The Obama Administration set another record today.
For the second year in a row they passed the trillion dollar deficit mark.

Don’t expect this chart to make it in any front page story.
(USA Today and Heritage)

For the second year in a row the Obama Administration pushed the national deficit above the Trillion dollar mark, further proof that Obamanomics are a complete failure.

Preliminary figures from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) show that Washington ran a $1.291 trillion deficit in 2010, just slightly less than last year’s $1.416 trillion.

To put these figures in perspective, the annual budget deficit between 1789 and 2008 never reached $500 billion. As a percentage of the gross domestic product (GDP), the past two years’ deficits of 10.0 and 8.9 dwarf all other deficits since World War II.

Recession-damped revenues continued to contribute to the budget deficit, coming in at 14.7 percent of GDP. However, low revenues are only a temporary contributor to the budget deficit. CBO data shows that once the recession ends, revenues should converge back toward their historical average of 18 percent of the economy.

The surging spending will likely be permanent. Federal spending this past year reached 23.6 percent of the economy, which, along with last year’s 25.4 percent, are the highest spending levels in American history outside of World War II. And President Obama’s budget would permanently maintain federal spending at these high levels.

Putting these revenue and spending trends together shows that long-term deficits will be driven exclusively by above-average spending. After all, if revenues revert back to their historical average, yet spending remains 5–6 percent of GDP above its historical average, then it will not take a mathematician or economist to determine which variable is driving the deficit upwards.

Spending dipped 2 percent in 2010, from $3.520 trillion to $3.453 trillion. Unfortunately, this was not the result of actual, repeatable spending restraint. After costing $154 billion in 2009, repayments to TARP lead to a $108 billion “profit” this past year. The cost of bailing out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac dropped from $91 billion to $40 billion. Deposit insurance costs declined $55 billion. Each of these savings represents one-time offsets from the cost of previous financial bailouts. These better-than-projected results should not, however, be confused with good policy.

 

Did Obama Help ISIS?

 

Disable Refresh for 30 Days

Cookies and JavaScript must be enabled for your setting to be saved.

1 2

`
  1. Cloward, Piven in action. He IS trying to shipwreck this country and the damn Dims in Congress are helping him!!

    G*d save us.

  2. His plan to destroy this country from the ground up is working like a charm.

  3. Record deficits, record debt, record unemployment rates, record home foreclosures,…Worst president EVER.

  4. All right, I’ll say it.

    UNPRECEDENTED!

  5. The most dangerous president EVER!

  6. This sh!t needs to stop!

  7. That is a better graph. The blue line is where the average yearly deficit under Bush was, $600 billion per year. Without TARP there might of been a surplus,

  8. Hey, I guess this IS an historic presidency.

  9. In two years Obama’s out of control spending has added more than a trillion dollars more to the deficit than that ‘spendthrift’ George W. Bush did in 8 years (the last two years of Bush’s term being with an out of control democrap congress).

  10. Highway to hell. Obama is a wake up call to the American public. If you do socialism then you get this if you follow the TPM/conservatives you’ll not get debt you’ll get outta debt and a free republic. powder is dry



1 2


`

© Copyright 2014, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions