Newt Gingrich: Defeating Obama “Most Dangerous President in US History” Is a “Duty Of National Security” (Video)

#1 February 21, 2012 at 9:26 am

Militant Conservative commented:

Anybody but Obama.

Coming to Carrollton Ga. Feb. 28th.

University of west Georgia.

#2 February 21, 2012 at 9:28 am

Finncrisp commented:

Newt is often right, and this is one of those times. We must end this Administration, and it’s destruction of our country through Marxist philosophy. We are enrtering and era of absolute state control of everything if we don’t.

#3 February 21, 2012 at 9:30 am

David Kramer commented:

I will have to plug my favorite author on Muzloids, Ann Barnhardt. She calls them what they are. Newt is correct. Islam is a death cult set up as a theocratic totalitarian system. They are inherently insane.

Tell me Muslims, how can you have a religion that allows you to go against your religion on certain days because Allah will not be watching on those days? What kind of frelling insanity is that?

Go get em Newt!

#4 February 21, 2012 at 9:35 am

Lady Mondegreen commented:

Newt may have a point, but electing him would be very, very dangerous. He has the attention span of a hummingbird, and he says absolutely anything that comes into his head. Not presidential material.

#5 February 21, 2012 at 9:39 am

Patty commented:

Michael Savage: Obama is a National Security Risk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmjx8ciw5jE

Obama Weakens Visa Requirements, Ignores National Security Risk

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/obama-weakens-visa-requirements-ignores-national-security-risk-137703158.html

__________________

Obama’s Incompetence is a National Security Risk

Twice in one week that Obama made our enemy stronger. First, he rejected the Keystone XL pipeline, the American people should be outraged at this lunacy. Here we have a friendly and good neighbor (Canada) that has our best interest, yet Obama turns his back on them to appease his lunatics base the environmentalist. At the same time, Canada is not going to wait on this president to make up his mind. He has delayed this process for three years while China has been waiting for Obama’s incompetency. Well it has paid off for China’s patience.

The environmentalist and the media are so un-American and nuts, they think by lobbying against the pipeline would save America environmentally? Do they think this is the first pipeline America trying to have to move any kind of liquid? Well, they should think about all of the water, sewer, gas, oil, and gasoline pipelines that are in existence throughout America? Some above ground and some are under. The crazy think about these environmentalist, they think that by restricting America from exploring the nation’s oil resources or importing oil from Canada would save the planet. How about the environmental policies of China, India, Russia, and the rest of the third world. They don’t give 2 cents about the environment. Also, they forgot to think about that for every dollar America spend on oil imported from Canada, they send America 90 cents. How crazy is that?

The second evidence of Obama’s incompetency is when Brazil stiffs Obama and signs an oil deal with China. This is after Obama’s visit to Brazil offering them loans and help in developing their offshore oil wells. Now, common sense and the patriotism should tell you that if you are in charge of a very wealthy country such as America with natural resources, you would obviously explore your own resources so you would not depend on other countries nor open yourself to blackmail. NO, not with Obama. He really love America by locking up the doors to expolring the countries natural resources, depending on forgien oil from countries who hate America, and risk its national security by empowering communist China. What a leader? The liberals and the elite must be celebrating for having an incompetant American president doing their bedding by distroying America.

Under Obama and democratic leadership, central and south America is returning to socialistic/communistic control. The Brazilian president is no different. Ms Rousseff, a former Marxist rebel who was imprisoned for three years in the early 1970s for resisting military rule, has promised to protect freedom of expression and worship, and to honour the constitution.

People with common sense cannot help but wonder if there is a special relationship between Ms. Rousseff and the Chinese. There are a lot of commonality between Obama and Rousseff. Both share a socialistic and Marxist ideologies. Both are an an awe of China and its new rise on the world stage. And both of them are doing everything they can to allow China have a greater influence in the western hemisphere.

It is very clear, that the domocrats, liberals, the elites, and an incompetent president are a National Security risk. America is not in their hearts best interest.

America WAKE UP. You MUST vote this incompetent president out of office in November 2012.

http://www.cfns.org/blog/obamas-incompetence-is-a-national-security-risk/

#6 February 21, 2012 at 9:41 am

Patty commented:

When you compromise our Greatness in for the sake of appeasing other nations and those nations see you are contradicting America’s Intelligence, you make us look weak.

#7 February 21, 2012 at 9:48 am

Mac commented:

Lady Monedgreen : Newt MAY have a point? But he is dangerous?Explain how he is dangerous. And please enough with the insults. Newt Gingrich is very intelligent man

#8 February 21, 2012 at 9:50 am

jorgen commented:

And Newt can beat Obama.

#9 February 21, 2012 at 9:52 am

Patty commented:

You may not think it but Obama care also puts our National Security at risk. Cost for the pet peeve Project will place our nation in spiral down.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/dec/13/obamacare-stalls-american-economic-engine/?page=all

An example of Obamacare’s job-crushing provisions is the new tax on manufacturers of medical devices. Already burdened by America’s anti-competitive tax code, these companies are forced by Obamacare to pay the federal government an additional 2.3 percent tax on their sales to the federal government. Worse still, this tax must be paid even if a company has lost money for the year, as many start-ups do, or is engaged in vital but expensive research and development. At the time President Obama signed Obamacare into law, medical-device companies employed nearly half a million Americans – and now job cuts are being announced.

Other Virginia companies and workers face tough times under Obamacare, too. For example, Norfolk Southern Railway announced in the first quarter of last year it would have to pay a $27 million charge for new health care costs. And Brinks, a Richmond-based security firm with worldwide reach, paid an additional $14 million in taxes because of Obamacare. Even though Mr. Kaine proclaimed this legislative “reform will control costs and lower costs for middle-class families,” it is now clear that the opposite is true. In fact, new data reveal that the cost of health insurance will increase nearly fourtimes as a result of Obamacare than would have been the case had it not passed.

The Office of the Actuary in the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced health insurance costs will rise by nearly 14 percent in 2014 instead of 3.5 percent, as would have been the case had Democrats not pushed through the legislation on a party-line vote.

Simply put, Obamacare is harming our job creators and destroying jobs through taxes and penalties.

We know that this is not the health care reform Americans want or deserve.

Instead of a government takeover, Americans want common-sense solutions that reduce costs, increase access to quality care, and put patients and doctors – not bureaucrats – in control.
_______________

Sarah is right another great article at the Daily Caller

#10 February 21, 2012 at 9:53 am

LookUp commented:

No one is more dangerous and more of an American enemy than Obama and his ilk. NOONE. Newt has his problems but on THIS issue, he has it pegged, precise and clear. Lady Mondegreen should be ignored for the Liberal that she is.

#11 February 21, 2012 at 9:57 am

Valerie commented:

#4 February 21, 2012 at 9:35 am
Lady Mondegreen commented:

Say what? The man who engineered the first takeover of the House from the Democrats in 40 years has the attention span of a hummingbird? Really?? Damn! I didn’t know hummingbirds where that persistent!

The man who, since he left office, has been pivotal on the education issue, has shown the rest of the two parties how to reach across the aisle, who takes a good idea from any source and is capable of turning it on it’s side to get a better solution? The man who knows and understands our system, and how to make effective use of it, and who wants an even playing field for every American?

The man America tried to elect the last time around, is not presidential material?

#12 February 21, 2012 at 10:02 am

Patty commented:

http://www.breitbart.tv/john-bolton-obama-doesnt-care-about-national-security/

John Bolton: Obama doesn’t care About National Security

#13 February 21, 2012 at 10:03 am

Valerie commented:

We all know, of course, that Lady Mondegreen is not interested in having anybody but Obama win the next election. That’s why she will, in series, tell us all what’s wrong with each candidate.

But you can watch for yourself and see if “her” characterization fits.

Uncommon Knowledge Special Edition: Newt Gingrich

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/211186.php

#14 February 21, 2012 at 10:04 am

Patty commented:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foJpIu34Ano

Bolton: U.S. Debt a National Security Risk….Obama debt over 5 trillion

#15 February 21, 2012 at 10:10 am

Patty commented:

Obama’s budget failures undermines Our National Security

When John Bolton expressed his concern over Obama’s budgeting priorities, it wasn’t merely partisan rhetoric. There are very real examples of how Obama’s mindset undermines national security while bloating the welfare state, similar to what Europe has been doing for decades. Our Army, Marines, Navy and Air Force will all experience real cuts in both manpower and capability.

Former U.N. ambassador John Bolton told The Daily Caller that President Obama’s cuts to the defense budget are an attempt to put more taxpayer funds into social welfare programs, labeling the move “exactly” what the Europeans have done. Bolton said Obama’s actions caused “bloated social welfare states” when they were attempted in Europe.

Here’s a classic example of how Obama’s policy decisions can be tied directly to national security, and there are others. Of course we should disperse our nation’s carriers; that’s common sense. If something disastrous were to happen, the reason their East Coast facilities were still so closely grouped all these years after 9-11 would likely be viewed as a scandal. But by then, there will be little left to do besides partisan finger-pointing, while some military planner somewhere would likely be blamed.

RICHMOND, Va. — The Navy’s plans to move an aircraft carrier from Virginia to Florida are on hold for at least five years, but the two states will likely see a shuffling of some other military ships.

Defense officials have said that having all five East Coast-based aircraft carriers based in one place, Norfolk, is a national security concern because of the possibility of a natural disaster or manmade calamity, but they have acknowledged the budget strains for relocating the carrier to Florida. Aircraft carriers on the West Coast are home-ported at three bases.

Even Obama’s own Defense Secretary understands the issue, yet Obama remains committed to spending on social welfare programs akin to political patronage payouts, making individuals dependent on government in whatever way he can manage to subsidize it – for now.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has said the automatic $500 billion in cuts or “sequester” over the next 10 years, supported by the White House, would cause “untold damage” to America’s national security. Under the Budget Control Act of 2011, the cuts will go into effect since the congressional super committee did not reach a deficit reduction agreement.

Unfortunately, one only has to look to Europe to see the horrendous consequences of the liberal mindset. As compared to the U.S., their defense capabilities are modest, at best, while their social programs threaten to bankrupt nation after nation in what would be a catastrophic series of collapses the day any final bill became due. They’re already experience downgrades, a warning sign of things to come.

http://bigpeace.com/driehl/2012/02/17/obama-budget-failures-undermine-national-security/

Patty commented:

All together now, our national security is a more of a risk since Obama

#17 February 21, 2012 at 10:11 am

USMC Thomas commented:

Like Newt or not, he speaks in a language people understand.

#18 February 21, 2012 at 10:14 am

StrangernFiction commented:

“He is incapable of defending the United States.”

I appreciate Newt pushing the envelope, but we have a lot further to go.

BARACK OBAMA IS PURPOSELY DESTROYING THE UNITED STATES!

#19 February 21, 2012 at 10:15 am

Patty commented:

OT- maybe

Regulations Are Costly to American Consumers and Businesses

The federal government continues to create costly regulations for American businesses and consumers. This persistence in creating subpar rules is due to a number of parties involved in the process who are motivated by factors other than the public good, say Richard Williams and Sherzod Abdukadirov of the Mercatus Center.

Individual business and industries are often major players in the creation of bad regulations. Though requirements imposed by federal agencies often impose harsh costs on these corporations, there are a number of circumstances under which they stand to benefit.

By voluntarily imposing higher costs on an industry, larger participants in a sector can drive smaller actors out of the market and increase their own market share.
Industrial giants can also advocate regulation as a means of creating barriers to entry, such that they face little competition from new startups.
Regulations can also create an artificial demand for a product that consumers do not normally want — the Renewable Fuel Standard created a demand for biofuel where one previously did not exist.

Members of Congress are also culprits in the creation of bad regulations. Traditionally, members have used pork barrel spending and public policy to appease key constituents. However, as public attention has increasingly focused on federal government action (especially on spending), members of Congress have found regulation to be a more effective, less obvious means of accomplishing the same end.

Finally, the individuals that staff the regulating federal agencies face adverse incentives.

Many regulators suffer from a sort of “tunnel vision” — they are focused on their agency’s individual mandate and fail to account for the impacts of regulations in other areas.
Others see regulations (especially costly ones) as a means of increasing the legitimacy of the agency and garnering a larger budget; this increases opportunities for promotion and a higher salary.

These parties, each in their own way, help to continue to create costly regulations for American consumers and businesses.

For text:

http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/publication/Blueprint_For_regulatory_Reform.pdf

#20 February 21, 2012 at 10:18 am

democraps suck commented:

No truer words can be spoken….if the idiot gets reelected we will lose more freedoms than you can imagine let alone be very vulnerable to mooslum attacks due to weakened security…..time to send the illegal Kenyan packing

#24 February 21, 2012 at 10:35 am

Sparky commented:

America, Newt SHOULD be your next President. He is the only candidate who can beat Obama.

He is hawkish, intelligent, steadfast, geo-politically savvy, and speaks to the critical issues in this election. He can hit the ground running on the first day without fumbling through a giant learning curve.

Newt is a Conservative with a proven track record. He has cleaned up the crap in Washington once before, and he can do it again.

I would rather Newt answer the red phone at 3 AM, than any of the other GOP candidates!

#25 February 21, 2012 at 10:56 am

BurmaShave commented:

Obama would not get very far as the nation’s most dangerous president ever, if the Liberal media were not thoroughly complicate in hiding Liberal treason everywhere.

#26 February 21, 2012 at 10:58 am

BurmaShave commented:

Complicit not complicate

#27 February 21, 2012 at 11:01 am

bg commented:

++

thank you Mr. Gingrich..

this Muslim, like you and others, has been warning
US of the very real dangers we face to no avail..

please keep this issue on the front burner, as it must be dealt with, else there is no reason to even bother with elections, and future generations will all be IslaMarxist Greens some day.. *sigh*

more here & here & here , in connecting links, and threads..

==

#28 February 21, 2012 at 11:06 am