9-11 Terrorists Ready to Rock New York City In Terror Show Trials
Posted by Jim Hoft on Sunday, November 22, 2009, 10:19 PM
Thanks Barack.
The 9-11 terrorists are ready to rock New York City- again.
The 9-11 terrorists are stoked to turn the New York City show trials into the most awesome terrorist spectacle since the 9-11 attacks.
The AP reported, via FOX Nation:
The five men facing trial in the Sept. 11 attacks will plead not guilty so that they can air their criticisms of U.S. foreign policy, the lawyer for one of the defendants said Sunday.
Scott Fenstermaker, the lawyer for accused terrorist Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali, said the men would not deny their role in the 2001 attacks but “would explain what happened and why they did it.”
The U.S. Justice Department announced earlier this month that Ali and four other men accused of murdering nearly 3,000 people in the nation’s deadliest terrorist attack will face a civilian federal trial just blocks from the World Trade Center site.
Ali, also known as Ammar al-Baluchi, is a nephew of professed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
Mohammed, Ali and the others will explain “their assessment of American foreign policy,” Fenstermaker said.
“Their assessment is negative,” he said.
The terrorist’s lawyers already told reporters that Obama and Holder’s gaffes may affect the trial.
What a disaster.
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
Rough Night… Obama Loses 36 Arkansas Counties to Unknown Democrat – Loses 67 Kentucky Counties to “Uncommitted”
Published May 23, 2012 at 4:57 am - 68 Comments
Betsy Ross commented:
A How-to Guide to Making a Mockery of the US Justice System:
Have the US Attorney General and the POTUS say they will try these people in a civilian court to show the world how just the US is.
Then in same breath announce that these defendants are guilty as charged before they even present their case.
Then stand there before the world with a straight face and say justice has been served.
jenny commented:
The best we can do is ignore this dog and pony show and pray no one else will be killed because of it.
lance commented:
Can this please be the last straw?
Camels can carry only so many pieces of straw.
Stephen commented:
Everyone with common sense knew they would do this as soon as it was announced…..will someone just give me the gun so I can do the dirty work and get this over with while inflicting as little pain as possible?
wanumba commented:
Are these lawyers for the defense being paid for out of tax-payer funds, too?
Connor commented:
The problem is that these guys were not arrested with “rights”. IF a civilian court finds them guilty it sets a precedence for future civil rights violations. If it finds them not guilty or throws the whole thing out which will protect actual citizen rights well then thats bad as well.
The fiasco and intelligence issues are nothing compared to the legal precedence which can be set for use against ANYONE by Holder’s white hating DoJ and Obama’s ego.
It is very scary.
myna commented:
The moribund of lawyer thieves are on parade for the Cirque de KSM galore while Obama is spending our way out of recession. The interest payments are rolling in. You know what, someday you have to pay the piper and the Chinese are coming to collect their profit. We are living in our bizzaro world, gird your loins.
Just_Saying commented:
So, in a war, before an American soldier can shoot to save his own life, must he first announce to the opponent, “You have rights”?
This plan is astoundingly insane. Don’t they see how ludicrous it is — yet?
.
Theyarecorrupt commented:
Obama stated that we need to have this trial out in the open to show the world how just we are.Then went on to promise a conviction and execution just peachy man! Somehow it seems fitting that Obama would consider that just. You have to take the guy at his word.
Seriously? commented:
“So, in a war, before an American soldier can shoot to save his own life, must he first announce to the opponent, “You have rights”?
This plan is astoundingly insane. Don’t they see how ludicrous it is — yet?”
Um, who is they? The rest of the US other than you? If so, I am sure they see how ludicrous that is… That is why no one sane is saying they should do that. Just because we aren’t doing that doesn’t mean that once arrested they don’t have rights. And yes they should be tried in New York. The second we are “too scared” of what they might do to try them in NY, the second we are scared into saying they don’t have rights, is the second the terrorists won.
That would be giving in to them because of the violent acts they carried out. Terrorism is defined as “the calculated use of violence (or the threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals”.
Stephen commented:
“the second we are scared into saying they don’t have rights, is the second the terrorists won.”
What a strange way to twist logic into nonsense. Then again there are those who think that because someone is ‘part Jewish’ and ‘in power’ that it is part of a global conspiracy, so I shouldn’t hold my breath at your retrograde logic. Terrorists are not covered by any international rules of war. They are non-uniformed and they attack civilian targets. In wars past spies were treated as such, as were saboteurs. In refraining from joining a recognized army, they abandon any international POW rights. If they were part of a recognized uniformed army then they would have POW rights, however no foreign combatant captured by the military has civilian rights.
These war criminals have been granted civilian rights for no reason other than to make a show trial of the CIA and anti-Islamist foreign policy. Nowhere in any document, American or international is anything like this advocated. It is a political stunt pulled off by those with the intellectual capacity of a teenager pulling pranks.
Lone Ranger commented:
For some treasonous reason, Obama and company want to see THE UNITED STATES put on trial – with the terrorists representing Obama and his henchmen – in the hopes that the UNITED STATES will be found guilty of evil-doing. Such is Obama’s hatred of everything that made America a great, world-leading country.
I cannot fathom the sick, depraved perspective that can drive such hatred. Surely Obama shares many of the same beliefs as the terrorists.
It still beggars belief that the mass of ignorant America voters put this disgraceful, pathetic excuse for an American into the most powerful position on Earth.
Gman commented:
Speaking of a trial. If you were to make the case that Obama hates the USA the evidemce would be overwhelming. The jury wouldn’t even have to go into deliberations.
I still can’t believe we have a president that despises this country.
jonyjoe101 commented:
who is paying for there high price lawyers” thats what I want to know.
Ann commented:
Below are some petitions to sign if any one wants/
Add your name to the group of 13077 people
who have already signed using the Internet!
Keep Terrorists OUT of Civilian Courts
President Obama’s Administration has decided to bring the worst of the worst — the terrorists responsible for the tragedy of 9/11 — to American soil to stand trial. What’s worse, they are planning to take them out of the military justice system and try these terrorists in CIVILIAN courts — a dangerous move that will put our war on terrorism in jeopardy. Stand with the American Center for Law and Justice and support Sen. Lindsey Graham’s legislative effort to keep the terrorists OUT of civilian courts. Please read the form below carefully and declare your membership with the ACLJ by adding your name to our Petition to Keep Terrorists Out of Civilian Courts.
Petition to Keep Terrorists
Out of Civilian Courts
https://www.aclj.org/Petition/Default.aspx?sc=3509&ac=1
http://www.thebravest.com/NeverForget/Video.htm
http://www.keepamericasafe.com/
http://www.thebravest.com/neverforget.htm
Helen commented:
“who is paying for there high price lawyers” thats what I want to know.”
You are. Of course if you belong to those “rich” Americans who are paying taxes and still have job. To make you feel better, you are not alone, there are some other who still pay taxes and work and will pay even more after Obama and the bunch of Congressional Democrats create the Socialized Health care. Of course if you still have a job.
Rhoda R commented:
Lone Ranger has the right of it. Just another knife thrust to American by our Manchurian president.
chuck in st paul commented:
and yet, 52% of the country will still not get it even after this debacle finally finishes some five years down the road
… even after the next horrendous attack on America soil…
It’ll still be “Bush’s fault”. G-d I’m tired of the 52%.
LimoLibsStink commented:
0bama:
Let me be clear. Those were not gaffes those were ammunition given to the defense lawyers to get my Muslim brothers off the hook. I have explained how the Muslims have invented everything from the pen and printing press to Taqiyya. They are great. Americans suck.
This will be a show trial. It will show all of the flaws of the Bush Administration. Then I think we can begin to prosecute Bush. His surveillance policies have uncovered too my shady donations to my campaign. This must stop.
American and its military must quit mucking up good Muslim countries – like Afghanistan. After I dither for a while I will come to realize that the Troops are wasting too much of my money. That money could go to ACORN. I will then decide that General Stanley McChrystal and his crappy men can’t beat the mighty Jihad bomb planters. I will make the decision to surrender in Afghanistan.
Bingo, the troops will come home in humiliation and join ACORN. Now isn’t that a brilliant plan? It sure is!
My limousine is running and I have more economic damage to do. America sucks. Good day.
BigAlSouth commented:
So. The Jihadists assessment of US foreign policy (under Bush) is “Negative.”
My assessment of the death penalty to terrorists is “Positive.”
Sounds like it equals out.
StandYourGround commented:
It is time to work towards getting the communist majority out of the Congress in 2010 and then we have to impeach this president for failure to defend the constitution (which was his sworn oath) and then clean house on these Bastards that are intent on destroying this country!
Democrats = Communists!
Fred Beloit commented:
It is not true that our President hates the country. He loves the airports, the illegal aliens, Broadway’s bright lights. It is only the American citizens he finds not to his taste. Guess he thinks we are all bigots, in spite of all the evidence (e.g., he was elected to three government offices) to the contrary.
squeaky commented:
immediately after 9-11 – one of the alleged
complaints was the american lifestyle being
projected to islamic nations by modern technology. whatever problems they have with
foreign policy – they’ve had a long term problem
with our so-called corrupt way of life. and as much as hollywood celebs like to point to
washington – they’re a big part of the equation
of hate…
expat commented:
The huge fallacy of this show-the-world reasoning is that it assumes the world understands something of the US justice system. The world doesn’t. It gets its info from Reuters and NYT analysis and lots of soundbites. Anyone who thinks the world will be paying attention to objections based on Miranda rights when they have the option of watching something hefty like the local talent search program is nuts. Most people will accept the local anchor’s opinion of whether or not the trial is fair, and most of the anchors will spin their anti-Americanism and choose their sound bites carefully.
Bobbi commented:
why doesn’t the Judge just make the trial off-limits for the press?
bg commented:
++
chuck in st paul @ 3:50 am #19
GWB = the buck stops here..
BHO = the Bus Stops here..
==
bg commented:
++
“their assessment of American foreign policy”
assess this
==
bg commented:
++
Obama the IslaMarxist is laughing out loud at US via this farce of a trial..
[Abdul-Malik also makes no bones about discussing how the election of President Obama is a step forward in the project of Islamization and the long term goal of Islamist domination which falls right in lock-step with that of the Muslim Brotherhood as revealed in their manifesto.]
wake the hell up America..
==
Kunte Kinte commented:
8 months before 9-11, American foreign policy was Bill Clinton’s foreign policy.
swizzle commented:
Thank god the Democrats are finally going to give these guys justice. I’d expect the Republican scum to try and deny them justice, but seeing thier cowardly selves cowering in corners crying about it is really pathetic. No wonder they couldn’t win a war, not in Iraq, not in Afghanistan(you know, the one they ignored for 8 years).
bg commented:
++
Kunte Kinte @ 8:56 am #31
re: [Bill Clinton’s foreign policy.]
just a sample:
Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize
[The offer, which would have brought Bin Laden to the Arab country as the first step of an extradition process that would eventually deliver him to the U.S., required only that Clinton make a state visit there to personally request Bin Laden's extradition. But senior Clinton officials sabotaged the offer, letting it get caught up in internal politics within the ruling family--Clintonian diplomacy at its best.]
Al Qaeda absent from final Clinton report
[The final policy paper on national security that President Clinton submitted to Congress — 45,000 words long — makes no mention
of al Qaeda and refers to Osama bin Laden by name just four times.]
Bush Called for Elimination of al Qaeda, Five-Fold Increase in Covert Funding
[Clarke describes the handover of intelligence from the Clinton administration to the Bush administration and the latter's decision to revise the U.S. approach to Al Qaeda. Clarke was named special adviser to the president for cyberspace security in October 2001. He resigned from his post in January 2003.
RICHARD CLARKE: Actually, I've got about seven points, let me just go through them quickly. Um, the first point, I think the overall point is, there was no plan on Al Qaeda that was passed from the Clinton administration to the Bush administration.
Second point is that the Clinton administration had a strategy in place, effectively dating from 1998. And there were a number of issues on the table since 1998. And they remained on the table when that administration went out of office — issues like aiding the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan, changing our Pakistan policy -- uh, changing our policy toward Uzbekistan. And in January 2001, the incoming Bush administration was briefed on the existing strategy. They were also briefed on these series of issues that had not been decided on in a couple of years.
And the third point is the Bush administration decided then, you know, in late January, to do two things. One, vigorously pursue the existing policy, including all of the lethal covert action findings, which we've now made public to some extent.
And the point is, while this big review was going on, there were still in effect, the lethal findings were still in effect. The second thing the administration decided to do is to initiate a process to look at those issues which had been on the table for a couple of years and get them decided.
So, point five, that process which was initiated in the first week in February, uh, decided in principle, uh in the spring to add to the existing Clinton strategy and to increase CIA resources, for example, for covert action, five-fold, to go after Al Qaeda.
The sixth point, the newly-appointed deputies — and you had to remember, the deputies didn't get into office until late March, early April. The deputies then tasked the development of the implementation details, uh, of these new decisions that they were endorsing, and sending out to the principals.
Over the course of the summer — last point — they developed implementation details, the principals met at the end of the summer, approved them in their first meeting, changed the strategy by authorizing the increase in funding five-fold, changing the policy on Pakistan, changing the policy on Uzbekistan, changing the policy on the Northern Alliance assistance.
And then changed the strategy from one of rollback with Al Qaeda over the course of five years, which it had been, to a new strategy that called for the rapid elimination of Al Qaeda. That is in fact the timeline.]
and Obama makes Clinton look more like a George
Washington in comparison to his Benedict Arnold..
==
bg commented:
++
swizzle @ 9:05 am #32
fizzle, you’re not even good for a laugh..
==
Pat the First commented:
Todd Beamer’s father just unloaded on Fox. It wasn’t an interview. There was no questioning. He spoke from his heart how this is affecting the families of 9/11. It was amazing.
I hope this makes YouTube. It was awesome.
He is starting something called something like “Project 9/2010 and 9/2012″. He doesn’t call this government an administration. He calls it a “regime”.
If they can organize even a 10th of the families of 9/11 against the Dems, those Dems who walk with the current leadership are dead politically. People will listen to those families.
tennismom commented:
Doesn’t Congress have the power to create a third form of court just for terrorists? One with its own facilities & rules apart from those of the civil and military court systems? I think so. Maybe if the outrage in NYC & nationally becomes great enough, people will pressure Congress to override what Holder & Obummler are planning to do…. I’d like to see terrorists tried in a safe location (like, outside the US or on a ship in international waters) & then imprisoned or executed in a similar non-US venue. The legislation should specify that terrorists charged in such a court system DO NOT have rights of US citizens as defined by the Constitutions; it should define their rights, clearly defining and limiting their rights to trial by a jury of their peers. There should also be a time limit (like 90 days) within which they must be given a trial, so as to prevent internment such as we have not at Gitmo that goes on and on with no end in sight.
Here’s an idea: Legislation could specify that if the country of origin of the terrorists refuses to take them back, we will execute them. We should keep in mind that our gov made efforts to repatriate all Gitmo ‘enemy combatants’, and those remaining are those whose countries of origin refused them. They are men without a countries. That doesn’t mean we need to adopt them. Being ‘HUMANE’ has limits & those limits should be defined in new laws.
USMC Thomas commented:
By allowing a civil trial in NYC for these terrorist’s and giving them a platform to espouse their belief’s to the world, SOBama will do more to advance radical Islam than if he revealed his deception and admitted he’s still a Muslim.
Consider the circus the Muslim Brotherhood created in Egypt at their trial and there the jailer’s had no restraints against physical punishment of unruly prisoners.
Remember the courtroom farce the Chicago 7 created in their show trial.
In the words of loudmouth T. O. Owens, “Get your popcorn ready.”
Bob commented:
Criticism of the US foreign policies are for Congress, diplomats, policy wonks, columnists, and the public on the public forum, not for terrorists.
These al Qaeda terrorists should be given no platform to air their criticism.
Solaratov commented:
swizzle
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:05 am | #33
You’re such a poor, pathetic, cowardly salad tosser, swishy.
You have no interest whatsoever in “justice” (sic) for the terrorist scum.
All you want is to see the United States put on trial. And you really, really want to see America embarrassed and shamed before the world.
You’re scum, you little coward. You don’t have the balls to actually do anything to America -the country you hate – so you sit and quiver in hopeful anticipation of someone else attacking or otherwise damaging America.
Salad tossers like you should just crawl away someplace and die. You’re of no use whatsoever to this country.
Chisum commented:
Swizzle Fizzles!
oldguy commented:
Disaster? I don’t think so. I’m looking forward to this trial lasting all the way to next November. A couple more Ft. Hoods during the trials should just about doom the left in this country, or are we so far gone this is just wishful thinking?
USMC Thomas commented:
@oldguy,
Regretfully, we are too far gone in this country when they went through the motions of deciding whether to allow the Fort Hood terrorist release from confinement before his trial.
Judicial brain fart.
Seriously? commented:
@ Stephen “What a strange way to twist logic into nonsense. Then again there are those who think that because someone is ‘part Jewish’ and ‘in power’ that it is part of a global conspiracy, so I shouldn’t hold my breath at your retrograde logic. Terrorists are not covered by any international rules of war. They are non-uniformed and they attack civilian targets. In wars past spies were treated as such, as were saboteurs. In refraining from joining a recognized army, they abandon any international POW rights. If they were part of a recognized uniformed army then they would have POW rights, however no foreign combatant captured by the military has civilian rights.
These war criminals have been granted civilian rights for no reason other than to make a show trial of the CIA and anti-Islamist foreign policy. Nowhere in any document, American or international is anything like this advocated. It is a political stunt pulled off by those with the intellectual capacity of a teenager pulling pranks.”
What? You didn’t counter my point at all. You made a silly off topic rant about a Jewish conspiracy and put up a straw man… Why even reply if that is all you had? Everyone has a right to a fair trial in my opinion. You can’t just say someone is , you need to prove it for them to be punished. If the evidence is so overwhelming anyway, then it should be a non-issue to convict.
chris commented:
Is anyone worried that Mohammed’s testimony will not be admissible due to being extracted under torture? Could cause a mistrial. Then Bush and Cheney could be impeached for perverting the course of justice.
AuntieMadder commented:
From Atlas Shrugs http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/11/new-yorkers-to-attorney-general-holder-we-will-fight-you-all-the-way.html
“NEW YORKERS TO ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER: “WE WILL FIGHT YOU ALL THE WAY!”
(snip)
The Coalition formed to fight the decision of President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder to try the 9/11 co-conspirators in New York City’s federal court, effectively giving war criminals the same rights as American citizens while endangering the safety of all New Yorkers. Two weeks ago, we sent a letter signed by 300 family members of 9/11 victims to the President, Attorney General and Defense Secretary Robert Gates asking them to reverse course. The letter has now been signed by over 120,000 Americans and is posted at http://www.keepamericasafe.com.”
Please, go read the letter at http://www.keepamericasafe.com/?page_id=1822 and, if you agree with its content, sign it to show your support.
Brad commented:
The military commission trial was already in motion; piece of sh** KSM had accepted death penalty. There was no reason under teh sun to change the venue. It’s the most cynical and sickets political decision I’ve ever witnessed. Not to mention how Obama and Holder have already tainted jury pools. This administration would have to work very hard to reach Carter’s competence. Thanks a lot Dems and Independent dumbsh**s.
bg commented:
++
Seriously? 4:25 pm #46
Is It Right to Fight?
[One other point, if everyone was a pacifist except the evil and lawbreakers of the world, then the world would be run by evil dictators or our society would be anarchy.
Pacifism in its fullest sense is untenable in the sinful world in which we live.
[snip]
The subject “Is it right to fight?” is a difficult issue because it makes us face the awful issues of a suppressive dictatorship, evil aggression, killing and death on the one hand and the “necessary evil” of war to stop it. Could this be the reason that General Robert E. Lee at the Battle of Fredericksburg said, “It is well that war is so terrible—we should grow too fond of it.” The just war position, in the writer’s opinion, fits best with the Scriptural evidence.
Remember, it is possible to love your enemies and use force against him. The principle that love is embraced in laws of justice helps us see that loving one’s enemy is to make sure that justice prevails. In doing so, the Christian is also demonstrating “love for the ones his enemy has hurt.”]
“On Moral Equivalency and Cold War History”
Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 10 (1996)
[Where does that leave us, though, with the new evidence we have about the victims of Stalin and Mao Zedong? One recent but reliable estimate suggests that Stalin's domestic victims alone - when one totals not only the figures for the purges but also for the collectivization of agriculture and the famine that resulted from it - numbered about twenty million dead. This does not count the additional acknowledged twenty-seven million Soviet citizens who died as a result of World War II. But this is not the worst of it. Estimates of those who died in one single episode - the Chinese famine produced by Mao's ill-conceived Great Leap Forward from 1958 to 1961 - now come to some thirty million, thereby qualifying the Chairman (whose image was once a popular adornment for t-shirts and dormitory wall posters in the West) as perhaps the greatest mass murderer of all time.
[snip]
Why didn’t the United States exploit its advantage to keep the Soviet Union from developing its own bomb? Or to avoid near-defeat in Korea? These are complicated questions, but one of the answers that comes up, when one looks at what American officials said to each other, is the conviction that a democracy could only use such a weapon as a last resort, and in self-defense.
But that in turn raises another interesting question of comparative morality: would an authoritarian system – one based on an ideology that explicitly justified any means necessary to achieve its ends, one that employed terror as a method of government, and one as casual about the loss of human life as were Stalin’s and Mao’s – have shown similar restraint had it got the bomb first?
[snip]
We need to be careful about the methodological metaphors we keep in our minds. Too much of Cold War history was written as if its major contenders were indeed featureless billiard balls, whose internal composition and character didn’t much matter. In retrospect, apples and oranges might have been the better metaphor: at least it would have allowed for irregularity, asymmetry, and the possibility of internal rot.]
same holds true today more than ever..
Death by Government
[How can we understand all this killing by communists? It is the marriage of an absolutist ideology with the absolute power. Communists believed that they knew the truth, absolutely. They believed that they knew through Marxism what would bring about the greatest human welfare and happiness. And they believed that power, the dictatorship of the proletariat, must be used to tear down the old feudal or capitalist order and rebuild society and culture to realize this utopia. Nothing must stand in the way of its achievement. Government--the Communist Party--was thus above any law. All institutions, cultural norms, traditions, and sentiments were expendable. And the people were as though lumber and bricks, to be used in building the new world.
Constructing this utopia was seen as though a war on poverty, exploitation, imperialism, and inequality. And for the greater good, as in a real war, people are killed. And thus this war for the communist utopia had its necessary enemy casualties, the clergy, bourgeoisie, capitalists, wreckers, counterrevolutionaries, rightists, tyrants, rich, landlords, and noncombatants that unfortunately got caught in the battle. In a war millions may die, but the cause may be well justified, as in the defeat of Hitler and an utterly racist Nazism. And to many communists, the cause of a communist utopia was such as to justify all the deaths. The irony of this is that communism in practice, even after decades of total control, did not improve the lot of the average person, but usually made their living conditions worse than before the revolution. It is not by chance that the greatest famines have occurred within the Soviet Union (about 5,000,000 dead during 1921-23 and 7,000,000 from 1932-3) and communist China (about 27,000,000 dead from 1959-61). In total almost 55,000,000 people died in various communist famines and associated diseases, a little over 10,000,000 of them from democidal famine. This is as though the total population of Turkey, Iran, or Thailand had been completely wiped out. And that something like 35,000,000 people fled communist countries as refugees, as though the countries of Argentina or Columbia had been totally emptied of all their people, was an unparalleled vote against the utopian pretensions of Marxism-Leninism.
But communists could not be wrong. After all, their knowledge was scientific, based on historical materialism, an understanding of the dialectical process in nature and human society, and a materialist (and thus realistic) view of nature. Marx has shown empirically where society has been and why, and he and his interpreters proved that it was destined for a communist end. No one could prevent this, but only stand in the way and delay it at the cost of more human misery. Those who disagreed with this world view and even with some of the proper interpretations of Marx and Lenin were, without a scintilla of doubt, wrong. After all, did not Marx or Lenin or Stalin or Mao say that. . . . In other words, communism was like a fanatical religion. It had its revealed text and chief interpreters. It had its priests and their ritualistic prose with all the answers. It had a heaven, and the proper behavior to reach it. It had its appeal to faith. And it had its crusade against nonbelievers.
What made this secular religion so utterly lethal was its seizure of all the state's instrument of force and coercion and their immediate use to destroy or control all independent sources of power, such as the church, the professions, private businesses, schools, and, of course, the family.]
more @ link..
what the fascist left have been aiming for is to “equate” good with evil.. that’s the only way they can appease their conscience in the face of the harsh reality they are trying to escape from because it does not fit in with their ideological utopian matrix.. if there is no good vs evil, then all is good even if [the] all is evil.. – bg
and you obviously don’t understand the enemy we face, think
they give a bats guano about your rights?? think again fool..
turning the other cheek to a Jihadist
is literally like saying, kill me now!!
“we love death more than you love life”
never forget that little ipso facto, seriously..
==
bg commented:
++
AuntieMadder @ 6:15 pm #48
[At the November 24th press conference, leading organizers of the Coalition will give details on a large rally which will be held on December 5th in New York City to protest the plan to bring terrorist detainees to trial in civilian courts.
Debra Burlingame, founder of 911 Families for a Safe and Strong America, said “We chose to hold it on Thanksgiving Week in the hope that our fellow Americans will join us in sending our prayers and messages of thanks to our troops and first responders, who will bear the brunt of these dangerous decisions made in Washington. Our rally on Saturday, December 5 will tell Attorney General Eric Holder, President Barack Obama and their supporters in Congress: We will fight you all the way! ”]
i’d say that has to be best news i’ve heard from New
York in months!! thanks for posting it.. (thumbsup)
==
bg commented:
++
Ann @ 2:05 am #16
Keep Terrorists OUT of Civilian Courts
President Obama’s Administration has decided to bring the worst of the worst — the terrorists responsible for the tragedy of 9/11 — to American soil to stand trial. What’s worse, they are planning to take them out of the military justice system and try these terrorists in CIVILIAN courts — a dangerous move that will put our war on terrorism in jeopardy. Stand with the American Center for Law and Justice and support Sen. Lindsey Graham’s legislative effort to keep the terrorists OUT of civilian courts. Please read the form below carefully and declare your membership with the ACLJ by adding your name to our Petition to Keep Terrorists Out of Civilian Courts.
Petition to Keep Terrorists
Out of Civilian Courts
https://www.aclj.org/Petition/Default.aspx?sc=3509&ac=1
http://www.thebravest.com/NeverForget/Video.htm
http://www.keepamericasafe.com/
http://www.thebravest.com/neverforget.htm
thank you Ann!! (thumbsup)
ps re: AuntieMadder @ 6:15 pm #48
http://www.keepamericasafe.com
http://www.keepamericasafe.com/?page_id=1822
==