Obama Administration Admits Polar Bears Are Not ‘Endangered’ But Sets Aside 187,000 Miles For Them Anyway
Posted by Jim Hoft on Wednesday, December 22, 2010, 10:32 PM
After democrats passed the junk science “pile of sh*t” Cap and Trade legislation in June 2009 a report was released, and suppressed, that showed that polar bear numbers, far from decreasing, were much higher than they were 30 years ago.
In fact, it’s about time for a cull.
Polar bear numbers in Canada have increased in 11 of 13 regions in recent years.
Polar bear encounters on the North Slope oil fields have risen to record levels the last two years.
There are 5 times as many polar bears today as there were 50 years ago:
Today the Obama Administration admitted that polar bears are not endangered but are a “threatened” species due to non-existent global warming climate change.
Despite the fact that the bear populations are booming, the Obama administration set aside 187,000 square miles in Alaska as a “critical habitat” for polar bears recently. The action that could restrict future drilling for oil and gas development. After all, it never was about the polar bears. It’s always been about their far left anti-American agenda.
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
NEWLY DISCOVERED VIDEO Previously Scrubbed From YouTube Shows Trayvon Martin Participating in Local Fight Club
Published May 21, 2012 at 12:19 am - 55 Comments
bigkahuna9 commented:
We need to bannish liberals to this wonderful area of Alaska… They can feed the polar bears…yes literally…at least they would be good for something bear food.
I am curious…Can the next President come in and open up all the garabage this scumbag president has taken over? Does this shiiiit need to be confirmed by congress? Can the President really have this kind of magic wand power to steals states land ?
this is sick This bastard needs stopped
HTLIT commented:
Pure land grab… and another way to shut off drilling! The fools are as bad as the Gestapo!
Redwine commented:
This has nothing to do with conservation or endangered species. It’s a land grab to put enormous swathes of US land under the jurisdiction of the Federal government.
In Oct., GP posted another massive federal land grab (http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2010/10/new-mexico-wilderness-bill-another-disastrous-federal-land-grab/). It’s all about destroying America. Witness the treasonous admission of radical Muslim “congressman” Ellison: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/progressive-vision-borderless-us-rep-keith-ellison-%E2%80%9Cgod-willing%E2%80%9D-%E2%80%9Cborder-will-become-an-irrelevancy%E2%80%9D/
and the extremely dangerous “czar” Van Jones: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/green-make-believe-van-jones-admits-left-is-pretending-need-for-regulations-and-cap-trade-in-green-movement/
Just_Saying commented:
Excellent question, BigKahuna at 10:40pm. The trouble is, this usually sticks — Jimmy Carter tied up thousands and thousands of acres in Alaska, and they are still tied up. Bad news for Alaska and America when the president decides he’s all-powerful.
.
mcc commented:
Definitely these land grabs are meant to restrict drilling and access to our natural resources. Not just the individual, but the entire nation cannot be allowed self-sufficiency.
kevin m commented:
Actually Obama has so far been one of the most successful presidents in the last 50 years.
bigkahuna9 commented:
Successful at tearing the country down, apart and dividing it like I personally have never seen. Pelosi congress has been the dirtiest, slimiest, most untransparent on record. The have abused power like no other. They should be jailed for their ruthless deficit spending. They have damaged this country beyond belief. Obama has successfully failed.
Obama will go down as the biggest scumbag to ever set foot in the oval office. My only hope is that rat bastard has ruined his party’s chances of ever controlling congress or the whitehouse again for the foreseeable future.
I also hope to God that Obama care, FCC Student loans and his tax policies are repeavel, revoked and shoved up his sorry a$$
Other than that I love the SOB
GLM In Ohio commented:
“Actually Obama has so far been one of the most successful presidents in the last 50 years….”
If your definition of success is the destruction of our business base, expansion of our debt, growth of our entitlement class, loss of real jobs, and intensification of racial tensions, then yes, Obama has indeed been the most successful President in the last 50 years. Probably the most successful in history. He will also go down in history as the most hated …
RSweeney commented:
As long as it reduces the flow of that icky oil, and hurts those greedy oil companies, it’s ok with Obama his pals.
Perhaps Alaska should buy a bunch of GE brand wind turbines instead.
squeaky commented:
“…..most successful presidents in the last 50 years….” in a pol pot kindda’ way. this is the new description of success? when one guys hero is another guys criminal….nothing changes
[The campaign was timed to begin this month because it is the seventieth anniversary of the high point of an artificial famine engineered by Stalin's regime which, by some accounts, cost more than 10 million lives.] there is nothing new or unprecedented about obama……
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/may/04/russia.usa
ausonius commented:
I can think of no better place to start than by the new House of Reps defunding this (as well as several other) agencies. Simply refuse to provide funding, cut it in half or something failrly dramatic. Pass bills to fund whatever agencies you so choose and refuse the others. That way, when the Senate and/or Obama refuse to pass it, they can explain the govt shutdown they created. Surely there are some smart and courageous fellows in the new House.
Hedgehog commented:
Agenda 21.
Joanne commented:
Obama gets pleasure from sticking it to Sarah Palin – can’t wait until she can stick it to him; it will be sooooo sweet. I hope he likes the colour orange.
susy commented:
Polar bears are white. Go figure.
Buffalobob commented:
Any who thinks that the environmental movement has anything to do with saving the environment or animals is a fool. Any who supports any of these organizations is a fool. Any sportsman that aligns with these organizations believing they are saving fishing, hunting or out door activity is a damn fool. These organizations have one thing and only one thing on their agenda. Bring the United States of America and the working people down to the level of the third world.
Billsocal commented:
Will bet you those lands are in area that has oil in them. It is just another ploy by the Rockfellers to block the US at getting at large oil fields in Alaska. It is all lies that are coming out of the government now a days. We just went through one of the wettest Decembers on record in SoCal and we are being told we are going to have a drought. Only problem is they had recorded snowfalls in the Sierra that last couple of years. Where is all the snow melt going? and it the same in the Colorado River.