Can we call him a socialist yet?
This was posted on the White House website today.
FACT SHEET: The President’s Framework for Shared Prosperity and Shared Fiscal Responsibility
Unreal. The White House website is now inundated with Obama’s socialist filth.
What a sad day this is for this great nation.
There’s a communist in the White House.
It’s on his birth certificate Father== Fidel Castro.
The parasites must be doing backflips in expectation that the Obama Money will still be coming their way.
It’s appropriate that the Blowhard spoke at a college. Eighteen-year-old know-nothings are the perfect receptacle for his vapid utterances.
i want to cry
i put on my boots everyday go to work im down to 11 employees
my legs feel older than my age
i can take it till i die
i just cant take seeing people get a check for no work
my god please help them see there sins
Sad day indeed.
Ironically, we simply cannot forget, Bill Clinton was advocating for Obamacare, saying the reason they lost the House for the first time in 40 years was because they didn’t pass Hillary’s Nationalization plans. Hillary Clinton hugged Nancy Pelosi and cried pretend tears upon the passing of the disastrous Obamacare.
Just wanted to say, those are Democratic Partisans typing this garbage – it is the entire Democratic Party which is the problem – not just the ugly Mr. Obama.
Chuck Schumer, Hillary Rodham, Barbara Boxer, Al Gore, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Charles Rangel, Al Franken, etc., they have been robbing Americans for years with this pathetic class warfare. All of these Democratic Partisans have been foolishly pushing dependency, killing opportunity, eroding freedoms, peddling appeasement, etc.
Obama sounded just like all the rest, with this ‘vast right wing conspiracy’ garbage.
Change is an epic flop, ‘smart power’ a total failure.
The Democratic Party has yet again, proven incompetent, corrupt, deceitful, vicious, unstable.
We simply cannot let them have any sincere influence, ever again.
Before we can prevent them from having any real influence again, we have to get out of the current mess. If possible.
And where are the GOPs on all this,may I ask? Huckabee? Pawlenty? Romney?
Do you relly think that any of these three can beat obama? We will be foisted
Huckabee for President-he is all over the cable, on Fox and Friends, on the spot at the top of the hour, he has written a book. This way the Republicans will be assured of a loss. I wishe we had somone to speak out. Maybe we will haveto do it ourselves, Set up an empty chair and have normal Americans speak out in favor of the Constitution and the Republic and gesturing to the empty chair. Maybe drape an empty suit over it.
All this hostility from the left is increasing and I think the lefties will be sending out goons.
Whoa there. Just because Obama uses Socialist metaphors and symbolism in his speeches and has socialists working on his staff and has socialists organize labor protests on his behalf and enacts socialist legislation does not mean you can call Obama a socialist.
good point wodun !
sinerely tom brokaw
No surprise. Here’s Dr. John Drew’s recollection of Barry at Oxy in 1980. He’s still “clinging” to his religion:
During Christmas break, Drew says he was at Grauman-Boss’ home in Palo Alto when Obama came over with Mohammed Hasan Chandoo, his roommate from Pakistan.
“Barack and Hasan showed up at the house in a BMW, and then we went to a restaurant together,” Drew says. “We had a nice meal, and then we came back to the house and smoked cigarettes and drank and argued politics.”
For the next several hours, they discussed Marxism.
“He was arguing a straightforward Marxist-Leninist class-struggle point of view, which anticipated that there would be a revolution of the working class, led by revolutionaries, who would overthrow the capitalist system and institute a new socialist government that would redistribute the wealth,” says Drew, who says he himself was then a Marxist.
“The idea was basically that wealthy people were exploiting others,” Drew says. “That this was the secret of their wealth, that they weren’t paying others enough for their work, and they were using and taking advantage of other people. He was convinced that a revolution would take place, and it would be a good thing.”
Drew concluded that Obama thought of himself as “part of an intelligent, radical vanguard that was leading the way towards this revolution and towards this new society.”
In contrast, “My more pessimistic Marxist perspective indicated this was not a realistic possibility, that we really hadn’t seen a sort of complete revolution take place anywhere in Western Europe, and that this isn’t what had happened in more socialistic Germany or in France,” Drew says. “He was pretty persistent, that I didn’t know what I was talking about.”
Drew’s viewpoint that a revolution was unrealistic “made me very unpopular that evening. It was considered a reactionary and insensitive thing to argue,” says Drew. ….
prosperity is just another word for
nothing left to do
2000 b c man learns to fish
2011 a d man learns to fill out form
gets a union pension bruce spr______ gets an erection
“Shared Prosperity”. Oh, I get it – I work my tush off and others get to “share” in the prosperity I’ve worked hard to create.
10 4 lily i know
“And here’s the thing: I believe that most wealthy Americans would agree with me. They want to give back to their country, a country that’s done so much for them. It’s just Washington hasn’t asked them to.”
So this would mean they want to pay higher taxes right? But Barky also said:
“And without even looking at a poll, my finely honed political instincts tell me that almost nobody believes they should be paying higher taxes.”
But then this is the man that wrote this:
Under water grottos, caverns
Filled with apes
That eat figs.
Stepping on the figs
That the apes
Eat, they crunch.
The apes howl, bare
Their fangs, dance,
Tumble in the
Musty, wet pelts
Glistening in the blue.
the truth is stranger than fiction judgy wudgy
Anybody notice that now he wants to have another commission determine what to do.
the liberals are not redistributing anything, they confiscating. stop saying they are spreading the wealth. what they are doing is concentrating more and more wealth in the hands of a few. they keep confiscating the income from the millions that work to concertrate it in the hands of the hundreds of politicans. they do this so they can have the control over the citizens that the citizens should have over them. the power to tax is the power to tyrannize.
Your donations help keep TheGatewayPundit.com online.