Islamists Kill Pregnant Woman & Children For Protesting Public Beatings

Islamists murdered a pregnant woman and 3 children on Thursday for protesting the public beatings of the village’s teenagers.
All Headline News reported, via ROP:

Four people have killed and more than 12 others injured as Hizbul Islam militants opened fire in the Haradhere district in Somalia’s Mudug region on Thursday.

The death and injuries occurred when a group of people congregated and protested at a public square where the militants were beating the village’s teenagers.

Pregnant woman and children are among those killed, a witness told a local radio station.

The witness indicated that Hizbul Islam fighters accused the teenagers of watching pornographic videos on their mobile phones.

But, please don’t mention that the killers were followers of Islam. It might upset Joy and Whoopi.

1 2 3 Newer Comments >>
`

#1 October 15, 2010 at 10:05 pm
Opus #6 commented:

Of course. For a second there I thought we would be spared the Daily Outrage, but here it is. Courtesy of that religion-that-must-not-be-named.
#2 October 15, 2010 at 10:20 pm
MrGoodwench commented:

Someone send more money to NASA …fast….
#3 October 15, 2010 at 10:29 pm
Opaobie commented:

Any comment from the “NOW” gang?
#4 October 15, 2010 at 10:32 pm
MrGoodwench commented:

How long before such ” incidents” start happening in Minneapolis ?
#6 October 15, 2010 at 10:37 pm
dnb commented:

Re: The ‘Where’s Mohammed” cartoon: Anyone notice how idyllic a day without the prophet seemed to be?
#7 October 15, 2010 at 10:38 pm
Opaobie commented:

….on the other hand, there may be an upside to the original incident — “the public beatings of the village’s teenagers” — if they impose it in some of the inner city ghettos….

“The witness indicated that Hizbul Islam fighters accused the teenagers of watching pornographic videos on their mobile phones.”

Opening fire on the bystanders is out, though.
#8 October 16, 2010 at 12:05 am
Andreas K. commented:

There is no such thing as “islamists” or “islamism.”

There is only islam. The (artificial btw) idea of “islamism” is really just that: artificial. Brought up by islam appeasers.

Leading scholars on islam like Nagel and Raddatz have stated this over and over again in the past.
#9 October 16, 2010 at 1:05 am
Diane Valencen commented:

The right once again proving steadfastly that bigotry is its own reward. I often wonder how you guys sleep at night with the talking points echoing in your empty heads?
#11 October 16, 2010 at 3:19 am
Andreas K. commented:

Dear Diane Valencen

I hope you really like sharia law.

You talk about bigotry? Read the koran, you infidel whore, who you are like apes and dogs and worse than cattle.

Under sharia law the following applies (just FYI, but you’re likely going to dismiss it as “racism” or some other BS, since you “intellectual” lefitsts are really just that: intellectual, but not intelligent):

· There is no freedom of religion
· There is no freedom of speech
· There is no freedom of thought
· There is no freedom of artistic expression
· There is no freedom of the press
· There is no equality of peoples-a non-Muslim, a Kafir, is never equal to a Muslim
· There are no equal rights for women
· Women can be beaten
· A non-Muslim cannot bear arms
· There is no equal protection under Sharia for different classes of people. Justice is dualistic, with one set of laws for Muslim males and different laws for women and non-Muslims.
· Our Constitution is a man-made document of ignorance, jahiliyah, that must submit to Sharia
· There is no democracy, since that means that a non-Muslim is equal to a Muslim
· Non-Muslims are dhimmis, third-class citizens
· There is no Golden Rule
· There is no critical thought
· All governments must be ruled by Sharia law

Unlike common law, Sharia is not interpretive, nor can it be changed.

Oh and you have to veil yourself. If you fail to do so, you can and will be beaten by your “muslim” buddies. Because not veiling yourself as women indicates the following: you’re a prostitute and can be raped.
#12 October 16, 2010 at 3:28 am
3Wire commented:

Why is it people like Diane can sleep at night with the knowledge that the believers of mohammed have killed a pregnant women and children. The killing in the name of their religion is not a problem for the likes of Diane or the View hags. The problem is people who speak against the killing of the pregnant woman and children in the name of Islam. I will not say it is the left who’s heads are empty I will say their heads are filled with hate.
#13 October 16, 2010 at 4:04 am
Militant Conservative commented:

Diane Valencen
October 16th, 2010 | 1:05 am | #9

because of your insulent out burst. I will rip more pages out of the defiled KORAN today.

Your sick lady. powder is dry.
#14 October 16, 2010 at 4:59 am
Male Silverback commented:

Diane, please address the problem and leave your comments about the right out.
#15 October 16, 2010 at 5:55 am
Finncrisp commented:

The religion of peace “strikes” again. Feminists silent… again.
#16 October 16, 2010 at 6:07 am
BigAlSouth commented:

Cone, on, Dude. It’s an “isolated” incident and can be attributed to only about 4% of the Muslim population worldwide.

What’s that? 1.3 Billion Muslim’s worldwide?

Four percent of 1.3 is what? Yer kiddin me.

Dang. That’s a lot of fanatics, ain’t it.
#17 October 16, 2010 at 6:22 am
No Man commented:

BigAl:

That’s 52,000,000 enemies of God and man and about the same number as emperor worshippers in Japan at the start of WWII. The other filthy pagans suppport. The Japs were (cruel) men, unlike these backward cowards with lumps of feces for brains.
#18 October 16, 2010 at 6:25 am
No Man commented:

That crap is already happening in parts of IL and MI that are suffering under sharia tyranny.

All you Obama-worshipping imbeciles: thanks for screwing up the greatest country on Earth.
#19 October 16, 2010 at 6:25 am
Diane Valencen commented:

I will address the subject in a post back at my site. For the record here Somalia is this way not merely because it is a state where Muslims live, but because it is in a state of anarchy. That state of anarchy was created as a remnant of the Cold War. When there was no longer a need to stop the threat of communism, that last great monster under the bed for the Right, the United States turned its back on Somalia. Let none of you forget that Osama bin laden was an American ally for ten years when the Soviet Union occupied Afghanistan. When America celebrated the defeat of the Red Army the Taliban moved right in and bin Laden turned his attention to how he could defeat his friends that had abandoned him in the mountains. 9/11 was blowback people not a manifestation of some deeper evil within Islam.
#20 October 16, 2010 at 6:28 am
Granny commented:

You know, this has nothing to do with “left” or “right”. Anybody who willingly accepts that killing those who protest against the beatings of teenagers without due process – with or without the cover of some “religion” – borders on the lunatic. Yes, Diane, I do mean you.