Iranian Regime Paper: Kill Saudis Living Abroad

The Iranian regime paper Kayhan called for the slaughter of Saudis living abroad.
Ansamed reported, via ROP:

An article published in the Iranian daily Kayhan, close to the supreme leader of the Islamic revolution, Ali Kamanaei, asks to monitor the movement of Saudis living for various reasons in Europe or the United States and to kill them in the name of the ”revolutionary executions”. The article is signed, according to Al Jazeera’s website which reports the news, by Husain Madari, representative of the supreme leader at Kayhan. (ANSAmed)

#1 April 21, 2011 at 7:15 pm
Granny commented:

Eating their own.
#2 April 21, 2011 at 7:25 pm
Winston commented:

Regime change in Iran will solve these issues once and for all
#3 April 21, 2011 at 7:27 pm
Ginger commented:

We know some one who loves Saudi money does that count?
#4 April 21, 2011 at 7:34 pm
commonman commented:

Al Jazeera isn’t that our leader’s favorite news channel ?
#5 April 21, 2011 at 7:48 pm
Old One commented:

Dinnerjacket & Iran are the 21st century’s redo of Hitler & nazi Germany. Too bad america’s clueless plitical class is to blind to see reality. Iran’s insanity like that ignored by the polticos of the 1930s is going to end in travail & tragedy for the world.
#6 April 21, 2011 at 7:55 pm
patman commented:

Let it happen. Who cares anymore. I don’t.
#7 April 21, 2011 at 7:58 pm
Dave-O commented:

Old One is wise.
#8 April 21, 2011 at 8:07 pm
JoeyO commented:

yeah, I’m really getting tired of waiting around for them to actually do something – they whine and threaten 24/7 and do little more then (poorly) try to sneak weapons into Gaza for someone else to put their necks on the line…

Either s#it or get off the pot already Iran!

The US could really, really, really use the boost that kicking your bitchy a$$ will provide and it would personally help us out a ton as its a great way to keep Obama from being re-elected (starting 2 new wars while never stopping the ones he promised will be an impossible sell to his base no matter how many times he spews the “Tax the Rich” chant)
#9 April 21, 2011 at 8:28 pm
tommy mc donnell commented:

have people noticed that almost all of the horrible acts that are committed in the name of the religion of peace are done at the behest of its religious leaders?
#10 April 21, 2011 at 8:34 pm
Gandalf commented:

There just has to be a Saudi Super Cleric that can issue a Fatwad to deal regime change in Iran. There just has to be.
#11 April 21, 2011 at 8:35 pm
american patriot commented:

Sunni or Shiite, who cares? They’re all POSs.

However a Muzzie gets done in, we should be just plain happy that he’s been done in.
#12 April 21, 2011 at 9:00 pm
coolidgerules commented:

Who cares? If there was anyone in our INTELLIGENCE dept’s that had a clue, they would be fomenting muzzie on muzzie violence. Let them off each other.
#13 April 21, 2011 at 9:22 pm
Tjexcite commented:

Their mutual hatred of Israel will not trump the mutual hatred of each other.
#14 April 21, 2011 at 10:17 pm
Spartan commented:

Interesting that many here think for the moment that at no point will one of these two groups eventually caves to the other? In order to survive, one will join the other to protect themselves against destruction. And they will partner up in the destruction of Israel. Saudi’s love money. Iranian mullahs love death. Who do you really think wins this? It ain’t Israel. And it ain’t the U.S. The Saudi’s are pissed at the ‘little prince’ for betraying them in Bahrain. And they were a little t’ed off when he didn’t do anything to Iran when they told him to a year ago.

This whole mess will get gruesome UGLY. Do you think Libya goes quietly away, either?
#15 April 21, 2011 at 11:04 pm
SandyfromChesterfield commented:

It is just too bad that we do not get Al Jazeera on our cable. Well, Hillary will see to it that we do.
#16 April 21, 2011 at 11:23 pm
Kathteach commented:

Among many others, Shakespeare wrote in the 16th century that “The Turks are at our Gate” and in fact – Rome was sacked by the Islam haters from another continent. It is an ancient battle all students should learn about.

Would it help at all for us all return to a disciplined study of the classics in literature, history and philosophy …..you know…..all those subjects everyone makes fun of because they are so unlikely to result in a job?

Wake up ……we have multitudes of PHDs who are working the window at Wendy’s right now in much of America.

When will we get back to having a friggin’ clue?

The world right now needs serious people who can do serious critical thinking work – even in college. And if not in college – where else?
#17 April 22, 2011 at 3:19 am
Andreas K. commented:

Here’s a funny detail about the sacking of Rome:

Battle of the Allia (387 BC) – Rome is sacked by the Gauls after the Battle of the Allia
Sack of Rome (410) – Rome is sacked by Alaric, King of the Visigoths
Sack of Rome (455) – Rome is sacked by Geiseric, King of the Vandals
Sack of Rome (546) – Rome is sacked and depopulated by Totila, King of the Ostrogoths, during the war between the Ostrogoths and the Byzantines
Sack of Rome (846) – The Arabs attack Rome and loot old St. Peter’s Basilica, though the Roman City walls prevent further damage to the city itself
Sack of Rome (1084) – Rome is sacked by the Normans of Robert Guiscard
Sack of Rome (1527) – Rome is sacked by the mutinous troops of Emperor Charles V

Rome was sacked seven times, only once by Arabs. The other six times it was done by other Europeans, and even Christians.

By the time Shakespeare wrote this, it was already far in the past, and it was never the Turks anyway. Way to go Shakespeare. He may have referred to either Siege of Vienna, during which the British, however, were rather silent and irrelevant. And the Turks were never at their gates.

I doubt there are any PhDs working at Wendy’s. More likely BAs from the usual things: psychology, philosophy, literature and similar.

Also, critical thinking from people who study psychology or philosophy? Give me a break. Philosophy is a joke. Psychology is reading tea leaves. Philosophy is supposedly the love for knowledge, but in reality it’s just the braindead types, who’re too stupid and/or lazy for real science, who do it. Just like with psychiartrists: they didn’t make the cut as real MDs.
#18 April 22, 2011 at 8:00 am
#1AMERICAN commented:

That would be called moo slum population control
#19 April 22, 2011 at 1:28 pm
Stuart commented:

Andreas K # 17
Your comment puts me in mind of of John W. Campbell, the founder of modern science fiction and late editor of Analog magazine. He was accused of not understanding the value of psychology. His response: “That is true but then again I have no understanding of the value of astrology, phrenology or the reading of tea leaves either.” I give psychiatrists a little more slack, but only those with a good grounding in bio chem and bio physics. I leave the Freudians and other mystics alone.