Horrific… 2 Abortionists Caught Storing Dozens of Unborn Babies in Freezer
Posted by Jim Hoft on Monday, September 6, 2010, 6:25 AM
Sick.
Police raided the offices of two Maryland abortionists and found dozens of unborn babies in a freezer.
Maryland has suspended the licenses of two doctors and ordered another to stop practicing in the state. (WJZ)
The NC Register reported, via Free Republic:
Two abortionists in Maryland (Dr. Steven Brigham and Dr. Nicola Riley) were ordered to stop practicing abortions in Maryland after a woman was severely injured.
Subsequently, police raided the clinic searching for medical records and to their horror they discovered dozens of unborn babies stored in a freezer.
After being shocked and disgusted my mind raced back to an incident a few months ago.
This would be a strange and horrible story if it had never happened before but just a few months ago another abortionist, this one in Philadelphia, was discovered to be keeping aborted babies in jars.
The offices of Philadelphia abortionist Kermit Gosnell were raided earlier this year after a woman was injured and they found the conditions of the clinic to be “deplorable and unsanitary.”
Authorities reported: “There was blood on the floor, and parts of aborted fetuses were displayed in jars.”
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
Busted!… Obama Headlined a DEMOCRAT SOCIALISTS OF AMERICA Event in 1996 **FLIER**
Published May 24, 2012 at 8:46 pm - 91 Comments
Militant Conservative commented:
Life, Liberty and the persuit of happiness. None of these may be sought if you first do not have LIFE.
Proof that the founders were wise beyound their time and years. This is Infanticide plain and simple.
It is evil. You may have the right, but do not use public funds for this. powder is dry
neomom commented:
Do you think the Muzzies would teach us that stoning thing. I have finally found a use for it. Bastards.
squeaky commented:
ghouls…….
WSG commented:
There goes breakfast.
gorgo commented:
LAKE OF FIRE.
The All Real Numbers Symbol commented:
That is digusting. Just … oh. Words fail me.
OBAMANATION @ NOTRE DAME commented:
http://www.FreeTheND88.org
dacoelec commented:
The results of Roe v Wade and Godless people…..
archer52 commented:
This is easy to understand once you accept certain concepts I learned over the twenty years of dealing with the dark side of humanity.
1. The mindset of the Nazi doctors who experimented on people like they were animals is not exclusive to that group or that time period. There are monsters in every generation. People will no moral clarity or conscience. Some are doctors. Some are killers. Some are both.
2. Just because someone looks normal or has a normal job does not mean they are normal. I’ve seen happy-go-lucky kids torture and kill other kids for fun. I’ve seen kids who were screwed up but certainly not to the level of murder kill over an insult or a slight. I’ve seen some people so twisted that getting into their heads is like a going into a bad Halloween horror maze. Just when you think you’ve seen everything, something else jumps out and scares the sh** out of you.
I had one detective come out of an interview with a 12yr old arsonist and look dead at me and say, “I’ve just spoken to the next Ted Bundy.”
To see certain “doctors” disregard the sanctity of human life is no shock. To many it doesn’t hold the value it holds for you and me. I simply doesn’t. I read that Dr. Kevorkian used to hover over dying patients and look into their lies to study the exact moment of death. He said he wanted to see the soul leaving, wondered what was on the other side….
I’m not surprised there are people like him in the abortion business.
IN MEMORY OF MARY JO commented:
Reminds me of the New Notre Dame fight song -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_JlYaKdrkI
kato commented:
This clinic will be an award-winning hospital under ObamaCare.
Kenny Solomon commented:
Here’s two links from The Philadelphia Inquirer….. The writer (Marie McCullough) has been following this since well before July.
Other than her work, I’m fairly certain the media as a whole has been ignoring the entire thing.
I know they’ve ignored it here in Florida – the bast….. the “doctor” has offices in my state.
———
21 July 2010…..
Steven Chase Brigham, a physician whose medical license has been revoked, relinquished, or temporarily suspended in five states, is now facing regulatory and tax troubles that could jeopardize his chain of 15 abortion clinics.
Brigham, 53, has rarely given interviews about his legal scrapes, which go back as far as 1989 and have pitted him against medical boards, creditors, landlords, patients, and others. He declined to be interviewed for this article.
———
3 September 2010
Doctor’s four-state abortion business under investigation.
Brigham also had $234,536 in federal tax liens against him in April for failing to pay payroll taxes from 2002 to 2006.
Maryland regulators are investigating not only Brigham, but also two physicians he employed, the documents show.
———–
There was an initial post on RedState about this – with no link sourced…. So I started in looking.
Digging up this stuff (and more) last evening had me completely unable to sleep overnight.
I can’t shake the images.
I need a stress relief session….. now, but the rang…. um….. The “stress relief center” isn’t open until tomorrow at 10am because of the holiday today.
Kenny Solomon
South Florida
pamlinson commented:
It’s called “OBAMA CARE”
seven commented:
Darwinists. Kill the young. The abortionist in KC ate some cooked aborted baby with his other lunch.
BurmaShave commented:
“Two abortionists in Maryland (Dr. Steven Brigham and Dr. Nicola Riley) were ordered to stop practicing abortions in Maryland after a woman was severely injured.”
Theoretically the whole argument for legalized abortion is to protect pregnant women; of course, we all know that it is really about elitists suppressing the population of the hoi polloi by killing babies.
Maria commented:
Oh, but abortions are *safe* (for the mother, anyway), right? No more “back alley abortions” for America, right? Isn’t that what they promised? Obama said his daughters will never be punished with a baby (I’m assuming this would be an “unwanted” baby).
Obamacare will fund such facilities. They regulate everything in America, but refuse to place any regulations on abortion clinics. Just try to open up a dental practice or an eye clinic and you pay out the wazoo because of all sorts of regulations. Hospitals and clinics that provide needed health services are subjected to the most rigorous inspections by the Joint Commission and other agencies – right down to the records. Abortion clinics are the exception, apparently. Why is this? My guess would be politics.
Palinfan commented:
Since this is the third person found hoarding dead babies, I’d be most curious to find out why. I wish the rest of this story would come out.
For these people, hell awaits.
Sanity commented:
How about stuffing them in a freezer after sucking out their “brains” while they’re still alive? Too progressive?
fedrefugee commented:
For those of you who live in California, these doctors are Barbara Boxer’s champions of the “right to choose”.
LL commented:
The unborn are human beings.
No matter how you slice the argument, they are. No matter how you slice THEM, they are.
There should be a death penalty attached to these Maryland butchers.
I understand the legal standing of “right to choose” but the immorality of the method of slaughter puts these ‘doctors’ in the came category as the very worst humans that have walked the earth.
Joanne commented:
People who perform abortions kill the unborn, so what does anyone expect. Can you imagine yourself pulling a live baby limb from limb out of a woman’s womb? These people are evil.
Insane Moron commented:
Oh no! This means that our nation’s babies are getting killed!
Fuzzlenutter commented:
Could we please stuff these two “doctors” in a couple of jars of formaldehyde for all to see?
Opus #6 commented:
This story is grotesque.
On the other hand, what do you expect from people who sign up to work as abortionists. Babies wriggle and struggle to get away from the abortion instruments while they are alive.
Here is testimony from a Planned Parenthood director who witnessed babies trying to move away from the abortionist.
http://mainfo.blogspot.com/2009/11/for-those-who-cant-be-thankful.html
These so-called doctors witness this first hand every day, multiple times per day. Beautiful, tiny, perfect human beings struggling for life and do they show mercy? No. They tear the babies to pieces.
I expect that these hired killers will be odd individuals, at the very least.
MochaLite commented:
So the press doesn’t care when they kill the babies, but it’s a big deal when then leave a mess on the floor or in a freezer? We have some seriously disturbed people in this country.
donh commented:
The Aztec temples that sacrificed humans to a pagan god are decorated with racks of skulls. Abortion is a demonic cananite ritual of a death cult practicing human sacrifice in worship to the Devil…. http://lh6.ggpht.com/_WuZRIPMAef0/SIFKjkbWJaI/AAAAAAAADFk/RnjPcQMijYE/100_tzompan.JPG
Deanna commented:
I agree with PalinFan. I wonder why these and other abortionists were keeping the bodies? Since, at least certainly with this “doctor,” profit is a motive why waste money storing them? Is there a market for this? It is all too sick for me to comprehend.
Insane Moron commented:
Abortion is wrong.
Kenny Solomon commented:
Here ya go……
Reality.
Not some sort of typical bitter God-clinging tin-foil hattery.
————
American Women’s Services
Dedicated to Reproductive Freedom and Quality Women’s Healthcare.
http://www.americanwomensservices.com
1-888-ABORTION
Insurance Call Center: 1-800-501-9162
————
Gee, it all sounds so full of sunshine and light…… Plus of course after twenty-five years in business, now there’s a renewed sense of hope and change.
Condescending hypocritical lying sacks of s…..
First, do no harm.
auntie em commented:
Not surprising at all. Abortionists and those who abort their babies are murderers….99% of them are serial killers.
greenfairie commented:
I’ve read account after account about the depravity and evil of your friendly neighborhood abortionist. The pro-death MSM, the neo-pagan feminists, and eugenics-loving progressives try to portray abortionists as heroes bravely standing up to “fanatics.” But there can’t possibly be anything right with someone who kills babies day after day and based on what I’ve read about these people, there certainly isn’t. Dirty clinics, botched procedures that leave women sterile or dead, ghoulishness, and a total lack of respect for their “patients.”
Andreas K. commented:
archer52
September 6th, 2010 | 7:17 am | #9
The irony is, that many of these Nazi doctors walked away. Never punshed, never put on trial. Same with their Japanese counterparts. The leaders of Unit 731 (which experimented mainly on Chinese civilians and POWs) walked away, under the protection of MacArthur himself. Nothing was ever done to them, they never faced trial for what they had done.
seven
September 6th, 2010 | 7:54 am | #14
Darwinists. Kill the young.
————————–
Actually, that’s not what Darwinism is about.
I would like to know why these two guys actually kept them frozen.
Research maybe?
At that point remember that doctors in Europe, who were doing research, had to dissect bodies secretly, otherwise the church would have murdered them.
Still, the only thing I can think of is stemcell research and for that a fetus isn’t necessarily the best option.
The biggest mindboggling thing here, though, is that fact that every MD takes an oath, which basically states: do no harm. And there are reasons for abortions that are totally fine in my book (in case of rape, for example, even though such cases, where the rape victim ends up pregnant, are very rare.) But just because someone was too lazy or dumb to use a condom, or because someone just couldn’t keep his or her pants on… No. That’s just crazy.
For me this has nothing to do with god, but rather with the fact that this oath has been around for hundreds of years and these people, who took it, just violate it for money. That says a lot about a society.
And well, don’t act so surprised. This is something the left wants. After Mao’s death China started with the one child policy. That led to the deaths of more than 15 million baby girls, many aborted, others just left to die. That, on the other hand, led to everybody wanting sons, and now China doesn’t have a healthy population anymore. They have a surplus of several million men. And the population is rising anyway, despite this policy.
Oh yeah and some abortions in China are done shortly before the woman would give birth.
Over here this fits into the left agenda as well. It was the former foreign minister of Germany, from the Green party, Joschka Fischer, who once said that the Germans must be thinned out ethnically.
What better way than pushing the idea of a “fun society” where anything goes, sell it as “it’s your right!” and provide the means to get rid of unwanted babies? It certainly helps with the idea of “thinning out” the population. Then add uncontrolled immigration and you get one thing: “Umvolkung”, basically ethnic cleansing by breeding.
Peter Warner commented:
Excuse me for being explicit, but I would like to see an in-depth interview with the repairmen who service the industrial garbage disposal units at these clinics. There’s a national story waiting there I think, if some journalist wants to report it.
Don’t be surprised at what establishment Democrats will do. If a person has no objections to killing babies, what will he NOT do?
Best regards, Peter Warner.
kato commented:
Where’s Janet Reno when we need her?
wanumba commented:
This begs the question, “What do they usually do with all the infant corpses?”
Bag the bodies up and send them to the incinerator with the biotrash?
There are a million abortions a year across the country. That’s a lot of corpses to dispose of. They certainly aren’t getting burials as human beings.
Carbon Monoxide commented:
“At that point remember that doctors in Europe, who were doing research, had to dissect bodies secretly, otherwise the church would have murdered them.”
WRONG! Here is the truth from catholic.com
Every writer knows that a solid gold metaphor can be more powerful than a fact. At the same time, some of our most pervasive metaphors can convey their own prejudices disguised as fact. Catholic urban legends—distortions of history or pure inventions cloaked in the guise of history—are the very stuff of living cultural metaphors in America. You can’t go a week reading your local urban newspaper without a column, editorial or letter to the editor invoking the Inquisition, Galileo, the alleged silence of Pius XII, or the Crusades as rhetorical shorthand to attack a Catholic position. Catholic urban legends are meant to provide a definitive judgment on any Catholic position without ever having to discuss that position itself. A Catholic urban legend properly raised will trump facts any day of the week.
Nowhere is this truer today than in the area of medical and scientific ethics. Few actually debate physician-assisted suicide on its own grounds. Instead, “Don’t Let Them Shove Their Religion Down Your Throat” committees are established to cloud the issue with a host of irrelevant, but culturally effective, diatribes based on Catholic urban legends.
Specter of the Dark Ages
In 2006, when President Bush seemed determined to exercise his first veto over legislation that would extend federal support for embryonic stem cell research, Republican Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania rose to speak on the Senate floor. The Senator argued for medical research that would destroy human embryos, a position the Catholic Church—and numerous ethicists—oppose.
Senator Specter quickly called up a host of Catholic urban legends, his alleged point being that long-standing religious objections to scientific advancement had historically set back medical development for centuries. According to the Senator, faith-based opposition to embryonic stem cell research must not block fantastical cures for virtually every malady afflicting mankind (including, by the way, preventing Senator Specter’s dentist from allowing him to grow a third set of teeth). Here’s a classic paragraph from his talk, spoken gravely from the Senate floor:
Michael Servetus has research on human anatomy. Pope Boniface VII banned the practice of cadaver dissection in the 1200s. This stopped the practice for 300 years and greatly slowed the accumulation of education regarding human anatomy. Finally, in the 1500s, Michael Servetus used cadaver dissection to study blood circulation. He was tried and imprisoned by the Catholic Church. (U.S. Senate July 17, 2006, Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005)
Senator Specter’s history was as weak as both his science and his teeth. Let’s look more closely at the history involved.
The Facts Exhumed
As far as can be understood, the senator was actually referring to Pope Boniface VIII, not Boniface VII. Boniface VII was an “anti-pope” who claimed to occupy the papacy in the late tenth century. That Boniface said nothing about the dissection of cadavers.
Pope Boniface VIII, Benedetto Caetani, was pope from 1294 to 1303. He was a tough pontiff, waging a protracted war of nerves with the French king over the rights of the Church and the authority of the papacy. The French king finally had him seized and he died a short time thereafter.
Nonetheless, during his reign Pope Boniface also undertook important steps in Church history. He proclaimed the first Holy Year in 1300, catalogued the papal library, and reorganized the Vatican archives. He also published Liber Sextus Decretalium in 1298, a vital collection in the history of Canon Law.
What about the dissection of cadavers, supposedly proscribed in a document called De Sepulturis? Did Boniface order that cadavers not be used for medical research, a ban that would land Michael Servetus in jail under Church authority 200 years later?
The reality is that no ban involving the dissection of cadavers for medical research was ever issued by Boniface. De Sepulturis actually referred to a practice of corpse abuse that probably existed at the time. The document condemns cutting up the bodies of the dead, cooking them so that the bones would be separated from the flesh, then carrying the bones back for burial in their homelands.
In De Sepulturis, Pope Boniface said that anyone committing such a barbarous act would be excommunicated. The condemnation had nothing to do with the dissection of cadavers for medical research, but dealt rather with abuse of a corpse—laws which exist in every state of the Union today.
Contrary to Senator Specter’s analysis, virtually all of the early work on anatomy took place at Church-sponsored universities throughout the period that he claimed dissection was condemned, 1300 to 1500. In fact, no historical evidence exists of any widespread dissection ban by the Church. Guy de Chauliac, a fourteenth-century surgeon and doctor who is considered one of the “fathers” of anatomical studies, served three popes as personal physician. He openly encouraged the use of dissection in the study of human anatomy and would hardly have been allowed to do so if such practices were condemned by his employers. Rather than serving as some kind of obstacle to medical advancement, the Church was the source of medical research for centuries.
Church documents of the period do reflect one concern: that clerics not be involved in conducting surgical procedures. This had nothing to do with any fears that surgical procedures were immoral, rather that early surgery was perceived as a secular profession. Additionally, the Church had moral qualms over the danger of botched surgery and what that could mean to the reputation of clergy. The Church believed, therefore, that surgery was best left to the laity. But it certainly did not condemn surgery, anatomical studies, or the dissection of cadavers as part of that study.
Doctor of Heresy
So what is the story of Michael Servetus? Did he end up in trouble with Church authorities because of research on cadavers and, as a result, set medical knowledge of the circulation of blood and human anatomy back for years?
Because of his arrogance and generally repellent personality, Michael Servetus (1511-1553) had the unique ability to unite all sides in the early years of the Reformation. Virtually every Protestant dissenter, as well as authorities within the Church, came to loathe him.
He was born in Spain and, as a young man, was well educated. After reading the Koran, Servetus fixated on the idea that belief in the Trinity caused an otherwise unnecessary division among Christians, Jews and Muslims. Christianity, Servetus believed, was thinly disguised polytheism.
Caught up in the ferment of conflicting interpretations of the faith once the authority of the Church had been rejected, he combined his anti-Trinitarian views with a newly discovered Protestantism. The result was his work De Trinitatis Erroribus. In it, he argued that Jesus was not equal and co-eternal with the Father but essentially the adopted Son of God, a kind of Arianism rediscovered for his own time. Jesus was a human prophet; the Trinity was a sham created not by the writers of the Gospels but by Greek philosophy. As with many of the alleged reformers, he saw himself as calling for a return to the simple faith of the Gospels. In reality, he was abandoning the Gospels entirely.
His work was not well received among the Protestants, to say the least, and he fled to France. Adopting the name Miguel de Villeneuve, he went to the University of Paris, where he studied geography, astrology and medicine. It was there that he met and undertook dissection with his fellow student Vesalius (1514-1564) who went on to be a leader in the growing understanding of human anatomy and circulation.
At some point in his research, Servetus discovered pulmonary circulation—the passage of blood from the heart to the lungs and back. This discovery was not formally published until 1553, when Servetus included it in the theological work called Cristianismi Restitutio that would lead to his death in Geneva.
His theological passions never left him, so Servetus had begun writing to John Calvin, the Protestant leader of Geneva. Calvin, no charmer himself, grew to detest him. The matter of his heresy was only part of the problem. Servetus himself was condescending and personally abusive. Calvin would write of him, “If he comes here…I will never permit him to depart alive.”
Servetus had decided that Christ was returning to earth soon to lead a final battle, as described in Revelation. Servetus believed he would be one of the warriors in the battle, serving under his namesake Michael the Archangel. As the philosopher Will Durant explained, “Servetus was a bit more insane than the average of his time” (The Story of Civilization, VI:481).
Serving as physician to the archbishop of Vienne, Servetus was able to arrange a secret publication of Cristianismi Restitutio. A copy found its way into the hands of John Calvin, who recognized the author as Servetus. Servetus was charged with heresy in Lyons, but the proof was with Calvin in Geneva, as no copy of the book existed in Lyons. In one of the stranger twists in history, Calvin apparently so detested Servetus’ theology that he had the book delivered to the Catholic Church authorities.
Day of Reckoning
The Church condemned Servetus, but he escaped from prison after only three days of incarceration. He fled across the French border into Geneva, where he showed up at one of Calvin’s reformed churches and was promptly arrested for heresy.
His trial did not go well. With his usual tactlessness, he announced his anti-Trinitarian views and confirmed his belief that infant baptism was an invention of the devil. For Calvin, enough was enough.
Servetus had no friends within the Protestant community, all of whose leaders saw him as a dangerous radical. Martin Luther had condemned him vociferously, as did the judges in Geneva. Calvin wanted him executed by sword, but the Protestant judges who had endured his rants during the trial had him burned at the stake on October 27, 1553, just outside Geneva.
In the midst of this chaotic life, Servetus had discovered the rudiments of pulmonary circulation. But was he imprisoned by the Catholic Church for conducting illegal dissections of cadavers as the urban legend cited by Senator Specter claimed? No: The dissection of cadavers was not condemned by the Church and, in fact, was commonplace in Church-sponsored universities.
Servetus got in trouble for his bizarre theology, a theology deplored not only by the Church—which only managed to imprison him for three days before he escaped over a garden wall—but by the Protestant dissenters who eventually killed him for that theology.
The problems of Michael Servetus had nothing to do with his dissection of cadavers for medical research. In fact, Servetus developed a proper understanding of the circulation of blood because of the foundation that had been built under the auspices of Church-sponsored study and research for centuries.
aprilnovember811 commented:
Barry and his monster friend Sebelius are ok with this though aren’t they. They think it’s ok to stick an ice pick in the skulls of babies, and just let them die, don’t they. And we’re funding it aren’t we?
Joanne commented:
Most aborted babies are thrown in garbage cans, so obviously these abortionists had something else in mind to do with these frozen babies.
Christopher Kelleher commented:
If the baby is no more than an inconvenient lump of cells to the “doctor,” his patient, and our ruling class, then why does the doctor memorialize it and why does the ruling class choke when these horrors are discovered? It is not overwrought to identify Satanism at work here.
Dave commented:
Abortion — the human sacrifice to the pagan gods of liberalism. And you thought offering human sacrifices ended with the end of the dark ages.
Samantha commented:
It is a state mandated law to store aborted fetuses in jars with a form of formaldahyde. Then they are sent to the state and are incinerated. I used to work at a clinic and that is standard protocol. However, I’m not sure about the late term because they are only legal if there is a fetal anomaly (fluid on the brain, mental retardation, etc).
left blood suckers commented:
The Obamas will probally give them some type of an award or promote another $150 dinner in their honor.