Now We Know… Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Got Bitch-Slapped By Iranian General
Posted by Jim Hoft on Sunday, November 28, 2010, 2:34 PM
It’s kiss and makeup time…
President Ahmadinejad (right) welcomes new Revolutionary Guards leader Mohammad Ali Jafari (Telegraph Photo)
Today’s Wikileaks leak is historic. Never before has a superpower lost control of such vast amounts of sensitive information. The The leaked documents presumably came from the same source- Private First Class Bradley Manning – who was bitter after a breakup with his boyfriend. Manning, smuggled the information out of a secure facility on a CD-RW labeled “Lady Gaga.”
But despite the horror of this latest leftist assault on the United States, at least we now know this…
Ahmadinejad got bitch-slapped by Ali Jafari.
Der Spiegel reported:
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emissaries also learn of a special “Iran observer” in the Azerbaijan capital of Baku who reports on a dispute that played out during a meeting of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council. An enraged Revolutionary Guard Chief of Staff Mohammed Ali Jafari allegedly got into a heated argument with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and slapped him in the face because the generally conservative president had, surprisingly, advocated freedom of the press.
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
Rev. Jeremiah Wright: Barack Obama Has Done Nothing For Black Community (Video)
Published May 16, 2012 at 7:37 pm - 46 Comments
retire05 commented:
Can anyone tell me why a PFC, basically one step up from a boot, had such access to classified information?
Is our national security so inept that it would do this? Is our military to incompetent that it would but a buck private in charge of documents that could do massive damage to the United States?
Oh, yeah, it is and it can all be summed up in two words: Nidal Hassan.
LYNNDH commented:
So, Conservatives want freedom of the Press? Who knew?
Vrajavala commented:
Retire05, He’s a hacker, right?
retire05 commented:
#4, yeah, he’s a hacker. One that swore an oath to not only the Constitution but to protect and defend the American people. In my view, there is no greater low life that Manning. Personally, I am sorry we abolished the firing squad. And didn’t Benedict Arnold do no less than what this guy did? Didn’t Arnold reveal secrets to our enemies (and yes, I view the clown from Wikileaks an enemy).
And what a role model for abolishing the DADT policy.
retire05 commented:
Sure, LYNNDH, I believe in the First Amendment. Consequently, I want your computer hacked into, all your medical records published on the internet, your criminal history, including any speeding tickets you may have gotten, published on the front page of yahoo news, your divorce records, and your most private emails put out there for all the public to see.
I am sure you would have no problem with that thinking that the freedom of the press trumps your right to privacy.
squeaky commented:
“Is our military to incompetent that it would but a buck private in charge of documents that could do massive ..] just following the allinsky principals of infiltration and changing/destroying the entity from within. beware of greeks bearing gifts….much as this guy who was represented [when he spoke locally] as a poli sci grad of howard u. who worked with amnesty international and just wanted to pay his bills and see the world…….
http://www.mudvillegazette.com/archives/007574.html
Reaganite Republican commented:
Barack’s kinda guy!
IOpian commented:
I am wondering why the CIA hasn’t made working for WikiLeaks a very dangerous job. Hopefully the KGB or Mossad can cause some folks to end up missing.
Granny commented:
#9 November 28, 2010 at 3:33 pm
IOpian commented:
I am wondering why the CIA hasn’t made working for WikiLeaks a very dangerous job. Hopefully the KGB or Mossad can cause some folks to end up missing.
_________
Given the way Obama’s regime has consistently strong armed and humiliated Israel, I would imagine that the Mossad is rather enjoying this. Why should they do TheWon any favors?
Granny commented:
#2 November 28, 2010 at 2:45 pm
retire05 commented:
Can anyone tell me why a PFC, basically one step up from a boot, had such access to classified information?
Is our national security so inept that it would do this? Is our military to incompetent that it would but a buck private in charge of documents that could do massive damage to the United States?
_______________
I find this exceedingly hard to believe too. Granted, DoD security is at least a couple of decades behind the eight ball and there is a certain class of teeny compu-geek that has historically delighted in breaking in. This just seems like way too much access for a mere private though.
protected due to violence commented:
This is a propaganda and Lobbying for ISLAMIC TERORIST REGIME, THIS NEWS IS BOGUS, AHMADINEJAD DESERVES TO BE HANGED LIKE THE IRRG Leader soon, By us Students
got slapped, right
grizzlybare commented:
Golly. You need a program to tell the good guys from the bad. Now I
see why Obama hates his job, and couldn’t care less about the country. He’s a pure ideologue, and fails miserably as a hands-on President.
Marx was probably a lousy golfer too.
Militant Conservative commented:
Till you have aleader and not an affirmative action president, what do you expect?
He’s a joke of global proportions. a usefull idiot to the rest of the word. THAT’S how smart he is. He can’t even outsmart the dumbest criminal leaders in the world. Let alone swim in the deep pool of thought that is America. He HATES America as founded. He will do everything to distroy her. then there are those of us willing to give our all. powder is dry.
Muggins commented:
Do these potentially embarrassing and compromising cables have to be save on some hard drive in Baghdad? I would suggest that most of these cables could have been deleted instead of saved.
john ritter commented:
My God, this place is infected by stupidity. Can you not see that this actually benefits us normal Americans?
Fred Beloit commented:
Let us consider the publishers who printed all of this dangerous information. Can someone explain to me how the NYT is different from a fence who, though he does not steal property directly, knowingly sells stolen property? That is a crime. Why is it that the NYT cannot be prosecuted for criminal activity?
Fred Beloit commented:
I should have added that yes the press is guaranteed freedom, but the Constitution doesn’t protect the right to sell illegally gotten goods.