UN Bans Climate Change Denier From Cancun Meetings
Posted by Jim Hoft on Monday, November 29, 2010, 2:46 PM
The UN banned a global warming denier from covering the talks this week in Cancun.
At the last conference in Copenhagen journaist Phelim McAleer was attacked during an interview with Neil Cavuto.
Now the UN won’t allow Phelim into their wealth redistribution meetings.
A veteran journalist and documentary film maker, known for asking difficult questions of climate scientists and politicians, has been denied press accreditation for the Cancun Climate Change Conference in Cancun, Mexico.
The UN has refused access to the Cancun Climate Change Conference to Phelim McAleer, who is well known for asking scientists and politicians difficult questions about Global Warming orthodoxy.
McAleer was notified of the UN’s refusal to accredit him just days before the international conference opening today.
McAleer produced and directed Not Evil Just Wrong, a documentary on Global Warming, and his reports from Copenhagen Climate Change Conference went viral on Youtube.
During one encounter an armed UN security guard prevented McAleer from asking a scientist difficult questions about the climategate e-mails and warned that if he did not stop filming he would confiscate his equipment and expel him from the conference.
McAleer was also assaulted by environmentalists during a live TV interview.McAleer says the refusal to allow him access to the Cancun Climate Change Conference is censorship.
The UN officials in Cancun are hoping to finalize a plan to tax the developed world for their greenhouse gas emissions.
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
Rev. Jeremiah Wright: Barack Obama Has Done Nothing For Black Community (Video)
Published May 16, 2012 at 7:37 pm - 46 Comments
JimmyT commented:
I would say it’s more of an admission than censorship. By not allowing him to attend, they’re admitting that he is obviously correct in view of “no global warming taking place here”. If they had solid facts to back their global warming position, then they could answer any question put before them. If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, than baffle them with BS.
Chisum commented:
Since the whole purpose of the meeting is to use “climate change” to confiscate money from wealthy countries and redistribute it to poor countries, I can see why any dissension would be unwelcome.
With the amount of money at stake I’m surprised that dissenters aren’t shot on sight.
Andreas K. commented:
Of course they don’t want him in there. Denying “global warming” (or even having doubts about it) is like being a nazi, I think that’s how Al Gore put it.
If they had solid facts, they would have shown them already. But all we got were James Hansen’s forged graphs (which he even admitted) and Mann’s hockey stick (which can’t be reproduced and for which all data has been “lost”, yeah, they didn’t have a backup of that data either.)
tarpon commented:
The science is settled, Al Gore said so … Well maybe the ethanol hooky, burning food, still has some rough edges.
If you liked the last winter, you will love this one, the sun is still on holiday and shows no signs of returning …
tommy mc donnell commented:
the left will resort to any means to get their hands on other people’s money.
bg commented:
++
UN Bans Climate Change Denier From Cancun Meetings
of course it does, and its not the first time, that said (just a sample)..
AL GORE, THE UNITED NATIONS,
AND THE CULT OF GAIA (1999)
Leftists Want to Grant Legal ‘Rights’ to Mother Earth
UN
["My hope is that this charter will
be a kind of Ten Commandments"
~ Mikhail Gorbachev
"The real goal of the Earth Charter is that it will
in fact become like the Ten Commandments"
~ Michael Strong
"We are moving toward a New World Order, the world
of communism. We shall never turn off that road."
~ Mikhail Gorbachev
"The social experiment in China under Chairman Moa's leadership
is one of the most important and successful in human history."
~ David Rockefeller]
Islam
[Today, the responsibility, which used to be laid at
the door of God, is fastened on the shoulders of man.]
the powers that be evidently believe the New World Order rests upon
Obama’s messianic shoulders, not to mention what the ONE believes..
you see, it’s like this..
without all this manipulating, fear-mongering, and out & out lying about MOTHER NATURE’S CLIMATE CHANGE, the ELITES cannot implement their NEW WORLD ORDER DREAMS for their new & genetically improved future generations.. sorry, but the reason they must kill CAPITALISM is due to the fact that their establishment is becoming a tad too crowded for their liking.. the less healthy rich people the better for the healthy rich people, get it yet??
==
burt commented:
If Al Gore believes his theory let him donate his millions. Put your money where your mouth is Mr. Gore.
squeaky commented:
a theory who’s biggest advocates are also the biggest hypocrites……
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1324859/Al-Gore-left-car-engine-running-hour-long-environmental-lecture.html
and lest we forget the limo that was left running during another gore speech [in nyc] so the annointed one wouldn’t have to suffer the inhumanity of oppressive heat. meanwhile back at the ranch, i believe at iotw is a nice article about mr green himself bono. the truth shall set you free – what are they afraid of – yes i know follow their wallets.
squeaky commented:
also when you consider the financial status of gore when he left d.c. and compare it to his income today. will tipper be waltzing off with a hefty settlement? inquiring minds want to know.
Mark1957 commented:
They evidently don’t believe their own science or they would hold the event in Greenland rather than Cancun.
Mo commented:
The title of his documentary, Not Evil Just Wrong, exposes the filmmaker’s faulty premise. It is evil to take by force or fraud wealth created by some and distribute it to others. The fact that they use the weather to dupe the gullible is as old as the hills and of secondary import.
reconstitution commented:
For anyone who wants to prove to themselves that global warming is a farce, I suggest investigating the records of sea level kept by the agencies that study tectonic plate movements. What you’ll find is that the dramatic sea level increases predicted by global warming have not occurred. The proof that global warming has not materialized after more than 30 years of liberal hyperbole is available to anyone who wishes to take the time to look it up.
Valerie commented:
This guy does not deny that climate change happens.
Lisa G in NZ commented:
“they” (globalists, world order elite-types) will NOT be swayed from their agenda to promote man as the cause of global warming… they want to be “biomassters”:
anyone happen to notice Fox mention “bioeconomy” as the future world-wide planned economy?
Fox link: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/11/21/biofuels-harmful-helpful-researchers-argue/
“The ETC Group, an international organization supporting sustainability and conservation, has just published its newest report, an 84-page document that presents a lengthy criticism of “the new bioeconomy.” In it, principal author Jim Thomas argues that using biofuels for energy and resources isn’t green — in fact, he says, in certain ways they can be more harmful to the environment than coal.”
Go read the report. IT IS CHILLING… especially how following this path would actually help destroy terra firma aka EARTH.
Report: http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/pdf_file/biomassters_v12.pdf
Ya know lefties love love love those UNINTENDED consequences. (Phelim M. and others have researched DDT and 50 millions deaths due to preventable malaria! thanks Rachel Carson who is a hero of Al Gore)
*sigh*
Andreas K. commented:
Valerie, nobody’s denying that “climate change” can happen. Or maybe even is happening (it’s not, we’re heading for a cooling.)
The thing that every sceptic is shooting at is the simple minded approach by those global warming screamers. They all say mankind is causing it.
And I say: where is the proof?
There are 380 PPM CO2 in the atmosphere. OMG, sounds a lot! But how many people know what 1 PPM is? It’s parts per million. So the atmosphere right now has 0.038% CO2! 0.038%!!!! We have more argon in the atmosphere than CO2.
That doesn’t cause anything. The concentration is simply TOO LOW.
Changes have been observed in experiments with concentrations of 60% CO2 and above. Which also explains why nobody has managed to reproduce a warming in an experiment. There’s simply not enough CO2 in the atmosphere.
If a warming of the Earth would happen right now, it would be caused by the sun and only the sun. However, the sun seems to be heading for a sleepy phase. She won’t be as active as before. That happens. That has happened numerous times in the past. Just like there will be warmings, as well.
During the past 2,000 years climate history shows clearly an up and down trend. The Romans could grow wine in England. 2,000 years ago. While the Chinese invented Chrome. Both cultures were, more or less, at their height. Why? When do cultures bloom? When to divilizations grow? In warming phases. In the 1,200s the Danish could grow wine as well. Today it’s far too cold in Denmark for that. Another warming phase.
Then the was the so called “little ice age.” Lots of people died. Harvests weren’t as expected, etc. Why? Because there was a cooling.
So, how could that happen?
It’s no surprised that Mann’s hockey stick completely ignores those facts. Cause these facts completely and utterly destroy his ridiculous “theory”. When you add those events to Mann’s graph, you can quickly see that there’s nothing abnormal with the warming that reached its peak in the 30s and 40s of the 20th century (those were the hottest years in the 20th century.)
Since then the temperature is actually going down. The Arctic Seas report ice records.
But of course, in summer, the ice in the Arctic is melting. Of course it is. It’s summer on the northern hemisphere. Global warming? Not really. Just the normal cycle of melting and freezing.
Also…
0.038% CO2 in the atmosphere, of which mankind produces, if we’re very, very, VERY lenient… 4%. But we have “saturated” the atmosphere with CO2. 0.038% CO2 is apparently “saturation”, at least according to the enviro-nitwits.
If 0.038% are saturation, what about Venus and Mars? Venus and Mars have similar CO2 levels. Way above 90%. Yet Venus is hot as hell, while Mars is freezing. Why?
It’s so simple.
Check the distance to the sun and you’ll see.
BTW, the same BS was pulled with the so called “hole” in the ozone layer. The hole, which isn’t really a hole, is still there and nobody really knows how long it has been there. And, that’s a fact, the hole’s size, and thickness of the Antarctic ozone layer is heavily influenced by the activity of the sun.
Again, it’s the sun.