The scandal grows…
It looks like the New York Times is not the only news organization to ignore the greatest scandal in modern science.

BBC joins in to “Hide the Decline”–

The face in the video belongs to Dr. Michael Mann, the father of the bogus global warming hockey stick graph.

The BBC was sent the Climategate files a month ago but refused to cover the story.
The Daily Mail reported, via Ace:

The controversy surrounding the global warming scandal today deepened after a BBC correspondent admitted he was sent the leaked emails more than a month before they were made public.

Paul Hudson, weather presenter and climate change expert, claims the documents allegedly sent between some of the world’s leading scientists are of a direct result of an article he wrote.

In his BBC blog two days ago, Hudson said: ‘I was forwarded the chain of emails on the 12th October, which are comments from some of the world’s leading climate scientists written as a direct result of my article “Whatever Happened To Global Warming”.’

That essay, written last month, argued that for the last 11 years there had not been an increase in global temperatures.

It also presented the arguments of sceptics who believe natural cycles control temperature and the counter-arguments of those who think it’s man’s actions which are warming the planet.

The leaked files – which show 4,000 documents which have allegedly been sent by scientists over the past 13 years – were apparently taken from servers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit, which is a world-renowned centre focused on studying climate change.

Previously:
MAN-BEAR-PIG Is Dead!… Emails Prove Global Warming Junk Science Conspiracy (Updated)
“Hockey Stick” Creator Implicated in Global Warming Conspiracy
Mainstream Media Ignores Greatest Scandal In Modern Science
Inhofe Will Call For Investigation Into Global Warming Email Scandal
Media Ignores Climategate Even as NASA Is Dragged Into the Scandal
Climategate Video & Children’s Book Released

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  1. Be interesting to watch this thing collapse in on itself especially when it is Al Gore, Barbara Boxer, John Kerry, Hollywood’s turn.

    Of course the Sun spots should return soon and an uptick in warming will be attributed once again to tailpipes.

  2. It seems that we will likely have to wait another 9 years for this whole thing to implode. Based on estimates from Tim Patterson, the 2018 solar cycle will be extremely weak leading to noticeable cooling across the globe–the problem is how to survive until the weight of the truth completely crushes these morons.

  3. And how does out Boy Genius President respond to such news?

    “Obama Will Carry Pledge of 17% U.S. Emissions Cut to Copenhagen”

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=auNcDqoM5ySk

  4. Call your Senator and ask him/her what they think of this and when they’ll open an investigation into this since tax payer money has been expended on this. This is far worse than Enron ever hoped to be.

  5. Proving, of course (as those of us who haven’t allowed our schooling to interfere with our education, have always known) that “Global Warming” & “Climate Change” has never been about “saving the planet” or “protecting the ecosystem” – it’s always been about CONTROLLING the planet and it’s inhabitants.

    Obama proves, in one more idiotic, moronic, symbolic gesture and trip that, the science has NEVER mattered.

    Will the last human being that buys the last incandescent bulb, please turn out the lights of Western Civilization.

    Thank you.

  6. You know that – just as sure as God made little green apples – none of this is going to stop obama’s plans to get rich from cap and trade. He is going to keep insisting that algore is right and he’s going to try to force the copenhagen treaty (or whatever they’ll call it) on us.
    About the only thing that we’re going to be able to do is force our congresscritters to shoot it down in the senate. Along with crap and tax.
    There is just too much money and power at stake for obama to let a little thing like the truth interfere with his plans. (I’d bet dollars to donuts that the deals are already in place that will let obama leave the white house as a billionaire – if he can deliver to his masters.)
    This is going to be one long, hard fight – and we should be starting now to make our senators aware that we know about the lies and the fraud involved — and that we’re not going to stand for being taxed to death for the biggest scientific fraud of the 20th&21st centuries. (Even though they don’t vote on treaties, lobbying the representatives, too, couldn’t hurt.)
    One of the things that we should do is make the senators aware that – as soon as the Conservatives take power after the 2010 midterms, we are going to call for an investigation of every senator who voted for the cap and trade and voted to ratify this treaty — with an eye toward hard jail time if any under the table deals or malfeasence is discovered. (They might not care about losing a senate seat – but none of them want to be investigated or go to prison.)

  7. And the media aiders and abettors are now vomiting copius word volume to claim that the material from Hadley CRU does not show purposeful manipulation of data and exclusion of contrary data. Senator Inhofe got ambushed on Kudlow -

    “Inhofe Ambushed on CNBC’s ‘The Kudlow Report’ by Fill-in Host over ClimateGate”

    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2009/11/25/inhofe-ambushed-cnbcs-kudlow-report-fill-host-over-climategate

    The UK Independent bleats -

    ‘Organic farming may counter climate change,’

    http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/organic-farming-may-counter-climate-change-report-says-1827624.html

    The UK Daily Mail chimes in -

    ‘Stop eating meat to save the planet from global warming’, Britons warned”

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1230781/Decade-soaring-temperatures-ahead-Health-Secretary-warns-real-present-danger-posed-climate-change.html

    Meh!

  8. I’m appalled just how many there are that would bring this country down for a lie. Somewhere there will be an accounting, somehow they will pay. Just how asleep were we to let all this get this far, did we fight wars and die for this.

    What more will they do to us before we rise up and throw this SCUM out. I know we must do it legally, but how much more arrogance can we stomach.

    Then we have a very good weapon to fight them in Sarah and some on our side would rather snipe at her and sit idly by and watch. Either be part of the solution or get the he## out of the way, just sit down and shut up.

  9. “East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit, which is a world-renowned centre focused on studying climate change.”
    ……….
    Can we edit that to “infamous centre focused on concocting climate change.”

  10. One thing I haven’t heard mentioned lately is the 800 year lag between warming and the increase of CO2. Gore addresses this in his docudrama but attributes it to increase of CO2 driving warming. However in the Great Warming Swindle it is shown he has it bassackwards. It is warming driving the increase in CO2 800 years later. And guess what happened 800 years ago in about 1200 AD…. the medieval warming period.

    Once again liberals attempting to think are 180 degrees out of phase with reality.

  11. So, revoke Al Gore’s Peace Prize and his Emmy and demand a public audit of his energy company activities … or did five billion other people just mention that before me?

  12. I wasn’t aware that the BBC was owned by the NY Times!!!!!

  13. I say throw is blubberous butt in jail, he’s lived high off the hog over this charade.

  14. I know it’s a stretch, but you (and Ace, and Carol Driver) need to read things properly.

    Hudson didn’t say he was approached with the leaked emails.

    He said that the emails, which were subsequently leaked, contained ones that had been sent to him.

    He was just confirming their authenticity.

  15. There were emails in the 60 MB zip file dated as recently as November 12, 2009. So something is fishy when they say they had the leaked emails one month before they went public (Nov. 19?).

  16. Ezzthetic,

    From the article it isn’t clear. Hudson says he was offered the emails but didn’t say whether he was offered the entire file. My guess is that he was.

    It appears that the file was assembled over a period of time, possibly to comply with an FOIA request. The intro describes the file as ‘randomly selected’, which of course it is not. But who selected it? Are there even more damning documents under wraps?

    To restore confidence the Climate Research Unit and their allies have to do what they should have done all along: make all their data, calculations, and reasonings available to anyone who asks.

  17. Funny nobody mentions NASA skewing its 2007 climate report to make all observed temperatures since 1970 appear warmer and all prior to that cooler:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/02/a_tale_of_two_thermometers/

  18. Among the many aspects of this major, major scandal is the besmirching of science, and the peer review process. On the latter Andrew Bolr here in Melbourne (Herald-Sun) puts it succinctly:
    “peer review has become ‘mates’ review”.
    In Aussie lingo a ‘mate’ is sometimes a positive term, but often (as here) a very negative one, implying collusion and sweetheart dealing by a corrupt clique.

  19. No worries Daggie Boy – she’ll be right mate!

  20. ++

    just a sample:

    The IPCC removes the Hockey stick [2007]

    Eco-economic Warfare and the Planned Collapse of Western Civilization>/a>

    Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty in Copenhagen

    More on Al Gore’s climate fraud promotion book “Our Choice”

    [Maurice Strong, who is regularly credited as founding father of the modern environmental movement, serves on the board of directors of CCX. Strong was a leading initiate of the Earth Summit in the early 90s, where the theory of global warming caused by CO2 generated by human activity was most notably advanced.

    Both Strong and Gore come from the Club of Rome clique, who in their 1991 Report, “The First Global Revolution” openly admitted how they were planning to exploit the contrived hoax of global warming in order to further their agenda.

    “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.,” they wrote.]

    About “Our Choice”

    [I’m offering you the choice of life or death.
    You can choose either blessings or curses.

    –Deuteronomy Chapter 30, Verse 19]

    With Hurricanes At Thirty Year Low, Gore Turns To Photoshop

    [With the increasingly discredited notion of man-made global warming crashing and burning on a daily basis, climate alarmists are being forced to accelerate their fearmongering to unprecedented levels. With the evidence failing to match up to the doomsday proclamations, Al Gore has turned to photoshop in order to make a CO2-choked earth look scary enough to sell his cap and trade scam.

    The latest example of climate cult fakery comes in the form of the front cover of Al Gore’s new book, Our Choice; A Plan To Solve The Climate Crisis.]

    Agenda 21

    The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development

    The Great Global Warming Swindle

    ==

  21. Hold on,
    I think you are misreading what Hudson is saying, he says:

    “I was forwarded the chain of emails on the 12th October, which are comments from some of the world’s leading climate scientists written as a direct result of my article ‘Whatever Happened To Global Warming’.”

    He was forwarded one email chain, not the whole package, and he was likely forwarded the chain by one of the participants of the chain because he was the subject. And he brings that up as evidence that the emails are legitimate because the one he was forwarded matches the one in the leaked zip file.

    Hudson couldn’t have been forwarded the whole package because the most recent emails in the leak are only two weeks old.

  22. I agree with Kazinski. I think that he was shown emails written in direct response to his BBC item. THey include one from Mann, if I recall correctly, wondering what was going on at the BBC, and saying that he would get in touch with Black, the BBC primary warmist apologist. I don’t think Hudson has done anything wrong here – in fact, the opposite. He’s a good guy.

  23. There’s another interesting aspect to this. Let’s assume that the email chain that Hudson was shown is the one concerning his “Whatever Happened To Global Warming Article”. These are the emails you can see by searching at http://www.eastangliaemails.com/search.php using the search terms hudson and bbc, and starting in mid October 2009.

    The conclusion from this is that someone _inside_ either CRU or one of the other institutions whose people were privy to the emails, leaked them to Hudson.

    That makes it much more likely that a whistleblower was involved in the major leak.

  24. It appears that New Zealand’s climate office, NIWA, is now also being found to have cooked the books.

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/

  25. on a good day – they’d run this guys off the
    street. just a new and improved shell game.
    what do they say – fool me once shame on you fool me twice shame on me. when you stick with the liar and make excuses because he brings home the “bacon”. excusing lack of character out of a sense of blind loyalty.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_game

  26. i have many associations who bought into the
    whole package [obama, global warming, healthcare etc] without even considering a less flattering profile. as far as i’m concerned – they own it. i could be wrong, but if i am the results won’t amount to much. if their wrong,
    things could get worst. at some point the second guessing will be over and reality will begin…….

  27. I’m pretty sure this is a daily mail journalist failing to read English. The way *I* read Paul Hudson’s post is that he was sent the email thread that refers to HIM only.

    He could not have been sent the whole thing since some of the emails date from after his receiving the thread.

  28. “CDR M
    November 25th, 2009 | 9:18 pm | #6
    Call your Senator and ask him/her what they think of this and when they’ll open an investigation into this since tax payer money has been expended on this. This is far worse than Enron ever hoped to be.”

    Actually, this IS Enron. They were an early proponent of “Cap and Trade (Tax)” and were hoping to clean up on:
    1. Artificially driving up the cost of oil.
    2. Selling nothing (carbon credits) for something ($$$)
    3. Being “At the table” when new regulations are written.

    This is a huge and continuing scam. Scientific fraud is simply one of the tools they use.

  29. In [this] article,

    Manipulation of raw data is at the heart of recent claims of corrupt scientific practice in climate science, with CRU’s Phil Jones recently claiming old temperature records collected by his organization were “destroyed” or “lost”, meaning researchers can now only access manipulated data.

    This is a criminal act of malfeasance that we have paid to have committed with our tax dollar support of this “research”.

    For more, read [The Dog Ate My Global Warming Data](title modified…)

  30. mrt
    November 26th, 2009 | 9:48 am | #35
    It keeps getting better.
    “White House Involvement in ClimateGate”

    Not only that, but I suspect that NASA is in it deep, too. A shame, since they are (were) our crown jewel of science and technology. And, we will find plenty of collusion in academia on this side of the pond.

    Modern liberalism and the substitution of political emotionalism for rational thinking is tearing everything apart.

  31. ++

    141 Driver @ 10:09 am #37

    Enron huh..

    you hadn’t seen nothin’ yet!!

    Billion-Dollar Scandal Not Ready for Prime Time

    [While the figures behind Enron were calculator-busting, the problems at Fannie Mae were greater: roughly $11 billion in earnings restatements. That’s about 19 times more than Enron’s accounting “errors.” Although broadcast news offered wall-to-wall coverage of the endless commas and zeros behind the Enron collapse, Fannie Mae’s staggering problems and the resignation of six top executives, including the CEO and chief financial officer, received almost no TV news attention.

    [..]

    Connections to the halls of power can make any story front-page news. Fannie Mae and Enron had no shortage of those. They employed two of the most generous campaign contributors in the nation. The media tried to link the leadership at Enron to the Bush administration and to several key figures in Congress. On the other hand, the broadcast media had nothing to say about the unambiguous connections between Fannie Mae board members and the Clinton administration.

    [..]

    Sadly, this perception of political correctness is out of touch with reality. According to a September 2003 report by a GSE watchdog group, Fannie Mae Policy Focus, Fannie lags far behind the market in facilitating housing for minority and first-time buyers. As a matter of fact, the GSEs buy less than 10 percent of private sector loans to first-time African-American and Hispanic purchasers. Moreover, Fannie and Freddie acquired “more loans made to absentee landlords, vacation homes, and second mortgages than first-time homebuyer loans,” according to the report.]

    and you won’t because the Progressives “own it”..

    they’ve recently disabled the pdf link.. they’re cleaning
    house alright, sweeping their dirt under the rug.. *sigh*

    ==

  32. @bg
    November 26th, 2009 | 11:05 am | #41
    they’re cleaning
    house alright, sweeping their dirt under the rug.. *sigh*

    Standard Operating Procedure for criminals.

  33. So the hockey stick turned out to be all hockey and no stick. As to the commenter so eager to throw the bums out of office, sorry, not going to happen. The connection between the corrupt and the corrupted is too strong. Only term limits can root them out and the public does not support term limits because they are convinced we must have a congress with more experience than that permitted by term limits; experience in climiquiddick-style behaviour apparently being an acceptable price to pay for it.

  34. Sorry Jim, but you are wrong on this (surprise!)… The guy at the BBC received one email. Just one, that happened to have a some quotes from a few other emails.

    If you had bothered to check the date of most of the emails you are frothing over, you would realize that they were written after October 12. Yes, after.

    Surely you can put two and two together…

  35. Here’s the most complete analysis of the duplicitous methods used by the East Anglia CRU to produce “research” that supported the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis.

    After reading this, it’s painfully obvious to me that the raw have been blatantly cooked to produce the result that the keepers of the keys to the crypt wanted to obtain.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/crus_source_code_climategate_r.html

  36. Fraud is often easy to spot -harder to prove. This nails them, but since inconvenient truth is always a fabrication to them, and the entire leftist world’s 30 year plan to conquer and control the entire world through the UN has just been exposed as a fraud, they’ll go through with their plans anyway. They own the media and the courts.

    My favorite silliness on this thing was when Bill Clinton invited 30 weather forecasters to the Whitehouse to “explain” global warming science to them. Who knows, maybe Monica taught him some climatologial tricks?

  37. If he got them on 12 Oct how come there are docs with 12 Nov dates in the files?

  38. It’s time for a full on revolution. We need to drag these politicos and their media enables into the street and cut off their g*&^%$#D heads.

© Copyright 2012, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Web Development By Arlington Kirk