Bill O'Reilly Mocks Obama's Screwy Ground Zero Mosque Comments (Video)
Posted by Jim Hoft on Monday, August 16, 2010, 9:17 PM
Bill O’Reilly mocked President Obama’s nutty Ground Zero Victory Mosque comments tonight on this show.
Bill O’Reilly on the Ground Zero Mosque Controversy:
“This is another in a long line of dubious decisions by the president. So here’s my advice to the White House… Why don’t you help these guys build a mosque and then try the mastermind of 9-11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, in it. That way you can combine two insane things together. And, that’s a memo.”
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
Busted!… Obama Headlined a DEMOCRAT SOCIALISTS OF AMERICA Event in 1996 **FLIER**
Published May 24, 2012 at 8:46 pm - 89 Comments
jainphx commented:
Bill O is right about 10% of the time, this is one of those times.
Oh according to the Detroit News Carl Levin was hit in the face by a pie in Big Rapids town hall. Big Rapids is strongly Demoncrapic.
jainphx commented:
Things they is a changen!!! Now someone needs to apply a pie to Stabenow.
bitterclinger commented:
O’Really stole that line. Either Rush or Beck said it today, ’cause I know I heard it before he said it.
Terry Gain commented:
Even a squish like Oh Reilly gets it. Sort of. BOR- leading from behind.
StrngernFiction commented:
I could swear I detect some heartfelt righteous indignation from Bill O’reilly here. Could that be? Nah, I must be hearing things.
Patman commented:
Will the mosque have a courtyard for stoning their women, or will they just drag the hapless victims out in the street?.. And where will they find the right sized stoning rocks?
Oh yeah, two blocks away…
F-N stoopid!
mark commented:
If Obama is going to wade into local zoning and real estate development plans across the country then why doesn’t he give a public speech supporting the rights of Wal-Mart to build a store on private property near ground zero? Apparently, some local politicians oppose Wal-Mart building there, and are probably the same ones supporting the mosque. Isn’t building on private property what “this country is all about”…as he tells us? Or does that only apply to mosque plans? And why are the plans for the 9/11 tribute towers still held up while mosque plans seem to be on a fast track approval plan, with presidential backing? Must be a coincidence…again.
neomom commented:
I think Beck is finally getting into the old micks head. Kind of like when Khan put the bug into Chekovs ear.
Old One commented:
I noted the Ted Baxter didn’t raise the issue of the Greek Orthodox Church not being allowed to rebuild by NY bureauweenies for the last 9 years but how the same bureaucraps are falling over themselves to fast track a Jihadist’s mosque.
As a commenter on a blog today stated Ted Baxter is the type of talking head {liberal} who will eat a mile of dear leader Ovomit’s crap just to kiss where it came from.
ogee commented:
O’Reily is all washed up. He wrote his meal ticket when he backed the phoney one and allowed the theft of the primary election.
Nothing has changed.
Rock commented:
Yes Bill has been driving me crazy since he gave Obama a pass in his interview during the election – oinly Brett Baire dared stand up to him.
Jayne on the left coast commented:
Well once B’OR talks sense. He’s a blow hard who has been kissing up to Obammy.
Joe College commented:
Hillary continues blameless during this fiasco even though the imam is fundraising around the world on her dime, and as her agent.
Hillary is getting the same treatment from the press that Obama got during his campaign. She is being protected from all bad news.
The press is keeping Hillary squeaky clean for a run in 2012, while they are in the process of cutting Obama loose. They have decided advancing the progressive agenda is more important than who the president is.
Scott Brooks commented:
This is an in-serious comment from O’Reilly and he knows it.
There is no way that the federal government can seize a mosque and hold a trial just because the president wants it so. That’s unconstitutional.
As usual, O’Reilly is just a guy who is making tons of money off of middle Americans who have suckered into his self-branding of “independent”.
Jack Okie commented:
Scott – it’s called hyperbole.
newmike commented:
Don’t understand the confusion. If given a choice between pro-America and anti-America, BHO will pick the anti-American side. The so-called “smart” people elected a man that has more in common with Hamas and Castro than average people in the US.
Karen commented:
I wish Bill would ask them why they aren’t helping the homeless people of Palestine with all that money they are raising for a Mosque. Perhaps we could tell them what their religious leaders priorities are. Isn’t it time we held Moderate Muslims accountable?
Mrs. X commented:
Bitter #3 — it was Rush, from his show yesterday.
squeaky commented:
[In fact, a one proposed idea that was eventually rejected was the International Freedom Center. This cultural center, first proposed in 2004, was a left-wing endorsed project that presented itself as a tribute to those who lost their lives on 9/11.] ah, yes the freedom center.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2010/aug/17/05-ground-zero-freedom-center-was-secular-liberal-/
Neo commented:
Let’s consider life in NYC with the “Victory Mosque”
This will be the biggest domestic target for those with Islamophobia.
The first “crazy” to “procure” a plane (or other large movable object) will be heading for Manhattan with one target in mind.
Mayor Bloomberg should consider that NYC will spend more money defending the “Victory Mosque” than it currently does protecting the kleptocrats over at the UN.
donh commented:
Research the history of the Grand Mosque in Cordova. It was built in several stages and served as a cultural center for the stdudy of Islamic law. Cordova is a spanish translation of the Islamic word QurTuna. Meaning of this word is unclear but it is a word accociated with muslim universities throuhgout the world. A highly esteemed Imam Al Qurtuna authored the Tasfir a difinitive volume on Islamic law. There is likely a connection between the word Qurtuna and Tunis, like New Tunis. The mosque at Ground Zero appears modelled after the fortified tower of the grand mosque at Tunis.. It may take a hundred years, but the muslims in New York are guaranteed to acquire surrounding properties and build
a grand courtyard enclosed complex around the proposed tower.
donh commented:
Image of the Zitouna Mosque in the Medina of Tunisia… http://www.happytellus.com/gallery.php?img_id=5795
bg commented:
++
thank you for awakening O’Reilly,
lets hope many others follow suit..
the man Obama appointed a US-ME State Department representative..
Feisal Abdul Rauf
[.] He advocates establishing sharia
“in more [ways than one] … through a kingdom or a democracy, [so long as the] fundamentals of Shariah [exist, with standards of Muslim scholars] required to govern. …to organize … relationships between government … and the governed.”]
RTWT!!
==
bg commented:
++
bitterclinger @ 9:32 pm #3
heh, i’ve heard all of them state something or other i’ve written many a time (even read some things i wrote in article’s & vise verse).. so what, lets just be thankful & appreciate the fact that the TRUTH is getting out there one way or another.. of which imho, doesn’t matter by whom or how it’s delivered, and why should it.. again imo, the issues, not the people should be the bottom line..
“All truths are easy to understand once they
are discovered; the point is to discover them.”
~ Galileo Galilei
==
bg commented:
++
OT.. but non-the-less relevant..
please remember that albeit a message for all,
he’s specifically targeting Muslims in America..
Divisive debate on Ground Zero
[The reality is that the impression many leading American Muslim groups leave of Islam can only be described as narcissistic spirituality. They obsess about what "we need," "I want," or what "you are doing to us." It's about what others should do for them, underlined by a demand for political correctness.
They seem to be indifferent to the feelings and needs
of the majority of America, Muslim or non-Muslim.
The president is just parroting that rather than leading.
Many major Muslim groups deny any responsibility for the reforms needed to stop radicals. Instead, they obsess on victimization, make belligerent demands, and wrap themselves in the First Amendment.
This $100 million political structure is a demand that is
wrong in many ways, but especially for Muslims in America.
[..]
Second, we need to celebrate our devotion to American
nationalism and its universal equality “under God.”
[..]
Our major holiday at the end of Ramadan will fall the day before the ninth anniversary of 9/11. May the lessons of Ramadan this year end with every imam asking Muslims to step away from tribal whims and demands and
step towards genuine reform and the separation of mosque and state.]
the opposite of what Obama has not only been preaching, but placing
supporters of in high positions who will be determining the legality of
such laws aka: “social justice”..
==
Arch commented:
Roger Simon has a puff piece on Politico
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/41134.html
comparing Obama’s “unpopular” position on the GZ mosque to Lincoln’s campaign against slavery and Eisenhower’s sending in the 101st Airborne to Little Rock to desegregate the schools. According to Simon, these two decisions were principled and did not “poll well.” He encourages Obama to support the muslims action regardless of the polls.
Mr. Simon should read US history. Lincoln was as a legislator (R-IL). His job was to discuss the issues with his constiuents, his peers and his opponents. Abolition was the nation’s majority position. It polled well enough to get his party control of both Houses of Congress and propelled him into the White House. His major position to reunite the country. He said publicly that he would accept slavery if it would save the Union.
President Eisenhower (a Republican) was a retired 5-star general who understood his obligation to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Sixty-five years ago, he commanded a combat force of 4.1 million men leading them to victory over the most evil threat to the free world. As president, he enforced the 1954 Supreme Court decision (Brown vs. Board of Education) declaring segregation unconstitutional. His adversary, Governor Orval Faubus, was a corrupt democrat in direct violation of the law.
President Barack Hussein Obama (a Democrat) fails to understand the U.S. Constitution. It’s a simple document written in plain English everyone can understand. The First Amendment prohibits the establishment of a state religion and protects the free practice of religion. No one is denying muslims their right to worship, but the First Amendment is not a license to build churches, temples or mosques on any location you chose. Obama had no obligation to interfere with or take a position on a local zoning issue.
The Cordova Mosque is not a house of worship; it is a victory monument to the muslim terrorists who murdered 3,000 people 500 feet from its entrance. This mosque is a place where radical islamists can savor the carnage their savage brothers inflicted on innocent victims. If Obama wants to pander to muslims by lauding this obscenity, let him accept the wrath of the American people.
I hope the mosque is never built. If it is, I hope (God willing) it burns to the ground. If I were a NY fire fighter, I would not lift a finger to save it.
Stuart commented:
Nice Mosque ya got there Mohammed.
It would be a real shame if something happened to it. You know, an accident.
wanumba commented:
O’Reilly is still mired in “communication issues” as the root of all disagreements.
This school of thought, found extensively amongst people who talk all day long in media and in academia AND in LAW, is totally unequipped in ANY measure to deal with real life aggression and duplicity.
O’Reilly doesn’t “get” it. He always interprets actions that form deliberate patterns and direction as, “mistakes.” He doesn’t have any sense of man’s capacity for evil, to lie to confuse the public so they react too slowly, too late.