Hmm.
There were 1,078 articles today written about Barack Obama’s speech today in Philadelphia.
Only one article, written by Britain’s Daily Mail, mentioned that a book was tossed at his head.

It narrowly missed him.

Once again, it took the British press to report on this incident.
(The Daily Mail)

And the AP also didn’t mention that a streaker was arrested at the rally today, too.

Either our media is even more corrupt than we thought or the Daily Mail has the story wrong.
Would they really hide this from the American public?

UPDATE: Make that 2 media outlets reported on the book.
Reuters also reported on the incident:

Our US media really is that corrupt.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  1. I don’t believe this happened. Nothing on Drudge, nothing on Fox. Nothing anywhere. The JournOList media would love to report this because no matter who threw it, it would be a TEA Party member until they were forced to admit it wasn’t, but then the story would be out there. Typical JournOList trick. So I think this story is bogus.

  2. Would they really hide this from the American public?
    —————–
    Depends on whether their bosses @ Mediamatters are working today or not ……

  3. They probably wrote the article in advance: “It was great! He was electric! Repubs are bad!”
    The end.

  4. I do believe this happened because there is a picture of the streaker – smack dab in the middle of the top of the Drudge front page with the headline ‘Final Streak: Vote 2010″.

    And by the way, most of those 1087 articles are likely simple republications of the same one AP article.

  5. a) Either our media is even more corrupt than we thought; or,
    b) The Daily Mail has the story wrong.

    Answer a) is correct regardless of whether answer b) is correct.

  6. It actually is a visual that the progressive media needs to keep suppressed: showing the President in dialectic, forceful opposition to the signification of reason, knowledge and education, will certainly cause further erosion in the educated electorate. “Book vs. Obama” is a terrible frame.

    Then again, I’m not confident the administration’s message management team has any competence left. Going from the absolute genius of the campaign effort to the utterly dismal administration program, we’ve seen ineptitude that has permitted the President to be associated with violent, New Black Panthers with billy clubs and militia uniforms and “Let’s smash up some Jew storefront” boots. Combine that with the worst-of-the-worst nonstop golfing and vacationing imagery that communicates a modern day Czar Nicholas II partying in excess unimaginable to the middle and lower class, and you’ve got flatlined presidency.

    It’ll be interesting to see if the current Ministry of Information incompetents can keep this out of the cycle or not. Probably will serve as a good gauge as to the state of their media control going into the home stretch on the mid-terms.

  7. When Bush had a shoe thrown at him, it made international news for over a week. There is even a monument in Iraq of a large bronze shoe… http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3533/3237740493_d22dc56bfd.jpg

  8. Take the first picture (closeup) and blow it up 350 times. Obama has been photoshoped in(see the white line around his head) and the book looks to be ‘laying’ on the branches of the tree.

  9. If you watch the video the book or pamphlet was thrown up on the stage and it really didn’t look that close to his head. It looks more like someone just tossed it up there. As for the naked guy, he does have something written on his stomach, probably a website since it ends in .com.

  10. As usual if we want to know what is going on with Obama we have to read the British Press…
    and Common Cents……

    http://www.commoncts.blogspot.com

  11. It looks like the book was thrown from behind. It probably hit the grinning idiot in the head.

  12. Matters little if it happened or not, Alphabet Pravda will report it to slander the right anyway they can.
    Of course if true, and a book was used, that might suggest a liberal, given their unflinching believe that the Right is book-shy.

  13. Mark AdamsNo Gravatar
    October 10th, 2010 | 8:22 pm | #10

    Take the first picture (closeup) and blow it up 350 times. Obama has been photoshoped in(see the white line around his head) and the book looks to be ‘laying’ on the branches of the tree.
    _________

    No, this picture is authentic and there are other pictures in the series. The white line around an object at 350X is a product of the mathematical formula used to blow it up. Means nothing.

  14. 0bama:

    Read my waging finger! We have to prove the pundits wrong and my economic plans to decimate the economy are working! We will win!

    Look, I have spent almost a trillion dollars of the Tax Payer’s money on buying the Main Stream Media and padding my crony’s bank accounts. We have cut another 95,000 jobs from the American economy and the unemployment rate is rapidly rising. That is what I call Change! Working people suck! Tax payers suck! They both suck!

    What was that object going by? Was that one of my books flying passed my big ears? Call the Secret Service and the FBI! We need to take all books way from these stupid tax payers…or buy enough guns to mow down this entire crowd!

    I fell like kicking some @ss! Get in your limousine Biden and take off your pants! Your @ss is mine!

    I am so mad! Adjust the teleprompter… Let me start again… We need more of your money to win this election. I know, I am rich and you are unemployed but it is going to get worse before I win. Get a job with ACORN and give me more of your money!

    My limousine is running and Barney Frank is in the back. He will be doing quickies for $25 and you will also get a tax deductible receipt. We must buy the Main Stream Media! Come and get Barney while he is hot! Good day… and buy some more of my books.

  15. I’m telling you, if the Republicans don’t take back the House and Senate by comfortable margins, we need to take to the streets.

  16. Granny
    October 10th, 2010 | 8:34 pm | #16
    No, this picture is authentic and there are other pictures in the series. The white line around an object at 350X is a product of the mathematical formula used to blow it up. Means nothing.
    —————————-
    You can look at the picture 100% and still see the white line cut. I invite you blow the picture up and LOOK at the book. It’s lying on the branch. This is an Reuter Copyright photo. The incident might have happen, but that photo has Doctored.

  17. Seems like Reuters and AP are the only ones generating reports and the news outlets just pick up whatever AP puts out. I get most news from telegraph.uk. They reported the Hal Lewis resignation over climategate. Didn’t find anything in the dinosaur media on that either.

  18. It is Penn so you bitter folks and religio-gun clingers have to see me hug the white guy.
    I’m a cool cat smiling guy. Trust me. We are gettin’ Hope -changey done. Your life is changed and, see, you hope for a job.

  19. The book must have been a pretty trashy novel…

  20. I just gotta know the book.

  21. The Manchurian Candidate. And I heard Hillary Clinton threw it. Anyone else want to take a guess? Maybe the blog chief wants to offer a prize to the one who’s right once the full facts come out?

  22. It looks like there is some sort of upside-down umbrella on the back cover of the paperback. How do we look that up?

  23. UFO.

  24. The Blaze also has it, too! – the new Glenn Beck News site…

    Maybe by daylight it will be so all over everywhere, they cannot cover up for it and have to tell us what the book in question was!

  25. Looks like I was wrong! The book story is all over the place now.
    If indeed a book was thrown, it was completely wrong. No one should get away with throwing anything at a President. And we should not lower ourselves to celebrating like the Leftist animals did when Bush had shoes thrown at him. God knows I can’t stand Obama but he IS the President and he MUST be safe.

  26. I did not throw the book at Obama. If I had, I would’ve hit him square on his simian forehead. And, I would’ve used “War and Peace”, not some flimsy semi-pamphlet.

    As Walt Kowalski said, “You can count on that.”

    Don’t blame me.

  27. He’s not the president….He is a Kenyan fraud!

  28. CBS reported it, both online and on television:

    http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6946817n

  29. http://www.michellemalkin.com has a closeup of the book and is asking people to let her know if they’ve seen it or can name the title. Great shots, so take a look if you can. Some say it looks like Bill O’Reily’s book, “Fair and Balanced”.

  30. @MarkAdams, there is video of the incident. The book is thrown at about the 0:38 mark. It happens very quickly, but yes, someone did indeed do it.

    And if you cock your head to the right a little, you see what looks like a coiled Gadsen Snake on the back cover above the barcode!

  31. A man named Sajid Ali Khan says it was his book, and I think I have identified the title.

    http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2010/10/to_boost_sluggi.html

  32. “You can look at the picture 100% and still see the white line cut. I invite you blow the picture up and LOOK at the book. It’s lying on the branch. This is an Reuter Copyright photo. The incident might have happen, but that photo has Doctored.”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha7hcqaU0eY

© Copyright 2012, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Web Development By Arlington Kirk