MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell tells Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) that she wouldn’t characterize George Soros as leftwing.
Which begs the question, “Who is leftwing then , Andrea?”

Via Bill O’Reilly

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  1. Well, since Soros is a fascist, and lefties think fascists are rightwing, I’ll give Mitchell credit for being consistent…

  2. According to Andrea, BHO is not a Leftist either.

    http://www.FreeTheND88.org

  3. I love Andrea!

    She would never want to http://www.dumpchrisdodd.com

    Waitress Sandwich anyone?

  4. wow. mind blowing. With hacks like her, we dont need media.

  5. ADVERTISEMENT

  6. “Begs the question” does not mean “raises the question.” It means “to assume what you are trying to prove.”

  7. Next up, Andrea Mitchell discusses how she wouldn’t categorize Hitler as a bad person.

  8. Oh my freaking God…..this is such a through the looking glass moment…..I don’t know quite which is more shocking….that this shocks me, or that after the last 9 months, I’m still capable of being shocked…..

  9. She just didn’t get to finish her thought. It makes sense when she is allowed to complete her thought. What she meant to say was “I wouldn’t characterize George Soros as left wing, if I wanted to continue as a journalist in this country.”

  10. Andrea et al think they are all moderates and sane.

  11. “I wouldn’t characterize George Soros as left wing, if I wanted to continue as a journalist in this country.”

    Yep, you’re right texmom. She sure as heck isn’t going to say anything about George Soros.

  12. ++

    OT..

    “you ain’t seen nothin’ yet!” ~ B Hussein O

    [There have been some crazy actions to come from Obama and his advisors regarding race. Remember when, not knowing ANY of the facts regarding an incident between a white police officer and a black professor, Obama said on national television that the officer acted "stupidly?" Or how about Obama's 20-year affiliation with a pastor who blasts America and advocates racial division?

    Well, now I think I've seen it all. Obama's Justice Department has ruled against the actions of the town of Kinston, North Carolina. What did this town do that was so terrible? The residents voted overwhelmingly to eliminate partisan elections for mayor and city council members. The Justice Department stepped in and said, "Whoa! Wait just a second!" According to the Justice Department, blacks in Kinston must have the Democrat Party in order to elect their "candidate of choice." How insulting! Basically, what Obama's team is saying is that blacks will only vote for Democrats, and without the party label, blacks can't figure out for themselves which candidate will get their vote. This is not only a slap in the face of the voters, but it continues Obama's efforts to divide people along racial lines rather than bring them together.]

    ==

  13. I wouldn’t characterize Andrea Mitchel as a journalist.

  14. Andrea, We are in a race to the bottom of the ratings.

  15. Back up and observe the big picture. So many people are telling you who and what they are, Media,WH, et al. Ya’ll ought to be worried, dangerous people in places of power. This is a turning point in history, which way it goes depends upon who is more dedicated to the cause.

  16. It would be a cold day in hell before I’d watch people of her ilk. And that ain’t elk.People still watch this garbage??

  17. Andrea Who?

  18. Pass KennedyCare. Do it for our FOUNDER…Do it for TED!

    http://www.FATBOY.cc

  19. andrea mitchel wouldnt characterize peanut butter as sticky,

    the sky as blue

    africa as a continent

    fire as hot……

  20. Jake Tapper questions Gibbs on crybaby WH statements regarding Fox News not being a “News organization”.

    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/10/todays-qs-for-os-wh-10202009.html

  21. After Trying to Delegitimize Fox News, White House Makes Bo Liaison to Other Media Lapdogs: http://optoons.blogspot.com/2009/10/after-trying-to-delegitimize-fox-news.html

  22. [groan]

    Aren’t you all so glad that we have ‘legitimate’ news outlets to cover the story without injecting their ‘perspective’ — unlike Fox News? So glad that Rahm pointed out the difference so we could be fully informed.

    /sarc

    When do we get to elect a new press core?

  23. Rob Crawford
    October 20th, 2009 | 11:10 am 1
    Well, since Soros is a fascist, and lefties think fascists are rightwing, I’ll give Mitchell credit for being consistent…

    He was a fascist only during WW2, when he sold out his fellow jews to the germans so that they could be transported to the camps.

    After WW2, however, soros worked for the communists as a snitch and had plenty of his fellow Hungarians arrested and sent to the gulag.
    Then, in the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, soros was busy turning in his countrymen to the russians – and running around Budapest robbing art galleries, banks and jewelry stores.
    After the revolution was quashed (with his help as a turncoat), soros “escaped to the West (with the assistance of his russian masters) with his horde of stolen money, jewels and art.

    Soros is nothing but an amoral piece of barbage who will sell out or destroy anyone for a few dollars or to ensure his own safety.
    With all that he’s done and doing, I’d bet that one of his largest expenditures is on security – for all the good it’ll do him.

  24. should be “…amoral piece of GARBAGE…”

    Additionally, soros does favor a communist-style of government, because he believes in subjegating and ruling people.
    Democracy is anathema to soros. People are too hard to control and enslave under Democracy (or in a Republic).

  25. Same idiot liberal thinking as the dumb boxes from “The [Liberal] View” characterizing the drugging and subsequent rape of a child “not rape-rape”.

    They don’t get it.

    At all.

  26. “He was a fascist only during WW2…”

    I beg to differ. That he worked for authoritarian thugs who called themselves socialists doesn’t change his underlying nature.

  27. ++

    New York Times to cut 100 newsroom positions

    just heard via Rush that the NYT plans
    on going philanthropic by December..

    gee, just in time for Obama to sign US over to the UN (Kerry & Teh-raaaayza’s dream come true).. *sigh*

    ==

  28. ++

    KR @ 11:49 am

    [Gibbs: ABC -

    Tapper: ABC. MSNBC. Univision. I mean how are they any different?

    Gibbs: You and I should watch sometime around 9 o’clock tonight. Or 5 o’clock this afternoon.

    Tapper: I’m not talking about their opinion programming or issues you have with certain reports. I’m talking about saying thousands of individuals who work for a media organization, do not work for a “news organization” -- why is that appropriate for the White House to say?

    Gibbs: That’s our opinion.]

    sarc on/

    most TRANSPARENT White House in US history..

    /sarc off

    ==

  29. I wish someone would ask Andrea (and any other drooling Obamacrat passing themselves off as a journalist) how it feels to be have literally been controlled by the Obama Whitehouse.

  30. Rob Crawford
    October 20th, 2009 | 12:58 pm 26

    Fascist = Socialist.

  31. And the drooling masses in SEIU t-shirts and ACORN officials all nod in agreement.
    We wouldn’t characterize him as left wing…
    We wouild call him.
    Sugar Daddy,
    Captain Dollar pants.
    The Boss,
    Thanks for the Jing person,
    Banker,
    Head Honcho,
    Bag man,
    Mr X.
    or
    The Bank of Libtardland.

    But not LEFT WING.

  32. And this is a REAL news organization?

  33. Well, Soros is’nt really leftwing. He’s far-leftfringe.
    But, Andrea is an idiot.

  34. Of course, Andrea Mitchell wouldn’t characterize George Soros As Leftwing; but how about “Sugar Daddy”?

© Copyright 2012, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Web Development By Arlington Kirk