Egyptian Foreign Minister: Hamas Is a “True Partner” For Peace
Posted by Jim Hoft on Wednesday, May 18, 2011, 8:06 PM
Peace Partners
Egyptian Foreign Minister Nabeel Arabi told an Italian paper that Hamas is a “true partner” for peace.
Israel National News reported, via Israel Survivor Updates:
Egyptian Foreign Minister Nabeel Arabi told Italian newspaper La Republica on Wednesday he had brokered the Fatah-Hamas reconciliation deal in the hopes of creating “a true partner” for peace.
“With this united Palestinian [government] Israel can negotiate for real, can carry through the implementation of UN Resolution 181 of 1947 which called for an Israeli and a Palestinian state,” Arabi said in the interview.
During the interview Arabi dismissed concerns that Hamas, being a terrorist organization, would actually hurt the peace process. “Even George Washington was considered a terrorist, Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, as well,” he said.
Arabi, scheduled to become secretary-general of the Arab League in July, said Hamas would agree to negotiate with Israel, despite the fact that some of the organization’s members called for violence against the Jewish State.
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
Rough Night… Obama Loses 36 Arkansas Counties to Unknown Democrat – Loses 67 Kentucky Counties to “Uncommitted”
Published May 23, 2012 at 4:57 am - 64 Comments
shibumi commented:
Wow, Egypt goes anti- Israel, anti-West and pro- Muslim, just like all of us said they would.
Coming soon: Egypt embraces Iran as a “partner in peace.”
And by “partner in peace” they mean, “a partner that can be used to kill infidels with us.”
Joanne commented:
In their sick minds they think Hamas is a ‘true partner for peace’, because they both have the same goals – kill all Jews and destroy the State of Israel. Good thing these buggers will then turn on each other.
L.E. Liesner commented:
I wonder if they spell it PIECE as in a very large chunk of Israel. With that idiot in the White House, Israel stands alone. Next in line is that “Great Satan” the USA. Feed, clothe and arm your enemy so they can attack you to. I wonder if all those liberal Jews in this country will vote for Obama in 2012 like they did in 2008.
Kenny Solomon commented:
But wait…… There’s more.
Your tax dollars at work, Muslim Brotherhood style.
US President Barack Hussein Obama Offers Aid To Muslim Brotherhood Takeover Of Egypt And Tunisia.
“……part of a broad effort to support democratic reform in the Middle East and North Africa, U.S. officials said.”
Nothing to see here. These are not the peace lovers you are looking for. Move along.
— — — — —
Jim, thanks again for linking to my humble and semi-legible website.
Kenny
Rich commented:
If Hamas is a “true partner in peace”, I say just award them a Nobel Peace Prize now for all of the peaceful things they will be doing in the future – just like Obama.
If we don’t, then we’re racists.
gus commented:
Who is HAMAS?
Why are they armed?
For what purpose.
What has happened to the LEFT? Do they not see this??
Redpillpatriot commented:
OH Snap! they’re bringing out their elite mime troops! Now I’m scared!
CT commented:
“… Hamas is a ‘true partner’ for peace…”
That would be the peace of the dead.
jony101 commented:
George Washington wasn’t considered a terrorist even by the British. He and his men fought wearing uniforms. They didn’t hide behind women and attack civilians. Nabeel Arabi learned his history from the same school obama learned his history.
Donny Donson commented:
I wonder if these islamic illiterates know what the sight post is for on that there gun! derrrr
J commented:
Egypt is correct…..if they think all will be well if they destroy Israel. Once Israel is gone (which I hope never happens)and their people discover that things only got worse (no trade deals, no money), who will be their next target (check the mirror). Unfortunately, the USA now has a man in power who agrees with our enemies.
chris commented:
Why do these cowards cover their faces? I guess I answered my own question.
AuntieMadder commented:
#9 May 19, 2011 at 12:33 am
jony101 commented:
George Washington wasn’t considered a terrorist even by the British. He and his men fought wearing uniforms. They didn’t hide behind women and attack civilians. Nabeel Arabi learned his history from the same school obama learned his history.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yeah, that load of dung jumped out at me, too.
ter·ror·ist
–noun
1. a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism.
2. a person who terrorizes or frightens others.
3. (formerly) a member of a political group in russia aiming at the demoralization of the government by terror.
4. an agent or partisan of the revolutionary tribunal during the Reign of Terror in France.
–adjective
5. of, pertaining to, or characteristic of terrorism or terrorists: terrorist tactics.
Word Origin & History
terrorist
in the modern sense, 1947, especially in reference to Jewish tactics against the British in Palestine — earlier it was used of extremist revolutionaries in Russia (1866); and Jacobins during the French Revolution (1795) — from Fr. terroriste ; see terror + -ist (also cf. terrorism). The tendency of one party’s terrorist to be another’s guerilla or freedom fighter was noted in ref. to the British action in Cyprus (1956) and the war in Rhodesia (1973). The word terrorist has been applied, at least retroactively, to the Maquis resistance in occupied France in World War II (e.g. in the “Spectator,” Oct. 20, 1979).
Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2010 Douglas Harper
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
By definition and even according to Libtardian word usage, George Washington was not a terrorist.
A_Nonny_Mouse commented:
Our elites take no notice of what “peace under Islam” really means: it’s the calm and quiet of the graveyard.
Oh, yeah, Islam’s “peace” will come – for some. Islam has no problem bringing “peace” to those who oppose submission to a 7th-century belief system.
= = = =
(Just re-reading prior comments: looks like #8 CT beat me to it. Doesn’t make it any less true, though!)