We’re starting to see a definite pattern of incompetence here.
It’s not just Attorney General Eric Holder who passes judgement on an immigration bill before he reads the law. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano confessed yesterday that she hasn’t found the time yet to review “in detail” the Arizona immigration law… But, she rejects the law anyway.
So do these people read any piece of legislation before they pass it or comment on it?
Just wondering.
UPDATE: The State Department Spokesperson also admitted he hasn’t read the 20 page bill but that he doesn’t like it.
ADVERTISEMENT
Published May 24, 2012 at 8:46 pm - 87 Comments
jorgen commented:
Have Holder and Napolitano not read the Constitution either?
neomom commented:
Ignorant, fraud, party hack. I’m so sick of these so called Professionals. She is supposed to be protecting us.
Arrest and Deport commented:
Something is really wrong with our system when a person with her intellect has any job beyond bagging groceries.
Arius commented:
Eric Holder and Janet Napolitano join the marching morons.
Patti commented:
She isn’t required to do more than reiterate the party talking points.
What do ya expect from an omoeba ?
BBC commented:
Anything that these people do not do themselves is by definition wrong and to be mocked.
Jimmy commented:
Not only is the former spokesthing for Snap-On-Tools ugly, she’s dumber than a sack of crap.
Valerie commented:
This is a message coming from the President: BO does not require the people who report directly to him to do their homework before they attend hearings. If he required them to be up to speed, they would be.
Just as obviously, nobody in the Democratic Party at the national level cares, either.
We need to take our country back from the non-readers.
chris commented:
There is no way that she has not read this law. Same for Eric “the Coward” Holder. It is a relatively short (10 page) bill that anyone who looks at legalese for a living would consume in a few minutes.
Given a certainty that they have read relevant parts of a short, important bill, why lie?
The BO spin machine has decided it is less embarrassing to lie about having read the bill (play dumb – easy for these two) than admit that 1070 almost completely parallels the federal law they are sworn to uphold.
JustSaying commented:
You know, these people are either “quite stupid”…or…they are the most ignorant people to walk the face of this earth..How dare these two get up there and say, “haven’t read the bill” but….this is my opinion….they are laughing at us..I don’t think they give a damn what we, the American people think…blatent abuse of power from this regime!
gus commented:
This is LIBTARD ideology at work.
It doesn’t matter what the law is. What matters is the end these hacks want to achieve.
They have no interest in the law, they have no interest in following the Constitution.
They believe they are ABOVE the LAW and ABOVE the CONSTITUTION.
The end of the Obama administration will be quite ugly.
Mark1957 commented:
Do any of them even know how to read? Yet the expect us to believe that they read the 2000+ page healthcare bill that they rammed down our throats, unbelievable arrogance !!!
Militant Conservative commented:
Be fearful of those that are currently in power. The end justifies the means is thier belief. To fight them we must suspend our morals and ethics lest they use them against us. powder is dry.
JKB commented:
I suspect they are lying or purposely avoiding reading the law or the 2 page summary the AZ legislature put out. If they acknowledge reading it then their statements reveal their incompetence with the law. Not a good revelation for so called lawyers. Also, it would reveal an ignorance of currently running programs and court decisions
NYC has run a stop and frisk program for over a decade – stopping with tenuous “reasonable suspicion” has been upheld by the courts over and over
1st Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed an officer who developed reasonable suspicion of illegal immigrant status during a traffic stop, checked with ICE and transported the individuals to ICE – So acting on reasonable suspicion of illegal status developed during a lawful stop is at least legal in Rhode Island.
If it is unconstitutional for state and local law enforcement to turn over someone suspected of violating federal law to the appropriate federal agency – well, I’m sure that will be good news to drug dealers and gun runners. If the state develops a case, they won’t be able to bring in the feddies.
Kevin P commented:
I think it takes a lot of effort to be that stupid.
Sandy commented:
They have all read the bill and know that the AZ law does not profile anyone. But this isn’t about AZ’s immigration bill its about politics. Obama needs the Hispanic vote and will pretend to care about Illegals because its a good issue. I doubt they will do anything more than talk because this is not a hot button issue that plays well in an election year.
Remember how Obama pretended to care about Arlen Spector. Now he doesn’t even return his calls.
zxczxczx commented:
I bet the White House has told them NOT to read it since Obama made lied about it.. If they read it they will have to say Obama lied.
Melvin Winter commented:
YouTube parody featuring Big Bird’s Sesame Street “reading hotline” and prominent Democrats including Napolitano: http://www.youtube.com/user/Optoons#p/u/0/rQk9t4YzRXY
Mark1957 commented:
Would someone please send this administration some copies of the Hooked on Phonics videos so that they will learn to read !!
Chippy commented:
These people are above “States Rights”. If it isn’t a federal government law they don’t give a damn.
antilbr commented:
change can start today….time to stand up for our country get rid of all these brain dead corrupt obama losers….GET OUT TODAY AND VOTE EVERY SEATED DEMORAT OUT TODAY…bid bye bye to arlen blanche and all seated dems today…lets vote america needs us!!!!!!!
jimbo commented:
They weren’t required to read the health care bill before they passed it…why should they read anything?
Terry Gain commented:
I bet the White House has told them NOT to read it since Obama made lied about it.. If they read it they will have to say Obama lied.
Close. If they claim they haven’t read it, they can’t be questioned on it.
ProLifer commented:
Janet Napolitano cannot even sell the lie.
She speaks as one who has had electroshock therapy!
C.G. commented:
Last Friday, Imus interviewed NY Rep. Weiner who is on the Judiciary Committee and he blasted the law and then admitted that he also has not read the law.
TXBitty commented:
Everyone of them has read the bill, before the ink was even dry. Watch what the other hand is doing.
TXBitty commented:
I think that everyone should call their Reps and Senators to find out if they have read SB1070. Holder, Napolitano, and Crowley’s offices should be called too.
Just wondering if this a Democrat thing going on here and what they are trying to pull.
Big L commented:
They don’t want to be deposed in the trials.
Depositions are arduous and open some hornets nests. Imo, I think there is a trap being set for them but not known what it is.Good. I hope they get sunk.
Sojourner commented:
…These people are above “States Rights”. If it isn’t a federal government law they don’t give a damn… I think you nailed it, Chippy/#21..
…A person would have to be aggressively ignorant to think these executive tools haven’t read the AZ bill.. So, where’s the common thread among Obama’s, Holder’s, Napalitano’s, Posner’s and now Crowley’s statements?
It’s in their feeeeling the law is wrong..as in POTUS,”misguided,” and Holder,”I don’t think its neccessarily a good idea” and Napalitano, “It is a bad law, I wouldn’t have signed a law of this ilk.” They all are saying this ‘immigration thing’, like healthcare, global warming, like abortion,is a ‘settled science.’ Judgment made and passed by Judge and Jurist, Obama and his circle of transformational insiders. They will tell us what we should believe.. rule of law be shredded. Rule of Obama..that’s the directive du jour.
And then there’s this little glimpse of truth that slipped out during PJ Crowley’s interview on Fox:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WdK5Z8PbXk
Starting at approx. 2:21,Crowley states, “I’m simply responding to the challenge that we at the DOS were apologizing for America.
.. {here’s the kicker:} “We were actually, STANDING UP TO AMERICA.. there it is.. The Dept of State is telling us how they and this treacherous administration really feeeeeeels.. they will STAND UP TO US and we can just sit down and shut up!
It’s time for Americans to defend themselves against these flagrant attacks on our laws, our Constitution and our right to live securely within the sovereign borders of our States in our sovereign Republic.
TXBitty commented:
Yep, Chippy@#21
Called one of Sen. Cornyn’s offices to ask if he had read SB1070. Staffer said, “I don’t believe he has, it’s a state issue not a federal issue.”
I also called TX Attorney General Greg Abbott’s Press office to see if AG Abbott had authorized Austin’s boycott of SB1070. The guy said (something to the effect) the City of Austin(Council and Mayor) is separate from the State. They can do what they want. He got a little mad when he thought I was grouping the two together.
jb commented:
kakistocracy
Government by the least qualified or most unprincipled citizens.