It Has Begun… CNN's Cafferty Urges Hillary to Challenge Obama in 2012 (Video)
Posted by Jim Hoft on Friday, January 29, 2010, 11:54 AM
The return of Shrillary–
CNN’s Jack Cafferty urges Hillary Clinton to challenge Obama in 2012.
Freedom’s Lighthouse reported, via Free Republic:
Agreed. It’s the right thing to do. Hillary must revive her campaign and challenge Barack Obama before he destroys the democratic party… Or maybe it’s already too late for that?
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
Busted!… Obama Headlined a DEMOCRAT SOCIALISTS OF AMERICA Event in 1996 **FLIER**
Published May 24, 2012 at 8:46 pm - 52 Comments
Tom63010 commented:
I liked the ending…..why would Wolf Blitzer think that anyone would think that Cafferty or anyone else on CNN would be hoping Hilliary would run against the Narcissist in Chief?
AuntieMadder commented:
Whoever runs against the Republican cadidate for prez in 2012 will lose. Obamao has done to the 2012 Dem candidate what the lamestream media did to the 2008 Republican candidate. The next POTUS will be a Republican. That is, if the next POTUS doesn’t take office before 2012.
retire05 commented:
Following the Republican retreat where Obama is currently taking Q & A. He is still sticking with the mantra that 95% of Americans got a tax cut although the IRS has announced that upwards of 15 million tax filers will probably owe taxes on 4/15 due to reduced payroll deductions.
If you want an example of how tone deaf this president is, just listen to his answers on Fox.
jonyjoe101 commented:
I would vote for a “rock” on the side of the road before I voted for hilary or obama. If that is the best the democrats can do, thinks look good for the republicans.
Auntie Em commented:
I think it’s too late for the dems.
Hilliary would definitely beat him in the primary, that is, if she’d stop dragging her feet as Sec. of State, but the democrats are sunk. Obama was the iceberg. They’ve been taken over by the progressives, and no longer represent a majority of the registered democratic voters.
Kathy from Kansas commented:
People forget that Hillary is just as radical socialist as Obama, it’s just that she favors a more cunning, subtle (an ultimately, more effective) approach for making the USA a socialist country.
Obama was mentored by Alinsky disciples; Hillary was mentored by the Great Man himself, wrote her senior thesis about him, was offered a job working directly with him upon graduation, and remained close personal friends with him until he died.
Beware this woman.
Old One commented:
Hillary though preferable to the Democorrupts
Marxist-in-Chief is herself a raving Alinskyite radical too.
Let us all hope for the sake of our nation Shrillary challenges B+ Odumber. The Pants Suit and her adulterer partner in crime are long past their sell by date. We should all irregardless of our religious beliefs or none utter a prayer that the Clintons and B+ together permanently incinerate the tyranny loving league that has for nearly two hundred years been doing great damage and defiling & sullying the words democrat and liberal.
redc1c4 commented:
if the GOP nominates a RINO loser like the Huckster, it really won’t matter who the Dem’s nominate, because there won’t be any substantive difference between the two candidates.
Liz commented:
Yep Huckabee would be a loser. This clip was entertaining, if CNN keeps it up they will almost be as good a news source as the National Enquirer, although the Enquirer sure beat them on the Edwards scandal, didn’t they?
Finncrisp commented:
Sometimes you get what you wish for; we need not be overconfident about outcaomes this early. Let us just revel in the failed presidency and take care of the business of electing solid conservatives. The Dems can decide what to do about the Marxist in the White house.
averagemelon commented:
Would ANYTHING pull the Democrats out of the fire? I don’t think a nuclear holocaust could do it. They are doomed and damned and have noone to blame but their miracle-man Obama.
Taken For Action commented:
“That is, if the next POTUS doesn’t take office before 2012.”
http://www.politico.com/blogs/laurarozen/0110/Debate_heats_up_on_Obamas_nuclear_agenda.html?showall
http://history.sandiego.edu/gen/filmnotes/sevendays.html
Comrade Terry commented:
Mrs. Clinton has been thoroughly unimpressive as Secretary of State. I don’t see her as being a successful candidate for the Oval Office.
Andrew X commented:
I’m a right-wing death beast, so wadda-eye-no, but I just don’t see Hillary as the “it” girl.
Frankly, what on earth has she done or accomplished, or even been seen doing in the past year? Granted, she has to live in Obama’s shadow and by his rules, but still…. what?
I note that Condi Rice was “it” for a time, then became SecState, did a fair to good job, but by the time she left she was “it” no more. The last SecState to become President? James Buchanan. Whoo hoo! Those facts may mean nothing, but there they are.
I dunno, it’s not a like or dislike thing, I’m just not feeling it. I think if she did run against Obama, the Dems would be just lackluster overall, and she might not win. She is too ancien regime, I think.
Just my gut.
aprilnovember811 commented:
Too late, the smart thing would’ve been to never tie yourself to him, everyone will always remember, even though he defeated her, she has promoted him. Why would he even want someone who promoted him, it doesn’t make sense. Forget it Jack, she doesn’t have a snowballs chance in hell of ever being elected President after this. Obama/Hillary, forever entwined.
Kathy from Kansas commented:
I think the USA will continue to go down the tubes until it wakes up and quits slaughtering one third of its children in the womb.
Whether you read the Bible or you read the secular versions of history, both of them make it painfully obvious that no civilization that sacrifices its own children–whether on the altar of Moloch or the altar of “self-fulfillment–survives in the long run.
As one wise philosopher said, “A nation that kills its children is a nation without hope.”
When someone asked Fr. Frank Pavone, founder of Priests for Life, if he thought abortion in the United States would still be legal 50 years from now, he replied, “Either abortion will be illegal in the United States 50 years from now–or there won’t be a United States 50 years from now.”
You can take that to the bank.
UnderTheBusDem commented:
Hillary is the only Democrat that walks the walk.
If the DNC stabs her in the back again, she will not run in 2012.
Obama has a long way to go to save his job, false promises will make him a one term President.
America wasn’t ready for a woman President, are they now????
tessa commented:
The word “shrill” has sexist connotations.
As a former Democrat, now independent, scott brown supporter, and regular reader here…
I would like to respectfully request that you abandon the terminology of the Hillary-hate movement of 08, and going forward select less offensive labels for ALL female leaders of ANY political persuasion.
Billy commented:
“Very good for us”???????
I love how they tried to downplay that comment. Cafferty loves a train wreck? Are we to believe that Cafferty wants the democrat party to self destruct after his pitch to have Hillary try and save it? These people are so transparent it makes me sick. And they have the nerve to call FOX news biased?
dallasdan commented:
Poor Wolf. He crapped in his pants.
retired military commented:
I hope Hillary beats Obama in the 2012 primaries. Minorities will stay home in droves. If Obama wins the primaries than the dems lose in droves anyway.
I doubt there is anyway either can win in 2012.
Daniel commented:
I want someone else.
Not Shrillary “Rose Law Firm” Clinton.
No Man commented:
Cafflerty is a consistent scumbag. He backs only scumbags.
Yeah, Hillary’s doing a great job. She deserves a promotion.
Nk shooting at SK
Iran about to bomb Isr. or ‘get it’ pre-emptively.
It don’t get any better.
brooklyn commented:
Cackle Cackle !
What Cafferty and other Democratic Partisans are seemingly unwilling to admit, Hillary is just as left wing kooky as Obama. Basically there are no Democrats remaining, who are not pushing a collecivist – appeasement disaster upon the USA, for their own petty gain.
Conceptions of seeing the Clinton Family and their Record as being ‘centrist’ are deeply flawed, and resemble a product of mythic fashion and Partisan Media push.
Bill Clinton often pretended to be a ‘centrist’. He was really quite a con artist. Playing to whatever audience standing before him. Both Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton created a revolt in 1994, pushing extremely leftwing policies, including an historic Tax Increase, and attempting to fully Nationalize Health Care behind closed doors. The American Public clearly understood, the Clinton Campaign prior to their Election was pure fraud.
One can debate if Mrs. Rodham Clinton is more to the left than her husband. We certainly understand, Bill Clinton is a self serving Politician, who was addicted to following poll data, willing to embrace any fashion deemed popular to further himself. However, Bill Clinton vetoed Welfare Reform, empowered Union Interests, tried to further enlarge Affirmative Action policies, greatly increased the size of the Civilian Government, , massively raised the Tax Burden on Americans (which helped created the Recession of 2000), etc. – Bill Clinton even appointed Justice Ginsberg, who might be the most radical Supreme Court Justice in Our Nation’s History.
In fact, the Clintons ran on an agenda of ending a ban on Homosexuality in the US Military, (which the Clintons were forced to settle on the confused “don’t ask-don’t tell” – simply due to Voter backlash in the face of the radical agenda). Ironically, ending “don’t ask – don’t tell” is something you have reported, in which Mr. Obama will now try to exploit, (insanely during the battle in the GWOT), to maintain support from an increasingly bitter leftist base.
Everyone should know full well, the Clinton Administration decidedly tracked to the left as well in foreign policy, embracing the Carter mantra of weak Appeasement. The famous Clinton appeasement of a killer named Arafat, the despotic Dictatorship of North Korea, etc., proved disastrous for all. The most regretful leftist foreign policy endeavor of the Clintons, proved to be the failure in aggressively addressing the rise of the Radical Muslim Terrorism – which was even criticized by the 9-11 Commission. The Clinton Administration did basically what the Obama Administration is doing today. The Clintons also gave Terrorists the rights of a US Citizen, and regretfully proved negligent in the arena of US National Security. Bill Clinton even slashed Military and Intel funding, commonly associated with the left’s agenda.
The vapid presentation of the Clintons as being ‘centrist’ is mistaken, and this is problematic, as it creates further confusion about the true political intent of the DNC. It distorts the reality, of just exactly how far left the modern Democrat Party has become.
Even when one looks at the composition of the Obama Administration, it largely filled with former Clinton Officials. Rahm Emanuel, Leon Panetta, Eric Holder, etc. The Clinton Administration and the Obama Administration are so similar in policy, vision, expression, representation, etc. And the overt negative response from the American Public has been very similar in encountering this leftist sophistry.
AuntieMadder commented:
tessa
January 29th, 2010 | 1:41 pm | #18
Tessa, I hear what you’re saying and I agree. Unfortunately, however, it’s not going to happen. In fact, requesting that it cease seems to cause it to increase. I can only suggest that you do what I do: wince and move on to the next post or comment.
leslie commented:
AuntieMadder
January 29th, 2010 | 4:42 pm | #25
tessa
January 29th, 2010 | 1:41 pm | #18
Tessa, I hear what you’re saying and I agree. Unfortunately, however, it’s not going to happen. In fact, requesting that it cease seems to cause it to increase. I can only suggest that you do what I do: wince and move on to the next post or comment.
Tessa and Auntie Madder,I have to girt my teeth just to read it through.I do not conceive of it ever ceasing unfortunately.Sigh………..
Jummy commented:
Obama is anti-American, and Anti-Christian and hates white people.
Rob De Witt commented:
The word “shrill” has sexist connotations.
As a former Democrat, now independent, scott brown supporter, and regular reader here…
I would like to respectfully request that you abandon the terminology of the Hillary-hate movement of 08, and going forward select less offensive labels for ALL female leaders of ANY political persuasion.
Unfortunately, y’all, Hillary is and always has been in fact “shrill,” and trying to neuter the language to avoid hurt feelings is what has brought us to this pass in the first place. She was a spoiled and angry child of privilege who translated her resentment of her father into radical politics, and formed (and has maintained) a marriage with a serial philanderer solely for the promise of power. Hardly an admirable role model, and, from all accounts, a rageball. “Shrill,” in a word.
You might also consider that any term ending in “ist” has as its purpose the control of other peoples’ behavior – racist, sexist, ageist, sizeist, speciesist, onandonandon, the pluperfect example of what George Orwell characterized as “claiming the High Moral Ground.”
I wouldn’t trust either Clinton as far as I could throw them, and I think he’s a sleazeball and she’s a witch. And tut-tutting over my terminology doesn’t make you better than me.
anonymous commented:
Hillary will lose the election in 2012. It will be over for her. We don’t want to see another Clinton in the White House.
AuntieMadder commented:
See? You not only got one beginning with hen or witch noises, but you also got scolded by another for bringing it up. Best to just look the other way and remember that it’s not beneath either side…as long as it’s not directed at one of theirs.
Chisum commented:
The resemblance is indeed uncanny
http://wizbangblog.com/content/2010/01/29/the-resemblance-is-indeed-uncanny.php
Scott commented:
Hillary is another corrupt lawyer who is nearly as filthy as Obama:
-Whitewater
-FBI Files Scandal
-Whitehouse Travel office scandal
-Baldfaced liar who went on the today show and accused the “vast right wing conspiracy” of making up lies about the Philanderer in Chief when she knew he had been chasing skirts for decades with her full knowledge and consent.
-Dodged sniper fire in Bosnia, lie.
-Norman Hsu, chinese election fraud tied to Hillary’s Presidential campaign.
-Do nothing Sec of State who send Bill Clinton to Korea to free journalists…Wasn’t that her job?
-State Dept issued visa to the Christmas bomber. They have no mechanism for pulling visa’s of persons with known terrorists ties…Let’s not forget that the Christmas bomber’s father turned him reported him to the US Embassy in Nigeria. In a post 9-11 world his visa should have been pulled immediately. This happened on Hillary’s watch…
-She is a committed socialists and liar who needs to leave America alone and go back to New York where she managed to carpet bag her way into the Senate. Which, by the way, Bill pardoned Puerto Rican terrorists to help get her the Puerto Rican vote in New York City. As well, he closed the Navy’s bombing range in Puerto Rico and gave Vieques Island back to Puerto Rico to build condos and deprived the Navy of a pre-deplyment training area. Once again, he did this to help Hillary with the Puerto Rican vote in New York City.
-Bill and Hillary have an estimated fortune of 50 million dollars after he left office just ten years ago flat broke and owing millions in legal fees.
-No one appears to see the conflict of interest in that Bill Clinton sells access as an international lobbyist to his wife since she is Sec of State.
-The trolls employed by democrats are already trying to lay some groundwork for Hillary in 2012. Be alert and challenge them at every point. The democrats have to be stopped from destroying this once great nation. Hillary is as bad and even worse than Obama…
-
Scott commented:
Hillary and Bill Clinton are selling access to the highest levels of our government. The media ignores the fact that Bill Clinton is raking in millions from foreign governments while his wife is Sec of State…Hmmmh…Is this what we want of a future President??? He left office just ten years ago flat broke and owing millions in legal fees. And yet, Hillary reported an estimated 50 million net worth in her bid for the Presidency…Hmmmh…
Scott commented:
Hillary won a seat in the Senate from New York. New York city has a very large Puerto Rican population…Bill Clinton famously pardoned Puerto Rican terrorists on his way out of office. Also, he closed the Navy’s bombing range in Puerto Rico and gave Vieques Island back to Puerto Rico. They are building condos and hotels there no doubt, yet our Navy lost one of the few live bombing ranges on the east coast…Hmmmh, was this a set-up to help Hillary get elected in New York???
Scott commented:
Hillary’s State Department failed to withdraw the visa of the Christmas bomber even though his terrorist ties were known to the CIA…As well, his father reported him to the Embassy in Nigeria…Her state departement had no mechanism for pulling the visa of a person with known terrorist ties…She was asleep at the wheel…Remember, this is the “only” executive position she has ever had…She hid behind her husbands coat-tails for decades as first lady of Arkansas and then of the United States…She casts a few votes as Senator from New York. This is her first job as the boss….Epic failure!!!
Scott commented:
Sorry about the repeats…Evidently the server wasn’t updating as fast as I was writing…
regards,