Former United Nations weapons inspector Scott Ritter said his duty was to be one of the most vocal and visible critics of President Bush’s Iraq policy. (Common Dreams)
Former UN weapons inspector and Bush-basher Scott Ritter was busted for contacting a 15 year-old online and showing himself masturbating on a web camera.
The Pocono Record reported, via Free Republic:

A former chief United Nations weapons inspector is accused of contacting what he thought was a 15-year-old girl in an Internet chat room, engaging in a sexual conversation and showing himself masturbating on a Web camera.

Scott Ritter of Delmar, N.Y., who served as chief U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991-98 and who was an outspoken critic of the second Bush administration in the run-up to the war in Iraq, is accused of contacting what turned out to be a Barrett Township police officer posing undercover as a teen girl.

The police affidavit gives the following account:

Officer Ryan Venneman was posing as 15-year-old “Emily” in an online chat room when he was contacted by someone using the name “Delmarm4fun.” This person, later identified as Ritter, told “Emily” he was a 44-year-old male from Albany, N.Y.

“Emily” told Ritter she was a 15-year-old girl from the Poconos, at which point Ritter asked for a picture other than the one “Emily” had posted on her account. Ritter then sent her a link to his Web camera and began to masturbate on camera.

“Emily” asked Ritter for his cell phone number, which he provided.

Ritter again asked “Emily” how old she was. Told she was 15, Ritter said he didn’t realize she was 15 and turned off his webcam, saying he didn’t want to get in trouble.

Ritter told “Emily” he had been fantasizing about having sex with her, to which she replied: “Guess you turned it off …”

Ritter then said: “You want to see it finish,” reactivated his webcam and continued masturbating and ejaculated on camera.

The online conversation occurred in February 2009, but the investigation lasted until November

Previously:
UN Soldiers Arrested in Congo On Sex Abuse Charges
UN Peacekeepers Trade Food for Sex… Again!
UN Slapped with New Child Sex Scandal
UN Faces Another Child Sex Scandal
Another UN Broken Record
Again… UN Troops Involved In Another Child Sex Scandal
Monday Shocker… UN Peacekeepers Sexually Abusing Kids
Wednesday Shocker: UN Official Busted With Kiddie Porn
Saturday Shocker: Another UN Official Caught With Child Porn
UN-backed Troops Accused of Killing & Raping Civilians

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  1. He must be shooting for a place as one of Obama’s czars. Maybe in charge of internet safety for children?

  2. Good grief . . . how can a man with half a brain put himself into this situation?

    His credibility? Out the window and crushed as it smashes into little bitty bits.

  3. I’m sure it is an isolated incident….let’s see if this gets the same media attention that say…the governor of SC received, or Karl Rove’s divorce (you know, Republicans can’t get divorced or they are hypocrites), or the congressman or senator who propositioned an undercover cop in the airport restroom (sorry, so much has happened in the last year, I can’t recall his name).

    I bet it gets buried. He was coerced, I am sure…wonder if he got any ideas from Kevin Jennings’ writings?

  4. What is it with these Obama guys . . . are they ALL perverts?

  5. Ritter was busted for the same thing in 2001 – he thought he was meeting a 16 year old at a Burger King.

    http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/01/22/ritter.arrest/

  6. Mental illness eventually shows it self.

  7. A czar appointment will undoubtedly be made: Child Internet Safety Czar.

  8. Couldn’t he get a job teaching kids under the “Safe Schools” czar, Kevin Jennings.

    This could be part of Obama’s “stimulus” program?

  9. Ewwwwww!

    Perv!

    God bless the agents who pose as kids and reel these creeps in.

  10. Such fine, upstanding people with high integrity the UN is seeking out these days for jobs. Don’t worry. Obama will bail him out and make a new Czar position for him to hold (instead of his own member).

  11. I guess Scott Ritter found what he was looking for: his Weapon of Mass Self-Destruction…

  12. Just another typical holier than thou lefty….until thy’re caught, of course.

  13. Come on – so the guy’s a pervert. Let’s not overstate the situation. The only person having sex (with himself) was Ritter, not the supposed ’15 year-old girl’. The worst that could have happened would be a 15-year-old getting a rather nasty biology lesson.

    If Ritter had followed this up with trying to meet up with the girl, then that would be a very different matter and Ritter would deserve all that comes to him. But I haven’t read that this is the case. In which case: where’s the victim?

  14. GOODIE: obama can hire him now!

    they belong together!

  15. I am sure the ACLU will defend his right to privacy.

    No wonder he hates Bush. Bush opposed sex outside of marriage.

  16. What a charade! He’ll plead not guilty, and then after being convicted he’ll cry how sorry he is. There’s going to be a lot of drama, but no justice involved. The educated barbarians of the liberal progressive elitist classes – are they all sociopaths? What should our society really do with this sort of trash?

  17. he can work with kevin jennings!

  18. When I saw the headline of this post I assumed that I would scroll down and see Scott Ritter.

  19. If Ritter had followed this up with trying to meet up with the girl, then that would be a very different matter and Ritter would deserve all that comes to him. But I haven’t read that this is the case. In which case: where’s the victim?
    ——————-
    Dear Dave,

    Ritter was caught once attempting to MEET A MINOR CHILD IN PERSON and the record was sealed.

    He was caught again, prompting this news.

    Do you think these were the only two times he has acted out his pedophilia?

  20. How much of a loser does one have to be to be neekid and waving one’s johnson in front of a camera that could be feeding to 500 million computers and certainly a database (for later), based on the assurances of an unseen person who he’s never met and doesn’t know from a turnip?

    He actually thought it was “private?”

    This guy was the “expert” the world was depending on to inform us about Saddam’s weapons programs? What did Saddam wag in front of him we didn’t hear about?

  21. Dave and Ladue Pundit:

    Remember that Scott Ritter, while a UN arms inspector, was initially critical of how lax the process was, then abruptly did a 180, taking Saddam’s side. When I saw his initial arrest I suspected that the Iraqis had caught him in a honey trap and either blackmailed him or provided underage companionship to get him to reverse his position. This last arrest reinforces my suspicions.

  22. #16: Actually, the story gets even weirder as you dig further into Ritter’s old 2001 case…. Turns out the prosecutor who dismissed that case in kept it SECRET from her boss for 2 years, and was FIRED when her boss found out about it:

    Scott Ritter criminal case costs prosecutor her job (Albany Times-Union)
    Albany Times-Union | 1/20/03 | Staff reports

    Colonie — The 2001 arrest of former U.N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter came to light late last week when an Albany County assistant district attorney was fired over her handling of the case.

    Ritter — an outspoken critic of President Bush’s plan for war against Iraq — was arrested by Colonie police in June 2001 after he allegedly was caught in an Internet sex-sting operation, according to a published report.

    Ritter, of Delmar, was arrested on a misdemeanor charge after he allegedly had a sexual chat on the Internet with an undercover investigator posing as an underage girl, The Daily News reported Sunday, citing law enforcement sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

    A judge sealed the case after it was adjourned in contemplation of dismissal. Colonie police on Sunday declined to discuss the case, citing the sealing order.

    Last week, District Attorney Paul Clyne fired Assistant District Attorney Cynthia Preiser for her handling of the case, saying Preiser failed to notify him about a “sensitive” case.

    Clyne said he launched an internal inquiry into the matter after a reporter from The Daily Gazette of Schenectady asked about a case involving Ritter.

    “Based on that inquiry, I determined that I should have been apprised of the existence of the case,” Clyne told the Times Union. “I was not, so Cindy Preiser was fired for failure to keep me abreast of what was going on in Colonie court.” Clyne declined to discuss Ritter’s arrest.

    No one answered the phone at Ritter’s home on Sunday.

    Ritter, a 41-year-old native of Gainesville, Fla., moved to the Capital Region two years ago with his wife and twin daughters.

    SOURCE: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/825984/posts

    So who the heck was protecting Scott Ritter in 2001 anyway, and why? Who knows, maybe we’ll soon find out….

  23. This guy is a very sick man. Disgusting. He should be fired from whatever current job he has and be divorced from a current spouse, if he has one.

    Sick!

  24. His constant appearances during the start-up to the Iraq war and the five years after that add up to ZERO…Arrogant pervert telling us Bush is making wrong decisions…Just another commie that thinks your are stupid.

  25. Here’s more on Ritter’s improperly-dismissed 2001 case, showing that it wasn’t even his first incident, either:

    On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, in an interview with CNN, Scott Ritter confirmed he was arrested in 2001 and charged with a misdemeanor after allegedly communicating with an undercover officer posing as a 16-year-old girl. According to a source close to the investigation and interviewed by CNN, Ritter reportedly communicated with who he thought was a teenage girl in an Internet chat room and arranged to meet her at a Burger King in Colonie, NY, a suburb of Albany, so she could witness him masturbating. Ritter was charged with “attempted endangerment of the welfare of a child,” a Class B misdemeanor. It was also reported that Ritter was also involved in an earlier incident in April 2001 after communicating with an undercover officer posing as a 14-year-old. [http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/01/22/ritter.arrest/ "Ex-arms inspector, war foe Ritter confirms 2001 arrest] ”CNN”.

    While Ritter was claimed that the Albany County District Attorney’s Office was engaged in the illegal act of releasing sealed documents, to date, however, Ritter has never presented any evidence to substantiate those charges. Furthermore, Ritter’s case was improperly disposed of in Ritter’s favor by veteran Albany County Assistant District Attorney Cynthia Preiser without the knowledge of Albany District Attorney Paul Clyne, who fired Preiser upon learning of her actions.
    [ http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Ritter_TimesUnio...
    "Three Times Union
    articles about Ritter's Arrest] “www.erichufschmid.net”.

    Further source: http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:zjdioe8zcd4J:antiwar.com/radio/2009/09/30/scott-ritter-9/+Assistant+District+Attorney+Cynthia+Preiser&cd=8&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us#idc-cover

  26. What is the difference between this guy and Jennings? None, really, there ought to be a job for him under Jennings somewhere. He’ll be fine.

  27. he wanted to train young girls to become future “weapons” inspectors. no harm in that.

  28. DaveNo Gravatar
    January 14th, 2010 | 12:23 pm | #14

    If your comment was intended as sarcasm, that’s one thing, but, if you read the report and still don’t recognize the “victim”, get yourself some professional help.

    Meanwhile, castrate the sicko, then send him off to a place where his presence will be greatly appreciated every morning, noon and night – prison!

  29. I think you have to be a sick perv to get a job at the UN these days.

  30. Ritter’s moral depravity was on display in 2003 when he admitted that, as a UN inspector, he’d actually seen prisons where Saddam held the children of his political opponents. Ritter said he’d seen such prisons but didn’t want to talk abou them “because [he] was talking peace, not war.” [I paraphrase from memory.] Anyone who can so easily dismiss the plight of children imprisoned by a despot is, IMHO, a heartless, amoral bastard. I can only hope he enjoys his term in an American prison and that his children can be taken away from him before he does them any more damage. He can, however, be thankful that the children of Iraq no longer have to fear being put in prison, thanks to George Bush, Tony Blair and our brave military.

  31. The Dems will spin this to be caused by Bush somehow.

  32. How does this turkey get a walk in what might be two cases involving minors? As Obama is so fond of saying “He has always been on the right (that is to say Left) side of history”. In other words he was useful to the Progs. To see how this works in reverse look to Massachusetts, where Martha Coakley was involved in one of the worst miscarriages of justice in the history of this country. That case involved the Amirault family. Coalkey and her Progressive supporters destroyed the Amiraults, and instead of facing some consequences for her wrongful prosecution, she is now the Democrat nominee for the U.S. Senate. Funny how it always seems to work out that way. Disgraceful. But that’s what you get from the Progs. One set of rules for them, and another for the rest.

  33. “Come on – so the guy’s a pervert. Let’s not overstate the situation. The only person having sex (with himself) was Ritter, not the supposed ‘15 year-old girl’. The worst that could have happened would be a 15-year-old getting a rather nasty biology lesson.

    If Ritter had followed this up with trying to meet up with the girl, then that would be a very different matter and Ritter would deserve all that comes to him. But I haven’t read that this is the case. In which case: where’s the victim?”

    DAVE — You are actually defending this guy? What is wrong with you? It’s his thought process that sick, the fact that he would do such a thing thinking that a 15 year old girl was his audience…and you want to defend that!
    If he made a conscious decision and decided that this was OK…and you defend it, then you have a screw loose as well.

    Get some counseling fast!

  34. Thank you, God, for exposing (literally) these vile creatures. These people are twisted, immoral, andcorrupt beyond salvation. Hope this winds up on the cover of the National Enquirer.

  35. “contacting a 15 year-old online and showing himself masturbating on a web camera.”

    A true O’barmy supporter. I sometimes wonder if anyone normal supports the president.

  36. #33 AcquiescenceAndSurrender;

    First off, you don’t speak on behalf of my or anyone else’s daughter.

    Next, this is a grown man showing himself in a committing a sexual act to what he thought was a 15 year old girl.

    Finally, the weirdest thing about your post, you don’t denounce what this piece of trash did.

    You sir, need help.

  37. Thank you Gateway Pundit for removing the original post number 33. That guy was a sicko.

  38. This was a guy CNN, MSNBC, CBS etc, all gushed over as THE EXPERT who would show that Bush lied about their being a weapons program.

    Funny how they could send teams of operatives to Alaska to go through Sarah Palin’s trash, but had no interest in sending one person to vet someone who they relied on to bash Bush over and over again.

  39. #14: In which case: where’s the victim?

    Are you nuts? Pennyslvania law (which applies here) protects all minor children from this kind of pervy activity. Ritter probably committed all of these crimes under the Pa. Crimes Code:

    18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3127

    § 3127. Indecent exposure

    (a) Offense defined.–A person commits indecent exposure if that person exposes his or her genitals in any public place or in any place where there are present other persons under circumstances in which he or she knows or should know that this conduct is likely to offend, affront or alarm.

    (b) Grading.–If the person knows or should have known that any of the persons present are less than 16 years of age, indecent exposure under subsection (a) is a misdemeanor of the first degree. Otherwise, indecent exposure under subsection (a) is a misdemeanor of the second degree.

    18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5903

    § 5903. Obscene and other sexual materials and performances

    (a) Offenses defined.–No person, knowing the obscene character of the materials or performances involved, shall:
    (1) display or cause or permit the display of any explicit sexual materials as defined in subsection (c) in or on any window, showcase, newsstand, display rack, billboard, display board, viewing screen, motion picture screen, marquee or similar place in such manner that the display is visible from any public street, highway, sidewalk, transportation facility or other public thoroughfare, or in any business or commercial establishment where minors, as a part of the general public or otherwise, are or will probably be exposed to view all or any part of such materials;
    (2) sell, lend, distribute, transmit, exhibit, give away or show any obscene materials to any person 18 years of age or older or offer to sell, lend, distribute, transmit, exhibit or give away or show, or have in his possession with intent to sell, lend, distribute, transmit, exhibit or give away or show any obscene materials to any person 18 years of age or older, or knowingly advertise any obscene materials in any manner;
    (3) design, copy, draw, photograph, print, utter, publish or in any manner manufacture or prepare any obscene materials;
    (4) write, print, publish, utter or cause to be written, printed, published or uttered any advertisement or notice of any kind giving information, directly or indirectly, stating or purporting to state where, how, from whom, or by what means any obscene materials can be purchased, obtained or had;
    (5) produce, present or direct any obscene performance or participate in a portion thereof that is obscene or that contributes to its obscenity;
    (6) hire, employ, use or permit any minor child to do or assist in doing any act or thing mentioned in this subsection;
    (7) knowingly take or deliver in any manner any obscene material into a State correctional institution, county prison, regional prison facility or any other type of correctional facility;
    (8) possess any obscene material while such person is an inmate of any State correctional institution, county prison, regional prison facility or any other type of correctional facility; or
    (9) knowingly permit any obscene material to enter any State correctional institution, county prison, regional prison facility or any other type of correctional facility if such person is a prison guard or other employee of any correctional facility described in this paragraph.

    18 Pa.C.S.A. § 6318

    § 6318. Unlawful contact with minor

    (a) Offense defined.–A person commits an offense if he is intentionally in contact with a minor, or a law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties who has assumed the identity of a minor, for the purpose of engaging in an activity prohibited under any of the following, and either the person initiating the contact or the person being contacted is within this Commonwealth:
    (1) Any of the offenses enumerated in Chapter 31 (relating to sexual offenses).
    (2) Open lewdness as defined in section 5901 (relating to open lewdness).
    (3) Prostitution as defined in section 5902 (relating to prostitution and related offenses).
    (4) Obscene and other sexual materials and performances as defined in section 5903 (relating to obscene and other sexual materials and performances).
    (5) Sexual abuse of children as defined in section 6312 (relating to sexual abuse of children).
    (6) Sexual exploitation of children as defined in section 6320 (relating to sexual exploitation of children).

    (b) Grading.–A violation of subsection (a) is:
    (1) an offense of the same grade and degree as the most serious underlying offense in subsection (a) for which the defendant contacted the minor; or
    (2) a felony of the third degree; whichever is greater.

    (c) Definitions.–As used in this section, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings given to them in this subsection:

    “Contacts.” Direct or indirect contact or communication by any means, method or device, including contact or communication in person or through an agent or agency, through any print medium, the mails, a common carrier or communication common carrier, any electronic communication system and any telecommunications, wire, computer or radio communications device or system.

    “Minor.” An individual under 18 years of age.

  40. Working for the UN will drive you to this …

  41. Dave 14
    Your liberalism is showing. Sometimes it is better to to not comment on things that tax you mental capacities.

  42. Just another leftwing “fister”!

  43. “Why don’t you have a seat right over there Scott.”

  44. Child Sex scandals and the UN. They are joined at the hip. So Scott fit right in.

  45. Thanks, again, for keeping the light on, GP..

    From Free Republic 1/25/2003:
    Was Scott Ritter Compromised by Amn Al Khass!
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/829655/posts#comment

    ( info deals with Ritter’s “amazing metamorphasis” between late 1997 and early 1998 from “genuine ‘fall-on-the-sword’ Marine Corp Major” to Bush’s “critics’ hero”).

  46. All liberals are not evil . . . only about 98%. This pervert is highly qualified for a cabinet post.

  47. If Ritter had priors, and had them before the runup to the Iraq War, then the GOP deserves the label ‘The Stupid Party.’

    How hard would it have been for Rove & Co. to shut Ritter down, along with a whole host of people who depended on Ritter’s testimony for ammunition?

    This is why Republicans lose elections these days when push comes to shove. McCain refused to get down & dirty with Obama, for instance. When will the current crop of Repubs stop bringing knives to a gunfight?

  48. Dave said:
    “The worst that could have happened would be a 15-year-old getting a rather nasty biology lesson.”

    Not even close to the “worst” thing that could happened, Dave. Ritter could be very lucky it was the cops who caught him. Not everyone he might choose to show it “finishing” to online might be a cop or a fifteen year old girl.The kid’s parents could just as well have shown him what theirs looks like while it’s “finishing” him.
    And there’s no way I would blame them.

  49. What is really sick is this disgusting twisted P.O.S. has twin daughters. One wonders what he has been doing to them. Well, I’m sure there is a place for this garbage in the Obums administration. It seems that he has all the qualifications: diseased liberal, anti-Bush, anti-American, Islam loving, twisted sex freak. He’ll more than likely be put in an office with Kevin Jennings, in charge of White House Kiddie Internet site.

  50. His prior busts for sexual offenses were reported just about the time Ritter did an abrupt about face in his views about Saddam having WMDs and Bush’s approach thereto, and I wondered at the time, if his perviness and someone either giving him what he desired, or blackmailing him, was the cause of his abrupt about face.

  51. #52 Too much:

    It seems that he has all the qualifications: diseased liberal, anti-Bush, anti-American, Islam loving, twisted sex freak.

    Sexual deviance is found across all races, across all classes, across the political spectrum. Former New York State Assemblyman Chris Ortloff, a stalwart of the Republican Party who was noted for pushing very stringent laws regarding sex offenders, is serving time for an underage sex sting. He was on the state parole board at the time of his arrest.

    Bernie Ward, once a prominent liberal talk show host in San Francisco, is now serving time for child pornography.

    Mr. Ritter appears to have adjusted his political views, so he is somewhat in the middle. Like Fred @#53, I suspect that his change of view regarding the Iraq War was related to his previous charges.

  52. The affidavit says that Ritter started the conversation with the girl and then for some reason showed his face on camera. The video apparently was not recorded and the officer had to recognize Ritter from the photos he saw later. It is also not clear why he gave his full name and location. Is it so that he would not be confused with other Scott or Bill Ritters? Scott Ritter seem to act very fullish for an intelligence agent, that had been previously caught in a very similar sting. Someone seems to have created a very easy case for the local police office that had only few such cases, one of which happens to be Scott Ritter. In conspirators’ defense, they did not try to totally destroy Ritter, even though they could. He may not get any time at all. Yet, his reputation is badly damaged already. The smear campaign could have failed, and then no one would have heard about it. But it has succeeded and it is all over the news.

    But why bother? The Iraq war is behind. This time it could be about Iran. Ritter is the only voice in the Western world arguing that Iran is not trying to acquire nuclear weapons. The talk from the previous smear campaign seems to have faded away as he did manage to get on to cable news couple times, but he was put down again. It does seem like a cycle and no one will listen to him again. The only thing missing is a war on Iran…

© Copyright 2012, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Web Development By Arlington Kirk