Classy Dems Compare Climate Change Deniers to "Teabaggers"
Posted by Jim Hoft on Friday, December 11, 2009, 11:28 AM
Stay classy democrats…
Democrats on Thursday compared climate change deniers to “teabaggers”- a vulgar sexual term.
The Hill reported:
House Democrats said Thursday that denying humans were causing climate change is like denying smoking causes lung cancer.
Reps. Edward Markey (Mass.), Jay Inslee (Wash.) and Earl Blumenauer (Ore.) also compared climate change “deniers” to “teabaggers” who spread the false rumor about death panels and swift boaters who attacked Sen. John Kerry’s (D-Mass.) war record during the 2004 presidential race.
The three members of the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming called a news conference on Thursday in response to the controversy over the hacked emails from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, which has now become known as Climategate.
Markey, who is the chairman of the select panel, said climate change skeptics were “engaging in a policy of distraction” by promoting the hacked emails. But he said the emails do nothing to refute the overwhelming evidence that humans are causing global warming.
“There is no magician trying to trick his audience,” Markey said. “Our world is getting hotter, faster.”
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
Horrible… Obama Tells Foolish Supporters: I’m Not Over-Spending… “I’m Running to Pay Down Our Debt”
Published May 23, 2012 at 11:51 pm - 59 Comments
manateespirit commented:
Tsk, tsk….sounds as if “the Fisters” are getting a bit testy.
chuck in st paul commented:
The is NO evidence that humans are causing climate change. There is only speculation. There IS propaganda and badly flawed computer models and cooked data.
In addition, we are not now warming nor are we warming “faster than ever”. We’ve been cooling for over a decade. On a centuries timescale we’ve been warming but are a long long way from the peak temperature of the Middle Ages Warm Period or the several other interglacial warm period peaks.
This guy is obviously either an idiot or just a pimp for watermellon facsim (or both more likely).
bg commented:
++
Earth to New World Order Deniers..
Eco-economic Warfare and the Planned Collapse of Western Civilization
[It is people such as Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachev, Al Gore, and Ted Turner that are at the forefront of the UN’s environmental/ depopulation agenda, at least at the visible/ gofer level. The four are also members of,
or have close connections to the Club of Rome. It is the Club of Rome
that has been guiding the environmental movement since its creation at the Rockefellers’ estate in Bellagio, Italy in 1968.
It’s aim is to reduce a large majority of the global population, as well as manufacture crisis through which the world can be “united” under a one world government, as was admitted in their 1991 publication, titled The First Global Revolution.]
The First Global Revolution:
Blueprint for a new global order
[“In searching for the new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and in their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which demands the solidarity of all peoples. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already warned, namely mistaking symptoms for cause. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changing attitudes and behaviors that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”]
1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Part 1)
1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Part 2)
too bad they felt the need to try & pull off such a scam; what a shame; we would have been way ahead of the game had they only been honest with us.. but no, they need to make their billions first & damn who lives or dies due to their lies.. also too bad there’s no part 3, etc..
btw, and albeit i suggested the theory many moons ago; i no longer need to be convinced that Obama was chosen to transition US into the New World Order.. i was truly hoping to be wrong, but can’t deny it any longer.. *sigh*
==
Living in The Twilight Zone commented:
The Dems sure are obsessed with male genitalia and orifices! I’m sure that they can produce a study showing how much of a carbon offset fisting produces.
JamesDoulos commented:
After years of listening to the liberal progressives call Bush a Nazi, call conservatives perverts (‘TeaBaggers’) and constantly thrash with violence anyone who wants to exercise their 1st Amendment Rights – who really cares what they think? It is obvious that the far left and their cronies & useful tools of the MSM are not interested in any sort of useful dialog. Without remorse, their one goal and objective seems to be the total destruction of America and any cultural values that America may still have left.
NeoKong commented:
Tell that to the Great Lakes region. They are freezing their butts off today. Some areas had below zero temps this morning. Winter has not even arrived yet.
bg commented:
++
OT..
via TRBO
Glenn Beck Show December 9, 2009
Glenn Beck Show December 10, 2009
==
averagemelon commented:
The world is dividing itself into the haves and the have-nots in a hurry. Sadly, global warming is just one of the tools.
It has never stopped amusing me, however, how many people in government actually think the rest of us do not have any real intelligence nor are capable of discerning thought. What convinces them of their monopoly on brain power? Weed?
Taqiyyotomist commented:
“The Dems sure are obsessed with male genitalia and orifices! I’m sure that they can produce a study showing how much of a carbon offset fisting produces.”
Twilight Zone, I’m sure some state university will do so as soon as they get that multimillion dollar grant for it. And at the end of the study, they will say, “…and we, for the sake of the world itself, need more grant money so that we can study this futher.” You know, a conclusion like every study done in the past 50 years by these academic numbskull leeches.
Taqiyyotomist commented:
I wish I was a university professor or head of a department. I would try to acquire funding for a study on just how many billions would be saved per year if we refused to give federal grant monies to idiots with “studies” that “desparately” need funding.
Last line would be:
“And in conclusion, we need more grant money in order to study this matter further.” (and so that I and the rest of the leeches in my department can continue to jet around the world living in luxury)
Mark L Harvey (aka Snooper) commented:
Why are the climate deniers calling themselves teabaggers?
http://bit.ly/5UhkQN
AuntieMadder commented:
manateespirit
December 11th, 2009 | 11:36 am | #1
Tsk, tsk….sounds as if “the Fisters” are getting a bit testy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes. Testy fisters, they are.
seven commented:
Don’t study the sun. It is not Mann made source of heat.
Nathan R. Jessup commented:
If anthropogenic global warming has such overwhelming evidence to support it, then why adjust the data at all? You see, when data is manipulated in any way, it directly implies the results are something other than expected.
Don’t EVER blame those who question immoral behavior, especially when the outcome has such gargantuan implications for the future. To question authority is American gentlemen…
“All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.” -Thomas Jefferson
Nathan R. Jessup
http://www.the-raw-deal.com
wanumba commented:
But he said the emails do nothing to refute the overwhelming evidence that humans are causing global warming.
“There is no magician trying to trick his audience,” Markey said. “Our world is getting hotter, faster.”
……………
No problemo!
Show us the data that supports the statement and in a way that other actual scientists can verify it.
It’s called the “Scientific Method.”
Too bad the CRU at EAU tossed their data – you could have used it. Now everyone has to start over reading thermometers for two hundred years.
Taqiyyotomist commented:
Mark, it is clear that you have your terminology confused.
“Climate Change Deniers” doesn’t refer to “folks that think global warming is real, the ones that support happy rights and women on women…”, as you wrote on your site, but the opposite.
“Deniers” is us, those who DENY that it is anything but a hoax. The “classy dems” cited here (they’re not “deniers”, but true believers) are saying that the “Teabaggers”, their term for the Tea Party Movement supporters, are the same as the “Deniers”, that they are interchangable.
Unfortunately, with your misunderstanding of the term “Climate Change Deniers”, the post at your site makes absolutely no sense at all.
Or, perhaps I’m missing something. I’ll admit that’s possible, though unlikely in this case.
Deniers = people who think it’s a hoax.
Deniers = enemy of AlGore and the Greenies.
Deniers = US.
seven commented:
Keep it up. I have seen no Democrats in congress step up and condem Pervert Jennings. When the next election comes along, we can point that out.
mike191 commented:
Every time one of these Dems demonize the American People the closer for removal by the elections of 2010.Moreover,for those who think they have secure districts-keep talking and see how secure you will be in 2012.
RJR commented:
And yet they try to say that a fetus is not a human. Who is in denial?
Mike commented:
You are all stupid! Why is there this uproar over global warming? This has NOTHING to do with the real reasons why we need to stop sucking on the middle east’s tit. There is a finite supply of fossil fuels and we are quickly running out. Forget Global warming. It probably does exist but it has nothing to do with man. Fossil fuels cause other problems. They cause pollution, acid rain, chronic health problems, and more. We have gone past the precipice. We need to urgently move towards newer technology that is also unlimited like hydrogen, solar, wind, and other technology such as harnessing the ocean currents. Nuclear is also an exhaustible source. Divert our money and efforts here. Offer incentives to the oil companies to move to these new technologies. Penalize them and threaten to shut them down if they don’t evolve. Think that’s not fair? All of you will blame the government and the BIG BAD oil companies after the supply has run out. Kind of like the smoker who blames the tobacco company after the fact.
Hypogean commented:
Mike
December 11th, 2009 | 1:22 pm | #22
We have gone past the precipice.
Then it’s too late and we should all stop worrying. Once you’re over the precipice you’re in free fall and you’re going to splatter to bits on the rocks below. Ever see anybody reverse their fall off a cliff in midair and make it back to the top? Of course not.
So all your recommendations are a waste of time. We’re doooooooooooomed!
Atomic Lib Smasher commented:
“There is no magician trying to trick his audience,” Markey said. “Our world is getting hotter, faster.”
Tell that to the Great Lakes region. They are freezing their butts off today. Some areas had below zero temps this morning. Winter has not even arrived yet.
Very true. I live around Chi-Town and the other day it was bitterly cold with those oh-so-lovely Lake effect winds acting up at around 40 mphs.
Global warming my ass. If they wanna call it “Climate Change”, I’ll give them that – it’s called WINTER is coming.
I personally like Carlin’s take on the whole matter. (Language warning)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOOc5yiIWkg
jorgen commented:
“Our world is getting hotter, faster.”
Must be their brians that are overheating.
HeatherRadish commented:
Democrats on Thursday compared climate change deniers to “teabaggers”- a vulgar sexual term.
But they respect and celebrate gay people, despite using a reference to homosexual sexual practices to denigrate ideological opponents. Really. Or something.
Bill MItchell commented:
You know, every time I read about supposedly intelligent, educated adults claiming that “there is no doubt that man is causing global warming” I just have to laugh.
The entire concept is so patently absurd as to be funny.
Earth has warmed and cooled literally millions of times over the last 4.5 billion years, and yet, this time because mankind has added a tiny amount to a trace gas over the last 100 years, WE are at fault!
If the Dumocrats had controlled Congress 150 million years ago, they would be drafting legislation to tax dinosaurs for excess farting.
I mean, seriously, what thinking person can accept that? It is the post hoc argument to end all post hoc arguments.
JPL17 commented:
Classy Dems Compare Climate Change Deniers to “Teabaggers”
Hey, I’m willing to be called “teabagger” by those gullible climate warmists, just as long as I can call them “global warming swallowers.”
bg commented:
++
re: bg @ 11:47 am #4
New World Order Depopulation Plans Exposed,
Agenda 21 Club of Rome EnvironMentalism
“We are moving toward a New World Order, the world
of communism. We shall never turn off that road.”
~ Mikhail Gorbachev
“The social experiment in China under Chairman Moa’s leadership
is one of the most important and successful in hman history”
~ David Rockefeller
Murder by Communism (by any other name)
[How can we understand all this killing by communists? It is the marriage of an absolutist ideology with the absolute power. Communists believed that they knew the truth, absolutely. They believed that they knew through Marxism what would bring about the greatest human welfare and happiness. And they believed that power, the dictatorship of the proletariat, must be used to tear down the old feudal or capitalist order and rebuild society and culture to realize this utopia. Nothing must stand in the way of its achievement. Government--the Communist Party--was thus above any law. All institutions, cultural norms, traditions, and sentiments were expendable. And the people were as though lumber and bricks, to be used in building the new world.
Constructing this utopia was seen as though a war on poverty, exploitation, imperialism, and inequality. And for the greater good, as in a real war, people are killed. And thus this war for the communist utopia had its necessary enemy casualties, the clergy, bourgeoisie, capitalists, wreckers, counterrevolutionaries, rightists, tyrants, rich, landlords, and noncombatants that unfortunately got caught in the battle. In a war millions may die, but the cause may be well justified, as in the defeat of Hitler and an utterly racist Nazism. And to many communists, the cause of a communist utopia was such as to justify all the deaths. The irony of this is that communism in practice, even after decades of total control, did not improve the lot of the average person, but usually made their living conditions worse than before the revolution. It is not by chance that the greatest famines have occurred within the Soviet Union (about 5,000,000 dead during 1921-23 and 7,000,000 from 1932-3) and communist China (about 27,000,000 dead from 1959-61). In total almost 55,000,000 people died in various communist famines and associated diseases, a little over 10,000,000 of them from democidal famine. This is as though the total population of Turkey, Iran, or Thailand had been completely wiped out. And that something like 35,000,000 people fled communist countries as refugees, as though the countries of Argentina or Columbia had been totally emptied of all their people, was an unparalleled vote against the utopian pretensions of Marxism-Leninism.
But communists could not be wrong. After all, their knowledge was scientific, based on historical materialism, an understanding of the dialectical process in nature and human society, and a materialist (and thus realistic) view of nature. Marx has shown empirically where society has been and why, and he and his interpreters proved that it was destined for a communist end. No one could prevent this, but only stand in the way and delay it at the cost of more human misery. Those who disagreed with this world view and even with some of the proper interpretations of Marx and Lenin were, without a scintilla of doubt, wrong. After all, did not Marx or Lenin or Stalin or Mao say that. . . . In other words, communism was like a fanatical religion. It had its revealed text and chief interpreters. It had its priests and their ritualistic prose with all the answers. It had a heaven, and the proper behavior to reach it. It had its appeal to faith. And it had its crusade against nonbelievers.
What made this secular religion so utterly lethal was its seizure of all the state's instrument of force and coercion and their immediate use to destroy or control all independent sources of power, such as the church, the professions, private businesses, schools, and, of course, the family. The result is what we see in Table 1.
But communism does not stand alone in such mass murder. We do have the example of Nazi Germany, which may have itself murdered some 20,000,000 Jews, Poles, Ukrainians, Russians, Yugoslaves, Frenchmen, and other nationalities. Then there is the Nationalist government of China under Chiang Kai-shek, which murdered near 10,000,000 Chinese from 1928 to 1949, and the Japanese militarists who murdered almost 6,000,000 Chinese, Indonesians, Indochinese, Koreans, Filipinos, and others during world War II. And then we have the 1,000,000 or more Bengalis and Hindus killed in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) in 1971 by the Pakistan military. Nor should we forget the mass expulsion of ethnic Germans and German citizens from Eastern Europe at the end of World War II, particularly by the Polish government as it seized the German Eastern Territories, killing perhaps over 1,000,000 of them. Nor should we ignore the 1,000,000 plus deaths in Mexico from 1900 to 1920, many of these poor Indians and peasants being killed by forced labor on barbaric haciendas. And one could go on and on to detail various kinds of noncommunist democide.
But what connects them all is this. As a government's power is more unrestrained, as its power reaches into all the corners of culture and society, and as it is less democratic, then the more likely it is to kill its own citizens. There is more than a correlation here. As totalitarian power increases, democide multiplies until it curves sharply upward when totalitarianism is near absolute. As a governing elite has the power to do whatever it wants, whether to satisfy its most personal desires, to pursue what it believes is right and true, it may do so whatever the cost in lives. In this case power is the necessary condition for mass murder. Once an elite have it, other causes and conditions can operated to bring about the immediate genocide, terrorism, massacres, or whatever killing an elite feels is warranted.
Finally, at the extreme of totalitarian power we have the greatest extreme of democide. Communist governments have almost without exception wielded the most absolute power and their greatest killing (such as during Stalin's reign or the height of Mao's power) has taken place when they have been in their own history most totalitarian. As most communist governments underwent increasing liberalization and a loosening of centralized power in the 1960s through the 1980s, the pace of killing dropped off sharply.
Communism has been the greatest social engineering experiment we have ever seen. It failed utterly and in doing so it killed over 100,000,000 men, women, and children, not to mention the near 30,000,000 of its subjects that died in its often aggressive wars and the rebellions it provoked. But there is a larger lesson to be learned from this horrendous sacrifice to one ideology. That is that no one can be trusted with power. The more power the center has to impose the beliefs of an ideological or religious elite or impose the whims of a dictator, the more likely human lives are to be sacrificed. This is but one reason, but perhaps the most important one, for fostering liberal democracy.]
btw, heard/read somewhere the deadline is December 31st 2009.. hah,
and we ponder “why the rush” & their “lalala can’t hear you” reaction??
TIMES UP!!
==
avery commented:
Markey,is a Watermellon.Bill Mitchell is right on.
Neo commented:
Don’t worry about the “teabaggers” thing … they we’re just giving us a “mudslide“
Jamest155 commented:
Climategate reminds me of Rathergate, where facts don’t matter, cause its “fake but true”. These global warming people have been completely busted. It was a fraud, a fake. The numbers were fudged and manipulated, the data was thrown out and they intimidated any dissent with blackball or firing. The hockey stick graph was a fraud. All 3 of the major climate research outfits were either fudging their numbers or were basing their results of fudged numbers. The debate is over. It was the biggest scientific hoax in world history.
IOpian commented:
I think they are right about calling those that do not believe man is causing a warming that is not happening ‘swiftboaters’. After all that is when a few people say something happened and two hundred fifty who were there say it didn’t happen that way yet the two hundred and fifty are ‘swiftboating’ the few non-deniers. I guess it can mean ‘exposing the lies’.
Agent 99 commented:
bg ….Thank You…{…} Bilderbergers..Trilateral Commission…CFR…Club of Rome …More …{…} Goal …Population Control for the love of Mother Earth …{…} Really it is about the ELITIST RULE… The NWO is upon us…
Lenny commented:
I don’t deny the fact that climate changes and I don’t suck scrotum. I doubt that we are causing climate change and I believe that the government should spend our money responsibly. The left’s labels say more about them than they do me.
eaglewingz08 commented:
If there is no magician making tricks about climate change then why did the central figures propounding the theory use the word ‘trick’ in their manufacturing/concocting data to support this purported global warming? Why did they destroy the raw data that would supposedly support global warming.
The global warmists have told us to show them the money!
We the taxpayers of the world say to the warmists show us all the RAW data and all your emails concerning this RAW data and its ADJUSTMENTS and the reasons for each of these ADJUSTMENTS by you before we pay you a penny.
Solaratov commented:
IOpian
December 11th, 2009 | 3:50 pm | #34
That is *exactly* what “swiftboating” is. Simply exposing the lies and fraud of a person or movement.
Kerry – the traitor – was, indeed, swiftboated.
And the agw fraudsters are in the process of being swiftboated.
Kinda neat, huh?
AnnS commented:
Did anyone know about this bill that just passed in the House today? It’s now in the senate and of of course obama is praising it?
WASHINGTON – The House passed the most ambitious restructuring of federal financial regulations since the New Deal on Friday, aiming to head off any replay of last year’s Wall Street failures that plunged the nation deep into recession.
The sprawling legislation would give the government new powers to break up companies that threaten the economy, create a new agency to oversee consumer banking transactions and shine a light into shadow financial markets that have escaped the oversight of regulators.
The vote was a party-line 223-202. No Republicans voted for the bill; 27 Democrats voted against it.
“This house has been on a spending spree, a bailout spree and a regulatory spree that I could never have imagined in any of my prior 18 years here in Congress,” Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio said.
Daniel commented:
Sorry to repeat, but here goes.
Markey said. “Our world is getting hotter, faster.”
If these “politicians” would shut up long enough, we wouldn’t be warming up so doggone fast.
We should give them the cold shoulder.
In November of 2010. I will do my part.
Richard Romano commented:
Hypogean
December 11th, 2009 | 1:29 pm | #23
Then it’s too late and we should all stop worrying. Once you’re over the precipice you’re in free fall and you’re going to splatter to bits on the rocks below. Ever see anybody reverse their fall off a cliff in midair and make it back to the top? Of course not.
So all your recommendations are a waste of time. We’re doooooooooooomed!
It’s amazing how hysteria is so much a part of leftist thinking.
Btw, always great to see a comment from you
shrek commented:
Daniel,
Ever post comments at Rathergate.com?
There was a Daniel posting there for a year or so and he left suddenly about a year ago.
Just curious and it’s really none of my business.
Chisum commented:
Sarah Palin Breaking Hearts On The Left
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2009/12/sarah-palin-breaking-hearts-on-the-left.html
bg commented:
++
Codex Alimentarius 2010 Plan”
oh btw, aside from ObamaCare part 1 (including death panels), do we know
what else became law in that UNREAD stimulus bill that was passed back in
February yet??
sarc on/
ps: did they find the 57th district yet??
Stimulus Stolen??
nah, that’s impossible..
not with some sort of god watching over it!!
/sarc off
==
jas commented:
The funny thing is if someone, say Obama were to admit climate hoax, like a wave across the nation the dems would proclaim “yeah what he said”. pathetic
Daniel commented:
Shrek,
I have never known, or seen, that site.
If you check my website link via my name, you will understand why.
Thanks for asking.
Daniel is a common first name.
Daniel commented:
P.S. Although it has been awhile since I have been a fairly regular (somewhat) visitor here, I think you will find some of the regulars here will recognize my gravatar.
bg commented:
++
Obama..
they bring a knife, we bring a gun!!
they bring a teabag, we bring a fist!!
==