It Has Begun… Vandals Smear Refried Bean Swastikas on Arizona State Capitol
Posted by Jim Hoft on Monday, April 26, 2010, 3:51 PM
Pro-illegal immigration protesters vandalized the state capitol building this weekend.
The vandals smeared refried bean swastikas on the building windows.
AZ Central reported, via Michelle Malkin:
The conflict over a sweeping crackdown on illegal immigration in Arizona intensified Monday as vandals smeared refried beans in the shape of swastikas on the state Capitol’s windows.
More protests were planned Monday after thousands gathered this weekend to demonstrate against a bill that will make it a state crime to be an illegal immigrant in Arizona.
Opponents say the law will lead to rampant racial profiling and turn Arizona into a police state with provisions that require police to question people about their immigrant status if they suspect they are here illegally. Day laborers can be arrested for soliciting work if they are in the U.S. illegally, and police departments can be sued if they don’t carry out the law.
But supporters of the law, set to take effect in late July or August, say it is necessary to protect Arizonans from a litany of crimes committed by illegal immigrants. Arizona is home to an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants.
Verum Serum has more swastika pictures from the rallies.
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
Obama Campaign National Co-Chair Admits Giving Students Credit For Volunteering to Elect Democrats
Published February 22, 2012 at 4:19 pm - 32 Comments
Zipity commented:
Who here is surprised by the violent reaction the pro-illegal immigrant groups are displaying? Why wouldn’t they be upset, we have looked the other way on ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION for decades. Now we are trying to close the gates, after the horses have left the barn, and have gotten used to playing the gringos for the morons they are….maybe we should have immigration laws like our neighbor to the south has…..
Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:
* in the country legally;
* have the means to sustain themselves economically;
* not destined to be burdens on society;
* of economic and social benefit to society;
* of good character and have no criminal records; and
* contributors to the general well-being of the nation.
The law also ensures that:
* immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;
* foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;
* foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;
* foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;
* foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;
* those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.
We looked at the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution. Now let’s look at Mexico’s main immigration law.
Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:
* Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
* Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)
* Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets “the equilibrium of the national demographics,” when foreigners are deemed detrimental to “economic or national interests,” when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when “they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)
* The Secretary of Governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article 38)
Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:
* Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)
* A National Population Registry keeps track of “every single individual who comprises the population of the country,” and verifies each individual’s identity. (Articles 85 and 86)
* A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).
Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:
* Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)
* Foreigners who sign government documents “with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses” are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)
Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:
* Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)
* Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)
* Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico—such as working with out a permit—can also be imprisoned.
Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,
* “A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally.” (Article 123)
* Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)
* Foreigners who “attempt against national sovereignty or security” will be deported. (Article 126)
Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:
* A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)
* Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)
greenfairie commented:
If they don’t like it, they can head on back to their failed homeland instead of bringing their gangs, kidnappers, rapists, and murderers here.
The irony is these Viva Aztlan types are more racist than anybody. They hate whites, blacks, and anybody who is not Mexican.
Darwin Akbar commented:
Smearing refried beans on windows and buildings is certainly going to do wonders in convincing the American people that they deserve to stay in this country and be granted citizenship. Keep it up, muchachos!
DINORight commented:
“More protests were planned Monday after thousands gathered this weekend to demonstrate against a bill that will make it a state crime to be an illegal immigrant in Arizona.”
Do they realize what an oxymoron (emphasis on the MORON) that is?! “…make it a state crime to be an illegal immigrant….” What is not clear about the word “illegal” – and why is it only a crime IF the state of AZ says so?
Secure the borders, send ‘em home, just like they do “south of the border.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Auntie Em commented:
What’s next, smeared guacomole??
Geez….get out of our country already and take your refried bean crayons with with you.
Patman commented:
Last night we had tacos in celebration of the true and unwavering leadership in AZ.
Wondering when the legals will be taking to the streets to protest illegals hoarding the system that the legals are paying for… or is that not PC.
redc1c4 commented:
i’m just hoping that they really used refried beans, and another substance that looks similar…
Mark commented:
Sounds like a war is brewing. You know we haven’t had a decent war within the boarders of the US for 145 years! Sometimes wars settle things and they tend to cure pacifism and complacency in a population both of which have been plaguing America for a generation.
theotherjimmyolson commented:
The Az central article does not identify the vandals. It would appear to be unwarranted to claim without a shred of evidence, that the vandalism was done by any particular group. Is this the standard operating procedure at this blog. Just blame whoever you want. Sounds a little like a certain central European country in the early 20th century, no?
Reaganite Republican commented:
I’m sick of the double-standards- can you imagine the uproar if some WASP in a sportcoat and loafers had smeared his club-sandwich in the shape of a swastika?
Ladue Pundit commented:
Remember the Alamo!
Chisum commented:
Sounds a little like a certain central European country in the early 20th century, no?
+++++++++++++++++++
So true. It was probably those evil Italians spreading those refried beans. Since refried beans are such a big part of their cuisine.
theotherjimmyolson commented:
You see, the thing is I don’t know a lot of Hispanics who would want to be associated with the swastika, I do however know that a lot of radical right wing groups have a long association with it. This blog as I see it is radical right wing. If you asked me I think it is much more likely that some radical right wing whackjob in an effort to discredit Hispanics, did this. I mean come on, refried beans, please.
theotherjimmyolson commented:
Looks like a right wing smear job.(pun intended)
Chisum commented:
You see, the thing is I don’t know a lot of Hispanics who would want to be associated with the swastika,
OH REALLY?
http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/26/theyre-back-a-gallery-of-open-borders-extremists/
Ladue Pundit commented:
The swastika became popular in a leftist-nationalist-socialist group called the Nazi Party. Since the radical socialists and leftist anarchists in the U.S. are always up for a rumble, it’s only natural that we’re seeing their trademark on display at this thugfest.
theotherjimmyolson commented:
You are linking to Malkin? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahaahahahhahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahhhahhahahhhahaahahahahahahhahaahahah
Ladue Pundit commented:
Good one, Chisum.
These unhinged illegals and their hippie sidekicks are heading for a Sheriff Arpaio slapdown.
The illegals are just leftist tools. They’ll be back to mowing lawns once the revolution is over.
Chisum commented:
I suppose it’s easier to write hahahaha……… instead of addressing the fact that the hispanics in the pictures had signs with swastikas and were waving communist flags.
How very right-wing of them.
theotherjimmyolson commented:
Because of course all historians agree that the national socialist, who attacked Russia without provocation and slaughtered 20 million slavs were leftist. Please, don’t vote Ladue Pundit.
Espresso Logic - The 6th Sense commented:
theotherjimmyolson
April 26th, 2010 | 3:26 pm | #9
The Az central article does not identify the vandals. It would appear to be unwarranted to claim without a shred of evidence, that the vandalism was done by any particular group. Is this the standard operating procedure at this blog. Just blame whoever you want. Sounds a little like a certain central European country in the early 20th century, no?
Go away Asshat Libtard Troll.
I see stupid people.
Espresso Logic - The 6th Sense commented:
theotherjimmyolson
April 26th, 2010 | 3:58 pm | #20
Because of course all historians agree that the national socialist, who attacked Russia without provocation and slaughtered 20 million slavs were leftist. Please, don’t vote Ladue Pundit.
Who left the door open? An asshat wandered in. Must of just finished his shift at Starbucks.
I see stupid people.
Andreas K. commented:
This is classic.
It’s the same here. If you say you’re against illegal immigration and also dare to say that criminal foreigners should be deported, you’re called a nazi.
Chisum commented:
10 Reasons the Nazis were left wing
Every conservative and patriot has at some point been accused by a leftist of being a “Nazi”. In fact it seems to be the favourite epithet of leftists, who toss it around in the direction of anyone who opposes them. I recently read that if you Google “Bush+Hitler”, you get over 1 million results, such is the frequency with which leftists accuse conservatives of being “Nazis”. The leftist typically casts the Nazis as extreme right wingers, and thus anyone who is a right winger is on the verge of Nazism in the fantasy world leftists live in, hence why they feel so inclined to accuse us of it. The insult is cheap and tasteless. It cheapens the lives of those killed by genuine Nazis, and betrays the lack of intellectual ammunition the left has in debates with conservatives, showing that leftists must resort to tasteless insults to get their point across and smear anyone who opposes them.
http://thewwp.blogspot.com/2006/07/10-reasons-nazis-were-left-wing.html
Chisum commented:
We need better trolls.
All we get are dumb ones.
theotherjimmyolson commented:
Unsettling isn’t it @#21 How the truth has a liberal bias. I am sorry I made you uncomfortable by pointing out that accusing some one of a crime without any evidence is illegal Un-American cowardly and unwise. I will leave you to the stupid people you surround your self with,so you can comfortably demean the (other).
JC commented:
F*cking Scum. Every. Single. One. Of. Them.
And every single half-wit who defends them and their actions.
Eden commented:
Well, gee, Jimmy, don’t go away mad. Just go away.
Valerie commented:
theotherjimmyolson
April 26th, 2010 | 3:53 pm | #17
Actually, you idiot, the person was linking to a gallery pictures of open-borders extremists, illustrating the use of the swastika by those idiots.
The point, of course, is that the people who use the swastikas have been leftists in the past (Nazis – socialists, leftists, the original users) and present (in the pictures).
Denial is not a river in Egypt.
Andreas K. commented:
The truth?
Jimmeh! You see, radical right wing doesn’t equal nazi. Hitler was no right winger. Hitler was left wing. He even said so himself. He lamented in early 1945 that, while the nazis had succeeded with wiping out the “class warriors” (aka the commies, who were the direct competition), they had failed to wipe out the German right wing.
Göbbels said in December 1933 that the NSDAP is the German left wing and that they had nothing more than a right wing “bourgeoisie”.
Little Benito in Italy was loved by the communists, until they realized that he was competition.
National socialism is in it’s essence socialism, but with a focus on nationalism and race. Communism, on the other hand, is a socialism with a focus on internationalism and class.
Yet Hitler was a class warrior himself, as many of his actions prove.
Another good example is North Korea. Media tries to sell it as a stalinist country, but it’s more of a national socialist country. It even has an “aryan master race” idea, the so called “national bloodline”.
I seriously doubt that this smearing was done by right wing people. In Germany, for example, when nazi stuff is smeared on places, the criminals are usually anarchists, “anti-fascists” and, like in a certain case where some Turks burned themselves down while stealing electricity, foreigners from certain “cultures”.
You see, right wing is the opposite of left wing. Left wing is what? Communism, dictatorship, oppression, death camps, fascism. So, by the logic of people like you, the opposite of that is… the same of it? Uh… how’s about no?
The biggest lie of the 20th century is painting the nazis as “right wing”. They were clearly not right wing. This was done after the war by the rest of the left wing, who saw their own goals in danger.
Andreas K. commented:
Additional note: want to know a German under Hitler who was right wing? Maybe even a right wing extremist? A right wing radical? I could name a few. Pretty much every member of the military resistance agaisnt Hitler was a radical right winger, but the most famous real radical right winger of Germany is…
Claus Philipp Maria Justinian Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg
I would also count the brave members of the White Rose as right wing extremists. They dared to say their opinion, much like the Tea Party folks today.
Sophia Magdalena Scholl, Hans Fritz Scholl and Christoph Hermann Probst, the key members of the White Rose (which stood for peaceful resistance and educating people about the truth and facts), were murdered for simply saying their opinion.
Murdered by… socialists.
Just like more than 120 million people in the 20th century.
oldguy commented:
If we were real Nazis we would welcome them, round them up, and gas them. I guess the Jews would have loved to have been deported.
Militant Conservative commented:
theotherjimmyolson
April 26th, 2010 | 3:38 pm | #13
your stupdity is shwing. LOL
We are a nation of laws not men.
The current administration is trying to make this a nation of men not laws. Which would you rather have, a land ruled by laws or the fiat of a man. (Right or Left) ? I want them both constrained by law to restrict their ability to affect MY freedoms AND yours. numb nut.
powder is dry.
Elly commented:
Golly – It sucks to be caught doing something illegal (or being something “illegal”) now doesn’t it. I’m sure this reaction is really going to help their position… NOT.
Too bad. I mean, what did they expect? Oh that’s right – free everything, from now on.
I guess if they want to live here they better become a CITIZEN!
Rhinestone Suderman commented:
Jimmy, seriously—you’re no longer my pal, and I want my signal watch back!
Kal-el, a.k.a. Superman.
Valerie commented:
Andreas, the troll is not going to recognize the name von Stauffenberg.
Others of us do, of course.
wanumba commented:
Can we dispense with the dreadful connotations of illegal, which has been redefined as of Friday as “brown?”
If one is illegal in the USA, one is LEGAL in another country. Let’s be POSITIVE!
Foreigners!
Sounds sophisticated!
Auntie Em commented:
God, I wish You had not promised to never flood the earth again. They wouldn’t have learned from history, not that they ever admit to believing it, and would have scoff at every person building a boat.
40 days of rain and no more libtards….paradise….peace.
Patriot Act commented:
Here’s is a good exposition of just how left-wing Hitler really was:
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/hitler.html
Read it and weep, Jimmy, assuming you can read. It’s kinda long, though. Might be above your pay grade.
theotherjimmyolson commented:
Mein Fuhrer! I can walk! @ 5;10P.M. Exactly which is why I was objecting to the lynch mob here taking the law into their own hands and acting as judge and jury. You can see that can’t you?
theotherjimmyolson commented:
Your stupdity is shwing. Ah, whose stupdity is shwing?
theotherjimmyolson commented:
Actually , I think it was Renus Van Der Lubbe who smeared the swastikas. Andreas K. At one time I was married to the daughter of the man who made Hitler’s trains run on time, and as a result have some knowledge of a certain central European country.
DANEgerus commented:
If we smeared refried beans all over the Mexican embassy… wouldn’t that be a hate crime?
Bean-i-fada!
AuntieMadder commented:
theotherjimmyolson
April 26th, 2010 | 3:38 pm | #13
You see, the thing is I don’t know a lot of Hispanics who would want to be associated with the swastika, I do however know that a lot of radical right wing groups have a long association with it. This blog as I see it is radical right wing.
I take it you don’t like this blog, what with all the negatives you’ve associated it with. So, why the hell are you here? Why do you visit blogs that you don’t like? IRL do you visit places you don’t like, too? What is wrong with you that you do that?
Oh! Wait! Nevermind. You’re a libtard and that explains it.
Rhinestone Suderman commented:
Wanumba, “foreigners!” I like that!
In any event, most of the foreigners at issue in Arizona, and the whole immigrants’ rights thing are Hispanic. Hispanic is a language group, not a race.