You can’t say we didn’t warn you.
Obama is in worse trouble than we thought.
Even hardcore leftist Thomas Friedman of the New York Times is wondering if the media blew it in vetting Obama the candidate.

Obama was vetted? When?

The Daily Caller reported:

During the 2008 presidential election season, many Americans were captivated by then-candidate Barack Obama’s promises of hope and change. And some would argue that much of the media were taken in by the promises too. Nearly three years into the Obama presidency, is it fair to say the media were duped?

On Sunday’s broadcast of CNN’s “Reliable Sources,” host Howard Kurtz asked New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman just that question. According to Friedman, the jury is still out.

“Way too soon to tell that kind of thing, I think,” Friedman said. “I think if — look, what have I been calling for, you know, the president to have — I think there is, we just so desperately needed a grand bargain that involves restructuring of debt, raising of taxes, cutting of spending and investing in the sources of our strengths as a country from everything from infrastructure to government-funded research to education. It’s so clear that’s what we need. My personal frustration with Obama has been that while he certainly tried that grand bargain for a little bit, it just kind of went away. Well, it didn’t on the work. He said [House Speaker John] Boehner backed out. I don’t know who backed out.”

 

 

Disable Refresh for 30 Days

Cookies and JavaScript must be enabled for your setting to be saved.

1 2 3

`
  1. ++

    WTF??

    God Help US..

    ==

  2. The most insane statement in this video doesn’t come from Friedman, it comes from Kurtz:

    “his critics would say he’s too much of a compromiser”

  3. these failed pundits make voodoo look fair & reasonable.

  4. Um, the media should do such a good job vetting ANY presidential candidate that there should NEVER even BE a question of whether the media blew it!

    When you do your very best, you know it. Even acknowledging the possibility that the media could have blown it admits that the media didn’t do its job.

    Do it right the first time, do it well, do it thoroughly, double and triple check it. That should apply to everything done by anyone anywhere, but especially the vetting of a presidential candidate.

  5. We know more about any of the Palin children then we do about Barack Obama.

  6. Their only complaining that Obama is not as radically Left as they had hoped. Message here is Soros is telling WTF via the media he expects more and stop living life large on his dime. We are still screwed, they fully intend to take the country down the path of Socialism, or get someone in the White House who can.

  7. According to Friedman, the jury is still out.

    Can someone please forcibly tattoo the letters I-D-I-O-T across Friedman’s forehead?

  8. The ‘birthers’ were thought of as nuts.
    Well, these pigs got what they deserve.
    Ann Coulter, also made fun of ‘birthers’, recently said that the MSM didnt vet Obama.
    Thats because people were too busy worrying about being called racists, instead of being moral and ethical.

  9. C’mon Thomas. Seriously, the guy was put into office while the media carried him on their shoulders cheering the whole time. There is no way Friedman is being honest.

  10. Obama was vetted? When?
    +++
    You don’t remember ?
    http://ficdn.fashionindie.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/barack-obama-shirtless_448x629-300×421.jpg
    :D
    He was wetted alright !

  11. So this asswipe just woke up from a coma?

    He’s only now figuring out what most of us knew before the election?

  12. I think all of this talk about Odumbo not being vetted started with Sarah Palin’s comment that the press is being so hard on republican candidates now because they did not want to repeat the mistake they made by not properly vetting Odumbo wich resulted in electing an incompetant president. Of course she knows as well as us that they did it on purpose but she put it into a context that made them accountable for their actions. She is a psy-ops genious.

  13. First of all, Friedman needs to learn correct English or this is con talk for “we will tweak the numbers and pull the wool over” Please, I smell some really bad stink going on. Con us once shame on you, con us twice and brother investigate these whack jobs quick.

    Economy isn’t going to recover in time for Obama but that said, Obama is over! We knew he was incompetent it took those so called intelligent and those incapable of a thought of their own 3 years to figure it out.

    They can try to vet Obama but he has hurt the U.S. and the damage he has done will take a real experience person in the White House to correct.

    From the military cuts to job cuts, from 2 trillion in spending and nothing to show for it, Geesh, vet give us a break.

  14. rbosque commented:
    He’s only now figuring out what most of us knew before the election?
    ++++++++
    Thats why he is a Nobel Prize winner and we are not

  15. The media’s vetting of SØBama is treasonous at best, especially considering the resources the Washington Post and the New York Times used to vet Sarah Palin’s e-mail over 2 years later.
    Thomas Friedman is a piece of excrement.

  16. Where were the (so called)conservitive media during the vetting proccess of wtf?They didn’t do their job either.They were right there with the lefties checking to see if Palin might have a run in her stocking or checking to see if her fingernails were painted properly,looking down their noses with disdain.

  17. Sad to witness the effects of Friedman’s mother’s total lack of Folic Acid during her pregnancy.

  18. #16, Spike – oh THAT was a good book! LOL!

    Anyway – ALL you said about the Media, Left AND RIGHT is Dead True – same for the RNC.

    NO WAY to look to THEM for Statesmanship or Leadership.



1 2 3


`

© Copyright 2014, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions