Pelosi Plans on Releasing Dirt on Newt… “When the Time is Right”
Posted by Jim Hoft on Monday, December 5, 2011, 11:53 AM
When the time is right…
Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters this weekend that she plans on releasing dirt on Newt Gingrich… “When the time is right.”
The Hill reported:
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is holding back some information on Republican Newt Gingrich that could detract from his presidential campaign, according to a report published Monday.
“One of these days we’ll have a conversation about Newt Gingrich,” Pelosi told Talking Points Memo. “When the time is right. … I know a lot about him. I served on the investigative committee that investigated him, four of us locked in a room in an undisclosed location for a year. A thousand pages of his stuff.”
Gingrich, who served as Speaker of the House, worked with Pelosi in Congress from 1987 to 1999. Pelosi also served on the ethics committee that investigated Gingrich for tax cheating and campaign finance violations in the late ’90s.
Gingrich filmed an ad with then-House Speaker Pelosi in 2008 to urge action on climate change, which haunted him early in his presidential bid this year. Gingrich called the ad “probably the dumbest single thing I’ve done in recent years” last month.
What a horrible woman.
Then again, maybe Pelosi’s just pi$$ed because Newt called for her resignation in 2009.
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
Rough Night… Obama Loses 36 Arkansas Counties to Unknown Democrat – Loses 67 Kentucky Counties to “Uncommitted”
Published May 23, 2012 at 4:57 am - 63 Comments
wtd commented:
Quote:
Damn it. Why & who let her out?
Isn’t there some ethical consideration which limits how/when information obtained by a Congressional investigative committee can be used — and by who? Why would a Congressional Committee be assigned for a year to investigate Gingrich ?
patman commented:
No matter how stretched out and sewn, her facelift can’t hide the ugliness and horrid character inside of this woman.
martha commented:
Maybe Newt can run that 60 minutes bit with pelosi having a deer-in-the headlights look when she was questioned about her insider trading deals in his next ad.
Rock commented:
A Piglosi nosing around in dirt, who’s surprised, she best be careful I suspect there is enough dirt on her to bury the Black Sea.
Militant Conservative commented:
Pelosi is opening herself up to being sued. This is just the Saul Alinsky way,
clear the field of opponents. You know like small dictator countries do.
powder is dry
SoldiersMom commented:
Hey, maybe this explains Newt sitting on that sofa with Pelosi going on about global warming – blackmail.
Whatever she “discloses” can it be any worse than Obama’s Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, et al disclosures. Whatever’s in Newt’s background, he’ll get my vote because I KNOW what I’ll get with 4 more years of Obama.
Bill Mitchell commented:
So the least popular human on Earth is gonna take Newt down?
Didn’t Nancy assure us on election day in 2010 that Democrats had easily retained the House? Missed it by that much.
Nelle commented:
If Pelosi is going to sling mud at Newt, it doesn’t seem wise to announce it first, much less do it.
But it could get very entertaining.
martha commented:
I’m not a birther, however I’ve seen stories circulating that she signed a different certificate regarding Obama’s eligibility than was required, anyone have more info on this? It’s not something I remember too well.
Rock commented:
Piglosi is a One World Order believer and hopes to sit on Soros lap in the coming glory days. She will use any tool, ideology, or lie to attain that dream.
John03 commented:
Well, if he slept with her there’s no way I could vote for him.
NeoKong commented:
That sounded like she is using her position as a U.S. Rep to attack a private citizen for political gain.
Swifty commented:
If she weren’t such a party hack, she would release dirt on Obama as well.
Jim - PRS commented:
This woman is beneath contempt.
Multitude commented:
Why are we bothering with these nasty primaries? The Deciders know Romney is The One, who will go forward in McCainian manner as deemed and fail, providing the Democratic progressives with the balance of their eight-year contract. Romney will have it in 2016 and allow for the Republican progressives to have their eight years.
Folks, this stuff has been all worked out. Please stay out of the way of the political machine, so nobody gets hurt.
JPeden commented:
She’s just started the “perception is reality” smear op. itself, allegedly establishing her own
“credibility”. Therefore, everything she says will be a lie. It’s all they got.
KLD commented:
I’m afraid, Nancy, anything coming from you I’ll take with a (huge) grain of salt. You have no credibility as far as I’m concerned. No that most of us are not aware Gingrich has stuff in his past.
Thousands of pages…when the time is right. You’re probably needing time to create your ‘stuff’. And hopefully divert attention from your own highly questionable behavior?
Ella commented:
#9 Martha – indeed good old Nance signed some papers that are questionable. We ought to pursue that. I am so tired of Pelosi I could spit.
bg commented:
++
like i said, despicably & dishonestly taking out the not so easy to do
outsider Herman Cain was half the battle, the other half will be a lot
easier, as they’re prepared for the insiders..
we the people SUCK for not only allowing, but aiding & abetting
them to sink such an honest man as Herman Cain like that..
we will pay for it, and we will get the “leadership” we deserves..
they sunk the Santa Maria, now scuttling
the Nina & Pinta will be mere childs play..
“You ain’t seen nothin’ yet!” B Hussein O
==
Ella commented:
So did Newt kill two Americans and several hundred Mexicans as Eric Holder and Obama allowed to take place via Fast & Furious? Did he execute three homosexuals as Obama allowed to happen (Nate Spencer, Larry Bland & Donald Young)? No? Well then shut your pie-hole Nancy.
Rock commented:
Martha #9
You can start here, then Google for more
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=109363
vamoose commented:
Agree with #8.
In addition to being a detestable example of the human life form, Nancy is a blow hard and a liar. When Geraldo opens Nancy’s vault of dirt, guess what viewers will be looking at? A heaping pile of never mind.
#1AMERICAN commented:
someone needs to take piglosi down…ugly POS skank
Valerie commented:
If Nancy had found real dirt on Newt back then, she would have used it.
Newt can handle this just fine.
Gary commented:
Multitude
I understand why you feel that way. But the closest comparison to this situation in recent history is 1979/80, and Carter lost in a landslide, despite a lot of polling at the time saying he was in like Flynn for another four years.
Then there was W, who is not all that conservative, who beat the anointed Algore in 2000.
Though Algore was not incumbent, he was the VP of a popular incumbent, which is nearly the same thing (a la Bush 41).
We’re not sunk, and we haven’t even begun to fight. Our fight begins after the primary.
BTW, if Nancy Pelosi wants to release dirt:
1. Why does she so brazenly announce that she’s engaging in political game-playing by “picking a time”?
2. Why doesn’t she just pull that shiny mask she’s wearing taut and let it snap back. That ought to release at least a little dirt.
Larkin commented:
Whatever dirt there is on Newt will pale by comparison to the existing dirt on obama, not to mention his corrupt administration.
And just maybe this time, there will be a well-connected, remorseful dem or two that realize another four years of hopenchange will actually sink this ship.
And there ain’t enough lifeboats, even for them.
vityas commented:
vile trull
Gary commented:
P.S.
If Romney or Gingrich end up being the guy, we’ll still be okay. We just have to focus on getting more conservative candidates into the House and Senate (where it is harder for the media to pick our candidates) and use them to pull the president to the right.
More Liberty commented:
Newt is just another establishment anti-liberty corporatist. Sorry but those of us that are constitutional conservatives know this man does not respect the US Constitution.
WHO IS NEWT?
10/22/1991 – Voted for an amendment that would create a National Police Corps.
03/-/1993 – Voted for sending $1.6 Billion in foreign aid to Russia.
11/19/1993 – Voted for the NAFTA Implementation Act.
11/27/1994 – Supported the GATT Treaty giving sovereignty to the U.N.
08/27/1995 – Suggested that drug smuggling should carry a death sentence.
04/25/1996 – Voted for the single largest increase on Federal education spending ($3.5 Billion)
04/10/1995 – Supported Federal taxdollars being spent on abortions.
09/25/1996 – Introduced H.R. 4170, demanded life-sentence or execution for someone bringing 2 ounces of marijuana across the border.
01/22/1997 – Congress gave him a record-setting $300,000 fine for ethical wrongdoing.
11/29/2006 – Stated that free speech should be curtailed in order to fight terrorism. Called for a “serious debate about the 1st Amendment.”
02/15/2007 – Supported Bush’s proposal for mandatory carbon caps.
09/28/2008 – Stated if he were in office, he would have voted for the $700B TARP bailout.
10/01/2008 – Stated in an article that TARP was a “workout, not a bailout.”
12/08/2008 – Paid $300,000 by Freddie Mac to halt Congress from bringing necessary reform.
03/31/2009 – States we should have Singapore-style drug tests for Americans.
07/30/2010 – States that Iraq was just step one in defeating the “Axis of Evil”.
08/03/2010 – Advocates attacks on Iran & North Korea.
11/15/2010 – Defended Romneycare
12/05/2010 – Stated that a website owner should be considered an enemy combatant, hunted down and executed, for publishing leaked government memos.
01/30/2011 – Lobbied for ethanol subsidies.
01/30/2011 – Suggested that flex-fuel vehicles be mandated for Americans.
02/13/2011 – Criticized Obama for sending less U.S. taxdollars to Egypt.
02/15/2011 – Wrote book saying he believes man-made climate-change and advocated creating “a new endowment for conservation and the environment.”
03/09/2011 – Blames his infidelity to multiple wives on his passion for the country.
03/15/2011 – Stated that NAFTA worked because it created jobs in Mexico.
03/19/2011 – Shows no regrets about supporting Medicare drug coverage. (Now $7.2T unfunded liability)
03/23/2011 – Completely flip-flopped on Libyan intervention in 16 days.
03/25/2011 – Plans to sign as many as 200 executive orders on his first day as president.
04/25/2011 – Became paid lobbyist for Federal ethanol subsidies.
05/12/2011 – More supportive of individual health-care mandates than Mitt Romney.
06/09/2011 – Campaign staff resigned en masse.
07/15/2011 – Poorly managed campaign is over $1 Million in debt.
08/01/2011 – Hired a company to create fake Twitter accounts to make fake followers.
10/07/2011 – Stated he’d ignore the Supreme Court and bypass the constitution and congress.
StrangernFiction commented:
Pelosi and Coburn double-teaming Gingrich. Who knew?
StrangernFiction commented:
Whatever dirt there is on Newt will pale by comparison to the existing dirt on obama
Dirt on Obama is redundant.
KornKing commented:
#11-John03
You ever see a dog throw up?
savethenation commented:
If they plan or releasing the info on this ethics investigation they had better be ready to release the documents on all the ethics investigations; like Maxine Waters, Rengal, etc. Would love to see them ALL.
Muddywood commented:
Nanu Nanu?
bg commented:
++
we the people lost the last election due to obots & allowing the msm
et al choose a rino to run against him for us.. and damn if Palin didn’t
almost win it for him, note the Rep hate towards her post selection is
competitive with the Dems natural hatred of all things not progressive..
we will lose this election, irrespective of whether or not Cain would have
won, but because he is out of the race due to his Republican detractors
aiding & abetting his Dem assassins..
==
NorthernX commented:
I hope somebody drops a house on that repulsive old witch sometime soon…
Andreas K. commented:
Newt buys into climate change and ethanol and also likes his gun control. He’s a sell out, just like everybody else on the Hill. Left, Right, doesn’t matter.
bg commented:
++
Muddywood #35 December 5, 2011 at 1:23 pm
==
Robert commented:
Here Pelosi is openly threatening to use information gathered as part of an official House ethics investigation for specifically partisan purposes.
That in and of itself is, or certainly should be considered, highly unethical and should trigger outrage among the Party of Wimps, but it won’t. Because they are the Party of Wimps.
StrangernFiction commented:
OT Alec Baldwin is a Mittens fan?
http://weaselzippers.us/2011/12/05/hollywood-leftist-alec-baldwin-if-romney-is-the-nominee-we-have-to-get-behind-him-and-support-him/
Mary commented:
Bring It! Be-yatch!
mcc commented:
I dare you to read this on a full stomach. I had to stop:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/november_december_2011/features/scandal_in_the_age_of_obama032995.php?page=all&print=true
Warning: Jonathan Alter on Obama’s successfully high standards.
A perfectly timed piece (Nov/Dec 2011). Those Lefties…so well-organized!
GotFreedom commented:
Is she going to dig that “dirt” out of her face–is that what she’s been injecting all these years?
She should talk about exposing dirt–she’s one of the crookedest politicos around!
Gandalf commented:
That SFO Nan is holding info on Neut assures my vote for him. I still mourn for Sarah.but Neut may just do the same kind of damage to the DC bunch.
bigL commented:
pig.
Reaganite Republican commented:
If you raise enough stink maybe you’ll be relevant again for a few minutes, you grizzled statist hag
Josh commented:
This is why I would hate politics. They spend a lot of time looking for dirt on the other fellow instead of actually doing something constructive. How about when the time is right, she resigns.
Corsair commented:
So we should be scared of this Bolshevik brainless Botoxed b1tchy broad from the Bay? HA!
daryl commented:
#30
you left one out.
12/4/11 – leads in the polls for the Republican primary….go figure
You don’t work for Pelosi and the leftists do you?
Molon Labe commented:
This is what you get when you lie down with scum. I’ll never forget the Pelosi-Newt global warming commercial nor his endorsement of the carbon tax, amnesty, obamacare. Newt is a bad joke. If he is elected he will be the new Nixon. And what a wonder Nixon was.
gee! commented:
Maybe Newt can return the flavor…………I’m sure he knows a great- deal about Pelosi………. How she became so rich when the world economy has floundered…………… liberal-play of suggestion ………….just saying
mcc commented:
UPDATE — NEWT RESPONDS:
First of all I’d like to thank Speaker Pelosi for what I regard as an early Christmas gift. If she’s suggesting she’s gonna use material she developed while she was on the ethics committee, that is a fundamental violation of the rules of the House and I would hope members would immediately file charges against her the second she does it.
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/12/05/pelosi-gingrich/
shrek commented:
Yeah,
They’re still bitter….. much
john b commented:
by the way, the standard line against Obama when accused by the MSM of any impropriety should be: “You weren’t concerned about a guy snorting cocaine; why should you care about this?”
mcc commented:
Re #53 — VIDEO here for Newt’s full remarks:
http://www.therightscoop.com/newt-fires-back-at-pelsoi-bring-it-on/
Craig commented:
Iowa Poll: Only Ron Paul Can Beat Obama (+ 2 Videos)
http://www.infowars.com/iowa-poll-only-ron-paul-can-beat-obama/
Extracts:
Yet the most interesting facet of this latest survey is how the Congressman matches up in a hypothetical head to head with Obama.
The poll finds that the incumbent President betters all GOP competitors except for Ron Paul.
This highlights how Paul’s biggest hurdle is securing the nomination. There is no doubt that Obama would have a real fight on his hands to retain the presidency against Ron Paul.
Paul also leads Obama 42 to 35% among independent voters and attracts 15 percent of Iowa’s Democrats according to the survey. The Congressman also betters Obama by 14 percentage points among voters under 45 years of age.
Tellingly, Paul also leads the way over his GOP rivals with 25% among voters who see a candidate’s position on the issues, rather than electability or popularity, as the most important factor of their candidacy
bg commented:
++
damn, i couldn’t ask for better evidence to back up my.. the Reps
“BLACKMAILED”, hence, doing nothing or joining with, theory.. eh,
nothing new to “all in the family” Obama, not to mention Wright,
Farrakhan & Jackson, etc, all of whom were in tight with Qaddafi..
==
Craig commented:
Folks, although I cannot stand this witch Pelosi, I have to say that she will be making you a favor by preventing you to vote for that globalist scum. Gingrich is the worst of all GOP candidates.
bg commented:
++
clarification re: #58 December 5, 2011 at 2:49 pm bg
re: the Reps “BLACKMAILED”
by Obama & Dhimmis et al..
==
timewilltell commented:
Pelosi put the “E” in evil.
Nancy commented:
The fact that Pelosi seems to feel it necessary to threaten Newt at this early a date says something. She wants to dethrone Gingrich so that Obama gets to run against Romney. The Democrats think Obama can beat Romney, and they aren’t so sure about Gingrich.
No matter who we pick, the Democrats are going to run the dirtiest campaign any of us have ever seen against him/her. Just remember, no one we pick is going to be a saint. Every one of us has skeletons of some kind in our closet. At least Gingrich’s skeletons are mostly known by now. And he knows where the bodies in Washington DC are buried, so if I were Pelosi, I’d think twice before threatening him too seriously, unless she wants to find a few choice skeletons of her own exposed for public viewing.
As far as I am concerned, any of the candidates (except possibly Huntsman and maybe Paul, although I’m not sure of that) would be an improvement on the current disaster-in-chief. If we have another 4 years of Obama, we aren’t going to have a country.
bg commented:
++
shrek #54 December 5, 2011 at 2:41 pm
Obmabot we much??
==
timewilltell commented:
Mittens will do exactly what McShame did.
Throw the election!
That’s why the lefts want him.
He is their boy!
bg commented:
++
timewilltell #64 December 5, 2011 at 3:07 pm
no, Perry is..
==
shrek commented:
Just stick it bg. don’t start any s**t and neither will I.
bg commented:
++
shrek #66 December 5, 2011 at 3:13 pm
oooh, ya’ll got me bitterly shakin’ in me boots toots..
==
Walt R. commented:
Be careful what you wish for Democrats. You keep forcing these other Republican candidates out of the race and a certain hockey-mom who ran Alaska might think of coming back. Yeah, keep going donkeys. Bring her back. I dare ya.
daryl commented:
Pay her no mind shrek.
bg’s afraid Newt Gingrich will pick Rick Perry as a running mate and she loses control of her bladder at just the thought. Poor thing.
bg commented:
++
daryl #69 December 5, 2011 at 3:19 pm
ROTF
MBO!!
thanks, i needed a good laugh!!
==
mcc commented:
This might be another reason why Newt gives Dems heartburn:
Perhaps most significantly, Gingrich has an extensive Hispanic outreach organization, which he has been building for years. Unlike anything in the Romney playbook, that network could give Gingrich a head start slicing into Obama’s base in key states in the Mountain West, where Hispanics are a fast-growing swing voting bloc. Polls show Hispanic voters, two-thirds of whom backed Obama in 2008, still favor the president — but GOP strategists believe that winning 40 percent of that vote could disrupt Obama’s electoral college strategy by putting Colorado, Arizona and Nevada in the Republican column.
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/05/democrats-feeling-a-little-conflicted-over-potential-gingrich-nomination/
daryl commented:
Damn! wonder who those three poor (NOT) so lucky bastards were. Bet it warped their psyches for the rest of their natural lives.
“four of us locked in a room in an undisclosed location for a year”…….in a room with Pelosi……
I’d just slit my throat with my thumbnail.
Craig commented:
Newt Stinks, But…
http://www.personalliberty.com/conservative-politics/newt-stinks-but-and-other-thoughts/?eiid=
Extracts:
Gingrich should be anathema to conservatives. In fact, for all the reasons Romney hasn’t appealed to conservatives, Gingrich can go one (at least) better: flip-flops, crony capitalism, would have voted for TARP, supports ethanol subsidies and, as recently as this summer, said he supported Federal mandates on purchasing health insurance (which he first did while lobbying for the healthcare industry) and a lover of wars, wars and more wars — oh, yes, and he believes in stripping Americans of their citizenship if they oppose the government.
In reading comments posted to neocon-supporting websites, the message seems to be, “Newt stinks, but anything is better than Obama.”
Such a meme proves the left/right paradigm remains firmly locked in place. George W. Bush was bad, Democrats love to say, because of the wars, bailouts and budget deficits. Obama is bad, Republicans love to say, because of the wars, bailouts and budget deficits. Gingrich will be better than Obama, Republicans say, because even though Gingrich supports wars and bailouts and budget deficits, his name is followed by an “R” rather than a “D.”
If you are truly a conservative, then Newt stinks — that is true — and so does Romney. But how does placing an “R” after a candidate’s name make the stink any more tolerable than the one we’re getting from the current “D” stinker? The only difference will be which group of corporatists get richer over the next four years. Fascism and tyranny will continue unabated, and government will continue to grow.
bg commented:
++
Earth to Pelosi..
a right leaning Democrat could beat Obama no
matter how many orgies they were involved in..
==
Gary commented:
Yeah right.
More evidence of Pelosi’s most transparent House.
She apparently has folders of “dirt” on people she’s keeping in case the time is ever right.
As for people on our side saying we’re doomed, we’re not. This isn’t just winnable, it’s (borrowing Rush’s word) landslideable.
There are still several months to go, and things could turn around as much this time as they did last time. Bachmann or Santorum could be back in the mix before it’s over.
As for Herman Cain, whether he was guilty of anything or not, there was enough there to make the donors stop writing checks, and unfortunately that’s the name of the game (check-writing, that is).
Bachmann to date remains the only candidate without a single hint of scandal on her reputation. No “termination settlement” employees, not text messages, no financial support. No major flip flops, no adulteries or even a divorce. No racist rocks. No string of racist comments (Ron Paul). No tax evasion. Well you get my drift.
Bachmann 2012
WTFPRESIDENT commented:
She’s an idiot. She belongs in prison for insider trading, along with a bunch of other losers in congress.
Gary commented:
Oh Craig
I’m so glad you’re here.
Were you in jail or something? Where you been man?
BTW, I just read this list of racist remarks made by Ron Paul.
Care to back him up on those? Apologize on his behalf maybe?
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/09/07/10-quotes-that-make-ron-paul-sound-racist/
http://www.realchange.org/ronpaul.htm#quotes
KornKing commented:
#525-The problem is that Newt’s running for Pres, and dirt will stick. Conversely, the witch is running for selection from SanFran, and they’ll vote her back in no matter what
Gary commented:
WTF,
You said it.
What I want to know is if the House has an oversight committee and the other self-policing committees to determine wrongdoing (and by the way, if her committee was appointed to find those things and did indeed find them, why are they not already public record? Isn’t she admitting she purposely betrayed her duties on that committee) then can I have my family and friends form and oversight committee when I decided to break the law, and let them decide if I should face criminal charges?
Gary commented:
I posted something to Craig, but a filter must have deleted it. Try again:
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/09/07/10-quotes-that-make-ron-paul-sound-racist/
Gary commented:
Ron Paul Quotes
Any comments on these quotes, Craig?
SturJen commented:
Never liked Gingrich for President, still don’t. He’s got too many Lib leanings on important issues for my taste. His best place is right where it is now. Pelosi can just jump into a vat of collagen and see if that helps her hideous visage.
This whole thing brings to mind a mental image of two hookers fighting over a john.
saxton commented:
uh oh…they don’t want Newt to run…obama and her are girlfriends..they picked McCain last time and I’m not going to let them pick again..he knows that she should be fired!
Johnny commented:
For lest we forget she was fined $21,000 by the Federal Election Commission
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/the-oh-so-ethical-nancy-pelosi
gee! commented:
#64 Hope you don’t care if i add to your committ here……………Obamacare…………Romneycare …………..one of same………….if Romney wins it take Obamacare off the table…………….thats what liberals and Obama’s mud-slingers are hoping for………..just saying
Blacque Jacques Shellacque commented:
So Newt, what do you think of that “couch” stunt now? Was it worth it?
The message that other Republicans should take away from this? Partner up with a Democrat at your peril.
Stephana commented:
Tell the punt to bring it. If she does something like that it will be a felony breach of the law and we can throw her worthless ass in jail.
Johnny commented:
It’s gotta make you wonder:
Why have Piglosi & Frankie said that Newt would be the best for the demovratic party?
Why is Alec Puke Baldwin behind Mittens?
IMO, they dont want to come up against Newt. Many feel that because Newt has been in DC for what 30 years or so, is a bad thing. I would agree in most cases but considering he may have dirt on some others there,…well, it may not be a bad thing.
While he may not be the best choice. This country can survive a term of Newt. It cant survive with 4 more years of this crap.
Who ever the nominee is, get behind them 110%.
Perfected democrat commented:
“One of these days we’ll have a conversation about Newt Gingrich,” Pelosi told Talking Points Memo. “When the time is right. … I know a lot about him. I served on the investigative committee that investigated him, four of us locked in a room in an undisclosed location for a year. A thousand pages of his stuff.”
Apparently there were no indictments or convictions, which means the year was an irrelevant waste of time, apparently just a partisan politics fishing expedition…
ogee commented:
yep she knows all about Newt and he is as bad as she is. She was his best buddy for a long while. She has some real dirt on this corrupt repub candidate. I hope she spills the beans without making us wait.
Vote Ron Paul. If you think he’s a kook you have been watching too much lamestream media and not enough you tubes of him. There is no dirt on RP to dish out so he’s the best candidate and he will give us TPer’s all we want by default. He will satisfy all voters and be a president of all not just some. Please vote Ron Paul so I can travel again without TSA BS. RP has an anti-TSA bill sitting in congress stalled. Save the constitution- vote RP! It’s our last chance.
Johnny commented:
Old news but interesting
http://ruthtalks.wordpress.com/2009/03/24/nancy-pelosi-actually-most-corrupt-member-of-congress/
Militant Conservative commented:
Knew it, WHOOT WHOOT, Ronulan alert.
So how is the pervert uncle these days?
Jim commented:
“That’s a fundamental violation of the rules of the House and I would hope that members would immediately file charges against her the second she does it,” Newt said.
“I want to thank Speaker Pelosi for what I regard as an early Christmas gift,” he said. “…I regard it as a useful education for the American people to see what a tainted political ethics operation Pelosi was engaged in.”
Perfected democrat commented:
Clarification of my earlier mistaken comment that there were no “indictments or convictions”, the following from a news source at the time:
“In a strongly worded report, special counsel James M. Cole concluded that Gingrich had violated tax law and lied to the investigating panel, but the subcommittee would not go that far. In exchange for the subcommittee agreeing to modify the charges against him, Gingrich agreed to the penalty Dec. 20 as part of a deal in which he admitted guilt.
Johnson called the reprimand and financial penalty “tough and unprecedented. It is also appropriate,” she said. “No one is above the rules of the House.”
The ethics committee that handled the charges against Gingrich went out of business at midnight last night without resolving complaints that the speaker received improper gifts, contributions and support from GOPAC, the political action committee he once headed. House Democrats are likely to submit those charges to the new ethics committee.
In addition, the Internal Revenue Service is looking into the use of tax-deductible charitable contributions to finance the college course Gingrich taught, which was at the center of the ethics case, and the ethics committee is making the material it gathered available to the tax agency.
At a closed-door meeting of House Republicans yesterday morning, the speaker noted his agreement to accept the sanction, which the ethics committee approved on a 7 to 1 vote Friday night, and said he wanted to get the matter behind him, according to lawmakers who attended.”
There needs to be a special prosecutor to investigate the wide ranging criminal political syndicate which the Democratic Party has become during the entire last decade.
bg commented:
++
and where are the Frank & Dodd et al crucifixions??
==
Neo commented:
It’s so nice to see that the “Politics of Personal Destruction” are dead.
Johnny commented:
#92 Perfected democrat
Good find.
Johnny commented:
On o’Reilly now,
None of the charges that the demoncratic party brought up were valid. (per Brit Hume).
bg commented:
++
’60 MINUTES’ EXPOSES PELOSI, BOEHNER CORRUPTION
keep telling you the “career” politicians on both sides of
the isle are in bed together, act 9, scene, 9 stage 9.. /s/
Democrats beat the market by 73 basis points per month, compared
to 18 for Republicans. That’s a rout anyway you look at it. Senators
fare even better than house members.
==
bg commented:
++
not to mention this albatross hanging around our grankids necks!!
==
Johnny commented:
Hey bg,
I keep thinking this must be a nightmare. But it’s not. Damn it!
Jim commented:
“I.R.S. Clears Foundation Linked to Gingrich’s Ethics Dispute
By DAVID E. ROSENBAUM
Published: February 04, 1999
In a case involving the ethics violations that led the House of Representatives to reprimand former Speaker Newt Gingrich in 1997, the Internal Revenue Service has cleared a private foundation close to Mr. Gingrich of breaking tax laws.
The I.R.S. ruling, in favor of the Progress and Freedom Foundation, does not directly exonerate Mr. Gingrich. But it suggests that he did not illegally use tax-exempt money for political purposes, one of the main accusations against him.”
Johnny commented:
Another not such a good thing
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2011/12/04/obama_justice_department_laundered_millions_of_dollars_in_mexican_cartel_profits
bg commented:
++
Johnny #99 December 5, 2011 at 7:20 pm
oh yeah, nightmare about covers every aspect of what is happening to
US.. the saddest and most disturbing factor of all is, there’s no way we
can deny what is happening isn’t being done on purpose to save a few
political elite butts (in ratio to the world pop), not “we the people’s”..
now look at out next line of “choices” for president,
and tell me they weren’t chosen for US yet again??
==
aprilnovember811 commented:
I’m assuming Newt has dirt on her he can release? And how about getting the man who’s lying about his identity school records, and true birth records. Come on Newt, get them! We know he’s not who he says he is. Get him!
bg commented:
++
December 5, 2011
2012 Republican Presidential Nomination
27.5 Gingrich +7.5
20.0 Romney
13.8 Cain
8.0 Paul
7.3 Perry
4.3 Bachmann
2.8 Santorum
2.3 Huntsman
==
bg commented:
++
re: #104 December 5, 2011 at 8:28 pm bg
oh shoot me already, gah!!
December 5, 2011
2012 Republican Presidential Nomination
27.5 Gingrich +7.5
20.0 Romney
13.8 Cain
8.0 Paul
7.3 Perry
4.3 Bachmann
2.8 Santorum
2.3 Huntsman
==
Simsalabim commented:
#73 Craig You sir are right on!!!
This is one f-ing scum bag kettle calling the other f-ing scum bag pot black.
I’ve never been so pissed off at both Demon-rats and Re-public-cannots. They both suck.
Patty commented:
Gee! and none of the media or democrats cared one iota about Obama, prior to his becoming president.
Now, the Queen of Mean is coming out to Destroy Gingrich. Aren’t the democrats kind and gentle people. The hate and the anger is eating them like cancer. Some day Pelosi will be out of Washington but I won’t hold my breathe. Seem Republicans just sit back and watch this nation falling apart piece by piece.
China is getting our technology and Iran is too. Boy is Iran. Suffering here at home and it seems that Princess Pelosi is gunning for Gingrich. Our leaders have made and Black Hole that is drawing everyone into it. The evil is spreading on a daily basis. So, have at Gingrich, take someone else apart like was done to Cain.
Until character and honor comes back, nothing will change.
bg commented:
++
December 5, 2011
National
27.5 Gingrich +7.5
20.0 Romney
13.8 Cain
8.0 Paul
7.3 Perry
4.3 Bachmann
2.8 Santorum
2.3 Huntsman
Iowa
26.3 Gingrich +10.3
16.0 Paul
15.3 Romney
9.0 Cain
7.7 Bachmann
7.3 Perry
4.7 Santorum
2.0 Huntsman
New Hampshire
36.0 Romney +14.3
21.7 Gingrich
13.7 Paul
9.3 Huntsman
5.0 Cain
3.0 Perry
3.0 Bachmann
1.3 Santorum
South Carolina
26.3 Gingrich +8.6
17.7 Romney
16.7 Cain
6.3 Perry
5.3 Paul
3.7 Bachmann
2.0 Huntsman
1.3 Santorum
Florida
44.0 Gingrich +27.0
17.0 Romney
14.0 Cain
4.5 Perry
4.5 Paul
3.5 Bachmann
3.0 Huntsman
1.0 Santorum
==
mcc commented:
Sorry I missed this interview – where Michelle Malkin takes command over Matt Lauer. I may have to get her book for Christmas “Culture of Corruption” – she exposes Mooch, too, calling her the First Crony:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmnOAtTPGMg&feature=related
I want all the ammunition I can get for the year ahead.
bg commented:
++
mcc #112 December 5, 2011 at 10:41 pm
very bright women, great VP material..
==
Jason commented:
She’s doing him a favor. Stop being so pathetic, as if you’d want a Republican to ignore getting the most they can out of oppo research. This is hardball.
Now he can ask himself if he’s really serious about this. Let’s face it, Newt’s run hasn’t always looked serious. None of us thought he’d be leading at this point. If he’s going to burn out, best to nip it in the bud now.
Noticing that Dems are rallying each other to quit attacking Newt and go after Romney. Don’t you see what’s going on here? Newt will get obliterated against Obama, and this canard that he’s such a great debater is based on him being combative and condescending.
He’s a loser, baby.
daryl commented:
“He’s a loser, baby.”
Like whistling past graveyards do ya jason?