NGO’s”) that receive Federal funds from using those funds “to pay for the performance of abortions as a method of family planning, or to motivate or coerce any person to practice abortions.” (22 U.S.C. 215lb(f)(1)). The August 1984 announcement by President Reagan of what has become know as the “Mexico City Policy” directed the Agency for International Development (“AID”) to expand this limitation and withhold AID funds from NGO’s that engage in a wide range of activities, including providing advice, counseling, or information regarding abortion, or lobbying a foreign government to legalize or make abortion available. These conditions have been imposed even where an NGO uses non-AID funds for abortion-related activities.

    These excessively broad anti-abortion conditions are unwarranted. I am informed that the conditions are not mandated by the Foreign Assistance Act or any other law. Moreover, they have undermined efforts to promote safe and efficacious family planning programs in foreign nations. Accordingly, I hereby direct that AID remove the conditions not explicitly mandated by the Foreign Assistance Act or any other law from all current AID grants to NGO’s and exclude them from future grants.


  • retire05

    Since bg, being the dishonest person she is, will not admit that I was right about Bill Clinton recinding the Mexico City Policy by providing the last sentence to her own USAID link, I will:

    “The policy has been in effect from 1985 until 1993, when it was recinded by President Bill Clinton.”

    Now, wipe the egg off your face, bg.

  • bg


    retire05 #37 February 4, 2012 at 8:55 pm

    again, this is NOT about me..

    you try to make EVERYTHING about me..

    hah, well you go right ahead baiting & switching, twisting & shouting,
    because i truly don’t give a flying bats guano what you think of me.. 😛


  • Patty


    Translation: “N. Korea Obtained a High-speed American Drone…Developing it into an Attack UAV”
    Yonhap News

    /begin my excerpts

    “N. Korea Obtained a High-speed American Drone…Developing it into an Attack UAV”

    Smuggled ‘MQM-107D’ from Mid-East…carried out a few test flights

    (Seoul=Yonhap News) Kim Gwi-keun = N. Korea obtained a high-speed drone produced in U.S. and is developing an attack drone based on it.

    A military source said on Feb. 5, “N. Korea recently obtained several ‘MQM-107D’ Streakers from a Mid-eastern country, probably Syria, and is developing an attack UAV based on it.”

    The source said that they equipped the high-speed drone with high explosive bomb(s) and performed a few flight tests but have not yet had the success, according to the intelligence authorities.

  • retire05

    bg, why do you think it is about you? Because that is what your over inflated ego demands?

    You made a point that Gingrich was for the Mexico City Policy. I pointed out that while he was in the House, even as Speaker, he did nothing to make it permanent since Clinton recinded it in 1993, when he had not only the authority, but the power to initiate legislation that would have made Reagans policy permanent. You, thinking you are the sharpest tack in the box, questioned that. But then went on to prove me right with your own links.

    You proved me right, and also proved that you’re not the sharpest tack in the box.


  • bg


    Patty #39 February 4, 2012 at 9:09 pm

    “North, 美 Table timely introduction of high-speed
    unmanned attack aircraft under development.”

    we are going to get hit, by whom when is irrelevant..

    unfortunately i also believe that’s what it’s going to take to wake US up.. 🙁


  • It is beyond me how people of faith could have supported a party that espouses, supports and embraces abortion and homosexuality to begin with.

  • catholics have been supporters of the democratic party. but not this democratic party.

  • OxyCon

    I don’t know how anyone who calls themselves a Catholic could vote for Obama.

  • OxyCon

    The Catholic Church in the United States is part of the worldwide Catholic Church, the Christian Church in full communion with the Pope. With more than 68.5 registered million members, it is the largest single religious denomination in the United States, comprising about 22 percent of the population.

    We need to make sure that all Catholics know what Obama is doing to their religion and their religious beliefs and make sure that the Catholic turnout reaches historical numbers.

  • Obamas regulation destroy jobs

    He is a fake…Jarrett his shadow makes me sick..they support Holder who allowed weapons to kill 300+ Hispanics and an ice agent but supports terrorists and radical Islamist. Jarrett is an Iranian ….they sent IRAN a drone plane with a big red ribbon…they openly told Iran about Israels plan..he gives our military secrets away…shuts down our defense shields.

    His speech is so fake……he is a racist bigot! so now he telling us I will tithe for you with your tax money…he is even trying to dominate us in free will on how much we give to our own church!!!!!!! And we are being forced to pay for abortions..and dumming down school grading system, school lunches and how we raise our kids..this is Lenin communism!!!!

  • Pingback: Religious Voters Flee Democrat Party and Obama | Liberal Whoppers()

  • Elaine S.

    “It is beyond me how people of faith could have supported a party that espouses, supports and embraces abortion and homosexuality to begin with.”

    Probably because of historic, ethnic and cultural allegiances going back to the Depression/FDR era or farther. The Democratic Party did not ALWAYS “embrace abortion and homosexuality.” No political party embraced abortion until at least the 1970s; homosexuality didn’t become a national issue until the AIDS epidemic started in the 1980s, and gay marriage didn’t become an issue until the 1990s. It’s taken this long for the message to finally sink in that “this is not your father’s (or mother’s, or grandparents’) Democratic Party anymore.”

  • Elaine S.

    “Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever”

    And don’t forget another famous Jefferson quote:

    “…this momentous question, like a fire bell in the night, awakened and filled me with terror. I considered it at once as the knell of the Union….I regret that I am now to die in the belief that the useless sacrifice of themselves, by the generation of 1776, to acquire self government and happiness to their country, is to be thrown away by the unwise and unworthy passions of their sons, and that my only consolation is to be that I live not to weep over it.”

    The latter quote was written in 1820 and refers to the so-called Missouri Compromise regarding the future extension of slavery. However, I think Jefferson’s words can apply to today in the sense that other issues the political/media establishment would have us believe to be “settled” or inevitable (including, but not limited to, abortion and gay marriage) have NOT been and are in fact becoming even more explosive.

  • Pingback: - Democrat Party Is Losing Christian Voters in Droves Thanks To …()

  • Adi


    A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong. Henrik Ibsen

    Just pick the majority/minority of your choice, and prove Ibsen right.

  • Adi

    “to prove” instead of “and prove”.

  • wanumba

    #38 February 4, 2012 at 9:04 pm
    bg commented:

    retire05 #37 February 4, 2012 at 8:55 pm
    again, this is NOT about me..
    you try to make EVERYTHING about me..

    Yes. It’s very noticeable. Personalizing the issues.

    But the rest of the time, it’s “Wormtongue” a constant, deliberate subversive narrative of dismissal, twisting, defeat and despair on behalf of Sauron.

  • Pingback: Sunday……open thread day « Newsbird's Views()

  • bg


    wanumba #53 February 5, 2012 at 5:52 am

    hobbits are nodding in agreement..

    there is just no disguising guttural..


  • Pingback: Sunday Roundup 2/5/12 TOM BRADY Edition()

  • JaneInBoston

    The stench of evil from this White House reeks to the skies.

  • Pingback: Christian voters leaving Democrat Party in droves | Lake Minnetonka Liberty()

  • Pingback: Christian voters leaving Democrat Party in droves | The Navigator()