Sarah Palin opens new front… Targets feminazis.

Sarah Palin sent out a Facebook message today in support of the March for Life that is being held on Friday. She told her supporters that real advocates are pro-life.
Life News reported:
Former vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin has a message for the mainstream media and abortion advocates. In a new note encouraging pro-life advocates at the March for Life, the former Alaska governor says pro-life people won’t “get over” abortion because abortions hurt women.
Palin starts the message, shared with her more than one million fans on FaceBook, with encouragement for the hundreds of thousands at the March for Life.
“Tomorrow the 37th annual March for Life will occur in Washington, D.C. January is a tough month to schedule a march in Washington, but every year hundreds of thousands of everyday Americans from across our nation brave the cold weather on the anniversary of the Roe vs. Wade decision to bear a positive witness to the culture of life,” Palin writes.
Palin then swings into her message for the media.
“In the years following Roe, we were told that the issue was no longer open for debate and that we should get over it and move on. But we couldn’t get over the stirrings of our conscience or move on from an issue that cuts to the heart of who we are as a nation,” she says.
“Affirming the dignity and worth of every innocent human life and defending the defenseless are fundamental American values. With that in mind, this peaceful, hopeful grassroots crowd of individuals, families and students comes to our capital every year to remind us that every innocent life is beautiful, precious and full of potential,” Palin continues…
“The pro-life movement is pro-women, and it empowers women with the message that we are strong enough and smart enough to be able to pursue education, vocations and avocations while giving life to a child,” she writes today.
“This movement is largely run by women. In fact, many of the earliest leaders of the women’s rights movement were pro-life – women like Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Alice Paul, the author of the original Equal Rights Amendment in 1923, who said, ‘Abortion is the ultimate exploitation of women,’” the Feminists for Life member adds.
ADVERTISEMENT
Published February 8, 2012 at 8:42 pm - 105 Comments
Left Coast Conservative commented:
Woo Hoo – way to go Sarah.
Alaskan commented:
Do as I say, not as I do?????……then why they heck is she going on the campaign trail with RINO John McCain.
Just_Saying commented:
Outstanding message, Sarah!
(I agree that Sarah should not be campaigning for McCain…)
.
ADVERTISEMENT
Sherry commented:
McCain is prolife. His wife took in a child handed to him by Mother Teresa. What Sarah is, is courageous.
I start to forget I like her when the media papers over her story with snears and snide remarks and I admit, I haven’t watched her on Fox. Then she says something like this, and I remember why I liked her to begin with, she is willing to say things that take a tremendous amount of heart to say.
Valerie commented:
The decision in Roe v. Wade took the power to coerce abortions away from both the Federal and the State governments. The only power the governments may assert, increasing as time passes, is to protect the mother and child.
The decision to abort a baby is confined to a case-by-case basis, made only by the individual most affected.
That, in a nutshell, is why the decision has not been overturned.
The consequences of a grant of power to the government were discussed in the opinion, and it was pointed out that, once a government is granted power to make a decision, the grant is, for all practical purposes irrevocable, and, there is no way to ensure how that power will be used. That is, a grant of power to prevent abortions is also, inevitably, a grant of power to coerce them.
At the time the opinion was written, people thought that there was no way a civilized government would coerce abortions. It was not much later that the government of China started doing exactly that.
There have been various attempts to get around the problem of the consequences to a grant of power to the government, none of them satisfactory enough to gain much support.
Andrew commented:
I have to agree with Alaskan. She’s willing to campaign for a man whose wife and daughter support the courts in California overriding the will of the people pertaining to gay marriage. That, and there is the Supreme Court decision today. Maybe she’ll withhold support for McCain until after the primary.
Corporal Vere commented:
Methinks the special interest group most favored by untrammeled abortion is the horde of over-sexed men-on-the-make, i.e., it tends to maximize the numbers of available casual sex partners.
Get that feminazis?
The individual most affected in an abortion is the unborn baby that is snuffed.
narciso commented:
Troll alert, danger Will Robinson, she feels loyalty to the one who allowed her to meet so many on the campaign trail, not so much for his
staff. She had clear disagreements on a number
of isssues, like Campaign Finance and the Detainee cases, that’s why she didn’t answer that
Couric question that easily
Marston Chronicles commented:
She is campaigning for McCain before the primary because she owes him one for choosing her as his VP candidate. I got a call yesterday from Scott Brown urging me to support McCain in the primary here in Arizona. In politics, you always make good on your political IOU’s to be a team player if you are in a multimember body like Congress. You need a lot of help to get anything done. That is why Scott Brown’s first stop today was to visit Senator McCain. Like him or not, McCain went out of his way to help Scott before anyone else and he certainly did not have to do that. Nobody else did until it looked like Scott might have a real chance.
Joanne commented:
Sarah speaks up for what she believes in, and she should be commended for her courage – many people would rather be quiet objectors because they fear confrontation. Sarah is a ‘bring it on’ girl.
brainpimp commented:
The republican party needs to stay out of the abortion arena. We get killed by it with moderates every freaking time. Just like the Dems get killed by gun rights.
BarbaraS commented:
It would have been bad taste for Sarah to refuse to campaign for McCain. Petty too. He brought her to the nation’s awareness and she owes him one.
Couric asked a gotcha question. She probably knew Sarah did not agree with McCain on that issue and knew Sarah could not say so. A VP candidate is obliged to back her boss on the issues. His platform is it not hers. He is really the one running not the VP who can be fired at any time.
Hugh commented:
I have always maintained that women dropped the ball on abortion. Where we have gone has been an utter disaster for women. As the nurturers of life, women have a profound responsibility. Where has the “Pro-choice” movement gotten us? I don’t support completely outlawing abortion but where we have gone is utterly disgusting. I know more women than I care to admit who have had numerous abortions–in effect, their choice of birth control. Where does the gravity of that choice enter the picture? When do we acknowledge responsibility? When do we look directly into the face of what that decision truly means? I know women who have bragged about having an abortion. Consider the bizarre and twisted logic of that. Women’s attitudes and actions shape the values and the ethics of our society. Where we have gone is tragic and has contributed to the coarsening of our culture and the devaluing of life. How does that benefit anyone?
Old One commented:
There is little doubt that it is irresponsible males who have been the big beneficiaries of Roe vs. Wade. I taught high school for nearly 40 years and you can not believe the number of times I heard who cares about sexual responsibility from the young men . I taught economics to seniors and constantly emphasized the link between personal and familial economic success and sexual restarint aimed especially at the boys who matter of factly responded regularly if a girl gets pregnant I will tell her to get an abortion.
Taqiyy. commented:
brainpimp:
“The republican party needs to stay out of the abortion arena. We get killed by it with moderates every freaking time. Just like the Dems get killed by gun rights.”
Interesting pick of verbs.
Our nation (UNDER GOD), is getting “killed” because his people within her are “staying out of the abortion arena”, and the longer we ignore the slaughter, the more our nation will suffer. In my opinion.
Andreas K. commented:
Actually.
Real women stand for choice, the choice of having a family instead of a career. Feminazis are against family. Women who chose family over career get attacked and called all kinds of things by feminazis in Europe.
As I’ve said numerous times: abortion is fine in certain cases. But it shouldn’t be a “Oh damn! I’m pregnant” panic button.
syn commented:
“The republican party needs to stay out of the abortion arena.”
Tragic really; Northeastern ‘Sanctity of Lifers’ will NEVER vote for a pro-life Republican.
For example, financial wizard Larry Kudlow would be an ideal candidate to run against Chuck Schumer unfortunately the Pope Peeps in this town would KILL a pro-life Republican before voting for one.
Yes, it is hideous, duplicitous and ugly however this is the way of the righteous do-gooder who would rather betray their faith than to ever give up their 50 pieces of government union silver.
syn commented:
“Where has the “Pro-choice” movement gotten us?
Around 45 million humanbeings exterminated, more or less.
Thanks to Pope’s Peeps perpetually electing their Bishops of Kennedy innocence is exterminated because Pope’s Union instead prefers government silver.
No wonder Pope’s Peeps hate GWB and SHP-they represent the life the Pope’s Peeps are trying to kill.
toomuch! commented:
Really syn, please you just need to stop. Your anti-Catholic rhetoric is getting so old, as well as your disparaging remarks. I don’t hear you calling the Lutherans “Looney Lutherans” for their support of abortion, ie Project Tammy, Dr. Tiller or the Mormons, many of them have told me that abortion is ok. I work with many people who claim to be Christians who support abortion, even though their church has said this is wrong. Do I believe that all the church members should be lumped into the pro-choice category because of one persons belief. You obviously have such deep hatred for the Catholic Church that you believe all Catholics feel the same about abortion as those politians that claim they are Catholic. As I have said in previous post to you that Pelosi, Kennedy and their ilk are in name only with the Catholic Church, bringing it out only when convenient to them. Oh, will you be at any of the Right to Life marches or protesting outside abortion clinics. When I go to these events the majority of people I meet there are Catholic. Laura Ingraham has been posting and commenting on the Right to Life march all week…another Catholic. Enough with your insipid comments, they only serve to make you look juvenile.
Scott commented:
“She’s willing to campaign for a man whose wife and daughter support the courts in California overriding the will of the people pertaining to gay marriage.”
What’s more important, preventing gay people from getting married or preventing unborn babies from being killed?
syn commented:
“Really syn, please you just need to stop. Your anti-Catholic rhetoric”
You cannot yet realize how the duplicity TORTURES my soul.
Catholicism is the single largest denomination in America and 50% of weekly Catholic goers empowered the man who advocated that a baby which survives the initial abortion MUST BE FORCED TO DIE in a hospital named after Christ.
My heart and my soul is tortured by this knowledge.
syn commented:
Catholicism today today is as much about the ‘Sanctity of Life’ as is Islam the ‘Religion of Peace’
Both Islam and Catholicism have the same problem both are so enamored with themselves that neither ever want to look at the duplicity of their actions.
Militant Conservative commented:
Does this make Sarah a “Birther” LOL
Life,Liberty and the persuit of happiness.
HMMMMM, sounds like the constitution is pro life.
conservative values win every time they are articulated and put into practice.
Powder is dry.
syn commented:
By the way, I have heard more than enough Catholics around this town bitch about those ‘backward pro-life fundamentalist out there Jesusland’ to counter your premise about the holiness of your faith.
syn commented:
Forget to mention…I live in NYC where abortion is the Capital of majestic Catholic Cathedrals.
irish commented:
Syn,
I’m sorry that you are so tortured by your excistance. There is nothing I say to you, except I will pray for you.
greenfairie commented:
There are “Catholics” and there are Catholics. The latter are at the forefront of the pro-life movement. When I lived in Northern VA, every year I’d see busloads of people from dioceses and archdioceses from all over roll into town for the annual March For Life. Thousands upon thousands of Catholic schoolkids. At the march itself, you’d see an overwhelming number of people with crucifixes and rosaries, and awful lot of Catholic clergy. Please don’t lump all Catholics in with moonbats within the Church or the cafeteria laypeople whose real religion is Liberalism. You may have a point in that the Church failed to root out the lefties long ago and have shied away from putting out the truth from fear of offending the flock.
But until I see evangelicals and Southern Baptists outnumber Catholics at these things, hold off on the Know Nothing Party propaganda.
mischief commented:
Nice try. The individual most affected is the baby.