Ya think?

Maybe it’s because they’re supposed to be supporting human rights, not terrorists.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  1. #1 February 7, 2010 at 3:41 pm

    chris commented:

    Was Reagan “damaged” in the eyes of conservatives by funding the Muhajadeen in their war against the Soviets? No, so why is Amnesty?

  2. #2 February 7, 2010 at 3:45 pm

    TxTenther commented:

    Im shocked, SHOCKED!

    /sarc

  3. #3 February 7, 2010 at 3:48 pm

    TxTenther commented:

    “Was Reagan “damaged” in the eyes of conservatives by funding the Muhajadeen in their war against the Soviets? No, so why is Amnesty?”

    Maybe because we have video of the Taliban shooting a woman in the head for committing adultry. This group is supposed to be a human rights organization, but we all know better.

  4. #4 February 7, 2010 at 3:51 pm

    TxTenther commented:

    Forgot the “e”

    5. ADVERTISEMENT

  5. #5 February 7, 2010 at 3:59 pm

    Opus #6 commented:

    The Taliban are our enemies. They stand for the Anti-American Dream. They dream of conquest and subjugation. They kill innocents in their quest without batting an eye.

    Anyone who does business with them should be painted with the same brush.

  6. #6 February 7, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    Jayne on the left coast commented:

    Isn’t this the group that always has the USA the worst place ever for human rights? They are just shills for Soros.

  7. #7 February 7, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    logic101 commented:

    It’s become painfully obvious that leftist groups like Amnesty International, the ACLU and the like will befriend anyone who is hostile to a:George Bush, b: the US military, C: the United States, d: Israel. If they meet any of those criteria, nothing else the do matters.

  8. #8 February 7, 2010 at 4:09 pm

    Corporal Vere commented:

    Reagan didn’t care about what people thought. He cared about facilitating America’s recovery from destructive policies of LBJ and Carter, and saving the world from an evil empire.

    Let’s see. The Taliban force little children to blow up themselves killing political opposition . . . Thats okay with Amnesty Int”l: they’re killing people who support democracy.

    Chris, you already gave us sufficient evidence of your stupidity. Please stop!

  9. #9 February 7, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    ar05075 commented:

    I’m notice it was a leftard that typed Muhajadeen instead of Mujahideen. And it’s the same clown that said Sarah was stupid….hmmm.

  10. #11 February 7, 2010 at 4:33 pm

    Militant Conservative commented:

    HMMMMMM, the unveiling continues. The liberal left is not having a good year.

  11. #12 February 7, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    ar05075 commented:

    A little OT but– If the Saints lose tonight I wonder if Obama will blame Bush(Reggie).??

  12. #13 February 7, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    hermie commented:

    Gee, the Taliban who used soccer stadiums to accomodate the mass executions of women and those who didn’t practice the Taliban’s version of Islam? The same Taliban who showed its ‘tolerance’ by blowing up ancient Buddist statues, or who threw acid in the faces of girls who wanted to attend school?

    Looks like Amnesty International isn’t picky regarding who it associates with, as long as they are anti-American or anti-Israel.

  13. #15 February 7, 2010 at 5:06 pm

    Valerie commented:

    OK, so somebody at Amnesty International actually believes in the purposes of the organization. Good for her.

  14. #16 February 7, 2010 at 6:36 pm

    Dick Turpin commented:

    I think that they have always had a problem identifying the differences between the good guys and the bad guys.

  15. #17 February 7, 2010 at 6:37 pm

    gus commented:

    The TALIBAN murders children, mothers, fathers, brothers, grandmothers.
    That is what they do.
    LIBTARDS simply hate America and if America holds TERRORISTS in Guantanamo, LIBTARDS choose to side with the TERRORISTS.
    Do you know why?
    2 reasons. Libtards are immoral, and libtards are very very very stupid.

  16. #18 February 7, 2010 at 6:54 pm

    bg commented:

    ++

    chris @ 3:41 pm #1

    again with the samo samo false accusation that YOU
    KNOW has been debunked every time you post it..

    Insanity is doing the same thing over and
    over again but expecting different results.

    aside from that, it has absolutely nothing to do with AI, if not
    aiding & abetting the Taliban, turning a blind eye to it.. duh!!

    ==

  17. #19 February 7, 2010 at 7:06 pm

    gus commented:

    Bg. I didn’t see Chris decry the Taliban.
    We all know why. They are the good guys to LIBTARDS. Killing innocents is a LIBTARD THING.
    They LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLOVE killing babies.
    In fact they fight for the right to do so. What is there to debate with Little Christine. She likes the Taliban, she likes baby killing.
    Prove me wrong Chrissy you pathetic little motherf****r.

  18. #20 February 7, 2010 at 7:09 pm

    bg commented:

    ++

    re: bg #18

    just a sample:

    The United States did not “create” Osama bin Laden

    try doing some real research chris, Wikipedia
    does not “qualify” as a source of factual info..

    ==

  20. #22 February 8, 2010 at 12:22 am

    Jane commented:

    Amnesty International has been known as an anti-Western organization for a long time. It was created by Communists from Europe.

  21. #23 February 8, 2010 at 2:08 am

    Andreas K. commented:

    (sh)amnesty international is damaged now? They’ve been damaged for years. Who really takes them serious anymore? They’re a bunch of leftwing nutjobs.

  22. #24 February 8, 2010 at 6:45 am

    squeaky commented:

    support for the mujahadeen started with carter.
    taliban weren’t a factor until 1994 [?] and are definately an example of being careful what you wish for…. there’s a lot of history that gets pushed aside to make political points…..

    http://www.infoplease.com/spot/taliban-time.html

  23. #25 February 8, 2010 at 8:20 am

    CommieBlaster commented:

    Amnesty International is funded by George Soros. See what other organizations he funds here: http://www.commieblaster.com/george-soros-fund/index.html

  24. #27 February 8, 2010 at 5:41 pm

    bg commented:

    ++

    squeaky @ 6:45 am #24

    thank you..

    but the US had no direct say where the funds went, nor in any training
    of the self-funded group that eventually came to be known as al-Qaeda..

    check out link @ post #20..

    ==

© Copyright 2012, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Web Development By Arlington Kirk