Why Were Dead Soldiers OK When Clinton Was in Charge?

Boy, those democrats sure hate to sacrifice soldiers in a battle against an enemy determined to destroy us.

Why then were democrats OK with sacrificing even more soldiers during the Clinton years?…

…During peacetime?

Click to Enlarge
Results from official government figures via Murdoc Online.

Honestly… You never heard them complain about military casualties during the Clinton years when we were not at war.
What gives?
Could it really be just a political game for democrats?

Why are democrats so concerned suddenly about military deaths when the US lost more than twice as many soldiers during the Clinton years than during the military campaigns in Iraq… and Afghanistan… combined?

Click to Enlarge
Numbers taken from Iraq Coalition Casualty Count and Operation Enduring Freedom websites. (4-22-2007)

Just wondering.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning