
Michael Laurie, left, and Rachael Bennett, right, of Ottawa, Canada, dress for the cold weather as they walk along the beach in Miami Beach, Fla. Monday, Dec. 27, 2010. Temperatures are expected to drop into the 30′s Monday night in South Florida. (AP/Lynne Sladky)
Florida just went through its coldest December ever breaking records set in 1935.
The Sunshine State lost $273 million from the December freezes alone — including nearly 9,000 acres of crops.
CBS Miami reported:
If you thought it was especially cold in December, it’s not just your imagination. The facts prove it, according to the National Weather Service, which announced Saturday that December 2010 set a record as the coldest December ever in Ft. Lauderdale. Miami, and Key West.
Forecasters say December was also the second coldest month ever in Key West.
A series of arctic cold fronts put South Florida into the deep freeze, with frost on the ground, crops damaged, and people forced to bundle up to face wind chills in the 20′s. While temperatures were unusually chilly as far south as Key West, where a one day overnight low record was set, Ft. Lauderdale, experienced the lowest low temperatures, giving them the nod for the record. However, even Miami and warmer Key West were still cold as records go.
Of course, a record low in Florida is not the same as a record low in the frozen Northeast. According to the weather service, the mean monthly average for Ft. Lauderdale in December was 60.4 degrees. That breaks the previous record of 62.2 degrees set in December 1935.
ADVERTISEMENT
Published May 17, 2012 at 1:26 pm - 151 Comments
Tom commented:
I get the point but it isn’t the coldest ever…we have no way of knowing that.
Bill Mitchell commented:
No matter what, it’s all global warming. This is why manmade global warming is not science – there is no scenario in which in can be disproven.
Bill Mitchell commented:
colder – global warming
hotter – global warming
wetter – global warming
dryer – global warming
more hurricanes – global warming
less hurricanes – global warming
vote for pedro commented:
Cut the funding for the research if their models can’t take known past data and generate today’s atmosphere and climate.
Bill Mitchell commented:
This is what liberals do. They create a false premise (“the earth has a fever”), then later, when justifying their position, they refer back to the original false premise and state that it is settled science and cannot be debated.
“Settled Science” is in itself a contradiction. Science is NEVER settled. To say you have settled science is to pretend that all that will ever be known about a subject is already known. It’s like “government creating jobs”. The government cannot create jobs (except government jobs). The government can only provide a fertile field in which private industry is freed to create jobs.
Everything about liberalism is a contradiction. They call themselves “progressives” yet espouse a political philosophy which has been proven to fail over and over again through history. There is nothing “new” or “progressive” about progressivism.
We should call them “Regressives”.
The Elector of Saxony commented:
“Flat Earth” was settled, official science for millennia. In the case of global warming, the role of the Church is played by international socialism. Believe, or Perish!!!!
GrayRider commented:
It’s all the fault of that damn man caused disaster global warming….err, global cooling….err, climate change.
GrayRider commented:
So, Tom #1 explain how the libtards copiously and frequently claimed some year (just pick one, that’s what they do) was “the hottest ever”.
tommy mc donnell commented:
its the coldest december in florida on record. we need a worldwide communist government to have permanently moderate climates. its the only way to stop these man-made cold spells, hot spells, droughts, floods, storms , whatever.
Stuart commented:
Not as cold as it could get. A few thousand years ago the last remnants of hardwood forest (hickory, oak, etc.) were confined to the florida peninsula. Everything north of Florida was either loess plains, boreal forest, glacial outwash plains, or ice. During the interglacial period the hardwoods recolonized the lands to the north to create the forests that were there when the first explorers saw North America in the 16th century. The ice ages haven’t ended by a long shot, we are only in an interglacial period that could end at mother nature’s him at any time.
We are perhaps only one big volcanic event away.
greenasagourd commented:
Uh, is there more of the article? Didn’t see anything about settled science etc. You folks get paid by the post. Let me sign up. I can Google weather, too
GLM In Ohio commented:
#11 January 2, 2011 at 1:36 pm
greenasagourd commented:
“Uh, is there more of the article? Didn’t see anything about settled science etc.”
That’s because there is NO SUCH THING as settled science. The post was short and sweet, because the point was short and sweet….we’re being fed an alarmist bill of goods, while the REALITY OF OUR UNPREDICTABLE CLIMATE is staring us right in the face.
Alarmists would have us believe that they have everything figured out, and the “science is settled”. These are the same arrogant progressive liberals who thought they knew how to perform social engineering, eliminate racism, end poverty, and bring about world peace. They can do NONE OF THESE THINGS. They never have, and they never will. They live in a perpetual state of fantasy and denial, and thinking Americans recognize that. We have no intention of allowing them to destroy America by imposing another one of their failed, misguided agendas upon us.
Silver Bullet commented:
It isn’t “man made global warming”, it’s “man made data” to establish an imaginary theory.
Communists are notorious liars.
GLM In Ohio commented:
Argh … “settled science” … give me a frigging break. After reading that comment again, I found my blood boiling … the arrogance of these people is enough to make me sick.
Henry Hawkins commented:
Greenasagourd: “Uh, is there more of the article?”
Henry: God forbid greenasagourd be required to click the provided link. Perhaps it is beyond his abilities. Here’s the rest of the article:
“Miami, the average mean temperature in December was 61.4 degrees, which also breaks the record for December 1935, which was 62.1 in Miami.
In Key West, the mean temperature for December was 63.1 degrees, a full 2 degrees under the previous record of 65.1 set more than a century ago in December, 1885. The coldest month in Key West history was January, 1981, and the December 2010 mean temperature matched that.
The mean temperature is an average of the high and low temperatures for the entire month.”
Greenasagourd: “Didn’t see anything about settled science etc.”
Which means no greenie has ever declared AGW science settled? It’s their primary mantra, intended to end a debate they are losing because in the end, science depends not on consensus, but on the evidence. When greenies do debate, they are forced to admit the evidence is not conclusive, their models are suspect, their data corrupted, and the debate floor is littered with instances of exaggerations, file drawer fallacies, data selection fallacies, and outright frauds.
“You folks get paid by the post. Let me sign up. I can Google weather, too.”
Ah. An ad hominem attack, irrelevant, but helpful to the damaged ego, and the last refuge of he who is losing the debate.
[Disclaimer: I was paid $42.50 for this post.]
Jeffery commented:
And yet, even with cold snaps in Fla and blizzards in England, 2010 is one of the warmest years of the past 10,000 years. The evidence supporting the current global warming event is overwhelming.
Anecdotal winter weather reports no more refudiate man-made global warming any more than summer heat waves in Europe and Australia, or deluges and floods in Pakistan or Australia confirm confirm it.
Is the Earth warming? Yes. Is the current warming event man-made? Most likely. Will it continue to warm? Most likely. Will several degrees C of warming by 2100 profoundly affect human societies? Yes.
Silver Bullet commented:
#16 Jeffery
If the evidence of global warming is so strong why does the left manufacture so much bogus data in an attempt to prove their fairytale?
This is what climate disruption global change (aka -weather) is really about…
Ottmar Edenhofer, a German economist and co-chair of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change admits the group’s primary goal is the redistribution of wealth and not environmental protection or saving the Earth.
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/554439/201011191859/The-Climate-Cash-Cow.aspx
Lets take a look at all the manufactured data by fraudulent people.
Bogus Data by a bogus leftist…
California (Hein Tran) grossly miscalculated pollution levels by 340% in a scientific analysis used to toughen the state’s clean-air standards
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/10/08/MNOF1FDMRV.DTL
Bogus Data…
UN climate change panel based claims on student dissertation and magazine article
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7111525/UN-climate-change-panel-based-claims-on-student-dissertation-and-magazine-article.html
Bogus Data…
UN pledges tighter controls after melting glaciers blunder
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/24/climate-change-un-row
Bogus Data…
A prime piece of evidence linking human activity to climate change turns out to be an artifact of poor mathematics.
http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/13830/
Bogus Data…
The hockey stick hoax
http://theblogprof.blogspot.com/2009/01/hockey-stick-hoax_5545.html
Bogus Documents…
Experts Say White House ‘Misrepresented’ Views to Justify Oil Drilling Moratorium
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/10/experts-say-obama-misrepresented-views-justify-offshore-drilling-ban/
Obama’s top science adviser, John P. Holdren, advocated the “de-development” of the United States
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/51702#
What they want is to ‘save’ the planet from capitalism. In other words…fundamentally transform the world into communist governance.
Henry Hawkins commented:
If you have conclusive evidence, you use it. If you don’t, you make it up. In politics, that is, not in science. What Silver Bullet has very nicely linked is not science, it’s politics. And what he has linked is less than 1% of what could be linked to in terms of AGW falsehoods.
GLM In Ohio commented:
#16 January 2, 2011 at 3:47 pm
Jeffery commented:
“Anecdotal winter weather reports no more refudiate man-made global warming any more than summer heat waves in Europe and Australia, or deluges and floods in Pakistan or Australia confirm confirm it.”
Refudiate? Really? REALLY?
“Is the Earth warming?” You have no idea. There is insufficient data to determine what is “normal” for anything other than a few hundred years of our history.
“Is the current warming event man-made?” Possibly, but given the huge number of other possible natural causes, it’s not likely.
“Will it continue to warm?” Yes, it will, before it cools, and then it will warm again. Evidence that this has been occurring for thousands of years abounds….
“Will (would) several degrees C of warming by 2100 profoundly affect human societies?” Perhaps. And, it’s possible that the effect could be extremely beneficial. Screaming bloody murder and ASSUMING that the effects of a warming period would be catastrophic are nothing but unsubstantiated scare tactics. We arrest people who scream “fire” in a crowded theater. This “climate warming” scam amounts to the same thing….
You “climate change” freaks are nothing but a bunch of arrogant know-it-alls, and most of you lack even a basic education. How do we know that? Because you use words like refudiate…. Refudiate? Really? I rest my case.
You want to impose your agenda on the rest of us, without one shred of proof that this “warming” period is anything but a natural event, and without a shred of proof that it would be bad for the earth. The taxation and regulation the “climate change” zealots are proposing will do massive damage to our economy, kill jobs, and make life much more difficult for everyone, especially the poor. The regular folks in this country, who don’t buy in to this scam, aren’t about to have it crammed down their throats only to sit back and watch the arrogant elite exempt themselves from it. When you alarmists start practicing what you preach, and give up your Escalades, quit jetting around the country, start living in dirt huts, shut off your electricity, and quit breeding, then maybe we’ll be impressed. Until then, just give it a rest.
Militant Conservative commented:
#1 January 2, 2011 at 9:10 am
Tom commented:
Another literal dunce. Coldest ever recorded by man.
Thus, what is the perfect temperature of the earth? Now, ten years ago,
50 years ago. The earth decides this not man. We’re getting ready to have massive flare activity from the sun. GEE man can’t be causing that either. But, the socialist will try and tax you for it. Some of you still don’t get it. This is about controlling the masses via taxation and confiscation of liberties and wealth. Powder is dry.
Militant Conservative commented:
#16 January 2, 2011 at 3:47 pm
Jeffery commented:
Idiot, other planets in our solar system are experiancing global warming.
DID WE DO THAT TOO??????? i think our culpret is it sun, NOW try and put out the sun will you skippy. There are forces you cannot imagine nor control. Just like there is a GOD you cannot imagine nor control. YOUR not in control dunce, never were. LORD help us your children have become ignorant beyond beleif. powder is dry.
Jeffery commented:
MC,
Why the name-calling and vitriol? Why do you say that other planets are warming? Do you have evidence of this? I am skeptical when someone doesn’t believe overwhelming scientific evidence on this planet but does believe a tale they’ve heard about Mars or Saturn or Pluto.
The sun is actually cooling a bit, yet the Earth warms. Do you have evidence that increased solar activity is causing the current warming? If you do, please share.
The Earth is warming now, but not because of a natural cycle but almost certainly because of the addition of man-made greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. There is little scientific debate about this. The relevant question is what, if anything, we should do about it.
Jeffery commented:
GLM,
More name-calling, tsk, tsk. I used ‘refudiate’ to poke fun at Sarah Plain, but you knew that. The scientific evidence on global warming is overwhelming. Pimping a Florida cold wave is mere clowning by the pundit and you should be insulted at such an ignorant post.
GLM In Ohio commented:
Jeffery, FYI, it’s not name calling when what a person says is true. Your statements reek of elitist arrogance, and you’re clearly an alarmist. If you don’t like the heat, stay out of the kitchen, but don’t expect me not to call it the way I see it…
Also, you clearly didn’t use “refudiate” to poke fun at Palin. When people like you smear Palin, you always make a point of using her name. No, I’m guessing the word was still fresh in your mind from all the left-wing blogs you frequent, and it just sort of spewed out there. I just couldn’t pass up the opportunity to highlight the fact that you liberals say a lot of stupid things too. Of course, once I pointed out your gaffe, you seized upon the opportunity to smear Palin like a good liberal. It’s so very refreshing and encouraging to know what a hole she’s boring into your brains. Here’s a hint though…. Next time, if you want us to believe you meant to use a stupid word like that sarcastically, try putting it in quotes or something. Then, maybe you won’t appear to be so wet behind the ears. Good try though …
As far as the “scientific evidence” on global warming goes, it’s only “overwhelming” to people who have no capacity for unbiased, individual thought. If you are overwhelmed by it, well, that’s your problem. Intelligent people who believe in REAL science consider ALL the facts, not just the ones that fit in with the pre-determined conclusions the media is feeding us. We will continue to work extra hard to dispel the myths being sucked up and regurgitated by sheeple like you.
GLM In Ohio commented:
And Jeff, continuing to make the statement that “there is little scientific debate” about the “facts” of global warming is a little ridiculous, don’t you think? Scientists and thinking people across the world are engaged in rabid arguments about AGW/Climate Change, and the subject is raging on every blog that has a related post open for comment ….
Again, more arrogant, elitist fantasy from the left. It is what it is, because we say so….
Ridiculous …
Militant Conservative commented:
#22 January 2, 2011 at 8:50 pm
Jeffery commented:
Vitriol?? I have a civil tounge, You just can’t handle the truth as spoken. The evironmental movement was taken over by the socialist/communist regime decades ago. IF you would stop having cranial rectal diesease you’d see this. I’m sorry your ignorance is so high that you blame human activity for natural weather. Gee, Mount pinatubo in the Phillipines and the man made disaster of 500+ oil wells in Kuwait on fire. What was the result??? 1 degree of cooling (COOOOLLLING). Mamby pamby metrosexual with no stones nor brain.
Atmosphere= 78%nitrogen + 21%oxygen = 99% CO2 makes up .4% of the content of the remaining 1%. Stuff it ya lil terd. The science was mase up and was found out. The original data cannot be found. Your part of the climate change socialists. All this about is taxing and confiscation of wealth and freedom.
Three motivations of man, LOVE , MONEY , POWER. Algore does not love even his own wife (he’s divorced). Money and power is all he loves. With either one he gets the other. I do not reseach for other weenies.
You’ll not accept facts anyway, such is the nature of those that are ideology driven and not cause and effect driven. powder is dry.
Jeffery commented:
GLM,
It is what it is because of the scientific evidence, not because of any authority. A simple recitation of facts does not make one arrogant, elitist, leftist or alarmist. That global warming is discussed on blogs like Gateway Pundit doesn’t mean there is a scientific debate. You and I are definitely not engaged in a meaningful scientific debate since you have offered no arguments to support your position(s).
Name-calling is not name-calling if the name-caller declares it’s not name-calling??? That’s funny.
Almost all professional scientists disagree with you. There is little scientific debate about whether the Earth is warming. The instrument and satellite record (since 1979) are clear and consistent. The reconstructed historical temperature record (from several proxies) argues that the current warming period (and the predicted warming) is the warmest in 10,000 years. This entire interglacial period (between the ice ages) encompasses the entire history of human civilization. There is no credible ‘natural’ explanation for the current warming. Melting ice caps, rising ocean levels, melting glaciers, cooling stratosphere and night warming are all phenomena that support the primary temperature record.
Even President Bush and his administration believed the scientific record on warming. As recently as 2008, Senator McCain supported a carbon cap and trade system. The CBO estimates that carbon dioxide mitigation efforts, although not cost free, will have less an impact on the overall economy than did the recent financial market meltdown through 2050. Of course there will be specific industrial disruptions as we convert from a coal and oil energy based economy to sustainable energy sources.
Please present your arguments that refute (or refudiate!) the scientific consensus on the temperature record and the theory of man-made global warming.
Do you really think a winter cold wave in Florida is evidence for or against the theory of global warming? Almost all scientists would agree it is not. Why are you not insulted that the Gateway Pundit thinks you are so dumb?
Jeffery commented:
Militant Conservative,
Do you have anything to offer other than silly name-calling? I didn’t think so.
How does your conservative militancy, with your dry powder, manifest itself? Are you preparing to bag yourself some leftist libs on judgement day? lol
Haha, you crack me up. Don’t ever change.
GLM In Ohio commented:
Jeffery, that was a very eloquently written piece of garbage. Arrogant elitists like you seem to be especially good at that. You have been presented with a variety of facts and arguments that more than adequately call the “settled science” of global warming into question, yet you refuse to open your mind and consider any of them. You were right about one thing … there is no way anyone is going to engage in a meaningful scientific debate with you. You simply won’t allow it.
M/C and I both hit the nail on the head though … neither of us is calling you names, we are simply stating the truth, and you just can’t handle reality. If you act like an arrogant tool here, you’ll be called one. If you say stupid things, you will be called stupid. Plain and simple….
And, while you might be feeling pretty cocky right now, rest assured that things can change very quickly in a society as unstable as ours. The rift between those who carry the water in this country, and those who simply want to take it is widening. Anyone can see that the taxpayers’ back is nearly broken. Unless something changes soon, the will of those who produce in this country is bound to collapse, and chaos will ensue. When that happens, there will be millions of people across America just like M/C and I who understand what, and who, caused it. I wouldn’t expect a lot of sympathy from us.
Atlas Shrugged – read it.