Rush Limbaugh: Pelosi Is a Liar and Thief & Should Go to Jail (Video)
Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, October 29, 2009, 9:25 PM
Agreed.
Rush Limbaugh reacted to Speaker Pelosi’s outrageous announcement today that her government run health care plan was “deficit neutral.”
Rush says this liar should go to jail and that Bernie Madoff is small fry compared to the theft going on in Washington today.
Here’s the transcript:
RUSH: As you have probably heard, ladies and gentlemen, Nancy Pelosi just once again claimed that the House health care reform bill will not add one penny to the federal deficit. Of course this is absurd. It will turn out to be absurdly untrue if this thing ever sees the light day of, and when it does, when it does, when it is exposed as a total fraud, when she and everybody else supporting this are exposed as total liars about all of this being deficit neutral, about all of this covering all these people, about everybody getting all this health care for what they think will be nothing, when all of that is exposed, shouldn’t people like Nancy Pelosi, who lie to get such things passed into legislation, have to face some kind of real consequences? This is nothing more than theft. Are they not thieves? They are stealing billions of dollars from US taxpayers, both taxpayers of today and tomorrow. You can’t even say that they’re enriched by their thievery ’cause they do it to buy votes and more power, and some of them do get enriched as a result of all this.
Why shouldn’t people who steal billions of dollars have to go to jail if the small fry like Bernie Madoff has to go to jail? Madoff is chump change compared to Nancy Pelosi, chump change compared to Barney Frank and Harry Reid. This is generational theft that is going on here. I mean let’s step back. Nancy Pelosi is the most radical Speaker of the House ever, from one of the most radical communities in the nation, San Francisco. She’s pushing this newest proposal now. She’s never cared about costs before, she doesn’t care about them now. She’s never cared about economic reality before because she’s insulated from it. She is wealthy. Her husband is wealthy beyond their wildest dreams. She is George McGovern on hormones, steroids and everything else, and she sees this as the best way for her and her ilk to remain in power for decades.
Folks, both the Senate bill, Dingy Harry’s little bill over there and Pelosi’s bill today are time bombs. They are ticking time bombs. They are designed to destroy private insurance companies and thus the economy. If you look at it from their standpoint these are brilliantly conceived bills and they’re guaranteed to work, they are going to do exactly what these Democrats intend. If they are passed, only massive Republican gains in 2010 and 2012 can diffuse this time bomb because the stuff doesn’t get implemented until after the 2012 election if it passes.
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
SANTORUM HAS HUGE NIGHT – Cleans Up In Missouri, Minnesota and Big Win in Colorado, Too
Published February 7, 2012 at 8:46 pm - 113 Comments
Brad commented:
Ahhh… sweet bombast… She is a liar however and a thief.
richwill commented:
Rush is right. What is happening is legalized theft. But then, congress has been doing this for years.
ADVERTISEMENT
jas commented:
These people need to go to jail. Pelosi has aided in destroying California and is now working on the nation.
Kathy T commented:
Rush speaks the truth … he is fearless.
Hypogean commented:
OT for the regulars here:
Remember how our Canadian pal Craig told us that U.S. District Judge David O. Carter–a former marine–would finally let Orly Taitz prove that Obama was ineligible? Carter was a hero! He was a real patriot, unlike me. He didn’t have his head in the sand.
Well, Judge Carter just tossed Taitz’s suit:
Orly Taitz Lawsuit Thrown Out By California Judge
Another challenge from birther queen Orly Taitz against President Obama’s birth certificate has been thrown out of court.
U.S. District Judge David O. Carter’s decision came down this morning, dismissing Orly Taitz’s challenge that Barack Obama is not a natural-born citizen and so is not the country’s legitimate president.
Judge Carter wrote in his decision that the plantiffs were asking the Court “to effectively overthrow a sitting president who was popularly elected by We the People‚ sixty-nine million of the people.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/29/orly-taitz-lawsuit-thrown_n_338870.html
So, either Judge Carter was “corrupted” and/or intimidated into compliance, or these lawsuits have absolutely no merit.
Poor Craig. He and Taitz were forced to take a hike again.
Hypogean commented:
Wow. Seems like Ms. Taitz is in a heck of a lot of trouble for her behavior during these proceedings:
Taitz encouraged her supporters to contact this Court, both via letters and phone calls. It was improper and unethical for her as an attorney to encourage her supporters to attempt to influence this Court’s decision. Despite these attempts to manipulate this Court, the Court has not considered any outside pleas to influence the Court’s decision.
Additionally, the Court has received several sworn affidavits that Taitz asked potential witnesses that she planned to call before this Court to perjure themselves. This Court is deeply concerned that Taitz may have suborned perjury through witnesses she intended to bring before this Court.
While the Court seeks to ensure that all interested parties have had the opportunity to be heard, the Court cannot condone the conduct of Plaintiffs’ counsel in her efforts to influence this Court…
Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction.
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/294181.php
Orly Taitz says everyone who disagrees with her is unpatriotic and a traitor? Gosh, I’m stunned that this approach didn’t persuade the judge to take her side.
So, how many predictions has Craig gotten wrong now? Pretty much every single one of them, huh?
Chisum commented:
“Orly Taitz says everyone who disagrees with her is unpatriotic and a traitor?”
========================
Wow, she said that?
Hmmm, where have I heard that before?
I must have had my head in the sand.
Choey commented:
Actually, my understanding is that judge Carter said that the courts have no constitutional authority to remove a sitting president and he is probably right. The only way to do this is to have a congressional investigation and if it is determined that Obama is ineligible, the house can impeach him and remove him from office. It is probably a waste of time to go through the courts. Put the republicans back in control of congress and you just might get the investigation.
bg commented:
++
re: Hypogean @ 10:07 pm #7
sarc on/
ah well, that’s because they didn’t take note of what
Michelle stated, lest the courts dare call her a liar??
His own mother .. was “very young
and very single when she had him.”
/sarc off
==
Sandy commented:
Pelosi is also a ball buster. She had demanded the Senate take up the Healthcare Bill first so they could bear the brunt of the rage. However, Reid didn’t move fast enough for her so she upstaged him touting a strong Public Option and leaving the Majority Leader in the dust. Seems like she can’t wait to take the Dems over a cliff.
Hypogean commented:
Chisum, a certain part of Canada sounds like this tonight:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdnwLX5m3G8
One Way commented:
I thought I’d heard recently Orly T. had been fined $20k by one of the courts.
For “misconduct” it turns out. Doubt it will do any good.
Seems she was slinging accusations at the judge, trying to get people to give perjured testimony as well as unethically requesting people contact the court to try to influence the court’s decision.
She’s pretty much lost all credibility.
bg commented:
++
ps re: bg @ 10:28 pm #12
sarc on/
amazing how some people can afford several
high class lawyers and spend a few million to
keep transparency out of the presidency huh..
/sarc off
==
Chisum commented:
Hypogean,
Were those monkeys calling me unpatriotic, a traitor and accusing me of having my head in the sand too?
I’ll bet that that’s how he-who-shall-not-be-named sounds as he’s spewing impotently while furiously typing.
Common Sense commented:
Rush and other talk show hosts need to ask Insane Obama( mm mm mm) and Nancy Pelosi and Reid and other dimwitted liberals to put their money and health where their mouth is. If they are so sure it wont add to deficit then they would easily feel comfortable betting the lives of their wife and kids and grandkids on it. If it doesnt add to deficit they live…If it does they die. I think we could kiss it goodbye in about 2 seconds. Also if it puts Insurance companies out of business along with shareholders then Liberals should all resign from congress and or go to jail. They should also be required to be covered under the plan. and First I want to see someone challenge this BS bill in court as to congress’s ability to mandate that any citizen purchase squat.
And as far as competition is concerned I say we show them what it is like when we make Govt fund all republican campaigns for office and let Republicans set the rules for fundraising and election procedures and spell out how much liberal staff can be paid ..and Republicans dont have to abide by these rules and see how they like PUBLIC RUN COMPETITION ! Use common sense on these slime and make them squirm under the lights when these questions are put to them and lets see the cochroaches run
Just_Saying commented:
Realizing that in Palin’s case it was a state, while Obummer’s in a federal case, but:
Why did Palin have to pay for her own legal defense (of the unfounded ethics cases) and the state’s AG’s office did not represent her, even though she was governor; conversely, in Obummer’s case, the Federal Department of Justice (i.e., taxpayers’ funds) is legally representing Obummer in all cases challenging his eligibility.
What’s the diff? Where’s the justice?
.
August West commented:
Pelosi’s even was so staged I was waiting to see an “applause” sign light up in the background. These people are so drunk with power its really pitiful…
Eric commented:
Hate the thread jacking by 7,8,9,10,12,14,15,16,17,21. Hey, you are free to speak, but….
Back ON topic…After saying “Don’t feed the trolls.”
I wonder, is the Secret Service required to protect impeached civil servants in Leavenworth?
Hypogean commented:
Eric
October 30th, 2009 | 1:04 am | #23
Hate the thread jacking by 7,8,9,10,12,14,15,16,17,21. Hey, you are free to speak, but….
Well, you haven’t suffered through the lunacy of Craig the Canadian Birther. You’ll also find that this is a pretty free-form place. No registration, and no rigid adherence to discussing only the topic of the thread.
The people who post here are pretty eclectic and can handle veering into different topics of discussion, especially since we’re been hearing for months now that Judge Carter would allow Taitz to prove Obama illegitimate once and for all.
Oops.
Make it Happen commented:
I’ve said it before…Pelosi should be shipped off to Gitmo. She is a criminal of the highest order.
anonymous commented:
Mrs. Pelosi is a ‘liar’. Rush is right. I agree with him.
Patrick Chester commented:
Hypogean: No, remember: if Craig makes a prediction that doesn’t come true, it was really made by FakeCraig, who is probably Tom W in disguise or the Scarlet Pimpernel trying to ruin Craig’s reputation…
mike191 commented:
The real problem is that outside of the blogs, our broken Media will not report on any glaring points of this bill that are horrific to the American People. Conjoin this with a bill longer than WarAnd Peace that was cobbeled together by aides who have no check and balance with congressmen not reading the finished product, you have this Pelosi nightmare.Mr. Limbaugh is correct about this form of tyranny.
Eric commented:
Still no one attempts to answer my “on thread” question, only attacks me for trying to keep an inline thought.
Is the Secret Service required to protect impeached civil servants in Leavenworth?
Chisum commented:
Eric,
Who attacked you?
Steve commented:
Thank you for posting this Gateway Pundit!!
Rush is a great American, bottom line!
COMMON CENTS
http://www.commoncts.blogspot.com
TSB commented:
Hey folks, we all need to pray that there WILL be an election in 2012…….. This George Soros commie gang is taking our freedoms away at an alarming rate.
Aitch748 commented:
Well, if there is no election in 2012, then there should be a full-scale revolt in 2013.
I don’t think the powers-that-be, those that still have any brains left in their pointy little heads at any rate, really want to take away our ability to change our government by peaceful legal means.
Tru commented:
Where was this guy during the Bush spending sprees? All Rush does is market the GOP. It’s too bad.
Scott commented:
While Valerie Jarrett used the phrase in the wrong context, Rush REALLY is “speaking truth to power”.
Common Sense commented:
Rush ripped the Bush spending all the time…as did the Liberal dumba$$es and the media. All excessive spending is bad doesnt matter who does it. Are you such na moron that you cant see deficit spending nis killing us as a country not as D’s & R’s ???? Anyone that belives this collossal clusterf**k of a bill is ever gonna be deficit neutral is clueless or dumber than a post. It’s a govt. beauracracy. They have never gotten a projection of the numbers right or even close with these type of programs. But magicallly the Big eared one and the stretched face lying Pelosi are going to save money ( not to mention neither has ever run a business or a state) Give me a break wake up people. Not to mention this is forcing US citizens to buy healthcare. Oh well except for all those excluded like Congress and Unions and so on
aprilnovember811 commented:
Rush is right. Barack Obama is one of the worst travesties to ever happen to this country. The people that voted him in, thought very little of their country or their futures to have done it. He is the enemy within, in addition to Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid. They are the axis of evil.
If you want the truth about Dr. Taitz and her lawsuit, and why Judge Carter did not hear it, visit this website.http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com
Judge Carter, may have had an issue with Dr. Taitz, but this case was not dismissed due to that, or because he did not believe Barack Obama is eligible. He does not have jurisdiction over this case, that simple. It must be heard in the DC Court. And just a warning to the little miscreants that appear here and everywhere taunting people, it won’t be tolerated on that website.
Hypogean,
You’re obviously too ill informed and uneducated to understand the damage this man Obama is doing to you or your future, or are you content to accept whatever crumbs he throws to you in your insignificant little life?
olm commented:
I have this mental picture of the liberals creating this massive central government that is totally encompassing individual freedom and happiness.
I love the Bernie Madoff comparisn because it is right on, the only difference is we can see what is happening, the victims of Madoff had no idea.
Swell528 commented:
We should make sure that if San Francisco ever has another earthquake, they get zero fema dollars or rescue from the national guard until they impeach Pelosi. If they want to keep electing this man made disaster into office, we will not be moved to offer them aide. Let them burn! Let them burn to the ground.
saxton commented:
Call for a Congressional Investigation: Reid, Peloski, Obama, Jarrett, ALL of them: they are treasonists–they DO NOT support “WE the PEOPLE”…everything he promised was a lie..
OUR soldiers, our young soldiers are being slaughtered! AND he does NOTHING?? NOTHING? His Generals, begged for help..OMG
We have to get these powerful, powerful evil people out of Office-and Obama has NO security TOP Secret clearance? ANd has all of our secrets? ALL of them????? He bows to the Eurpoean world? Andnow our health care system is being destroyed????? AMA only supplies friggin CPT codes–dear GOD what have we done to our grandchildren??? Our soldiers–who feel they are forgotten? These people are in bed with SORUS, the DEMPACK-SORUS…we are being forced, forced to do this? AND now CAP&TAX–NONE of us will have a dime left-it will GO TO OBAMA and his CLONES.
Lauren commented:
Why do we keep saying this is going to hurt FUTURE generations? It’s going to hurt everybody immediately with higher taxes, “fees,” the destruction of health care as we know it, plus the further devaluation of the American dollar because it will increase the national debt. That means everything will cost more at a time when unemployment is at 10 percent and rising. Yeah future generations will get hurt too, but don’t think you won’t immediately.
bg commented:
++
Eric @ 1:04 am #23
i totally agree..
but please try not to lump us all together..
especially when the party being attacked
is not present to defend themselves..
i believe their motto is:
“KEEP CRAIG ALIVE SO WE CAN
KILL HIM OVER & OVER AGAIN”
(or have fun, or something like that)
ad hominem attacks on bg commencing in 3, 2, 1..
==
Solaratov commented:
Eric ~ If someone has Secret Service protection (or any kind of law enforcement protection) and goes to prison, the protection – just like all of their other privileges – stop.
The best that the prison system will do for them is put them into protective solitary confinement.
And Eric, nobody attacked you. You were merely offered an explanation of how things sometimes run around here. You’ll know it if you get attacked on this forum – believe me.
bg commented:
++
OT (or not)..
via TRBO
Blue Curtain Edition
[Fox News Channel’s Glenn Beck Show October 29, at the mid hour, featured the unveiling of the long-awaited mystery behind the blue curtain.
But first: It was all about free speech and the radicals in the White House who want to squelch it, stomp it out like a noxious bug, toss it into the abyss.]
==
Joanne commented:
Hypoman, it is rather cowardly of you to attack Craig when he isn’t even posting on this thread and able to protect himself. It must be nice that the Department of Justice lawyers are now representing Obama in Court, rather than his previous civilian lawyers. Wouldn’t you say this poses a conflict of interest?
Why exactly do you have a problem with Americans wanting Obama to prove his eligibility in Court? The more times you support Obama on this blog, the clearer it becomes that you indeed cannot throw off your liberal views any more than Obama can prove his eligibility.
aprilnovember811 – you rock!
Joanne commented:
bg – you rock too!
Joanne commented:
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
Hypoman – a lawyer, you ain’t.
“JUDGE CARTER DID NOT HOLD THAT QUO WARRANTO WAS IMPROPER TO CHALLENGE THE ELIGIBILITY OF A SITTING PRESIDENT.
This was the most extraordinary part of today’s ruling. It opens the door wide for a proper eligibility challenge in the DC District Court where the hurdle for standing is different from ordinary federal cases.
Please take note that the Department of Justice attorneys argued before Judge Carter that quo warranto – even if brought properly in the DC District Court – could not be used to challenge the eligibility of a sitting President. Judge Carter’s ruling did not support the Department of Justice position.
The ruling today affirms that the proper venue for challenging the eligibility of a sitting President is the DC District Court.
This is a very encouraging ruling for those contemplating a quo warranto challenge to President Obama’s eligibility in the DC District Court.”
“Here is Judge Carter’s correct ruling on the quo warranto issue:
C. Quo Warranto Claims…
“The writ of quo warranto must be brought within the District of Columbia because President Obama holds office within that district. The quo warranto provision codified in the District of Columbia Code provides, “A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military.” D.C. Code §§ 16-3501 – 16-3503. Should a person other than the Attorney General of the United States or the United States Attorney wish to bring a quo warranto claim, that person must receive leave of court to do so. Id. at § 16-3502. This leave of court must be granted, according to the text of the statute, by the District Court for the District of Columbia.”"
Hypogean commented:
Joanne
October 30th, 2009 | 11:52 am | #45
Hypoman, it is rather cowardly of you to attack Craig when he isn’t even posting on this thread and able to protect himself.
How horrible of me! It’s a crime, I say!
It must be nice that the Department of Justice lawyers are now representing Obama in Court, rather than his previous civilian lawyers. Wouldn’t you say this poses a conflict of interest?
No.
Why exactly do you have a problem with Americans wanting Obama to prove his eligibility in Court?
I have a problem with lying, incompetent, demented Orly Taitz.
The more times you support Obama on this blog, the clearer it becomes that you indeed cannot throw off your liberal views any more than Obama can prove his eligibility.
Yes, I’m clearly an Obama supporter. Everyone can see that by the way I can him the most corrupt, incompetent president in the history of the republic.
Hypogean commented:
Joanne
October 30th, 2009 | 12:19 pm | #47
This is a very encouraging ruling for those contemplating a quo warranto challenge to President Obama’s eligibility in the DC District Court.
Of course. Every horrendous defeat of Orly Taitz is an encouraging step forward. Craig says the same thing.
I’ll bet you $100 to your favorite charity that nothing will come of this, either.
Hypogean commented:
bg
i believe their motto is:
“KEEP CRAIG ALIVE SO WE CAN
KILL HIM OVER & OVER AGAIN”
No, my motto is “STOP PUTTING WORDS IN MY PRECIOUS, PRETTY MOUTH!”
bg commented:
++
Joanne @ 11:52 am #45
we’re paying for Obama to keep his BC & all
his other concealed information from US??
Obama is the most TRANSPARENT PRESIDENT..
only now people are finally waking up & paying attention to his
anti-American “just words”, heart, mind, and soul, if he has one..
“else we have lost our country” to the New World Order..
==
Joanne commented:
Fortunately, most people are not blind and unethical as yourself. Orly Taitz is a dentist and a lawyer; I’m sure she puts you all to shame on all counts. Anyone with half a brain knows Obama refuses to provide proof of his eligibility for Office because the proof shows he is not eligible…except for perhaps you and the rest of the liberals who know Obama mustn’t be eligible but do not care if the Constitution is upheld or not.
Isn’t it time for a new handle or something.
Hypogean commented:
Joanne
October 30th, 2009 | 1:58 pm | #52
Fortunately, most people are not blind and unethical as yourself. Orly Taitz is a dentist and a lawyer; I’m sure she puts you all to shame on all counts.
When it comes to being sanctioned by judges, she sure has me beat. Her former client, Captain Rhodes, wrote a letter to the judge who heard her case, complaining about Tatiz’s behavior. Weird that you say I’m unethical for opposing Taitz’s unethical behavior.
Isn’t it time for a new handle or something.
I know you’re pleased as punch that I have a stalker who published all my personal information on line, including my phone numbers and a photo of me. How would you like it if I did that to you, Joanne? Would you be all smug and chortling if I hired a private detective and found out everything I could about you, and then published it online simply because I disagree with you? If someone did that to you, I would demand that the person be found and punished.
But I’m a better person than you, apparently. I put simple humanity ahead of politics.
There’s nothing personal in this, Joanne. I don’t know you or want to know you. I’m opposing your attempt to undermine the faith Americans have in their institutions. You, on the other hand, are personalizing all of this, even though I’m not the one constantly putting your personal safety at risk.
You should know that I’m not afraid, and I’m not going to stop challenging you, even if you keep putting me at risk. Some things are worth taking a risk for. You don’t scare me, so do your worst.
Hypogean commented:
Can’t say it any better than Jerry Stiller.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2LdHH0hmHY
Joe commented:
Drug addicts like to accuse other people of committing crimes. It seems like every drug addict I’ve ever known constantly accuses other people. Rush is no different…
G commented:
JoeNo Gravatar
October 30th, 2009 | 4:03 pm | #55
Idiot.
Mark in Kansas commented:
EricNo Gravatar
October 30th, 2009 | 5:12 am | #29
Still no one attempts to answer my “on thread” question, only attacks me for trying to keep an inline thought.
———————————
We don`t need “Victims” here. The regulars are able to maintain more that one train of thought as they discuss off-topic topics, and I have no doubt you`re able to do the same. You absolutely will not be able to convince the regular posters on this blog to use it in the manner you deem appropriate so either join in or stay on topic.
bg commented:
++
Eric @ 5:12 am #29
re: [Is the Secret Service required to protect
impeached civil servants in Leavenworth?]
sorry Eric, haven’t got a clue, so i googled it
and here’s a few of the links that popped up..
IMPEACHMENT AND TRIAL
Andrew Johnson
A Citizens Guide to Impeachment
==
AuntieMadder commented:
Pelosi calls Rush a liar and a thief. The words “pot,” “kettle,” and “black” come to mind.
AuntieMadder commented:
Heh. I read the blog title bass-ackwards.
Rush is right. Pelosi is a liar and a thief.